Skip to main content
Log in

In Vitro Activity of Cefotaxime against Clinically Significant Pathogens

  • Section 1: The Current Situation on Bacterial Resistance to Third Generation Cephalosporins
  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The present in vitro antibacterial activities of cefotaxime and 8 other cephalosporins (cefoperazone, cefmenoxime, cefpiramide, latamoxef cefamandole, cefmetazole, cefotiam and cephazolin) were evaluated simultaneously in 384 strains of Gram-positive cocci, 595 strains of Enterobacteriaceae, 240 strains of non-fermenters and 143 strains of anaerobes and miscellaneous organisms. The results were expressed as minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range, MIC90 and MIC90. Of the β-lactams, cefotaxime and latamoxef exhibited the highest activity against a wide variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. MIC90 of cefotaxime, however, for species of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Xanthomonas maltophilia, enterococci, Bacteroides sp. and Clostridium difficile were more than 100 mg/L. Cefpiramide and cefoperazone were generally less active than these 2 agents. All strains were tested for β-lactamase production by the cefinase disc method and the relationship of susceptibility to β-lactams was evaluated in each species. The need was demonstrated for periodic susceptibility testing to be performed to better guide empirical antimicrobial therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bourgault A-M, Roseblatt JE. Characterization of anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli by using rapid slide tests for β-lactamase production. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 9: 654–656, 1979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carmine AA, et al. Cefotaxime. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacological properties and therapeutic use. Drugs 25: 223–289, 1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goto S, et al. Methods for determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Chemotherapy 29: 76–79, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieg NR, Holt JG. In Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol 1. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz TO, et al. Comparative in vitro activity of moxalactam, cefotaxime, cefoperazone, piperacillin and aminoglycosides against Gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 18: 645–648, 1980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lang SDR, Edwards DJ, Dwack DT. Comparison of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, and moxalactam (LY127935) against aerobic Gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 17: 488–493, 1980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsuhashi S, Inoue M. Masuyoshi S. Antibacterial activity of cefotaxime. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 6 (Suppl.): 37–47, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miwatani T, et al. The antibacterial activity of new cephem antibiotics against clinical isolates. A comparison of the antibacterial activity of cefotaxime with other antibiotics. Japanese Journal of Antibiotics XXXVI: 260–276, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery K, Raymundo L Jr, Drew WL. Chromogenic cephalosporirt spot test to detect β-lactamase in clinically significant bacteria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 9: 205–207, 1979

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakashio S, et al. Antimicrobial activity of cefotaxime against various clinical pathogens. Journal of New Remedies and Clinics 31: 849–853, 1982a

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakashio S, et al. Antimicrobial activity of cefoperazone against various clinical pathogens. Journal of New Remedies and Clinics 31: 1027–1031, 1982b

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakashio S, et al. Antimicrobial activity of cefmetazole against various clinical pathogens. Progress in Medicine 2: 1330–1334, 1982c

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakashio S, et al. Evaluation of ‘Enteogram’ system for rapid identification of the Enterobacteriaceae. Clinical Microbiology 12: 605–610, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakashio S, et al. Antimicrobial activity of ofloxacin, new pyridone carboxylic acid, against various clinical pathogens. Progress in Medicine 6: 565–572, 1986a

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakashio S, Oura H, Ifokawa C, Miyamoto T, Sakama T. Evaluation of ‘Nonfergram’ system for rapid identification of glucose-nonfermentative Gram-negative rods. Clinical Microbiology 13: 373–380, 1986b

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakashio S, et al Serotype and antibiotic susceptibility of Siaphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas acntginosa isolated from burned patients, with the special reference to hospital infection. Journal of Japanese Association of Infectious Diseases 60: 222–230, 1986c

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker RH, Park S-Y. Safety of cefotaxime and other new beta-lactam antibiotics. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 14 (Suppl. B): 331–335, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rolinson GN. β-Mactam antibiotics. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 17: 5–36, 1986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schrinner E, et al. Antibacterial activity of cefotaxime and other newer cephalospofins. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 6 (Suppl. A): 25–30, 1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verbist L. Comparison of in vitro activities of eight β-lactarhase-stable cephalosporins against β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 19: 407–413, 1981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakashio, S., Nakamura, M. In Vitro Activity of Cefotaxime against Clinically Significant Pathogens. Drugs 35 (Suppl 2), 14–21 (1988). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198800352-00006

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198800352-00006

Keywords

Navigation