Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of the Distribution Volume that can be Used to Calculate the Intravenous Loading Dose

  • Leading Article
  • Published:
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An intravenous loading dose is given to rapidly achieve a desired drug concentration in the blood. A loading dose calculated with the volume of distribution (Vd) at steady state will result in high peak concentrations and possibly serious adverse effects. A loading dose based on the central compartment Vd (Vc) followed by a maintenance infusion may also miss the target drug concentration and cause serious adverse effects. The Vd can be viewed as a time-dependent variable that expands from the Vc immediately after injection, to eventually include the steady-state Vd.

If the loading dose is calculated from a Vd determined after the time of peak effect (tmax), then the actual concentration will exceed the target concentration at the tmax. If a loading dose is calculated from a Vd before the peak effect occurs, the actual concentration will be insufficient to achieve the target concentration at tmax. A loading dose based on the Vd at the tmax will accurately achieve the concentration at the tmax without unexpected adverse effects.

To determine the Vd at peak effect, it is necessary that an effect can be measured, the peak effect can be detected and the plasma concentrations are sampled frequently enough to quantify the plasma concentrations at the tmax. For drugs that attain an ultra-fast effect (1 to 2 minutes), arterial samples need to be measured. If the onset of effect is intermediate or slow, venous blood can be sampled as the arterial and venous concentrations may be similar at the tmax.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schüttler J, Schwilden H, Stoeckel H. Pharmacokinetics as applied to total intravenous anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1983; 38S: 53–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barratt RL, Graham GG, Torda TA. Kinetics of thiopentone in relation to the site of sampling. Br J Anaesth. 1984; 56: 1385–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Helmers H, Van Peer A, Woestenborghs R, et al. Alfentanil kinetics in the elderly. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1984; 36: 239–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lemmens HJM, Bovill JG, Burm AGL, et al. Alfentanil infusion in the elderly: prolonged computer infusion of alfentanil in the elderly surgical patient. Anaesthesia. 1988; 43: 850–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiou WL. The phenomenon and rationale of marked dependence of drug concentration on blood sampling site: implications in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, toxicology and therapeutics: I. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1989; 17: 175–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiou WL. The phenomenon and rationale of marked dependence of drug concentration on blood sampling site: implications in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, toxicology and therapeutics: II. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1989; 17: 275–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. DiStefano JJ. Optimized blood sampling protocols and sequential design of kinetic experiments. Am J Physiol. 1981; 240: R259–65.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ducharme J, Varin F, Bevan DR, et al. Importance of early blood sampling on vecuronium pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1993; 24: 507–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Raemer DB, Buschman A, Varvel JR, et al. The prospective use of population pharmacokinetics in a computer driven infusion system for alfentanil. Anesthesiology. 1990; 73: 66–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shafer SL, Varvel JR, Aziz N, et al. Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered by computer-controlled infusion pump. Anesthesiology. 1990; 73: 1091–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barvais L, Cantraine F, D’Hollander A, et al. Predictive accuracy of continuous alfentanil infusion in volunteers: variability of different pharmacokinetic sets. Anesth Analg. 1993; 77: 801–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Coetzee JF, Glen JB, Wium CA, et al. Pharmacokinetic model selection for target controlled infusions of propofol: assessment of three parameter sets. Anesthesiology. 1995; 82: 1328–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vaughan DP, Tucker GT. General derivation of the ideal intravenous drug input required to achieve and maintain a constant plasma drug concentration: theoretical application to lignocaine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1976; 10: 433–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chiou WL. Potential pitfalls in the conventional pharmacokinetic studies: effects of the initial mixing of drug in blood and the pulmonary first-pass elimination. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1979; 7: 527–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roerig DL, Kotrly KJ, Dawson CA, et al. First-past uptake of verapamil, diazepam, and thiopental in the human lung. Anesth Analg. 1989; 69: 461–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Taeger K, Weninger E, Schmelzer F, et al. Pulmonary kinetics of fentanyl and alfentanil in surgical patients. Br J Anaesth. 1988; 61: 425–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Niazi S. Volume of distribution as a function of time. J Pharm Sci. 1976; 65: 452–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shafer SL, Gregg KM. Algorithms to rapidly achieve and maintain stable drug concentrations at the site of drug effect with a computer-controlled infusion pump. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1992; 20: 147–69.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Henthorn TK, Krejcie TC, Shanks CA, et al. Time-dependent distribution volume and kinetics of the pharmacodynamic effector site. J Pharm Sci. 1992; 81: 1136–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Minto CF, Schnider TW, Shafer SL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. II. Model application. Anesthesiology. 1997; 86: 24–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Minto CF, Schnider TW, Egan TD, et al. Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. I. Model development. Anesthesiology. 1997; 86: 10–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Murphy MR, Hug CC. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous morphine in patients anesthetized with enflurane-nitrous oxide. Anesthesiology. 1981; 54: 187–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Scott JC, Stanski DR. Decreased fentanyl and alfentanil dose requirements with age: a simultaneous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987; 240: 159–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Inturrisi CE, Colburn WA. Application of pharmacokineticpharmacodynamic modeling to analgesia. In: Foley KM, Inturrisi CE, editors. Advances in pain research and therapy: opioid analgesics in the management of clinical pain. New York: Raven Press, 1986: 441–52.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rosow C. Pharmacology of opioid analgetic agents. In: Rogers MC, Tinker JH, Covino BG, et al., editors. Principles and practice of anesthesiology. StLouis: Mosby Year Book, 1993: 1155–83.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hill HF, Chapman CR, Saeger LS, et al. Steady-state infusions of opioids in human. II. Concentration-effect relationships and therapeutic margins. Pain. 1990; 43: 69–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harry J. M. Lemmens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wada, D.R., Drover, D.R. & Lemmens, H.J.M. Determination of the Distribution Volume that can be Used to Calculate the Intravenous Loading Dose. Clin Pharmacokinet 35, 1–7 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-199835010-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-199835010-00001

Keywords

Navigation