, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 548–569 | Cite as


A Review of its Pharmacological Properties, and Therapeutic Efficacy in Pain States
  • Heather A. Friedel
  • Andrew Fitton
Drug Evaluation



Flupirtine is a novel non-opiate centrally acting analgesic agent with muscle relaxant properties, advocated for use in a number of pain states. Preliminary evidence suggests that flupirtine 100 to 200mg orally or 150mg rectally 3 to 4 times daily (maximum daily dose 600mg) is more effective than placebo in relieving moderate acute pain of various types. For the relief of pain due to surgery, traumatic injury, dental procedures, headache/migraine and abdominal spasms, flupirtine has proved at least as effective as the opiate analgesics codeine, dihydrocodeine and pentazocine, the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents suprofen, diclofenac and ketoprofen, as well as dipyrone and paracetamol (acetaminophen). Although evidence to support a role in the treatment of chronic pain is limited, flupirtine has been found as effective as pentazocine in short term trials of patients with muscular or neuralgiform pain, dysmenorrhoea, soft tissue rheumatism or cancer pain.

The safety profile of flupirtine has not yet been fully established, although initial evidence suggests that adverse reactions, while frequent, are usually minor in nature. The most common reactions are drowsiness, dizziness, dry mouth and various gastrointestinal complaints, In comparison with opiate drugs, flupirtine appears to produce fewer central nervous system effects, no respiratory or cardiovascular depression, and no overt tolerance or physical dependence on prolonged administration.

If these initially favourable results are confirmed in larger long term trials, then flupirtine would appear to represent an effective analgesic for the relief of moderate pain, particularly that of musculoskeletal origin.

Pharmacodynamic Properties

Flupirtine is a centrally acting analgesic which, unlike the opiates or more peripherally acting drugs such as diclofenac, appears to modify pain perception via activation of descending mono-aminergic pathways. Flupirtine has demonstrated analgesic activity in a number of animal models: while less potent than morphine, buprenorphine, methadone and dextromoramide, flupirtine was as potent as pentazocine and more potent than pethidine (meperidine), dextropropoxyphene, codeine, phenacetin and paracetamol (acetaminophen). In healthy volunteers, oral flupirtine exhibited an analgesic potency similar to that of pentazocine, with dose-dependent decreases in pain intensity occurring within 30 to 60 minutes and peaking at 1.5 to 2 hours postdose.

Flupirtine displays muscle relaxant activity at doses similar to those producing analgesia, an effect possibly mediated via GABA-ergic mechanisms. The potency of flupirtine is comparable to that of the GABA agonist baclofen and the benzodiazepines diazepam and tetrazepam. Flupirtine additionally possesses anticonvulsant activity, but no appreciable anti-inflammatory or antipyretic activity.

Flupirtine produces a dose-related central nervous system depression, although the degree of sedation noted with usual therapeutic doses is less than that with diazepam, pentazocine or antihistamines, and significant impairment of psychomotor performance has not been observed. Flupirtine does not produce clinically significant respiratory or cardiovascular depression. Preliminary evidence from animal and human studies suggests that flupirtine confers little risk of tolerance or dependence. The sedation and euphoria evoked by high doses of flupirtine is mitigated by dysphoric feelings of tension, anxiety and confusion, suggesting a low abuse potential.

Pharmacokinetic Properties

Flupirtine is rapidly absorbed from the gastric mucosa, appearing in the plasma within 15 to 30 minutes and reaching a peak plasma concentration of approximately 0.8 mg/L at 1.6 to 2 hours after an oral 100mg dose. Following a rectal dose of 150mg, a similar peak plasma concentration is reached in 5.7 hours. The oral and rectal bioavailabilities of flupirtine are 90% and 72.5%, respectively, and steady-state plasma concentrations are attained within 2 days. Flupirtine is more than 80% reversibly bound to human albumin in vitro and has an apparent volume of distribution of 154L in healthy volunteers.

