Advertisement

Sports Medicine

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 216–228 | Cite as

Strength Training for Female Athletes

A Review of Selected Aspects
  • Jean Barrett Holloway
  • Thomas R. Baechle
Review Article

Summary

Women and men respond to strength training in very similar ways from their individual pretraining baselines. Women on the average have smaller bodies than men, have less absolute muscle mass and smaller individual muscle fibers, and display approximately two-thirds of the absolute overall strength and power of men. In addition, children are enculturated to view strength as masculine, an outlook which has depressed the pursuit and performance of strength activities by women. However, unit for unit, female muscle tissue is similar in force output to male muscle tissue, and there is some evidence to support similar, proportional increases for the sexes in strength performance and hypertrophy of muscle fibre relative to pretraining status. Strength training can also provide beneficial alterations in bone, body fat and self-concept in women. There is no evidence that women should train differently than men, and training programmes should be tailored for each individual.

Keywords

Strength Training Female Athlete Weight Training Strength Performance Lower Body Strength 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alen M, Hakkinen K. Androgenic steroid effects on serum hormones and on maximal force development in strength athletes. Journal of Sports Medicine 27: 38–46, 1987Google Scholar
  2. Armitage S. An investigation of the Hungarian methods of training female weighlifters. Women’s Weightlifting World 10 (November): 5–9, 1988Google Scholar
  3. Asmussen E. Growth in muscular strength and power. In Rarick GL (Ed.) Physical activity, growth, and development, pp. 60–79, Academic Press, New York, 1973Google Scholar
  4. Aulet MR, Gutin B, Wang J, Pierson RN. Regional bone density in weightlifters, runners, and sedentary subjects. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 21(2) [Suppl]: S115, 1989Google Scholar
  5. Baechle TR. Women in resistance training. Clinics in Sports Medicine 3(4): 791–807, 1984Google Scholar
  6. Bailey LL, Byrnes WC, Dickinson AL, Foster VL. Muscular hypertrophy in women following a concentrated resistance training program. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 19(2) [Suppl]: S16, 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bale P, Williams H. An anthropometric prototype of female power lifters. Journal of Sports Medicine 27: 191–196, 1987Google Scholar
  8. Bond V, Gresham KE, Tuckson LE, Balkisoon B. Strength comparisons in untrained men and trained women bodybuilders. Journal of Sports Medicine 25: 131–134, 1985Google Scholar
  9. Bompa T. Theory and methodology of training, Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, 1983Google Scholar
  10. Borgen JS, Corbin CB. Eating disorders among female athletes. Physician and Sportsmedicine 15(2): 89–95, 1987Google Scholar
  11. Brazell-Roberts JV, Thomas LE. Effects of weight training frequency on the self-concept of college females. Journal of Applied Sport Science Research 3(2): 40–43, 1989Google Scholar
  12. Brooke MH, Engel WK. The histographic analysis of human muscle biopsies with regard to fiber types. Neurology 19: 221–233, 1969PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown RD, Harrison JM. The effects of a strength training program on the strength and self-concept of two female age groups. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 57(4): 315–320, 1986Google Scholar
  14. Capen EK, Bright JA, Line PA. The effects of weight training on strength, power, muscular endurance and anthropometric measurements on a select group of college women. Journal of the Association for Physical and Mental Rehabilitation 15: 169–173, 180, 1961Google Scholar
  15. Costill DL, Daniels J, Evans W, Fink W, Krahenbuhl G, Saltin B. Skeletal muscle enzymes and fiber composition in male and female track athletes. Journal of Applied Physiology 40(2): 149–154, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cumming DC, Wall SR, Galbraith MA, Beicastro AN. Reproductive hormone responses to resistance exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 19(3): 234–238, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cureton KJ, Collins MA, Hill DW, McElhannon Jr FM. Muscle hypertrophy in men and women. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 20(4): 338–344, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dalsky GP, Stocke KS, Ehansi AA, et al. Weight-bearing exercise training and lumbar bone mineral content in postmenopausal women. Annals of Internal Medicine 108: 824–828, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Davies CTM, White MJ, Young K. Muscle function in children. European Journal of Applied Physiology 52: 111–114, 1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Del Rey P. The apologetic and women in sport. In Oglesby (Ed.) Women and sport: from myth to reality, pp. 107–111, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia 1978Google Scholar
