Athletes and Pain Tolerance

Summary

Athletes’ attitudes towards pain, and the cognitive strategies they use while experiencing pain, may be reflected in their pain tolerance levels and their performance and adherence to sport injury rehabilitation. Association and dissociation are 2 of the more popular cognitive strategies, and most research has found that these strategies increase pain tolerance and performance. It has not clearly been established how these results are transferred to athletes overcoming the pain associated with injury rehabilitation. The major limitation of most of these pain induction techniques is that they are inherently safe, and individuals know that the induced pain can be terminated at any time. Not only will the stressor be terminated, but the pain experienced will also decline because the pain is due to the stimulation. Thus, it is possible that pain tolerance and performance levels are higher in experimental settings than would normally be in real-life situations. However, exercise-induced muscle soreness is one pain induction technique which attempts to alleviate this limitation and therefore provide more realistic levels of pain to tolerate. The pain, stiffness, prolonged reduction in muscle strength, and decreased range-of-motion that appear 24 to 48 hours after strenuous eccentric exercise does not fully subside until 8 to 10 days after the initial bout of exercise. Study participants experience long-lasting, real-life pain. Thus, it is worthwhile for those involved in sport injury rehabilitation to be aware of the effectiveness of these cognitive strategies that may assist athletes to overcome the pain associated with exercise-induced muscle soreness, and how this relates to rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Kraus JF, Conroy C. Mortality and morbidity from injuries in sports and recreation. Annu Rev Public Health 1984; 5: 163–92

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Pedersen P. The grief response and injury: a special challenge for athletes and athletic trainers. J Natl Athlet Train Assoc 1986; 21: 312–4

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Fisher AC, Hoisington LL. Injured athletes’ attitudes and judgments toward rehabilitation adherence. J Natl Athlet Train Assoc 1993; 28: 48–54

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Domm MA. Rehabilitation adherence [unpublished master’s thesis]. Ithaca: Ithaca College, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gauron EF, Bowers WA. Pain control techniques in college-age athletes. Psychol Rep 1986; 59: 1163–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Fisher AC, Domm MA, Wuest DA. Adherence to sports injury rehabilitation programs. Physician Sportmed 1988 July; 52: 47–51

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bresler D. Learning to control pain [cassette]. New York: Ziff-Davis, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Melzack R, Dennis SG. Neurophysiological foundations of pain. In: Sternbach RA, editor. The psychology of pain. New York: Raven Press, 1978: 143–54

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bayer TL, Baer PE, Early C. Situational and psychophysiological factors in psychologically induced pain. Pain 1991; 44: 45–50

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hotchkiss DD. Cognitive strategies for athletic pain tolerance [unpublished master’s thesis]. Ithaca: Ithaca College, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Duda JL, Smart AE, Tappe MK. Predictors of adherence in the rehabilitation of athletic injuries: an application of personal investment theory. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1989; 11: 367–81

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fisher AC. Adherence to sports injury rehabilitation programmes. Sports Med 1990; 9: 151–8

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lynch GP. Athletic injuries and the practicing sport psychologist: practical guidelines for assisting athletes. Sport Psychol 19881; 2: 161–7

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Smith AM, Scott SG, Wiese DM. The psychological effects of sports injuries: coping. Sports Med 1990; 9: 352–69

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Weise DM, Weiss MR. Psychological rehabilitation and physical injury: implications for the sportsmedicine team. Sport Psychol 1987; 1: 318–30

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Weiss MR, Troxel RK. Psychology of the injured athlete. J Natl Athlet Train Assoc 1986; 21: 104–10

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Fernandez E. Artifact in pain ratings, its implications for test-retest reliability, and correction by a new scaling procedure. J Psychopath Behav Assess 1989; 12: 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Chapman CR. Pain and perception: comparison of sensory decision theory and evoked potential methods. In: Bonica JJ, editor. Pain. New York: Raven Press, 1980: 111–39

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Friedman H, Thompson RB, Rosen E. Perceived threat as a major factor in tolerance for experimentally induced cold-water pain. J Abnorm Psychol 1985; 94: 624–9

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Pennebaker JA, Lightner JM. Competition of internal and external information in an exercise setting. J Persp Soc Psychol 1980; 9: 165–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Thorn BE, Williams GA. Goal specification alters perceived pain intensity and tolerance latency. Cognit Ther Res 1989; 13: 171–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Melzack R. The puzzle of pain. New York: Basic Books, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Brena S. Pain and religion: a psychophysiological study. Springfield: Thomas, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bogduk N. The anatomy and physiology of nociception. Aust Assoc Musculoskel Med Bull 1991 March: 14–29, 32–6

