Skip to main content
Log in

Oral Etoposide in Germ Cell Tumours

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients with germ cell tumours who relapse or fail to achieve disease-free status after first-line chemotherapy have a poor prognosis. When administered orally, etoposide produces responses in approximately 25% of patients whose disease is refractory to therapy and is a reasonable choice for palliative treatment in patients who are otherwise incurable. Oral etoposide has also been studied as maintenance therapy in patients who have been treated with salvage chemotherapy or surgery, with results that compare favourably with historical data. We recommend 3 months of maintenance oral etoposide for patients who achieve a complete response to any type of salvage therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Einhorn LH, Richie JP, Shipley WU. Cancer of the testis. In: DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, editors. Cancer: Principles and practice of oncology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1993: 1126–51

    Google Scholar 

  2. Einhorn LH. Treatment of testicular cancer: a new and improved model. J Clin Oncol 1990; 8: 1777–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Broun ER, Nichols CR, Kneebone P, et al. Long-term outcome of patients with relapsed and refractory germ cell tumors treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow rescue. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117: 124–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Einhorn L, Weathers T, Loehrer P, et al. Long term follow-up of second line chemotherapy with vinblastine, ifosfamide and cisplatin in disseminated germ cell tumors. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1996; 15: 240A

    Google Scholar 

  5. Newlands ES, Bagshawe KD. Epipodophyllin derivative (VP 16-213) in malignant teratomas and choriocarcinomas [letter]. Lancet 1977; 2: 87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Slevin ML, Clark PI, Joel SP, et al. A randomized trial to evaluate the effect of schedule on the activity of etoposide in small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 1333–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cavalli F, Klepp O, Renard J, et al. A phase II study of oral VP-16-213 in non-seminomatous testicular cancer. Eur J Cancer 1981; 17: 245–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller JL, Einhorn LH. Phase II study of daily oral etoposide in refractory germ cell tumors. Semin Oncol 1990; 17 Suppl. 1: 36–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper M, Einhorn LH. Maintenance chemotherapy with daily oral etoposide following salvage therapy in patients with germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 1167–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Loehrer PJ, Lauer R, Roth BJ, et al. Salvage therapy in recurrent germ cell cancer: ifosfamide and cisplatin plus either vinblastine or etoposide. Ann Intern Med 1988; 109: 540–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Murphy BR, Breeden ES, Donohue JP, et al. Surgical salvage of chemorefractory germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 324–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Saxman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saxman, S. Oral Etoposide in Germ Cell Tumours. Drugs 58 (Suppl 3), 31–34 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199958003-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199958003-00005

Keywords

Navigation