Sports Medicine

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 221–236 | Cite as

Home Advantage in Sport

An Overview of Studies on the Advantage of Playing at Home
  • Alan M. NevillEmail author
  • Roger L. Holder
Leading Article


This review identifies the most likely causes of home advantage. The results of previous studies have identified 4 factors thought to be responsible for the home advantage. These can be categorised under the general headings of crowd, learning, travel and rule factors. From the accumulated evidence, rule factors were found to play only a minor role (in a limited number of sports) in contributing to home advantage. Studies investigating the effect of learning factors found that little benefit was to be gained from being familiar with the local conditions when playing at home. There was evidence to suggest that travel factors were responsible for part of the home advantage, provided the journey involved crossing a number of time zones. However, since high levels of home advantage are observed within countries where travel distances are not great, travel factors were not thought to be a major cause of home advantage. The evidence from studies investigating crowd factors appeared to provide the most dominant causes of home advantage.

A number of studies provide strong evidence that home advantage increases with crowd size, until the crowd reaches a certain size or consistency (a more balanced number of home and away supporters), after which a peak in home advantage is observed. Two possible mechanisms were proposed to explain these observations: either (i) the crowd is able to raise the performance of the home competitors relative to the away competitors; or (ii) the crowd is able to influence the officials to subconsciously favour the home team. The literature supports the latter to be the most important and dominant explanation. Clearly, it only takes 2 or 3 crucial decisions to go against the away team or in favour of the home team to give the side playing at home the ‘edge’.


