Abstract
Levodopa is available in three forms: immediate-release, orally disintegrating and sustained-release tablets. Levodopa is metabolised in the gastrointestinal tract, kidney and liver by aromatic acid dopa decarboxylase using pyridoxine as a cofactor. Approximately 70–80% of the dose is eliminated in the urine. Central conversion of levodopa to dopamine likely occurs at surviving dopaminergic terminals and at serotonergic and adrenergic nerve terminals that contain decarboxylase. Dopamine is metabolised by catechol-O-methyltransferase and monoamine oxidase. The major metabolites of dopamine are homovanillic acid and dihydroxyphenylacetic acid.
Levodopa remains the most efficacious pharmacological treatment for the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Results of current levodopa trials suggest that treatment with levodopa at the onset of disease provides superior motor and functional control compared with dopamine receptor agonists. Moreover, levodopa is generally better tolerated with a lower incidence of gastrointestinal and neuropsychiatric adverse effects. The debate over the role of levodopa in the treatment of PD is fuelled by the results of in vitro studies that show generation of free radicals by levodopa and its toxic effects on cell cultures. Levodopa has also consistently been shown to produce motor fluctuations (in particular dyskinesias) sooner than has been observed in PD patients, especially younger patients, given dopamine agonists initially. However, the cumulative body of knowledge thus far does not show definitive evidence that levodopa is neurotoxic to parkinsonian patients.
In older PD patients with lesser risk of motor fluctuations, levodopa may be used initially, and perhaps solely, in demented PD patients and those at higher risk of developing neuropsychiatric adverse effects. In young parkinsonian patients with mild motor dysfunction, use of levodopa may be delayed or the dosage minimised. However, because of levodopa’s superior efficacy, when a rapid and sustained symptomatic improvement is required because of significant motor disability, levodopa may be used as the first-line agent regardless of age.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
References
Ehringer H, Hornykiewicz O. Distribution of noradrenaline and dopamine (3-hydroxytyramine) in the human brain and their behavior in diseases of the extrapyramidal system [in German]. Klin Wochenschr 1960; 38: 1236–9
Birkmayer W, Hornykiewicz O. The L-3,4-dioxyphenylalanine (DOPA)-effect in Parkinson-akinesia [in German]. Wien Klin Wochenschr 1961; 73: 787–8
Barbeau A, Sourkes T, Murphy G. Les catecholamines dans la maladie de Parkinson. In: DeAjuriaguerra J, editor. Monoamines et systeme nerveux central. Paris: Masson, 1962: 925–7
Cotzias GC. L-Dopa for Parkinsonism [letter]. N Engl J Med 1968; 278(11): 630
Cotzias GC, Van Woert MH, Schiffer LM. Aromatic amino acids and modification of parkinsonism. N Engl J Med 1967 Feb 16; 276(7): 374–9
Tolosa E, Marti MJ, Valldeoriola F, et al. History of levodopa and dopamine agonists in Parkinson’s disease treatment. Neurology 1998; 50 (6 Suppl. 6): S2–10; discussion S44-18
Cotzias GC, Papavasiliou PS, Gellene R. Modification of Parkinsonism: chronic treatment with L-dopa. N Engl J Med 1969; 2807): 337–45
Markham CH, Treciokas LJ, Diamond SG. Parkinson’s disease and levodopa: a five-year follow-up and review. West J Med 1974; 121(3): 188–206
Nyholm D, Aquilonius SM. Levodopa infusion therapy in Parkinson disease: state of the art in 2004. Clin Neuropharmacol 2004; 27(5): 245–56
Product Information: Sinemet®, carbidopa/levodopa. Whitehouse Station (NJ): Merck and Co., 2002
Bredberg E, Tedroff J, Aquilonius SM, et al. Pharmacokinetics and effects of levodopa in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1990; 39(4): 385–9
Okereke CS. Role of integrative pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic optimization strategy in the management of Parkinson’s disease patients experiencing motor fluctuations with levodopa. J Pharm Pharm Sci 2002; 5(2): 146–61
Goldberg LI, Rajfer SI. Dopamine receptors: applications in clinical cardiology. Circulation 1985; 75: 245–8
Pfeiffer R. Optimization of levodopa therapy. Neurology 1992; 42(Suppl. 1): 39–43
Koller WC, Hubble JP. Levodopa therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 1990; 40 (10 Suppl. 3): 40–7
Calne DB. Treatment of Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 1993; 329(14): 1021–7
Capildeo R. Implications of the 5-year CR FIRST trial. Sinemet CR Five-Year International Response Fluctuation Study. Neurology 1998; 50 (6 Suppl. 6): S15–17; discussion S44-18
Kurth MC. Using liquid levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease: a practical guide. Drugs Aging 1997; 10(5): 332–40
Product Information: Parcopa™ orally disintegrating tablets, carbidopa-levodopa orally disintegrating tablets. Milwaukee (WI): Schwarz Pharma, 2003
Yeh KC, August TF, Bush DF, et al. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of Sinemet CR: a summary of human studies. Neurology 1989; 39 (11 Suppl. 2): 25–38
Mouradian MM, Heuser IJ, Baronti F, et al. Modification of central dopaminergic mechanisms by continuous levodopa therapy for advanced Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 1990; 27: 18–22
Stocchi F, Olanow C, Warren MD. Continuous dopaminergic stimulation in early and advanced Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 2004 Jan 13; 62(1) Suppl. 1: S56–63
