Summary
The development of the conventional indirect method of blood pressure measurement was essentially complete by 1905, 70 years ago. The method has certain shortcomings, but these can be offset to a large degree by control over conditions of measurement, provision of proper apparatus, and intensive training of observers. Still, there are potential advantages which might be met by an acceptable automated device. An experimental evaluation of five such devices led to rejection of each of them on grounds of inadequate measurement performance, mechanical failures, or both. Only the Random-Zero device (Hawksley), among the instruments tested, gave good performance in comparison with the conventional method and was free of serious mechanical disadvantages. Evaluation of new devices will continue to be of great importance, and proposed guidelines for such studies are reviewed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benson, H.: Methods of blood pressure recording: 1733–1971; In Onesti, Kim and Moyer (Eds) Hypertension: Mechanisms and Management, The Twenty-Sixth Hahnemann Symposium (Grune and Stratton, New York 1973).
Evans, J.G. and Rose, G.: Hypertension. British Medical Bulletin 27: 37–42 (1971).
Feinleib, M.; Labarthe, D.; Shekelle, R. and Kuller, L.: Criteria for evaluation of blood automated blood pressure measuring devices for use in hypertensive screening programs. A report of the Committee on Criteria and Methods of the Council on Epidemiology, American Heart Association. Circulation 49: 6–11 (1974).
Geddes, L.A.: The direct and indirect measurement of blood pressure (Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago 1970).
Holland, W.W.: The reduction of observer variability in the measurement of blood pressure; in Pemberton (Ed.), Epidemiology: Reports on Research and Teaching, 1962 (Oxford University Press, London 1963).
Kirkendall, W.M.; Burton, A.C.; Epstein, F.H. and Freis, E.D.: Recommendations for human blood pressure determination by sphygmomanometers. American Heart Association. Circulation 36: 980–988 (1967).
Labarthe, D.R.; Hawkins, CM. and Remington, R.D.: Evaluation of performance of selected devices for measuring blood pressure. American Journal of Cardiology 32: 546–553 (1973).
Remington, R.D. (for the Hypertension Detection and Foliowup Program Investigators): The Hypertension Detection and Followup Program (USA); in Epidemiology and Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases, INSERM 21: 185–194 (1973).
Rose, G.A.: Standardization of observers in blood pressure measurement. Lancet 1: 673–674 (1965).
United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Task Force on the Assessment of Automated Indirect Blood Pressure Measuring Devices for Mass Screening: Report (In press, 1976).
Wilcox, J.: Practice Blood Pressure Readings. Film Catalog No. M1582, National Medical Audiovisual Center, Atlanta, Georgia (1961).
Wright, B.M. and Dore, CF.: A Random-Zero sphygmomanometer. Lancet 1: 337–338 (1970).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Labarthe, D.R. New Instruments for Measuring Blood Pressure. Drugs 11 (Suppl 1), 48–57 (1976). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-197600111-00015
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-197600111-00015