Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Parametric and Nonparametric Population Methods

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Bustad A, Terziivanov D, Leary R, et al. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies. Clin Pharmacokinet 2006; 45(4): 365–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leary RH, Jelliffe RW, Schumitzky A, et al. A unified parametric/nonparametric approach to population PK/PD modeling [online]. Annual meeting of the Population Approach Group in Europe; 2002 Jun 6–7; Paris. Available from URL: http://www.lapk.org [Accessed 2006 Jun 28]

  3. Jelliffe R, Schumitzky A, Bayard D, et al. Model-based, goal-oriented, individualised drug therapy: linkage of population modeling, new ‘multiple model’ dosage design, Bayesian feedback and individualised target goals. Clin Pharmacokinet 1998; 34(1): 57–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jelliffe R, Schumitzky A, Van Guilder M. Population pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics modeling: parametric and nonparametric methods. Ther Drug Monit 2000; 22: 354–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Steimer JL, Mallet A, Golmard JL, et al. Alternative approaches to estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters: comparison with the nonlinear mixed-effect model. Drug Metab Rev 1984; 15: 265–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mentré F, Gomeni R. A two-step interactive algorithm for estimation in nonlinear mixed-effect models with an evaluation in population pharmacokinetics. J Biopharm Stat 1995; 5: 141–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bennett JE, Wakefield JC. A comparison of a Bayesian population method with two methods as implemented in commercially available software. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1996; 24: 403–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Girard P, Mentré F. A comparison of estimation methods in nonlinear mixed effects models using a blind analysis [online]. 14th meeting of the Population Approach Group in Europe; 2005 Jun 16–17; Pamplona. Available from URL: http://www.page-meeting.org [Accessed 2006 Jun 28]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Delivery, Groningen University Institute for Drug Exploration, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Johannes H. Proost

  2. Department of Anesthesiology, Research Group for Experimental Anesthesiology and Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Johannes H. Proost & Douglas J. Eleveld

Authors
  1. Johannes H. Proost
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Douglas J. Eleveld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Proost, J.H., Eleveld, D.J. Parametric and Nonparametric Population Methods. Clin Pharmacokinet 45, 851–852 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200645080-00007

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200645080-00007

Keywords

Search

Navigation