  21. Dibrizzo R, Fort IL, Brown B. Dynamic strength and work variations during three stages of the menstrual cycle. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 10(4): 113–116, 1988Google Scholar
  22. Dishman RK, Gettman LR. Psychological vigor and self-perceptions of increased strength. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 13: 73–74, 1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. du Plessis MP, Smith PJ, du Plessis LAS, Geyer HJ, Mathews G. The composition of muscle fibers in a group of adolescents. In Binkhorst et al. (Eds) Children and exercise XI, pp. 323–328. Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc, Champaign, 1985Google Scholar
  24. Fahey T, Rolph R, Moungmee P, Nagel J, Mortara S. Serum testosterone, body composition, and strength in young adults. Medicine and Science in Sports 8(1): 31–34, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Freedson PS, Mihevic PM, Loucks AB, Girandola RN. Physique, body composition, and psychological characteristics of competitive female body builders. Physician and Sportsmedicine 11(5): 85–93, 1983Google Scholar
  26. Fry AC, Bibi KW, Eyford T. Stature variables as discrimination of foot contact during the squat exercise in untrained females, Journal of Applied Sports Science Research 3(3): 72–73, 1989Google Scholar
  27. Fry AC, Housh TJ, Hughes RA, Eyford T. Stature and flexibility variables as discriminators of foot contact during the squat exercise. Journal of Applied Sport Science Research 2(2): 24–26, 1988Google Scholar
  28. Fuchs CZ, Zaichkowsky LD. Psychological characteristics of male and female bodybuilders: the iceberg profile. Journal of Sport Behavior 6(3): 136–145, 1983Google Scholar
  29. Garhammer J. Sports Illustrated strength training, 2nd ed., New American Library, New Jersey, 1987Google Scholar
  30. Garhammer J. A comparison of maximal power outputs between male and female weightlifters in competition. Journal of Applied Sport Science Research, 3(3): 73, 1989aGoogle Scholar
  31. Garhammer J. Weight lifting and training. In Vaughan CL (Ed.) Biomechanics of sport, Ch. 5, pp. 169–211, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, 1989bGoogle Scholar
  32. Gasser OFW. Weight training and self concept. Unpublished master’s thesis, UCLA, Los Angeles, 1965Google Scholar
  33. Glass B. Roundtable: strength training and conditioning for the female athlete. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal 7(3): 14, 1985Google Scholar
  34. Grumbt WH, Alway SE, Gonyea WJ, Stray-Gunderson J. Isometric strength and morphological characteristics in the arm flexors of elite male and female body builders. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 20(2) [Suppl.]: S71, 1988Google Scholar
  35. Hakkinen K. Factors influencing trainability of muscular strength during short term and prolonged training. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal 7(2): 32–37, 1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hakkinen K, Pakarinen A, Alen M, Kauhanen H, Komi PV. Relationship between training volume, physical performance capacity, and serum hormone concentrations during prolonged training in elite weight lifters. International Journal of Sports Medicine 8 (Suppl.): 61–65, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hakkinen K, Pakarinen A, Alan M, Kauhanen H, Komi PV. Neuromuscular and hormonal adaptations in athletes to strength training in two years. Journal of Applied Physiology 65: 2806–2912, 1988Google Scholar
  38. Hakkinen K, Pakarinen A, Komi PV, Ryushi T, Kauhanen H. Neuromuscular adaptations and hormone balance in strength athletes, physically active males and females during intensive strength training. Congress Proceedings, XIIInternational Congress of Biomechanics 26–30 June, UCLA, Los Angeles, 1989Google Scholar
  39. Heyward VH, Johannes-Ellis SM, Romer JF. Gender differences in strength. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 57(2): 154–159, 1986Google Scholar
  40. Holloway JB, Beuter A, Duda JL. Self-efficacy and training for strength in adolescent girls. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 18(8): 699–719, 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hosler WW, Morrow JR. Arm and leg strength compared between young women and men after allowing for differences in body size and composition. Ergonomics 5(4): 309–313, 1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hudson J. Physical parameters used for female exclusion from law enforcement and athletics. In Oglesby CA (Ed.) Women and sport: from myth to reality, pp. 19–57, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, 1978Google Scholar
