Skip to main content
Log in

β-Blockers in Asthma

  • Section 5: Cardioselectivity
  • Published:
Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The purpose of the first part of this study was to determine the dose of metoprolol which produced an equal degree of β1-blockade over 24 hours (assessed by suppression of exercise heart rate) to atenolol 100mg daily in normal volunteers. Both drugs had been given for 5 days. The equivalent dose was 300mg once daily or 100mg twice daily.

The second part set out initially to investigate the effects on respiratory function in 14 asthmatic hypertensive patients of single doses of propranolol 40mg, atenolol 100mg and metoprolol 100mg. Propranolol had a greater deleterious effect and blocked the effects of salbutamol significantly more than either atenolol or metoprolol, which were very similar. Atenolol 100mg daily, metoprolol 100mg twice daily and placebo were then given for 3 weeks each under blind, randomised, crossover conditions and the effects assessed by diary card and peak flow rate. Atenolol caused significantly less aggravation of asthma than metoprolol. However, no β-blocker is completely safe to give to asthmatics and they should be avoided if possible. If a β-blocker must be given to an asthmatic, atenolol given with a β2-stimulant bronchodilator appears to be the drug of choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astrom, H.: Comparison of the effects on airway conductance of a new selective beta-adrenergic blocking drug, atenolol, and propranolo) in asthmatic subjects. Scandinavian Journal of Respiratory Diseases 56: 292–296 (1975).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M.K.; Berrill, W.T.; Cruickshank, J.M. and Sterling, G.M.: A comparison of four beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists in patients with asthma. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 5: 415–419 (1978).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comerford, M.B. and Besterman, E.M.M.: Relative activity of atenolol and metoprolol. British Medical Journal 3: 260 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decalmer, P.B.S.; Chatterjee, S.S.; Cruickshank, J.M.; Benson, M.K.. and Sterling, G.M.: Beta-blockers and asthma. British Heart Journal 40: 184–189 (1978).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harry, J.D.; Cruickshank, J.M.; Young, J. and Barker, N.: Relative activities of atenolol and metoprolol on the cardiovascular system of man. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 20: 9–15 (1981).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsson, G.; Svedmyr, N. and Thiringer, G.: Effects of intravenous propranolol and metoprolol and their interaction with isoprenaline on pulmonary function, heart rate and blood pressure in asthmatics. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 6: 175–180 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M.J.; John, V.A.; Quarterman, C.P. and Welling, P.G.: A single and multiple dose pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of conventional and slow-release metoprolol. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 17: 87–92 (1980).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyngstam, O. and Ryden, L.: Metoprolol and atenolol for mild-to-moderate hypertension. Lancet 2: 634 (1979).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tattersfield, A.E.; Mackay, A.D.; Cribbin, H.R. and Baldwin, C.J.: How cardioselective are the new beta-blocking drugs? Sixth Scientific Meeting of the International Society of Hypertension: Göteborg, 173 (1979).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lawrence, D.S., Sahay, J.N., Chatterjee, S.S. et al. β-Blockers in Asthma. Drugs 25 (Suppl 2), 232–236 (1983). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198300252-00067

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-198300252-00067

Keywords

Navigation