Adis International Limited National Football League Crowd Density Home Team Home Advantage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Courneya KS, Carron AV. The home advantage in sport competitions: a literature review. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1992; 14: 13–27Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clarke SR, Norman JM. Home ground advantage of individual clubs in English soccer. Statistician 1995; 44: 509–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nevill AM, Holder RL, Bardsley A, et al. Identifying home advantage in international tennis and golf tournaments. J Sports Sci 1997; 15: 437–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holder RL, Nevill AM. Players performance at international tournaments: is there a home advantage? J R Stat Soc 1997; 46: 551–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schwartz B, Barsky SF. The home advantage. Soc Forces 1977; 55: 641–61Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edwards J. The home field advantage. In: JH Goldstein, editor. Sports, games and play: social and psychological viewpoints. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum, 1979: 409–30Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Varca P. An analysis of home and away game performance of male college basketball teams. J Sport Psychol 1980; 2: 245–57Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dowie J. Why Spain should win the World Cup. New Scientist 1982; 94: 693–5Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Snyder EE, Purdy DA. The home advantage in collegiate basketball. Sociol Sport J 1985; 2: 352–6Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pollard R. Home advantage in soccer: a retrospective analysis. J Sport Sci 1986; 4: 237–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pace A, Carron AV. Travel and the home advantage. Can J Sport Sci 1992; 17: 60–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Adams RD, Kupper SJ. The effect of expertise on peak performance: the case of home-field advantage. J Sport Behav 1994; 17: 108–19Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Agnew GA, Carron AV. Crowd effects and the home advantage. Int J Sport Psychol 1994; 25: 53–62Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moore JC, Brylinsky J. Facility familiarity and the home advantage. J Sport Behav 1995; 18: 302–11Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nevill AM, Newell SM, Gale S. Factors associated with home advantage in English and Scottish soccer. J Sport Sci 1996; 14: 181–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clarke S. Home advantage in balanced competitions: English soccer 1991–1996. 3rd Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Sports; 1996 Sep 30-Oct 2; Queensland, Australia, 111–6Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baumeister RF, Steinhilber A. Paradoxical effects of supportive audiences on performance under pressure: the home field disadvantages in sports championships. J Personal Soc Psychol 1984; 47: 85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schlenker BR, Phillips ST, Boniecki KA, et al. Championship pressures: choking or triumphing in one’s own territory? J Personal Soc Psychol 1995; 68: 632–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baumeister RF. Disputing the effects of championship pressures and home audiences. J Personal Soc Psychol 1995; 68: 644–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McCutcheon LE. The home advantage in high school athletics. J Sport Behav 1984; 7: 135–8Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gayton WF, Langevin G. Home advantage: does it exist in individual sports? Percept Mot Skills 1992; 47: 706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bray S, Carron A. The home advantage in alpine skiing. Aust J Sci Med Sport 1993; 25: 76–81Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wright EF, Christie SD, McGuire GR, et al. The home-course disadvantage in golf championships: further evidence for the undermining effect of supportive audiences on performance under pressure. J Sport Behav 1991; 14: 51–60Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wright EF, Voyer D, Wright RD, et al. Supporting audiences and performance under pressure: the home-ice disadvantage in hockey championships. J Sport Behav 1995; 18: 21–8Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gayton WF, Matthews GR, Nickless CJ. The home field disadvantage in sports championships: does it exist in hockey? J Sport Psychol 1987; 9: 183–5Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kornspan AS, Lerner BS, Etzel EF, et al. The home disadvantage in the National Football League’s conference championship games. Percept Mot Skills 1995; 80: 800–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schlenker BR, Phillips ST, Boniecki KA, et al. Where is the home choke? J Personal Soc Psychol 1995; 68: 649–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moore JC, Brylinsky JA. Spectator effect on team performance in college basketball. J Sport Behav 1993; 16: 77–84Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thirer J, Rampey M. Effects of abusive spectator behaviour on the performance of home and visiting intercollegiate basketball teams. Percept Mot Skills 1979; 48: 1047–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Greer DL. Spectator booing and the home advantage: a study of social influence in the basketball arena. Soc Psychol Q 1983; 46: 252–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nevill A, Balmer N, Williams M. Crowd influence on decisions in association football [letter]. Lancet 1999; 353 (9162): 1416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Barnett V, Hilditch S. The effect of an artificial pitch surface on home team performance in football (soccer). J R Stat Soc 1993; 156: 39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Courneya KS, Carron AV. Effects of travel and length of home stand/road trip on the home advantage. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1991; 13: 42–9Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jehue R, Street D, Huizenga R. Effect of time zone and game time changes on team performance: National Football League. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25: 127–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Smith RS, Guilleminault C, Efron B. Circadian rhythms and enhanced athletic performance in National Football League. Sleep 1997; 20: 362–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Steenland K, Deddens JA. Effect of travel and rest on performance of professional basketball players. Sleep 1997; 20: 366–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Courneya KS, Carron AV. Batting first versus last: implications for the home advantage. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1990; 12: 312–6Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jurkovac T. Collegiate basketball players’ perceptions of the home advantage [thesis]. Bowling Green (OH): Bowling Green State University, 1983Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bar-Eli M, Tenenbaum G, Levy-Kolker N. A crisis related analysis of perceived spectator behaviour in competition. Can J Sport Sci 1992; 17: 288–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Glamser FD. Contest location, player misconduct, and race: a case from English soccer. J Sport Behav 1990; 13: 41–9Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lefebvre LM, Passer MW. The effects of game location and importance on aggression in team sport. Int J Sport Psychol 1974; 5: 102–10Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Silva JM, Andrew JA. An analysis of game location and basketball performance in the Atlantic Coast Conference. Int J Sport Psychol 1987; 18: 188–204Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Underwood GL, Whitwood JR. Aggression in sport: a study of an English first division soccer team. Fed Int Educ Phys Bull 1980; 50: 31–9Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    McGuire EJ, Courneya KS, Widmeyer WN, et al. Aggression as a potential mediator of the home advantage in professional ice hockey. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1992; 14: 148–58Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Russell GW. Crowd size and density in relation to athletic aggression and performance. J Soc Behav Personal 1983; 11: 9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sumner J, Mobley M. Are cricket umpires biased? New Scientist 1981; 91: 29–31Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dennis PW, Carron AV. The relationship between game location and officiating decisions in National Hockey League officials [abstract]. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1998; 20: S63Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lehman DR, Reifman A. Spectator influence on basketball officiating. J Soc Psychol 1987; 127: 673–5Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wright CR, House T. The diamond appraised. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1989Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Stefani RT. Observed betting tendencies and suggested betting strategies for European football pools. Statistician 1983; 32: 319–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, School of Human SciencesLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolEngland
  2. 2.School of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamEngland

Personalised recommendations