Summary
Visual reaction time and choice reaction time were determined after combined physical and mental stress to examine the influence of the β- adrenoceptor blocking agent atenolol on driving- related abilities. Electro- oculography was used in 2 groups of males in a double- blind crossover study, after three days of placebo or 50mg of atenolol. In the first group of subjects in both periods of the experimental design, visual reaction time was longer with placebo than during treatment with atenolol; their interquartile differences as measures of the concentration of the subjects showed the same effect. The beneficial effects of treatment were small, but highly significant. In the second group there was no effect of atenolol on visual reaction lime, choice reaction time or the number of correct reactions per time period. From both studies it is concluded that atenolol does not impair either reaction times or concentration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Broadhurst, A.D.: The effect of propranolol on human psychomotor performance. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine 51: 176–179 (1980).
Cruickshank, J.M.: How safe are beta-blockers? Drugs 25 (Suppl. 2): 331–340 (1983).
Grizzle, J.E.: The two-period change-over design and its use in clinical trials. Biometrics 21: 467–480 (1965).
Harms, D.; Pachale, E. and Nechvatal, D.: Influence of the beta-blocking drug atenolol and other medications on visual reaction time. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine 52: S31–S34 (1981).
Neil-Dwyer, G.: The clinical importance of lipid solubility in beta-blockers. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine 52: S19–S22 (1981).
Schenk, G.K.; Lang, E. and Anlauf, M.: Beta-receptor blocking therapy in hypertensive patients — effects on vigilance and behaviour. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine 52: S35–S39 (1981).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harms, D., Pachale, E. The Effect of Atenolol on Reaction Times and Concentration. Drugs 25 (Suppl 2), 265–267 (1983). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198300252-00081
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198300252-00081