Skip to main content
Log in

Sulconazole

A Review of its Antimicrobial Activity and Therapeutic Use in Superficial Dermatomycoses

  • Drug Evaluation
  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Synopsis

Sulconazole is a substituted imidazole antimicrobial agent structurally related to other drugs in this group. It possesses a broad spectrum of activity in vitro against dermato-phytes, yeasts and some Grampositive bacteria. The efficacy and safety of sulconazole 1% cream has been demonstrated in controlled clinical studies in patients with superficial dermatophyte or yeast infections. In these trials, sulconazole generally displayed similar efficacy to clotrimazole, econazole and miconazole, although in a few studies sulconazole produced better and/or quicker improvement than clotrimazole or miconazole in small numbers of patients with tinea pedis. Further studies in larger groups of patients are needed to confirm these encouraging preliminary findings.

Thus, sulconazole is an effective and well tolerated alternative to other topical imidazole drugs in the treatment of superficial fungal infections of the skin.

Pharmacodynamic Properties

Sulconazole possesses a broad spectrum of antifungal activity, inhibiting the growth of dermatophytes, yeasts and various filamentous and dimorphic fungi at concentrations below 5 mg/L in vitro. To overcome inconsistencies in MIC values caused by varying experimental conditions, the determination of relative inhibition factors (RIF) of antifungal drugs has been proposed. It has been shown that against representatives of pathogenic yeasts, dermatophytes and Aspergilli, the RIF values of sulconazole were broadly similar to those of other imidazoles. The fungicidal potency of sulconazole in vitro depends on its concentration and on the growth phase of the inoculum cells. Sulconazole has also demonstrated antibacterial activity in vitro, with MIC values below 12.5 mg/L, against several Staphylococcus species, Streptococcus faecalis and certain Grampositive anaerobes.

It appears that sulconazole exerts antifungal activity through effects which destroy the capacity of the fungal cell membrane to maintain the intracellular environment.

Pharmacokinetic Properties

About 12% of a topically administered (forearm) dose of sulconazole 1% cream was estimated to be percutaneously absorbed in humans. This value varied markedly in different animal species.

Therapeutic Use

In controlled, comparative clinical trials of patients with superficial fungal infections of the skin, sulconazole has demonstrated clear superiority over placebo and was generally of similar overall clinical efficacy to clotrimazole, econazole and miconazole. Treatment was normally administered twice daily for between 2 and 5 weeks in these studies. Two studies showed that compared with clotrimazole, sulconazole possessed significantly greater overall clinical efficacy in patients with tinea cruris or tinea pedis, and it appears that sulconazole may relieve some of the symptoms of tinea pedis (erythema, scaling, pruritus and maceration/erosion) more quickly than clotrimazole. The 2 drugs were otherwise found to be of similar efficacy, with mycological cure achieved in over 70% of patients. No significant differences were reported in the results of 2 comparisons with econazole, both drugs achieving very high cure rates in patients with tinea pedis or tinea cruris. Likewise, sulconazole and miconazole were generally of similar overall clinical efficacy, although in 2 studies of patients with tinea pedis sulconazole tended towards superiority, but the differences were not statistically significant. Sulconazole again tended to cause a more rapid relief of some clinical symptoms.

Reported relapse rates 4 to 12 weeks following the end of treatment were low for sulconazole and the other imidazole antifungal drugs tested. Differences that were observed usually favoured sulconazole.

Side Effects

Sulconazole has generally been very well tolerated in clinical trials. In the largest study, involving 323 patients, the overall incidence rate of adverse effects was 3.4%, with redness, irritation, contact dermatitis and pruritus being the most frequently reported. Few patients have withdrawn from sulconazole treatment due to side effects.

Administration

Sulconazole 1% cream should be rubbed gently into the affected and surrounding skin area twice daily. To minimise the risk of reinfection treatment should continue for 3 weeks in Candida infections, tinea cruris, tinea corporis and pityriasis versicolor, and for 4 weeks in patients with tinea pedis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avila JM. Treatment of dermatomycoses with sulconazole 1% nitrate cream or miconazole nitrate 2% cream. Current Therapeutic Research 38: 328–333, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Beggs WH. The effect of antifungal imidazoles on resting cells of Candida parapsilosis. IRCS Medical Science: Biochemistry 11: 677, 1983

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beggs WH. Influence of growth phase on the susceptibility of Candida albicans to butoconazole, oxiconazole, and sulconazole. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 16: 397–399, 1985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clissold SP, Heel RC. Tioconazole: a review of its antimicrobial activity and therapeutic use in superficial mycoses. Drugs 31: 29–51, 1986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fujihara M, Hirakoso K, Harigaya S. Pharmacokinetics of sulconazole nitrate. (1) Fate in rats after application to the skin. Pharmacometrics 28: 145–154, 1984

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gip L, Forsström S. A double-blind parallel study of sulconazole nitrate 1% cream compared with miconazole nitrate 2% cream in dermatophytoses. Mykosen 26: 231–241, 1983

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heel RC, Brogden RN, Speight TM, A very GS. Econazole: a review of its antifungal activity and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs 16: 177–201, 1978

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata K, Yamamoto Y. Studies on the antifungal activities of sulconazole nitrate. I. In vitro antifungal activities. Japanese Journal of Medical Mycology 23: 314–317, 1982

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata K, Yamamoto Y. Studies on the antifungal activities of sulconazole nitrate. II. Influences of various factors on the antifungal activity. Japanese Journal of Medical Mycology 25: 147–157, 1984

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kerridge D. Mode of action of clinically important antifungal drugs. In Rose & Tempest (Eds) Advances in microbial physiology, Vol. 27, pp. 1–72, Academic Press, London, 1986

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lassus A, Forsström S. A double-blind parallel study comparing sulconazole with econazole in the treatment of dermatophytoses. Mykosen 27: 592–598, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lassus A, Forsström S, Salo O. A double-blind comparison of sulconazole nitrate 1% cream with clotrimazole 1% cream in the treatment of dermatophytoses. British Journal of Dermatology 108: 195–198, 1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McVie DH, Littlewood S, Allen BR, Pollock AC, Wood P, et al. Sulconazole versus clotrimazole in the treatment of dermatophytosis. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology 11: 613–618, 1986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nishizawa Y, Ozeki S, Takahashi N. Clinical study of RS 44872 (sulconazole nitrate) solution in dermatomycosis. Japanese Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine 61: 3401–3404, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Odds FC. Laboratory evaluation of antifungal agents: a comparative study of five imidazole derivatives of clinical importance. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 6: 749–761, 1980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odds FC, Abbott AB. Relative inhibition factors: a novel approach to the assessment of antifungal antibiotics in vitro. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 13: 31–43, 1984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odds FC, Webster CE, Abbott AB. Antifungal relative inhibition factors: BAY 1-9139, bifonazole, butoconazole, isoconazole, itraconazole (R51211), oxiconazole, Ro 14-4767/002, sulconazole, terconazole and vibrinazole (BAY n-7133) compared in vitro with nine established antifungal agents. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 14: 105–114, 1984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qadripur S-A. Double-blind parallel comparison of sulconazole nitrate, 1% cream and powder with econazole, 1% cream and powder, in the treatment of cutaneous dermatophytoses. Current Therapeutic Research 35: 753–758, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan VS, Thirumoorthy T. Treatment of cutaneous candidiasis: a double blind parallel comparison of sulconazole nitrate 1% cream and clotrimazole 1% cream. Australian Journal of Dermatology 24: 33–36, 1983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • RS 44872 Study Group. Clinical evaluation of RS 44872 (sulconazole nitrate) cream in dermatomycosis. Nishinihon Journal of Dermatology 46: 769–782, 1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer PR, Brogden RN, Pinder RM, Speight TM, Avery GS. Miconazole: a review of its antifungal activity and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs 9: 406–423, 1975a

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer PR, Brogden RN, Pinder RM, Speight TM, Avery GS. Clotrimazole: a review of its antifungal activity and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs 9: 424–447, 1975b

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sud IJ, Chou D-L, Feingold DS. Effect of free fatty acids on liposome susceptibility to imidazole antifungals. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 16: 660–663, 1979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanenbaum L, Anderson C, Rosenberg MJ, Akers W. 1% sulconazole cream v 2% miconazole cream in the treatment of tinea versicolor. Archives of Dermatology 120: 216–219, 1984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanenbaum L, Anderson C, Rosenberg M, Dorr A. A new treatment for cutaneous candidiasis: sulconazole nitrate cream 1%. International Journal of Dermatology 22: 318–320, 1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanenbaum L, Anderson C, Rosenberg MJ, Howard W, Mc-Daniel W, et al. Sulconazole nitrate 1% cream: a comparison with miconazole in the treatment of tinea pedis and tinea cruris/ corporis. Cutis 30: 105–118, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe S, Shimozuma M, Hei K, Kukita A. Clinical evaluation of RS 44872 (sulconazole nitrate) solution in the treatment of dermatomycosis. Nishinihon Journal of Dermatology 46: 966–972, 1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woscoff A, Carabeli S. Treatment of tinea pedis with sulconazole nitrate 1% cream or miconazole nitrate 2% cream. Current Therapeutic Research 39: 753–757, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi H, Hiratani T, Iwata K. Studies on the mode of action of a new imidazole antimycotic sulconazole. Japanese Journal of Medical Mycology 24: 253–262, 1983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida H, Kasuga O, Yamaguchi T. Studies on antifungal activities of sulconazole. I. In vitro antimicrobial activity. Chemotherapy 32: 477–484, 1984

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benfield, P., Stephen, P. Sulconazole. Drugs 35, 143–153 (1988). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198835020-00004

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198835020-00004

Keywords

Navigation