  43. Hunter GR. Changes in body composition, body build and performance associated with different weight training frequencies in males and females, National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal 7(1): 26–28, 1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Huston AC. Sex-typing. In Mussen PH (Ed.) Handbook of child psychology; Vol. 4, Socialization, personality, and social development, pp. 387–467. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1983Google Scholar
  45. Ikai M, Fukunaga T. Calculation of muscle strength cross-sectional areas of human muscle by means of ultrasonic measurements. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Physiologie Einschliessich Arbeitsphysiologie 26: 26–32, 1968Google Scholar
  46. Ikai M, Fukunaga T. A study on training effect on strength per unit cross-sectional area of muscle by means of ultrasonic measurement. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Physiologie Einschliessich Arbeitsphysiologie 28: 173–180, 1970Google Scholar
  47. Ikai M, Steinhaus AH. Some factors modifying the expression of human strength. Journal of Applied Physiology 16: 157–163, 1961PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Jackson SA, Marsh HW. Athletic or antisocial? the female sport experience. Journal of Sport Psychology 8: 198–211, 1986Google Scholar
  49. Jones H, Priest J, Hayes W, Tichenor C, Nagel D. Humeral hypertrophy in response to exercise. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 59A: 204–208, 1977Google Scholar
  50. Komi PV, Karlsson J. Skeletal muscle fibre types, enzyme activities and physical performance in young males and females. Acta Physiology Scandinavia 103: 210–218, 1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kraemer WJ. Endocrine responses to resistance exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 20(5) [Suppl.]: S152–S157, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Laubach L. Comparative strength of men and women: a review of the literature. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine 47(5): 534–542, 1976Google Scholar
  53. Levine L, Falkel JE, Sawka MN. Upper to lower body strength ratio comparisons between men and women. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 16(2): 125, 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Liu H, Liu P, Qin X, et al. Investigation of menstrual cycle in women weightlifters, Department of Exercise Physiology, National Institute of Sports Science, Beijing, 1987aGoogle Scholar
  55. Liu P, Liu H, Qin X, et al. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of women weightlifters, Department of Exercise Physiology, National Institute of Sports Medicine, Beijing, 1987bGoogle Scholar
  56. MacDougall JD, Sale DG, Alway SE, Sutton JR. Differences in muscle fibre number in biceps brachii between males and females. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences 8: 221, 1983Google Scholar
  57. Malina RM. Anthropometric correlates of strength and motor performance. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 3: 249–273, 1975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Malina RM. Secular changes in growth, maturation, and physical performance. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 6: 203–255, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Malina RM. Growth, strength and physical performance. In Stull (Ed.) Encyclopedia of physical education, fitness and sports, Vol. 11, pp. 443–470, Brighton Publishing Co, Salt Lake City, 1980Google Scholar
  60. Maughan RJ. Relationship between muscle strength and muscle cross-sectional area: implications for training. Sports Medicine 1: 263–269, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mayhew JL, Gross PM. Body composition changes in young women with high resistance weight training. Research Quarterly 45(4): 433–440, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Mazess RB, Whedon GB. Immobilization and bone. Calcified Tissue International 35: 265–267, 1983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Metheny E. Symbolic forms of movement: the feminine image in sports. In Connotations of movement in sports and dance, pp. 43–56, William C. Brown, Dubuque, 1985Google Scholar
