Summary
Despite its severity, the disposition of women towards pain during childbirth is influenced by many complex personal and cultural factors. Such influences may inspire a degree of stoicism towards labour pain which would be extraordinary in other painful circumstances. Nevertheless, the majority of women who deliver in a modern obstetric unit request some form of pharmacological pain relief An important component of proper antenatal education, therefore, is to provide impartial information about the various analgesic alternatives which are available within each centre
Regimens of analgesia which depend on the systemic absorption of drugs (e.g. parenterally administered opioids; inhalational analgesia) are simple to administer but they have limited efficacy and are commonly associated with unpleasant central side effects. While soine innovations in actual drug administration have been introduced, it is unlikely that any further major improvements will be feasible using the systemic approach to analgesia
Epidural analgesia has become established as the most effective and consistently reliable method of providing pain relief in labour. Recent advances have demonstrated that many of the adverse effects traditionally associated with epidural analgesia can be substantially reduced by administering local anaesthetics in smaller doses. It is becoming apparent that additional patient benefits are possible when epidural opioids are also used in combination with local anaesthetics. Techniques which allow the mother to exercise personal control over her epidural analgesia requirements are rceived more favourably and may help reduce the need for obstetric intervention
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abouleish E. Paracervical block. In Abouleish E (Ed.) Pain control in obstetrics, pp. 342–358, Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1977
Arthurs G, Rosen M. Acceptability of continuous nasal nitrous oxide during labour: a field trial in six maternity hospitals. Anaesthesia 36: 384–388, 1981
Beazley JM, Leaver EP, Morewood JHM, Bircumshaw J. Relief of pain in labour. Lancet 1: 1033–1035, 1967
Belsey EM, Rosenblatt DB, Lieberman BA, Redshaw M, Caldwell J, et al. The influence of maternal analgesia on neonatal behaviour: pethidine. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 88: 398–406, 1981
Bogod DG, Rosen M, Rees GAD. Extradural infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine at 10ml h−1to women during labour. British Journal of Anaesthesia 59: 325–330, 1987
Brownridge P. Spinal anaesthesia revisited: an evaluation of subarachnoid block in obstetrics. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 12: 334–342, 1984
Brownridge P. Epidural bupivacaine-pethidine mixture: clinical experience using a low-dose combination in labour. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 28: 17–24, 1988
Brownridge P. Epidural medication afterthe initial dose: reflections on current methods of administration during labour. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 18: 300–308, 1990
Brownridge P, Cohen SE. Neural blockade for obstetrics and gynecologic surgery. In Cousins MJ & Bridenbaugh PO (Eds) Neural blockade in clinical anaesthesia and management of pain, 2nd ed., pp. 600–602, Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1988
Brownridge P, Frewin D. A comparative study of techniques of postoperative analgesia following caesarean section and lower abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 13: 123–130, 1985
Covino BG. Clinical pharmacology of local anesthetic agents. In Cousins MJ & Bridenbaugh PO (Eds) Neural blockade in clinical anaesthesia and management of pain, 2nd ed., pp. 111–114, Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1988
Crawford JS. Some maternal complications of epidural analgesia for labour. Anaesthesia 40: 1219–1225, 1985
Dolan PF, Rosen M. Inhalation analgesia in labour: facemask or mouthpiece? Lancet 2: 1030–1031, 1975
Gambling DR, Yu P, Cole C, McMorland GH, Palmer L. A comparative study of patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labour. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 35: 249–254, 1988
Girvan CB, Moore J, Dundee JW. Pethidine compared with pethidine-naloxone administered during labour. British Journal of Anaesthesia 48: 563–569, 1976
Holdcroft A, Morgan M. An assessment of the analgesic effect in labour of pethidine and 50 per cent nitrous oxide in oxygen (Entonox). Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth 81: 603–607, 1974
Justins DM, Francis D, Houlton PG, Reynolds F. A controlled trial of extradural fentanyl in labour. British Journal of Anaesthesia 54: 409–414. 1982
Latto IP, Molloy MJ, Rosen M. Arterial concentrations of nitrous oxide during intermittent patient-controlled inhalation of nitrous oxide in oxygen (Entonox) during the first stage of labour. British Journal of Anaesthesia 45: 1029–1034, 1973
Li DF, Rees GAD, Rosen M. Continuous extradural infusion of 0.0625% or 0.125% bupivacaine for pain relief in primigravid labour. British Journal of Anaesthesia 57: 264–270, 1985
Lieberman BA, Rosenblatt DB, Belsey E, Packer M, Redshaw M, et al. The effects of maternally administered pethidine or epidural bupivacaine on the fetus and newborn. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 86: 598–606, 1979
Lysak SZ, Eisenach JC, Dobson CE. Patient-controlled analgesia during labor: a comparison of three solutions with a continuous infusion control. Anesthesiology 72: 44–49, 1990
McQuitty FM. Relief of pain in labour: a controlled double-blind trial comparing pethidine and various phenothiazine derivatives. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth 74: 925–928, 1967
Melzack R. The myth of painless childbirth. Pain 19: 321–337, 1984
Morgan BM, Bulpitt CJ, Clifton P, Lewis PJ. Analgesia and satisfaction in childbirth (the Queen Charlotte’s 1000 mother survey). Lancet 2: 808–810, 1982
Murphy TM, Mather LE, Stanton-Hicks MD’A, Bonica JJ, Tucker GT. Effects of adding adrenaline to etidocaine and lignocaine in extradural anaesthesia. 1: Block characteristics and cardiovascular effects. British Journal of Anaesthesia 48: 893–898, 1976
Reed PN, Colquhoun AD, Hanning CD. Maternal oxygenation during normal labour. British Journal of Anaesthesia 62: 316–318, 1989
Robinson JO, Rosen M, Evans JM, Revill SI, David H, et al. Self administered intravenous and intramuscular pethidine: a controlled trial in labour. Anaesthesia 35: 763–770, 1980
Rosen M. Recent advances in pain relief in childbirth: inhalation and systemic analgesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia 43: 837–848, 1971
Smedstad KG, Morison DH. A comparative study of continuous and intermittent epidural analgesia for labour and delivery. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 35: 234–241, 1988
Stainthorp SF, Bradshaw EG, Challen PD, Tobias MA. 0.125% bupivacaine for obstetric analgesia? Anaesthesia 33: 3–9, 1978
Stefani SJ, Hughes SC, Shnider SM, Levinson G, Abboud TK, et al. Neonatal neurobehaviour effects of inhalation analgesia for vaginal delivery. Anesthesiology 56: 351–355, 1982
Wiener PC, Hogg MIJ, Rosen M. Effects of naloxone on pethidine-induced neonatal depression. British Medical Journal 2: 228–231, 1977
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brownridge, P. Treatment Options for the Relief of Pain During Childbirth. Drugs 41, 69–80 (1991). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199141010-00007
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199141010-00007