Flupirtine undergoes hepatic biotransformation to 2 primary metabolites, one of which has 20 to 30% of the analgesic activity of the parent compound. 18% of an oral dose of flupirtine is excreted in the faeces and 72% in the urine, two-thirds of the latter comprising parent compound and the 2 identified metabolites. The mean plasma elimination half-life of flupirtine ranges from 6.5 to 9.6 hours after oral administration and is 10.7 hours after rectal administration in healthy volunteers; these values are increased in the elderly and those with renal or hepatic disease. High plasma flupirtine concentrations, indicative of drug accumulation, have been recorded in patients with biliary cirrhosis, and may be associated with the development of ataxia.

Therapeutic Use

Flupirtine has been used in a number of studies of patients with moderate postoperative pain. Oral flupirtine 100 to 200mg or rectal flupirtine 150mg, administered up to 4 or 5 times daily for 1 to 4 days, provided superior analgesia to placebo on several subjective rating scales. Equivalent analgesic efficacy was demonstrated vis-a-vis the opiate analgesics codeine, dihydrocodeine, pentazocine and metamizol, the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents suprofen, diclofenac, naproxen and ketoprofen, and the peripherally acting agent, paracetamol. Similar results were found in patients with pain due to trauma, abdominal spasm, headache/migraine and dental procedures. Painful conditions with a large inflammatory component, e.g. wisdom tooth extraction, were less responsive to flupirtine.

The role of flupirtine in the treatment of chronic pain states is less well defined. Although patients with severe pain due to malignancy tended to respond more favourably to flupirtine than to pentazocine over a 1 -week treatment period, information regarding its longer term efficacy in this setting is lacking. Patients with muscular or neuralgiform pain, dysmenorrhoea or soft tissue rheumatism showed similar analgesic responses to flupirtine and pentazocine over 2 to 8 weeks of treatment, and flupirtine was the better tolerated agent. Those patients with inflammatory rheumatism were again less responsive to flupirtine and pentazocine.

In the only long term trial reported to date, in which 191 patients with chronic rheumatic pain were initiated on 12 months’ treatment with oral flupirtine 300 mg/day (mean), complete pain relief was obtained by 18 to 25% of patients.


Adverse reactions to flupirtine have been relatively frequent but generally minor in nature, usually necessitating few withdrawals from clinical trials. Common dose-related adverse effects include drowsiness, dizziness, dry mouth and various gastrointestinal complaints. In comparison with other analgesics, flupirtine has proved to be well tolerated, producing fewer central nervous system effects than the opiates. The respiratory and cardiovascular depression associated with the opiates have not been seen with flupirtine, nor has overt evidence of tolerance or dependence been manifest on long term (⩽ 12 months) flupirtine administration. The tolerability of flupirtine in elderly patients and those with moderate renal impairment appears comparable to that in younger patients and those with normal renal function. However, ataxia in association with elevated plasma flupirtine concentrations has been noted in patients with biliary cirrhosis, and patients with a history of hepatic encephalopathy have experienced symptom recurrence during flupirtine therapy.

