References
Sheiner LB. The intellectual health of clinical drug evaluation. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1991; 50: 4–9
Peck CC. Clinical new drug development: how golden are the eggs? Boerhaave Professorship Inaugural Lecture, Leiden University, The Netherlands, 25 Mar 1994
Breimer DD. The relevance of the application of PK/PD modelling concepts. Keynote lecture, 2nd International Symposium on Measurement and Kinetics of In Vivo Drug Effects: 1994 Apr 14–16; Leiden, The Netherlands
Peck CC, Barr WH, Benet LZ, et al. Opportunities for the integration of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicokinetics in rational drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992; 51: 465–73
Sheiner LB, Tozer TN. Clinical pharmacokinetics: the use of plasma concentrations of drugs. In: Melmon KL, Morelli HF, editors. Clinical pharmacology: basic principles of therapeutics. New York: Macmillan; 1978: Chap. 3, 71–109
Collins JM, Grieshaber CK, Chabner BA. Pharmacologically guided phase I clinical trials based upon preclinical drug development. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 1321–6
Holford NHG, Williams PEO, Muirhead GJ, et al. Population pharmacodynamics of romazarit. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 39: 313–20
Vozeh S, Kewitz G, Perruchoud A, et al. Theophylline serum concentrations and therapeutic effect in severe acute bronchial obstruction: the optimal use of intravenously administered theophylline. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982; 125: 181–4
Holford NHG, Black P, Briant R, et al. Theophylline target concentration in severe airways obstruction — 10 or 20 mg/L? A randomised concentration-controlled trial. Clin Pharmacokinet 1993; 25: 495–505
Holford NHG, Hashimoto Y, Sheiner LB. Time and theophylline concentration help explain the recovery of peak flow following acute airways obstruction. Population analysis of a randomised concentration controlled trial. Clin Pharmacokinet 1993; 25: 506–15
Sanathan L, Peck CC. The randomized concentration-controlled trial: an evaluation of its sample size efficiency. Controlled Clin Trials 1991; 12: 780–94
Levy G. Concentration-controlled versus concentration-defined trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993; 53: 385
Levy G. Rebuttal: Concentration-controlled versus concentrationdefined trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993; 53: 387
Peck CC. Reply: Concentration-controlled versus concentrationdefined trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993; 53: 385–7
Endrenyi L, Zha J. Comparative efficiencies of randomized concentration- and dose-controlled trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1994; 56: 331–8
Levy G, Ebling WF, Forrest A. Concentration- or effect-controlled trials with sparse data. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1994; 56: 1–8
Holford NHG, Peck CC. Population pharmacodynamics and drug development. In: Van Boxtel C, Holford NHG, Danhof M, editors. The in vivo study of drug action. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1992: 401–13
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holford, N.H.G. The Target Concentration Approach to Clinical Drug Development. Clin-Pharmacokinet 29, 287–291 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-199529050-00001
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-199529050-00001