Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Recommendations of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Hepatic or Renal Impairment

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is the prodrug of the acyclic nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor tenofovir that is indicated for use in the treatment of HIV. Tenofovir is eliminated as unchanged drug in the urine, with a significant component of active tubular secretion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment, both of which are common in HIV-infected individuals.

Patients and methods: HIV seronegative and otherwise healthy subjects with varying degrees of renal or hepatic function were recruited, and tenofovir pharmacokinetics were evaluated over 48 hours (hepatic impairment study) and 96 hours (renal impairment study) following a single tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300mg dose. Subjects with hepatic dysfunction were categorised based upon Child-Pugh-Turcotte score, and subjects with renal impairment were categorised based upon their calculated creatinine clearance (CLCR) using the Cockcroft-Gault method.

Results: As expected for a renally eliminated drug, subjects with and without hepatic impairment displayed similar tenofovir systemic exposures without evidence of substantial alterations in drug disposition, and therefore no dosage adjustments were warranted in these patients. In contrast, in subjects with renal impairment, two distinct groups were observed: (i) subjects with CLCR ≥50 mL/min in whom tenofovir pharmacokinetics were similar to subjects with normal renal function; and (ii) subjects with CLCR <50 mL/min (moderate or severe impairment) in which tenofovir renal clearance was substantially reduced and thus drug exposures increased. Subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) demonstrated no extrarenal route of tenofovir elimination. Simulations of once-daily or modified dosing regimens demonstrated the need for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate dose-interval adjustment to prevent unnecessary drug accumulation. In patients with ESRD, high-flux haemodialysis efficiently removed tenofovir, with an elimination rate of 134 mL/min and an extraction coefficient of 54%.

Conclusion: No tenofovir disoproxil fumarate dose adjustment is warranted in the setting of hepatic impairment. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300mg every 48 hours in individuals with moderate renal impairment and twice weekly corresponding to every 72–96 hours in those with severe renal impairment is recommended in order to target steady-state tenofovir exposures consistent with those observed in subjects with normal renal function receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300mg once daily. For subjects receiving thrice-weekly 4-hour maintenance haemodialysis sessions, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300mg administered every 7 days after a haemodialysis session is recommended. HIV-infected patients with significant end-organ dysfunction should be monitored in accordance with clinical practice, including close management of their viral suppression and clinical chemistries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Table I
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Palella Jr FJ, Delaney KM, Moorman AC, et al. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med 1998; 338(13): 853–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents [online]. Available from URL: http://AIDSinfo.nih.gov [Accessed 2005 Oct 6]

  3. Miller MD, Margot N, Lu B, et al. Genotypic and phenotypic predictors of the magnitude of response to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment in antiretroviral-experienced patients. J Infect Dis 2004 Mar 1; 189(5): 837–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gallant JE, Staszewski S, Pozniak AL, et al. Efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF vs stavudine in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients: a 3-year randomized trial. JAMA 2004 Jul 14; 292(2): 191–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gallant JE, DeJesus E, Arribas JR, et al. Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV. N Engl J Med 2006; 354(3): 251–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Barditch-Crovo P, Deeks SG, Collier A, et al. Phase I/II trial of the pharmacokinetics, safety, and antiretroviral activity of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in HIV-1 infected adults. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001; 45(10): 2733–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kearney BP, Flaherty JF, Shah J. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: clinical pharmacology and pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacokinet 2004; 43(9): 595–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rodriguez-Rosado R, Garcia-Samaniego J, Soriano V. Hepatotoxicity after introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy [letter]. AIDS 1998 Jul 9; 12(10): 1256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sulkowski MS, Thomas DL, Chaisson RE, et al. Hepatotoxicity associated with antiretroviral therapy in adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus and the role of hepatitis C or B virus infection. JAMA 2000 Jan 5; 283(1): 74–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. D’Agati V, Appel GB. Renal pathology of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Semin Nephrol 1998 Jul; 18(4): 406–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Winston JA, Bruggeman LA, Ross MD, et al. Nephropathy and establishment of a renal reservoir of HIV type 1 during primary infection. N Engl J Med 2001 Jun 28; 344(26): 1979–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kearney BP, Liaw S, Yale K, et al. Pharmacokinetics following single dose administration of tenofovir DF in subjects with renal impairment [poster]. Sixth International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection; 2002 Nov 17–21; Glasgow

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kearney BP, Benhamou Y, Flaherty J, et al. Tenofovir pharmacokinetics in hepatic impairment and drug interaction potential with agents used to treat viral hepatitis [poster no. 600]. 11th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 2004 Feb 8–11; San Francisco (CA)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976; 16(1): 31–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kearney BP, Ramanathan S, Cheng AK, et al. Systemic and renal pharmacokinetics of adefovir and tenofovir upon coadministration. J Clin Pharmacol 2005 Aug; 45(8): 935–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Viread. VIREAD® (US Prescribing Information). Foster City (CA): Gilead Sciences Inc, 2005

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

These data were presented in part at the Sixth International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection, Glasgow UK, November 2002 and the 11th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, San Francisco, CA, USA, February 2004.

These studies were conducted by Gilead Sciences, Inc. The authors are employees of Gilead Sciences, Inc. The authors would like to thank the subjects who participated, the investigators, Sandra Hayashi, Dion Coakley, Li Hsu, Marianne Poblenz and Blake Doherty for their valuable contributions to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian P. Kearney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kearney, B.P., Yale, K., Shah, J. et al. Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Recommendations of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Hepatic or Renal Impairment. Clin Pharmacokinet 45, 1115–1124 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200645110-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200645110-00005

Keywords

Navigation