The review of the effects of artificial turf and natural grass on surface-related traumatic injuries in soccer suggests that surfaces with artificial turf produce more abrasion injuries than surfaces with natural grass. Most authors report no significant difference in injury frequencies for the number of traumatic injuries. However, some authors report fewer traumatic injuries on artificial turf especially after a period of adaptation on the artificial turf A difference in injury pattern and injury mechanism when playing on different types of surfaces has been suggested, as well as an increased injury risk for frequent alternating between different playing surfaces.
The relationship between knee and ankle injuries and the fixation of the foot to the ground is not yet evaluated in soccer. In American football, the severity and incidence of knee and ankle injuries were reported to be significantly lower when using shoes with lower friction properties. However, in American football severe injuries typically occur in collision situations often independent of the surface. Soccer is characterised by sprinting, stopping, cutting and pivoting situations, where shoe-surface relations are essential and frictional resistance must be within an optimal range. Future research should address this compromise between performance and protection.
KeywordsImpact Force Natural Grass Overuse Injury American Football Ankle Injury
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Blyth CS, Mueller FD. Football injury survey. Physician and Sportsmedicine 9: 45–52, 1974aGoogle Scholar
- Blyth CS, Mueller FD. Football injury survey 2: identifying the causes. Physician and Sportsmedicine 2(10): 71–78, 1974bGoogle Scholar
- Engebretsen L, Kase T. Fotballskader og kunstgress. Tidskrift Nor Laegeforen 26(107): 2215–2217, 1987Google Scholar
- FIFA. Laws of the game and universal guide for referees with USSF supplement, English ed., FIFA, 1984Google Scholar
- Franke K. Traumatologie des Sports, Volk und Gesundheit, VEB Verlag, Berlin, 1977Google Scholar
- Hort W. Behandlung von Schaeden auf Konststoffboeden. BISP, Koln 50(9): 176–181, 1977Google Scholar
- Jelinek R. Verletzungen beim Fussballsport. Osterreiches Journal fuer Sports Medicine 1: 5–15, 1971Google Scholar
- Jorgenson U. Implications of heel-strike — an anatomical, biomechanical, physiological and clinical study with focus on the heel-pad. Linkoping University Medical Dissertations No. 284, Linkoping, 1989Google Scholar
- Jorgensen U, Ekstrand J. The significance of heel support for the shock absorbency at heel strike in gait and running. International Journal of Sports Medicine, in press, 1988Google Scholar
- Kocher H. Neuere Erfahrungen mit Kunststoffrasen. BISP, Koeln 3: 63–65, 1976Google Scholar
- Liljedahl SO. Common injuries in connection with conditioning exercises. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation 3: 1–5, 1971Google Scholar
- Nadravnik C. Prevention of accidents in football. First International Congress on Sports Medicine Applied to Football. Vol. II, D. Guanella, Rome, 1980Google Scholar
- O’Donoghue DH. Treatment of injuries to athletes, 2nd ed. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1970Google Scholar
- Pardon ET. Lower extremities are site of most soccer injuries. Physician and Sportsmedicine 6: 43–48, 1977Google Scholar
- Renstrom P, Peterson L, Edberg B. Valhalla artificial pitch at Gothenburg 1975–1977, a two-year evaluation, Rapport Naturvardsverket, Sweden, 1977Google Scholar
- Smodlaka VN. Rehabilitating the injured athlete. Physician and Sportsmedicine 11: 43–52, 1977Google Scholar
- Stanway A. Cited in Caldwell R. Soccer players prefer astro turf to grass field. Physician and Sportsmedicine 9(2): 22, 1981Google Scholar
- Weightman D, Brown RC. Injuries in association and rugby football. British Journal of Sportsmedicine 5: 43–48, 1974Google Scholar
- West-Berlin Soccer Federation. Risk of injury, a comparison between 230 sports fields, Berlin, 1985Google Scholar
- Winterbottom W. Artificial grass surface in association football: report and appendices, British Sports Council, London 1985Google Scholar