  64. Morrow JR, Hosler WW. Strength comparisons in untrained men and trained women athletes. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 13(3): 194–198, 1981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. National Strength and Conditioning Association. Position paper on strength training for female athletes. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal 11(4): 43–55; 11(5): 29–36, 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ness RG, Patton RW. The effect of beliefs on maximum weight-lifting performance. Cognitive Therapy and Research 3(2): 205–211, 1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nilsson BE, Westlin NE. Bone density in athletes. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 77: 179–182, 1971PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Nutter J. Physical activity increases bone density. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal 8(3): 67–69, 1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. O’Shea J. Roundtable: strength training and conditioning for the female athlete. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal 7(3): 14, 1985Google Scholar
  70. O’Shea J, Wegner J. Power weight training and the female athlete. Physician and Sportsmedicine 9(6): 109–120, 1981Google Scholar
  71. Oyster N, Morton M, Linnel S. Physical activity and osteoporosis in post-menopausal women. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 16(1): 44–50, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Prince FP, Hikida RS, Hagerman FC. Muscle fiber types in women athletes and non-athletes. Pflügers Archiv 371: 161–165, 1977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Raithel KS. Are girls less fit than boys? Physician and Sports-medicine 15(11): 157–163, 1987Google Scholar
  74. Ramirez MD. Self-perception of personality among selected female athletes. Dissertation Abstracts International 41(6): 2500–A, 1980Google Scholar
  75. Roman RA. The training of the weightlifter (translated by Charniga A), 2nd ed., Sportivny Press, Livonia, Michigan, 1986Google Scholar
  76. Roundtable. Strength training and conditioning for the female athlete. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal 7(3): 10–29, 1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ryushi T, Hakkinen K, Kauhanen H, Komi PV. Muscle fiber characteristics muscle cross-sectional area and force production in strength athletes, physically active males and females. Scandinavian Journal of Sports Science 10(1): 7–15, 1988Google Scholar
  78. Sale DG. Neural adaptation to resistance training. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 20(5) [Suppl]: S135–S145, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sale DG, MacDougall JD, Alway SE, Sutton JR. Muscle cross-sectional area, fibre type distribution, and voluntary strength in humans. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences 8: 221, 1983Google Scholar
  80. Sale DG, O’Hagan F. Comparison of isokinetic and weight resistance training in young men and women. Abstracts of Sport Canada Applied Sport Research Program 1984–86: 27, 1987Google Scholar
  81. Saltin B, Henriksson J, Nygaard E, Andersen P. Fiber types and metabolic potentials of skeletal muscles in sedentary man and endurance runners. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 301: 3–29, 1977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schantz P, Randall-Fox E, Hutchison W, Tyden A, Åstrand PO. Muscle fibre type distribution, muscle cross sectional area and maximal voluntary strength in humans. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 117: 219–226, 1983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Shelton TO, Mahoney MJ. The content and effect of ‘psyching-up’ strategies in weight lifters. Cognitive Therapy and Research 2(3): 275–284Google Scholar
  84. Smith EL, Gilligan CA. Effects of inactivity and exercise on bone. Physician and Sportsmedicine 15(11): 91–104, 1987Google Scholar
  85. Smith EL, Smith PE, Ensing CP, Shea MM. Exercise in middle-aged women decreases bone involution. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 16(2): 104, 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Snyder EE, Kivlin JE. Women athletes and aspects of psychological well-being and body image. Research Quarterly 46(2): 191–199, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Snyder EE, Spreitzer E. Family influences and involvement in sports. Research Quarterly 44: 249–255, 1973Google Scholar
  88. Staron RS, Malicky ES, Falkel JE, Hagerman FC, Dudley GA. Effects of heavy resistance weight training on muscle fiber size and composition in females. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 21(2) [Suppl.]: S71, 1989Google Scholar
  89. Starr B. The strongest shall survive, strength training for football, Port City Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 1978Google Scholar
  90. Stillman RJ, Massey H, Boileau RA, Misner JE, Slaughter MH. Bone mass and physical activity level in women. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 21(2) [Suppl.]: S111, 1989Google Scholar