Dosage and Administration

Flupirtine is available in 50 and 100mg oral capsules and 75 and 150mg rectal suppositories. The usual adult dose is one 100mg capsule or 150mg suppository 3 to 4 times daily, to a maximum of 6 doses per day. The oral dose may be increased to 200mg 3 times daily for more severe pain. The dose in children (⩾ 6 years.) is 50mg orally or 75mg rectally 3 or 4 times daily, to a maximum of 6 doses per day. The minimum analgesic dose should be used in elderly patients and those with renal disease, hepatic dysfunction or hypoalbuminaemia. The duration of treatment should not exceed 8 days without review by a medical practitioner. Driving or the use of machinery should be avoided during treatment with flupirtine. Patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy should have coagulation time measured regularly and patients taking paracetamol-containing medications should be monitored for elevated hepatic transaminases if treatment is to continue beyond a few days. Flupirtine is not recommended for patients with biliary cirrhosis or a history of hepatic encephalopathy.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrams SML, Baker LRI, Crome P, White AST, Johnston A, et al. Pharmacokinetics of flupirtine in elderly volunteers and in patients with moderate renal impairment. Postgraduate Medical Journal 64: 361–363, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baisi F, Pomponi P, Ceccarelli G. A new analgesic (D9998) in episiotomy pain. In Italian. Therapeutika 86: 1–8, 1986Google Scholar
  3. Basbaum AJ, Fields HL. Endogenous pain control systems: brainstem spinal pathways and endorphin circuitry. Annual Review of Neuroscience 7: 309–338, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Battistini C, Ceccarelli G, Pretolani E. A new analgesic, flupirtine (D 9998), in painful traumas resulting from sports activities. In Italian. Therapeutika 86: 1–8, 1986Google Scholar
  5. Biehl B. Auswirkungen des Analgetikums Flupirtin auf die Fahrtüchtigkeit. Arzneimittel-Forschung 35: 77–81, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bleyer H, Carlsson K-H, Erkel H-J, Jurna I. Flupirtine depresses nociceptive activity evoked in rat thalamus. European Journal of Pharmacology 151: 259–265, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bloomfield SS, Nelson ED, Mitchell J, Peters N, Cissell G, et al. Flupirtine and acetaminophen analgesia after episiotomy. Abstract. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 37: 182, 1985Google Scholar
  8. Borgognone A, Gatti A, Lombardi V, Mennella G, Celeste MG, et al. A new non-opioid analgesic (flupirtine) in the treatment of postoperative pain: controlled study. In Italian. Therapeutika 86: 1–9, 1986Google Scholar
  9. Bromm B. Assessment of analgesia by evoked cerebral potential measurements in humans. Postgraduate Medical Journal 63; (Suppl. 3) (9–13): 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bromm B, Ganzel R, Herrmann WM, Meier W, Scharein E. Pentazocine and flupirtine effects on spontaneous and evoked EEG activity. Neuropsychobiology 16: 152–156, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bromm B, Ganzel R, Herrmann WM, Meier W, Scharein E. The analgesic efficacy of flupirtine in comparison to pentazocine and placebo assessed by EEG and subjective pain ratings. Postgraduate Medical Journal 63; (Suppl. 3) (109–112): 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Brune K. Pharmacology of centrally acting analgesics: an introduction. Postgraduate Medical Journal 63; (Suppl. 3) (5–7): 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Capocasale R, Rispoli F, Frontespezi S, Galasso U. Flupirtine: a double-blind study vs placebo of its analgesic activity in general surgical pain. In Italian. Riforma Medica 102: 85–91, 1987Google Scholar
  14. Carlsson K-H, Jurna I. Depression by flupirtine, a novel analgesic agent, of motor and sensory responses of the nociceptive system in the rat spinal cord. European Journal of Pharmacology 143: 89–99, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Darius H, Schrör K. The action of flupirtine on prostaglandin formation and platelet aggregation in vitro. Arzneimittel-Forschung 35: 55–59, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Diamantis W, Gordon R, Sofia RD. Analgesic activity following combined oral administration of flupirtine maleate and peripherally acting analgesics in mice and rats. Postgraduate Medical Journal 63; (Suppl. 3) (29–34): 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dimpfel W, Spüler M, Nickel B. Radioelectroencephalography (tele-stereo-EEG) in the rat as a pharmacological model to differentiate the central action of flupirtine from that of opiates, diazepam and phenobarbital. Neuropsychobiology 16: 163–168, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dimpfel W, Spüler M, Nickel B. Dose- and time-dependent action of morphine, tramadol and flupirtine as studied by radioelectroencephalography in the freely behaving rat. Neuropsychobiology 20: 164–168, 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fantini C, Ciampini M, Silvij S. Double-blind clinical trial versus placebo with flupirtine, a new analgesic, in sports traumatology. In Italian. Therapeutika 86: 1–7, 1986Google Scholar