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Melzack, R. Psychologic aspects of pain. In: Bonica JJ, editor. Pain. New York: Raven Press, 1980: 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Williams SL, Kinney PJ. Performance and nonperformance strategies for coping with acute pain: the role of perceived self-efficacy, expected outcomes, and attention. Cognit Ther Res 1991; 15: 1–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ryan ED. Perceptual characteristics of vigorous people. In: Fisher AC, editor. Psychology of sport. Palo Alto: Mayfield, 1976: 432–6

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Beecher HK. Relationship of significance of wound to pain experienced. JAMA 1956; 161: 609–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Crossman J, Jamieson J. Differences in perceptions of seriousness and disrupting effects of athletic injury as viewed by athletes and their trainer. Percept Mot Skills 1985; 61: 1131–4

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Weinberg RS, Smith J, Jackson A, et al. Effects of association, dissociation and positive self-talk strategies on endurance performance. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1984; 9: 25–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Spink KS. Facilitating endurance performance: the effects of cognitive strategies and analgesic suggestions. Sport Psychol 1988; 2: 97–104

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84: 191–215

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social-cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Dolce JJ, Doleys DM, Raczynski JM, et al. The role of self-efficacy expectancies in the prediction of pain tolerance. Pain 1986; 27: 261–72

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Weinberg RS, Gould D, Yukelson D, et al. Effect of pre-existing and manipulated self-efficacy on a competitive muscular endurance task. J Sport Psychol 1981; 3: 345–54

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Weinberg RS, Jackson A, Gould D. Expectations and performance: an empirical test of Bandura’s self-efficacy theory. J Sport Psychol 1979; 1: 320–31

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Taylor SE. Positive illusions: creative self-deception and the healthy mind. New York: Basic Books, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Rotter JB. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Med Monogr Suppl 1966; 80: 1 (609)

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    McCall KD, Malott JM. Distraction and coping with pain. Psychol Bull 1984; 95: 516–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Egbert LD, Battit GE, Welch CE, et al. Reduction of postoperative pain by encouragement and instruction of patients. N Eng J Med 1964; 270: 825–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kanfer FH, Goldfoot DA. Self-control and tolerance of noxious stimulation. Psychol Rep 1966; 18: 79–85

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kanfer FH, Seidner ML. Self-control: factors enhancing tolerance of noxious stimulation. J Pers Soc Psychol 1973; 25: 381–9

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Stevenson MK, Kanfer FH, Higgins JM. Effects of goal specificity and time cues on pain tolerance. Cognit Ther Res 1984; 8: 415–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Morgan WP. The mind of the marathoner. Psychology Today 1978 Apr: 38–40, 43, 45–46, 49

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Morgan WP, Pollock ML. Psychologic characterization of the elite distance runner. Ann NY Acad Sci 1977; 301: 382–403

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Pennebaker JA, Skelton J. Psychological parameters of physical symptoms. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1978; 4: 524–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Sachs MH, Sachs ML. Psychology of running. Champaign: Human Kinetics, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Knuckle C. Phasic pain induced by cold. J Appl Psychol 1949; 1: 468–74

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Armstrong RB. Mechanisms of exercise-induced delayed onset muscular soreness: a brief review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1984; 16: 529–38

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Clarkson PM, Nosaka K, Braun B. Muscle function after exercise-induced muscle damage and rapid adaptation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992; 24: 512–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Smith LL. Acute inflammation: the underlying mechanism in delayed onset muscle soreness? Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23: 542–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Pen LJ, Fisher AC, Sforzo GA, et al. Cognitive strategies and pain tolerance in athletes with muscle soreness. In press

  53. 53.

    Fisher AC, Mullins SA, Frye PA. Athletic trainers’ attitudes and judgments of injured athletes’ rehabilitation adherence. J Athletic Training 1992; 28: 43–7

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Ryan ED, Kovacic CR. Pain tolerance and athletic participation. Percept Mot Skills 1966; 22: 383–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Scott V, Gijsbers K. Pain perception in competitive swimmers. BMJ 1981; 283: 91–3

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Anshel MH. Sportpsychology: from theory to practice. Scottsdale, AR: Gorsuch Scarisbrick, 1990

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorette J. Pen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pen, L.J., Fisher, C.A. Athletes and Pain Tolerance. Sports Med 18, 319–329 (1994). https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199418050-00004

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cognitive Strategy
  • Muscle Soreness
  • Pain Tolerance
  • Athletic Trainer
  • Noxious Stimulation