Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Cilostazol on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Warfarin

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the effect of cilostazol administration on warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics following a single 25mg dose of warfarin.

Design

A randomised double-blind 2-period crossover with healthy volunteers receiving either 100mg cilostazol twice daily for 13 days or matching placebo twice daily for 13 days, and the other treatment 21 days later. A single 25mg dose of warfarin was given 14 days prior to the start of the study, and 7 days after the cilostazol and placebo treatments.

Study Participants

15 normal healthy male volunteers.

Outcome Measures

Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters for (R)-and (S)-warfarin, the area under the curve of the prothrombin time (AUCPT), activated partial thromboplastin time (AUCaPTT), Ivy bleeding times, unbound fraction (fu) of cilostazol, and warfarin were determined for each individual.

Results

For (R)- and (S)-warfarin, the 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of the geometric means (90% CI) of the maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve were between 0.88 to 1.03. The 90% CI for the AUCPT and AUCaPTT was between 0.95 and 1.06. For Ivy bleeding time, the 90% CI for the ratios of the geometric means ranged between 0.71 and 1.22. The fu of cilostazol did not differ significantly between the 2 treatments. There was a 17% increase in the fu of warfarin (p < 0.05), which was not clinically significant.

Conclusions

Coadministration of warfarin with twice daily administration of cilostazol 100mg did not alter (R)- and (S)-warfarin pharmacokinetics, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, Ivy bleeding times, or cilostazol protein binding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strandness D, Eugene MD, Braunwald E, et al., editors. Vascular diseases of the extremities. Principles of internal medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1987: 1040–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tsuchikane E, Katoh O, Sumitsuji S, et al. Impact of cilostazol on intimai proliferation following directional coronary atherectomy: a prospective randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29(2 Suppl. A): 397A.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elam MB, Heckman J, Crouse JR, et al. Effect of the novel antiplatelet agent cilostazol on plasma lipoproteins in patients with intermittent claudication. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1998; 18(12): 1942–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Black DJ, Kunze KL, Wienkers LC, et al. Warfarin-fluconazole II a metabolically based interaction: in vivo studies. Drug Metab Dispos 1996; 24(4): 422–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Suri A, Forbes WP, Bramer SL. The effects of CYP3A inhibition on the metabolism of cilostazol. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999; 37 Suppl. 2: 61–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Abbas R, Chow CP, Browder NJ, et al. In vitro metabolism and interaction of cilostazol with human hepatic cytochrome P450 isoforms. Hum Exp Toxicol. In press.

  7. Duursema L, Muller FO, Hundt HKL, et al. Model to detect warfarin-drug interactions in man. Drug Invest 1992; 4(5): 395–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Benedek IH, King SYP, Powell RJ. Effect of moricizine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 1992; 32(6): 558–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fu CJ, Tata PNV, Bramer SL. Simultaneous quantitative determination of cilostazol and its metabolites in plasma by high performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci App 1999; 728(2): 251–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bramer SL, Forbes WP. Effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of cilostazol. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999; 37 Suppl. 2: 25–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tata PNV, Bramer SL, Ji AL. Plasma protein binding and displacement studies of cilostazol [abstract no. 3281]. American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists Annual Meeting; 1997 Nov 2–6; Boston. Pharm Res 1997; 14 Suppl. 11: S555.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gibaldi M, Perrier D. Pharmacokinetics. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schuirmann DJ. Comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1987; 15(6): 657–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bramer SL, Forbes WP, Mallikaarjun S. Cilostazol pharmacokinetics after single and multiple oral doses in healthy males and patients with intermittent claudication resulting from peripheral arterial disease. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999; 37 Suppl. 2: 1–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven L. Bramer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mallikaarjun, S., Bramer, S.L. Effect of Cilostazol on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Warfarin. Clin Pharmacokinet 37 (Suppl 2), 79–86 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-199937002-00009

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-199937002-00009

Keywords

Navigation