Sports Medicine

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 191–200 | Cite as

Impact of Resistance Training on Endurance Performance

A New Form of Cross-Training?
Review Article

Summary

In accordance with the principles of training specificity, resistance and endurance training induce distinct muscular adaptations. Endurance training, for example, decreases the activity of the glycolytic enzymes, but increases intramuscular substrate stores, oxidative enzyme activities, and capillary, as well as mitochondrial, density. In contrast, resistance or strength training reduces mitochondrial density, while marginally impacting capillary density, metabolic enzyme activities and intramuscular substrate stores (except muscle glycogen). The training modalities do induce one common muscular adaptation: they transform type IIb myofibres into IIa myofibres. This transformation is coupled with opposite changes in fibre size (resistance training increases, and endurance training decreases, fibre size), and, in general, myofibre contractile properties. As a result of these distinct muscular adaptations, endurance training facilitates aerobic processes, whereas resistance training increases muscular strength and anaerobic power. Exercise performance data do not fit this paradigm, however, as they indicate that resistance training or the addition of resistance training to an ongoing endurance exercise regimen, including running or cycling, increases both short and long term endurance capacity in sedentary and trained individuals. Resistance training also appears to improve lactate threshold in untrained individuals during cycling. These improvements may be linked to the capacity of resistance training to alter myofibre size and contractile properties, adaptations that may increase muscular force production. In contrast to running and cycling, traditional dry land resistance training or combined swim and resistance training does not appear to enhance swimming performance in untrained individuals or competitive swimmers, despite substantially increasing upper body strength. Combined swim and swim-specific ‘in-water’ resistance training programmes, however, increase a competitive swimmer’s velocity over distances up to 200m. Traditional resistance training may be a valuable adjunct to the exercise programmes followed by endurance runners or cyclists, but not swimmers; these latter athletes need more specific forms of resistance training to realise performance improvement.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    McCafferty WB, Horvath SM. Specificity of exercise and specificity of training: a subcellular review. Res Q 1977; 48 (2): 358–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burke EB. Improved cycling performance through strength training. Natl Strength Cond Assoc J 1983; 5 (3): 6–7, 70-71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bulbulian R, Wilcox AR, Darabos BL. Anaerobic contribution to distance running performance of trained cross-country athletes. Med Sci Spors Exerc 1986; 18 (1): 107–18Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daniels J, Scardina N. Interval training and performance. Sports Med 1984; 1: 327–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tanaka H. Effects of cross-training: transfer of training effects on VO2 max between cycling, running and swimming. Sports Med 1994; 18 (5): 330–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Staron RS, Leonardi MJ, Karapondo DL, et al. Strength and skeletal muscle adaptations in heavy-resistance-trained women after detraining and retraining. J Appl Physiol 1991; 70 (2): 631–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kraemer WJ, Patton JF, Gordon SE, et al. Compatibility of highintensity strength and endurance training on hormonal and skeletal muscle adaptations. J Appl Physiol 1995; 78 (3): 976–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    MacDougall JD. Morphological changes in human skeletal muscle following strength training and immobilization. In: Jones NL, McCartney N, McComas AJ, editors. Human muscle power. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Publishers, 1986: 269–85Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Houston ME, Froese EA, Valeriote SP, et al. Muscle performance, morphology and metabolic capacity during strength training and detraining: a one leg model. Eur J Appl Physiol 1983; 51: 25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tesch PA, Komi PV, Hakkinen K. Enzymatic adaptations consequent to long-term strength training. Int J Sports Med 1987; 8: 66–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goldberg AL, Etlinger JD, Goldspink DF, et al. Mechanism of work-induced hypertrophy of skeletal muscle. Med Sci Sports 1975; 7: 185–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gonyea WJ, Sale D. Physiology of weight-lifting exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982; 63: 235–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Widrick JJ, Trappe SW, Costill DL, et al. Force-velocity and force-power properties of single muscle fibers from elite master runners and sedentary men. Am J Physiol 1996; 271: C676–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Widrick JJ, Trappe SW, Blaser CA, et al. Isometric force and maximal shortening velocity of single muscle fibers from elite master runners. Am J Physiol 1996; 271: C666–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fitts RH, Widrick JJ. Muscle mechanics: adaptations with exercise- training. In: Holloszy JO, editor. Exercise and sport sciences reviews. Vol. 24. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1996: 427–73Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abernethy PJ, Jurimae J, Logan PA, et al. Acute and chronic response of skeletal muscle to resistance exercise. Sports Med 1994; 17 (1): 22–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Klitgaard H, Zhou M, Richter EA. Myosin heavy chain composition of single fibres from m. biceps brachii of male body builders. Acta Physiol Scand 1990; 140: 175–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hickson RC, Dvorak BA, Gorostiaga EM, et al. Potential for strength and endurance training to amplify endurance performance. J Appl Physiol 1988; 65 (5): 2285–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nelson AG, Arnall DA, Loy SF, et al. Consequences of combining strength and endurance training regimens. Phys Ther 1990; 70 (5): 287–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tesch PA, Thorsson A, Colliander EB. Effects of eccentric and concentric resistance training on skeletal muscle substrates, enzyme activities and capillary supply. Acta Physiol Scand 1990; 140: 575–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thorstensson A, Hulten B, Doblen WV, et al. Effect of strength training on enzyme activities and fiber characteristics in human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 1976; 96: 392–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saltin B, Gollnick PD. Skeletal muscle adaptability: significance for metabolism and performance. In: Peachey LD, Adrian RH, Geiger SR, editors. Handbook of physiology. Section 10: skeletal muscle. Bethesda (MD): American Physiological Society, 1983: 555–631Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Luthi JM, Howald H, Claassen H, et al. Structural changes in skeletal muscle tissue with heavy-resistance exercise. Int J Sports Med 1986; 7: 123–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hather BM, Tesch PA, Buchanan P, et al. Influence of eccentric actions on skeletal muscle adaptations to resistance training. Acta Physiol Scand 1991; 143: 177–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schantz P. Capillary supply in hypertrophied human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 1982; 114: 635–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tesch PA, Thorsson A, Kaiser P. Muscle capillary supply and fiber type characteristics in weight and power lifters. J Appl Physiol 1984; 56 (1): 35–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    MacDougall JD, Ward GR, Sale DG, et al. Biochemical adaptation of human skeletal muscle to heavy resistance training and immobilization. J Appl Physiol 1977; 43 (4): 700–3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hickson RC. Interference of strength development by simultaneously training for strength and endurance. Eur J Appl Physiol 1980; 45: 255–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hickson RC, Rosenkoetter MA, Brown MM. Strength training effects on aerobic power and short-term endurance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1980; 12 (5): 336–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    O’Bryant HS, Byrd R, Stone MH. Cycle ergometer performance and maximum leg and hip strength adaptations to two different methods of weight training. J Appl Sports Sci Res 1988; 2 (2): 27–30Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Isometric or dynamic training: differential effects on mechanical properties of a human muscle. J Appl Physiol 1984; 56 (2): 296–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gettman LR, Ayres JJ, Pollock ML, et al. The effect of circuit weight training on strength, cardiorespiratory function, and body composition of adult men. Med Sci Sports 1978; 10 (3): 171–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gettman LR, Ayres JJ, Pollock ML, et al. Physiologic effects on adult men of circuit strength training and jogging. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979; 60: 115–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gettman LR, Ward P, Hagan RD. A comparison of combined running and weight training with circuit weight training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14 (3): 229–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wilmore JH, Parr RB, Girandola RN, et al. Physiological alterations consequent to circuit weight training. Med Sci Sports 1978; 10 (2): 79–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hurley BF, Seals DR, Ehsani AA, et al. Effects of high-intensity strength training on cardiovascular function. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1984; 16 (5): 483–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hunter G, Demment R, Miller D. Development of strength and maximum oxygen uptake during simultaneous training for strength and endurance. J Sports Med 1987; 27 (3): 269–75Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dudley GA, Djamil R. Incompatibility of endurance- and strength-training modes of exercise. J Appl Physiol 1985; 59 (5): 1446–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Holloszy JO, Coyle EF. Adaptations of skeletal muscle to endurance exercise and their metabolic consequences. J Appl Physiol 1984; 56 (4): 831–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Simoneau JA, Lortie G, Boulay MR, et al. Human skeletal muscle fiber type alteration with high-intensity intermittent training. Eur J Appl Physiol 1985; 54: 250–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tesch PA, Karlsson J. Muscle fiber types and size in trained and untrained muscles of elite athletes. J Appl Physiol 1985; 59 (6): 1716–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Howald H, Hoppeler H, Claassen H, et al. Influences of endurance training on the ultrastructural composition of the different muscle fiber types in humans. Pflugers Arch 1985; 403: 369–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fitts RH, Costill DL, Gardetto PR. Effect of swim exercise training on human muscle fiber function. J Appl Physiol 1989; 66: 465–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gollnick PD, Armstrong RB, Saltin B, et al. Effect of training on enzyme activity and fiber composition of human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 1973; 34 (1): 107–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fitts RH, Holloszy JO. Contractile properties of rat soleus muscle: effects of training and fatigue. Am J Physiol 1977; 233: C86–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fitzsimons DP, Diffe GM, Herrick RE, et al. Effects of endurance exercise on isomyosin patterns in fast- and slow-twitch skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 1990; 68 (5): 1950–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Staron RS. Correlation between myofibrillar ATPase activity and myosin heavy chain composition in single human muscle fibers. Histochemistry 1991; 96: 21–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Morgan DW, Bransford DR, Costill DL, et al. Variations in the aerobic demand of running among trained and untrained subjects. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27 (3): 404–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Costill DL. The relationship between selected physiological variables and distance running performance. J Sports Med 1967; 7: 61–6Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jones NL, McCartney N. Influence of muscle power on aerobic performance and the effects of training. Acta Med Scand 1986; 711 Suppl.: 115–22Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ono M, Miyashita M, Asami T. Inhibitory effect of long distance running training on the vertical jump and other performances among aged males. In: Komi P, editor. Biomechanics V-B. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1976: 94–100Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Stone J, Brannon T, Haddad F, et al. Adaptive responses of hypertrophying skeletal muscle to endurance training. J Appl Physiol 1996; 81 (2): 665–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Riedy M, Moore RL, Gollnick PD. Adaptive response of hypertrophied skeletal muscle to endurance training. J Appl Physiol 1985; 59 (1): 127–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Noakes TD. Implications of exercise testing for prediction of athletic performance: a contemporary perspective. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1988; 20 (4): 319–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Komi PV, Viitasalo JT, Rauramaa R, et al. Effect of isometric strength training on mechanical, electrical, and metabolic aspects of muscle function. Eur J Appl Physiol 1978; 40: 45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Moritani T, deVries HA. Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain. Am J Physical Med 1979; 58 (3): 115–30Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Johnston RE, Quinn TJ, Kertzer R, et al. Improving running economy through strength training. Strength Cond 1995; 17 (4): 7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Basmajian JV, DeLuca CJ. Muscles alive: their functions revealed by electromyography. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1985Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Coyle EF. Integration of the physiological factors determining endurance performance ability. In: Holloszy JO, editor. Exercise and sport sciences reviews. Vol 23. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1995: 25–63Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tanaka H, Bassett J, Swensen TC, et al. Aerobic and anaerobic power characteristics of competitive cyclists in the United States Cycling Federation. Int J Sports Med 1993; 14 (6): 334–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Inbar O, Kaiser P, Tesch P. Relationships between leg muscle fiber type distribution and leg exercise performance. Int J Sports Med 1981; 2: 154–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Petersen SR, Miller GD, Wenger HA, et al. The acquisition of muscular strength: the influence of training velocity and initial VO2 max. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1984; 9 (4): 176–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Marcinik EJ, Potts J, Schlabach G, et al. Effects of strength training on lactate threshold and endurance performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23 (6): 739–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rutherford OM, Greig CA, Sargeant AJ, et al. Strength training and power output: transference effects in the human quadriceps muscle. J Sports Sci 1986; 4: 101–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Smith DJ. The relationship between anaerobic power and isokinetic torque outputs. Can J Sports Sci 1987; 12 (1): 3–5Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Costill D, Sharp R, Troup J. Muscle strength: contributions to sprint swimming. Swim World 1980; 21: 29–34Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Davis JF. Effects of training and conditioning for middle distance swimming upon various physical measures. Res Q 1959; 30 (4): 399–412Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Hawley JA, Williams MM. Relationship between upper body anaerobic power and freestyle swimming performance. Int J Sports Med 1991; 12 (1): 1–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Sharp RL, Troup JP, Costill DL. Relationship between power and freestyle swimming. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14 (1): 53–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Toussaint HM, Vervoorn K. Effects of specific high resistance training in the water on competitive swimmers. Int J Sports Med 1990; 11 (3): 228–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Davis JF. The effect of weight training on speed in swimming. Physical Educator 1955; 12: 28–9Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Nunney DK. Relation of circuit training to swimming. Res Q 1960; 31 (2): 188–98Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Thompson HL, Stull GA. Effects of various training programs on speed of swimming. Res Q 1959; 30 (4): 479–85Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Tanaka H, Costill DL, Thomas R, et al. Dry-land resistance training for competitive swimming. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25 (8): 952–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Kiselev AP. The use of specific resistance in highly qualified swimmers’ strength training. Sov Sports Rev 1991; 26 (3): 131–2Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Bulgakova NZ, Vorontsov AR, Fomichenko TG. Improving the technical preparedness of young swimmers by using strength training. Sov Sports Rev 1990; 25 (2): 102–4Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Costill DL, Kovaleski J, Porter D, et al. Energy expenditure during front crawl swimming: predicting success in middledistance events. Int J Sports Med 1985; 6 (5): 266–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Craig AB, Skehan PL, Pawelczyk JA, et al. Velocity, stroke rate, and distance per stroke during elite swimming competition. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985; 17 (6): 625–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Department of KinesiologyUniversity of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Department of Exercise and Sport SciencesIthaca CollegeIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations