Skip to main content
Log in

Memory Function — Effects of Different Antihypertensive Drugs

  • Section 3: Quality of Life
  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Improvement in the efficacy of newer antihypertensive agents has resulted in consideration of the side effects of drug therapy. Impairment of memory function resulting from antihypertensive therapy has been clinically suspected. This observation has been supported by a study in which the effects of methyldopa and propranolol on memory function were reported. Recently, memory function has been assessed in a group of patients treated with either a β-blocker (atenolol) or an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (enalapril) in a randomised, observer-blind study in moderate essential hypertension. The patients were assessed, on placebo and after 16 weeks of treatment on active therapy, by use of a series of 4 memory function tests related to everyday life. In the hypertension study group, 13 received atenolol and 12 received enalapril. Similar reduction of diastolic pressure occurred in both groups, but systolic pressure was significantly reduced in the enalapril group (p < 0.05). In the atenolol group memory performance scores were consistently lower than in the placebo phase in 9 of 28 estimates of memory function. In the enalapril group there were no significant changes. The study indicated that atenolol might produce mild memory impairment, whereas enalapril was devoid of any measurable effect on memory function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Betts TA, Alford C. β-Blocking drugs and sleep: a controlled trial. Drugs 25 (Suppl. 2): 268–272, 1983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croog SH, Levine S, Testa MA, Brown B, Bulpitt CJ, et al. The effect of antihypertensive therapy on quality of life. New England Journal of Medicine 1314: 1657–1664, 1986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Elia G, Jacobson L, von Knorring L, et al. Changes in psychopathology in relation to EEG variables and visual average evoked responses (V.AER) in schizophrenic patients treated with penfluridol or thiothixene. Acta Psychiatra Scandinavica 55:309–318, 1977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck MW. Effects of noise, activation level and response dominance on retrieval from semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 104: 143–148, 1975

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser HS, Carr AC. Propranolol psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry 129: 508–509, 1976

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garvey HL, Ram N. Centrally induced hypotensive effects of betaadrenergic blocking drugs. European Journal of Pharmacology 33: 283–294, 1975

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein AG, Change JE. Recognition of complex visual stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics 9: 237–241,1971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond NV, Grozelier JH. Laterality, attention and rate effects in the auditory temporal discrimination of chronic schizophrenics: the effect of treatment with chlorpromazine. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology and Cognate Medical Sciences 30: 91–103, 1978

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley LR, Ungapen S, Davie L, Spencer DJ. The effect of betaadrenergic blocking drugs on speaker’s performance and memory. British Journal of Psychiatry 142: 512–517, 1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heald AF, Ita CE. Distribution in rats of an inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme. SQ 14,225, as studied by whole-body auto-radiography and liquid scintillation counting. Pharmacologist 19: 129, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Jachuck SJ, Brierley H, Jachuck S, Willcox PM. The effect of hypotensive drugs on the quality of life. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 32: 103–105, 1982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter I, Richardson PJ, Wyke MA. Differential effects of atenolol and enalapril on memory during treatment for essential hypertension. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 21: 641–645, 1986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milner B. Visual recognition and recall after right temporal lobe excision in man. Neuropsychologia 6: 191–209, 1968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner B. In Pribham KH, Broadbent ED (Eds) Biology of memory, pp. 29–50, Academic Press, New York, 1970

  • Olajide S, Lader M. Psychologropic effects of enalapril maleate in normal volunteers. Psychopharmacology 86: 374–376, 1985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patel L, Turner P. Central actions of beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs in man. Medical Research Reviews 1: 387–410, 1981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell EW. A multiple scoring method for the assessment of complex memory function. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology 43: 800–880, 1975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salem SA, McDevitt DG. Central effects of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 33: 52–57, 1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S, Hotchkiss E, Saravay SM, Bayer C, Ramsay P, et al. Impairment of memory function by antihypertensive medication. Archives of General Psychology 40: 1109–1112, 1983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waal HJ. Propranolol-induced depression. British Medical Journal 2: 50, 1967

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richardson, P.J., Wyke, M.A. Memory Function — Effects of Different Antihypertensive Drugs. Drugs 35 (Suppl 5), 80–85 (1988). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198800355-00014

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198800355-00014

Keywords

Navigation