  91. Stobbe TJ. The development of a practical strength testing program for industry. Unpublished dissertation, Departments of Industrial and Operations Engineering and Industrial Health Service, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1982Google Scholar
  92. Stone MH. Implications for connective tissue and bone alterations resulting from resistance exercise training. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 20(5) [Suppl.]: S162–S168, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Stone MH, Carter D, Smith DP, Ward T. Olympic weightlifting: physiological characteristics of the athlete. In Terauds J (Ed.) Science in weightlifting, pp. 45–53. Academic Publishers, Del Mar, 1979Google Scholar
  94. Stone MH, O’Bryant H. Weight training: a scientific approach, Burgess International Group, Minneapolis, 1987Google Scholar
  95. Takano B. Coaching optimal technique in the snatch and clean and jerk, Part 1. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal 9(5): 50–59, 1987aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Takano B. Coaching optimal technique in the snatch and clean and jerk, Part II. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal 9(6): 52–56, 1987bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Takano B. Coaching optimal technique in the snatch and clean and jerk, Part HI. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal 10(1): 54–59, 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Takano B. The training of Diana Fuhrman — a case study. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal, in press, 1990Google Scholar
  99. Tesch PA. Acute and long-term metabolic changes consequent to heavy-resistance exercise. In Marconnet & Komi (Eds) Muscular function in exercise and training, pp. 67–89. Karger, Basel, 1987Google Scholar
  100. Trujillo C. The effect of weight training and running exercise intervention on the self-esteem of college women. International Journal of Sport Psychology 14: 162–173, 1983Google Scholar
  101. Tucker LA. Effect of a weight training program on the self-concepts of college males. Perceptual and Motor Skills 54: 1055–1061, 1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Tucker LA. Effect of a weight training program on the self-concept: a profile of those influenced most. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 54(4): 389–397, 1983aGoogle Scholar
  103. Tucker LA. Muscular strength and mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45: 1355–1360, 1983bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Tucker LA. Self-concept: a function of self-perceived somatotype. Journal of Psychology 113: 123–133, 1983cPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Weiss LW, Cureton KJ, Thompson FN. Comparison of serum testosterone and androstenedione responses to weight lifting in men and women. European Journal of Applied Physiology 50: 413–419, 1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wells CL. Women, sport & performance, a physiological perspective, Human Kinetics Publishers Inc., Champaign, 1985Google Scholar
  107. Wells CL, Plowman SA. Sexual differences in athletic performance. Physician and Sportsmedicine 11(8): 53–63, 1983Google Scholar
  108. Westerlind KC, Byrnes WC, Freedson PS, Katch FI. Exercise and serum androgens in women. Physician and Sportsmedicine 15(5): 87–94, 1987Google Scholar
  109. Westfall C, Going S, Parmenter R, Perry C, Boyden T, et al. Femur and spine bone mineral content of eumennorrheic female body builders, swimmers, runners and controls. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 20(2) [Suppl]: S60, 1988Google Scholar
  110. Wilkes RL, Summers JJ. Cognitions, mediating variables, and strength performance. Journal of Sport Psychology 6(3): 351–359, 1984Google Scholar
  111. Wilmore JH. Alterations in strength, body composition and anthropometric measurements consequent to a 10-week weight training program. Medicine and Science in Sports 6(2): 133–138, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Women’s Sports Foundation Survey. The Miller Lite Women’s Sports Foundation survey — the new American athlete. Women’s Sports and Fitness 8(1): 35, 1975Google Scholar
  113. Woo SLY, Kuei SC, Amiel D, Gomez MA, Hayes WC, White FC, Akeson WH. The effect of prolonged physical training on the properties of long bone: a study of Wolff’s law. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 63A(5): 780–787, 1981Google Scholar
  114. Wright J, Stone MH. NSCA position paper: use and abuse of anabolic steroids. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal 7(5): 44–59, 1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ADIS Press Limited 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Barrett Holloway
    • 1
  • Thomas R. Baechle
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of KinesiologyUCLA ExtensionLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations