Abstract
Tegafur/uracil (UFT®) is an oral fluorinated pyrimidine composed of a combination of uracil and tegafur in a 4: 1 molar ratio. When given on a continuous basis, it yields a fluorouracil area under the concentration-time curve identical to that achieved with isomolar concentrations of fluorouracil administered by continuous infusion. Its 8.7% response rate in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is modest, but it has demonstrated synergy with cisplatin in human solid tumour xenografts. In combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC, response rates of 29 to 43% were observed with acceptable toxicity Researchers in Japan have demonstrated the utility of this agent as adjuvant therapy after surgical resection, either alone or in combination with cisplatin and vindesine versus observation; long term survival rates exceed 60%, compared with 49% for the control group. Efforts in the US will assess the role of this agent as non-cross-resistant consolidation therapy after a plateau in response has been obtained with platinum-based therapy in advanced disease. They will also recapitulate the Japanese studies, assessing their utility as adjuvant therapy in NSCLC patients who have undergone resection. Finally, ongoing phase I studies are combining this agent with paclitaxel and other systemic agents.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pinedo HM, Peter FJ. Fluorouracil: biochemistry and pharmacology. J Clin Oncol 1988; 6: 1653–64
Pazdur R, Covington WC, Brown NS, et al. Comparative steady state pharmacokinetics of oral UFT versus protracted intravenous 5-fluorouracil. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1996; 15: 474A
Hirata K, Sasaki K, Yamamitsu S, et al. A comparison of 5-fluorouracil concentration of 5-fluorouracil drip infusion versus oral UFT in plasma of the same patients. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 1993;20: 1409–11
Taguchi T, Fume H, Koyama Y, et al. Phase I study of UFT. Jpn J Cancer Chemother 1980; 7: 966–72
Nakajimo O, Ihara K, Isoda T, et al. Phase I and II studies of mixture of 1-5 fluorouracil and uracil. Jpn J Cancer Chemother 1980; 7: 1558–60
Ota K, Taguchi T, Kimura K, et al. Report on nationwide pooled data and cohort investigation in UFT phase II study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1988; 22: 333–8
Keicho N, Saijo N, Shinkai T, et al. Phase II study of UFT mixture in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1986; 16: 143–6
Wada H, Hitomi S, Teramatsu T. Postoperative non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective randomized trial of cisplatin, vindesine, UFT versus UFT alone versus control. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1994; 13: 1084A
Yamada Y, Saito H, Oie S, et al. Experimental study of the effect of combined treatment of UFT with CDDP on human solid tumor-xenografts in nude mice. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 1990; 17: 1327–31
Shimizu N, Teramoto S, Hitomi S, et al. A randomized controlled postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy trial of MMC and tegafur versus MMC and UFT for adenocarcinoma of the lung —first study. Jpn J Lung Cancer 1991; 31: 1011–9
Wada H, Hitomi S, Teramatsu T, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection in non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 1048–54
Ichinose Y, Takanashi N, Yano T, et al. A phase II trial of oral tegafur and uracil plus cisplatin in patients with inoperable nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer 1995; 75: 2677–80
Koinumaru S, Matsuda T, Saitoh J, et al. Pilot study of UFT combined with 5 consecutive days cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 1997; 18: 241–51
Niitani H, Yoshimori K, Yoneda S, et al. Phase II trial of UFT plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Proc Int Assoc Study Lung Cancer 1997; 18: 56A
Nakazato H, Koike A, Sail S, et al. Efficacy of oral UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy to curative resection of colorectal cancer: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1997; 16: 990A
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Langer, C.J. The Role of Tegafur/Uracil in Pulmonary Malignancy. Drugs 58 (Suppl 3), 71–75 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199958003-00010
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199958003-00010