  20. Feingold E, Classen W, Tille Ch, Netter P. Comparisons of analgesics on different pain stimuli. In German. Arzneimittel-Forschung 32: 901, 1982Google Scholar
  21. Galasko CSB, Courtenay PM, Jane M, Stamp TCB. Trial of oral flupirtine maleate in the treatment of pain after orthopaedic surgery. Current Medical Research and Opinion 9: 594–601, 1985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gatto R, Frontespezi S. Study on the analgesic activity of flupirtine in dentistry. In Italian. Quadeni di Odontostomatologia 3: 71–82, 1986Google Scholar
  23. Gessler M, Hiedl P. Beeinflussung der Schmerzschwelle beim Menschen durch Pharmaka und TNS. Abstract. Münchener Medizinische Wochenschrift 122: 1687, 1980Google Scholar
  24. Gordon R, Sofia RD, Diamantis W. Effect of flupirtine maleate on the nociceptive pathway, ECG, evoked potentials and polysynaptic reflexes in laboratory animals. Postgraduate Medical Journal 63; (Suppl. 3) (49–55): 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hedges A, Warrington SJ, Turner P, Niebch G. Flupirtine maleate and antipyrine half-life. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 33: 437, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Herrmann WM, Hiersemenzel R, Aigner M, Lobisch M, Rieth-müller-Winzen H. Langzeitverträglichkeit von Flupirtin in der Praxis. Ergebnisse einer offenen Einjahresstudie bei Patienten mit chronischen Gelenkschmerzen. Poster presentation, 17th Annual Meeting of the German Society for the Study of Pain, Bielefeld, Germany, November 4–7, 1992Google Scholar
  27. Herrmann WM, Kern U, Aigner M. On the adverse reactions and efficacy of long-term treatment with flupirtine: preliminary results of an ongoing twelve-month study with 200 patients suffering from chronic pain states in arthrosis or arthritis. Postgraduate Medical Journal 63; (Suppl. 3) (87–103): 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Heusinger JH. Efficacy and tolerance of flupirtine and pentazocine in two multicentre trials. Postgraduate Medical Journal 63; (Suppl. 3) (71–79): 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hlavica P, Niebch G. Untersuchungen zür Pharmakokinetik und Biotransformation des Analgetikums Flupirtin beim Menschen. Arzneimittel-Forschung 35: 67–74, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hummel T, Friedmann T, Pauli E, Niebch G, Borbe HO, et al. Dose-related analgesic effects of flupirtine. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 32: 69–76, 1991PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jakovlev V, Achterrath-Tuckermann U, von Schlichtegroll A, Stroman F, Thiemer K. Allgemeine pharmakologische Untersuchungen mit dem Analgetikum Flupirtin. Arzneimittel-Forschung 35: 44–55, 1985aPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Jakovlev V, Sofia RD, Achterrath-Tuckermann U, von Schlichtegroll A, Thiemer K. Untersuchungen zur pharmakologischen Wirkung von Flupirtin, einem strukturell neuartigen Analgetikum. Arzneimittel-Forschung 35: 30–43, 1985bPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnston A, Warrington SJ, Turner P, Riethmuller-Winzen H. Comparison of flupirtine and indomethacin on frusemide-in-duced diuresis. Postgraduate Medical Journal 63: 959–961, 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kobal G, Assi A, Hummel Th. Local anesthetic effects of flupirtine accessed by subjective estimates and pain-related evoked potentials. Abstract. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology 337 (Suppl.): R110, 1988Google Scholar
