Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Author’s Reply

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bustad A, Terziivanov D, Leary R, et al. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies. Clin Pharmacokinet 2006; 45(4): 365–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Girard P, Mentré F. A comparison of estimation methods in nonlinear mixed effects models using a blind analysis [online]. 14th meeting of the Population Approach Group in Europe; 2005 Jun 16–17; Pamplona. Available from URL: http://www.page-meeting.org [Accessed 2006 Jun 28]

  3. Tsuchiwata S, Mihara K, Yafune A, et al. Evaluation of Bayesian estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters. Ther Drug Monit 2005; 27(1): 18–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Applied Pharmacokinetics, USC Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA

    Roger Jelliffe

Authors
  1. Roger Jelliffe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jelliffe, R. The Author’s Reply. Clin Pharmacokinet 45, 852–854 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200645080-00008

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200645080-00008

Keywords

Search

Navigation