  35. Kobal G, Hummel Th. Effects of flupirtine on the pain-related evoked potential and the spontaneous EEG. Agents and Actions 23: 117–119, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koch H-R, Kremer F, Trier HG, Marzinkowski, A. Die Bewertung möglicher Arzneimittelneben-wirkungen am Auge im Probandenversuch. Darstellung am Beispiel einer Okulotoxi-zitätsstudie mit Flupirtine. Klinische Monatsblatter für Augenheilkunde 180: 70–74, 1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Magnussen H, Scheidt-Mackes M. Der Einfluss von Flupirtin auf den Atemantrieb gesunder Probanden und Patienten mit verschiedenen Lungenerkrankungen. Pneumologie 46: 580–586, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Mastronardi P, D’Onofrio M, Scanni E, Pinto M, Frontespezi S, et al. Analgesic activity of flupirtine maleate: a controlled double-blind study with diclofenac sodium in orthopaedics. Journal of International Medical Research 16: 338–348, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mazzarella B, Mastronardi P, Rossi AE, Chiefari M, Ceccarelli G. Controlled clinical evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of flupirtine and ketoprofen in postepisiotomy pain. Current Therapeutic Research 44: 232–241, 1988Google Scholar
  40. McMahon FG, Arndt Jr WF, Newton JJ, Montgomery PA, Per-hach JL. Clinical experience with flupirtine in the US. Postgraduate Medical Journal 63; (Suppl. 3) (81–85): 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McMahon FG, Vargas R. A new clinical bioassay for antipyresis. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 31: 736–740, 1991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Million R, Finlay BR, Whittington JR. Clinical trial of flupirtine maleate in patients with migraine. Current Medical Research and Opinion 9: 204–212, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moore RA, Bullingham RES, Simpson S, O’Sullivan G, Evans PJD, et al. Comparison of flupirtine maleate and dihydrocod-eine in patients following surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia 55: 429–432, 1983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Müller-Limmroth W. Einfluss des neuen Analgetikums Flupirtin auf die psychomotorische Leistungsfähigkeit des Menschen. Arzneimittel-Forschung 35: 1089–1092, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Narang PK, Howard DM, Seaman C, Sheridan P, Porter R, et al. Single and multi-dose kinetics of flupirtine (F) in epileptic patients. Abstract. Acta Pharmacologica et Toxicologica 59 (Suppl. 5): 109, 1986Google Scholar
  46. Narang PK, Tourville JF, Chatterji DC, Gallelli JF. Quantitation of flupirtine and its active acetylated metabolite by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography using fluoro-metric detection. Journal of Chromatography 305: 135–143, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nickel B. The antinociceptive activity of flupirtine: a structurally new analgesic. Postgraduate Medical Journal 63; (Suppl. 3) (19–28): 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nickel B, Aledter A. Comparative physical dependence studies in rats with flupirtine and opiate receptor stimulating analgesics. Postgraduate Medical Journal 63; (Suppl. 3) (41–43): 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nickel B, Borbe HO, Szelenyi I. Investigations with the novel nori-opioid analgesic flupirtine in regard to possible benzodiazepine-like abuse inducing potential. Arzneimittel-Forschung 40: 905–908, 1990aPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Nickel B, Engel J, Szelenyi I. Possible involvement of noradrenergic descending pain-modulating pathways in the mode of antinociceptive action of flupirtine, a novel non-opioid analgesic. Agents and Actions 23: 112–116, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nickel B, Jakovlev V, Szelenyi I. Einfluss von Flupirtin, verschiedener Analgetika und Muskelrelaxantien auf den Skelettmuskeltonus wacher Ratten. Arzneimittel-Forschung 40: 909–911, 1990bPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Nickel B, Szelenyi I. Muscle relaxing activity of flupirtine, a centrally acting analgesic. Poster session, 4th European Congress ‘Back Pain’ Current Concepts and Advances, Budapest, July 2-5, 1992Google Scholar
  53. Nickel B, Zerrahn H. Pharmaco-electroencephalography in the rat as a method for characterization of different types of analgesics. Postgraduate Medical Journal 63; (Suppl. 3) (45–47): 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Niebch G, Borbe HO, Hummel T, Kobal G Dose-proportional plasma levels of the analgesic flupirtine maleate in man. Arzneimittel-Forschung 42: 1343–1345, 1992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Obermeier K, Niebch G, Thiemer K. Untersuchungen zür Pharmakokinetik und Biotransformation des Analgetikums Flupirtin bei Ratte und Hund. Arzneimittel-Forschung 35: 60–67, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Ottaviani C, Frontespezi S, Morandi A, Sala G. A new analgesic (D9998, flupirtine). Clinical evaluation in trauma patients. In Italian. Riforma Medica 101: 545–548, 1986Google Scholar
  57. Palumbo G. Controlled clinical study of flupirtine, a new analgesic, in episiotomy pain. In Italian. Therapeutika 86: 1–9, 1986Google Scholar
  58. Porter RJ. Mechanisms of action of new antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsia 30 (Suppl. 1): S29–S34, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Porter Aj, Gratz E, Narang PK, Mirsky AE, Schwerdt P, et al. Effect of flupirtine on uncontrolled partial or absence seizures. Abstract. Epilepsia 24: 253–254, 1983Google Scholar
  60. Powell-Jackson P, Williams R. Use of flupirtine maleate as an analgesic in patients with liver disease. British Journal of Clinical Practice 63-66, 1985Google Scholar
  61. Preston KL, Funderburk FR, Liebson IA, Bigelow GE. Evaluation of the abuse potential of the novel analgesic flupirtine maleate. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 27: 101–113, 1991PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Riethmüller-Winzen H. Flupirtine in the treatment of post-operative pain. Postgraduate Medical Journal 63; (Suppl. 3) (61–66): 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Scheef W. Analgesic efficacy and safety of oral flupirtine in the treatment of cancer pain. Postgraduate Medical Journal 63; (Suppl. 3) (67–70): 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Sebening H, Schnelle H, Plominski R, Klein G. Einfluss von Flupirtin auf Hämodynamik und Blutgase gesunder Probanden. Kardiologie 9: 55–62, 1991Google Scholar
  65. Sheridan PH, Seaman CA, Narang PK, White BG, Schwerdt P, et al. Pilot study of flupirtine in refractory seizures. Abstract. Neurology 36 (Suppl. 1): 85, 1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sitzer G. Einfachblindstudie mit Flupirtin gegen Acetylsalicylsäure bei Patienten mit spinalem Wurzelreizsyndrom. Jatros Orthopädie/Traumatologie 6: 37–42, 1991Google Scholar
  67. Sofia RD, Diamantis W, Gordon R. Abuse potential and physical dependence liability studies with flupirtine maleate in laboratory animals. Postgraduate Medical Journal 63; (Suppl. 3) (35–40): 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Swedberg MDB, Shannon HE, Nickel B, Goldberg SR. Pharmacological mechanisms of action of flupirtine: a novel, centrally acting, non-opioid analgesic evaluated by its discriminative effects in the rat. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 246: 1067–1074, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Szelenyi I, Mollenhauer J, Brune K. Autoradiographic distribution of flupirtine, a novel centrally acting analgesic in rats and rabbits. 9th European Workshop on Inflammation (EWI), Erlangen, West Germany, April 26-28, 1987Google Scholar
  70. Szelenyi I, Nickel B. Putative site(s) and mechanisms(s) of action of flupirtine, a novel analgesic compound. Postgraduate Medical Journal 63; (Suppl. 3) (57–60): 1987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Szelenyi I, Nickel B. Pharmacological profile of flupirtine, a novel centrally acting, non-opioid analgesic drug. Agents and Actions 32 (Suppl.): 119–123, 1991PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Szelenyi I, Nickel B, Borbe HO, Brune K. Mode of antinociceptive action of flupirtine in the rat. British Journal of Pharmacology 97: 835–842, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Twycross R. Schmerzbehandlung bei Karzinompatienten. Schmerz 4: 65–74, 1990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vaupel DB, Nickel B, Becketts K. Flupirtine antinociception in the dog is primarily mediated by nonopioid supraspinal mechanisms. European Journal of Pharmacology 162: 447–456, 1989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Venhaus R, Sommer K, Lobisch M, Lüben V, Nowak H. Flupirtin bei verschiedenen Kopfschmerzformen in der Praxis. Ergebnisse einer multizentrischen placebokontrollierten Doppelblindstudie mit 3 parallelen Gruppen. Poster presentation, 17th Annual Meeting of the German Society for the Study of Pain, Bielefeld, Germany, November 4-7, 1992Google Scholar
  76. Weiser T, Nickel B, Szelenyi I, Wienrich M. In-vivo and in-vitro findings about the muscle relaxing properties of flupirtine. Poster session, Autumn Meeting of the German Society of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Graz, Austria, September 6–9, 1992Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International Limited 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heather A. Friedel
    • 1
  • Andrew Fitton
    • 1
  1. 1.Adis International LimitedMairangi Bay, Auckland 10New Zealand

Personalised recommendations