Nyholm D, Nilsson Remahl A, Dizdar N, et al. Duodenal levodopa infusion monotherapy versus oral polypharmacy in advanced Parkinson disease. Neurology 2005; 64: 216–23
Nutt JG, Woodward WR, Beckner RM, et al. Effect of peripheral catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibition on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of levodopa in parkinsonian patient. Neurology 1994; 44(5): 913–9
Product Information: Comtan®, entacapone. East Hanover (NJ): Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 2000
Parkinson Study Group. Entacapone improves motor fluctuations in levodopa-treated Parkinson’s disease patients. Ann Neurol 1997; 42: 747–55
Product Information: Stalevo™ (carbidopa, levodopa and entacapone) tablets. East Hanover (NJ): Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, 2003
Product Information: Comtan®, entacapone. East Hanover (NJ): Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation, 2000
Product Information: TASMAR® tablets, tolcapone tablets. Costa Mesa (CA): Valeant Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2006
Figa-Talamanca L, Gualandi C, Di Meo L, et al. Hyperthermia after discontinuance of levodopa and bromocriptine therapy: impaired dopamine receptors a possible cause. Neurology 1985; 35(2): 258–61
Friedman JH, Feinberg SS, Feldman RG. A neuroleptic malignant-like syndrome due to levodopa therapy withdrawal. JAMA 1985; 254(19): 2792–5
Sian J, Dexter DT, Lees AJ, et al. Glutathione-related enzymes in brain in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 1994; 36(3): 356–61
Jenner P. Oxidative stress in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 2003; 53Suppl. 3: S26–48
Fahn S, Cohen G. The oxidant stress hypothesis in Parkinson’s disease: evidence supporting it. Ann Neurol 1992; 32(6): 804–12
Mena MA, Pardo B, Paino CL, et al. Levodopa toxicity in foetal rat midbrain neurones in culture: modulation by ascorbic acid. Neuroreport 1993; 4(4): 438–40
Mytilineou C, Han SK, Cohen G. Toxic and protective effects of L-dopa on mesencephalic cell cultures. J Neurochem 1993; 61(4): 1470–8
Tanaka M, Sotomatsu A, Kanai H, et al. Dopa and dopamine cause cultured neuronal death in the presence of iron. J Neurol Sci 1991; 101(2): 198–203
Steece-Collier K, Collier TJ, Sladek CD, et al. Chronic levodopa impairs morphological development of grafted embryonic dopamine neurons. Exp Neurol 1990; 110(2): 201–8
Agid Y. Levodopa: is toxicity a myth? Neurology 1998; 50(4): 858–63
Mytilineou C, Walker RH, Baptiste R, et al. Levodopa is toxic to dopamine neurons in an in vitro but not an in vivo model of oxidative stress. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2003; 304(2): 792–800
Quinn N, Parkes D, Janota I, et al. Preservation of the substantia nigra and locus coeruleus in a patient receiving levodopa (2 kg) plus decarboxylase inhibitor over a four-year period. Mov Disord 1986; 1(1): 65–8
Rajput AH. Levodopa prolongs life expectancy and is non-toxic to substantia nigra. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2001; 8(2): 95–100
Camp DM, Loeffler DA, LeWitt PA. L-DOPA does not enhance hydroxyl radical formation in the nigrostriatal dopamine system of rats with a unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesion. J Neurochem 2000; 74(3): 1229–40
Murer MG, Dziewczapolski G, Menalled LB, et al. Chronic levodopa is not toxic for remaining dopamine neurons, but instead promotes their recovery, in rats with moderate nigrostriatal lesions. Ann Neurol 1998; 43(5): 561–75
Datla KP, Blunt SB, Dexter DT. Chronic L-DOPA administration is not toxic to the remaining dopaminergic nigrostriatal neurons, but instead may promote their functional recovery, in rats with partial 6-OHDA or FeCl(3) nigrostriatal lesions. Mov Disord 2001; 16(3): 424–34
Han SK, Mytilineou C, Cohen G. L-DOPA up-regulates glutathione and protects mesencephalic cultures against oxidative stress. J Neurochem 1996; 66(2): 501–10
Mena MA, Davila V, Sulzer D. Neurotrophic effects of LDOPA in postnatal midbrain dopamine neuron/cortical astrocyte cocultures. J Neurochem 1997; 69(4): 1398–408
Blin J, Bonnet AM, Agid Y. Does levodopa aggravate Parkinson’s disease? Neurology 1988; 38(9): 1410–6
Scigliano G, Musicco M, Soliveri P, et al. Mortality associated with early and late levodopa therapy initiation in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 1990; 40(2): 265–9
Lesser RP, Fahn S, Snider SR, et al. Analysis of the clinical problems in parkinsonism and the complications of long-term levodopa therapy. Neurology 1979; 29 (9 Pt 1): 1253–60
Uitti RJ, Ahlskog JE, Maraganore DM, et al. Levodopa therapy and survival in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: Olmsted County project. Neurology 1993; 43(10): 1918–26
Markham CH, Diamond SG. Modification of Parkinson’s disease by long-term levodopa treatment. Arch Neurol 1986; 43(4): 405–7
Markham CH, Diamond SG. Long-term follow-up of early dopa treatment in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 1986; 19(4): 365–72
Dopamine transporter brain imaging to assess the effects of pramipexole vs levodopa on Parkinson disease progression. JAMA 2002; 287(13): 1653–61
Holloway RG, Shoulson I, Fahn S, et al. Pramipexole vs levodopa as initial treatment for Parkinson disease: a 4-year randomized controlled trial. Arch Neurol 2004; 61(7): 1044–53
Whone AL, Watts RL, Stoessl AJ, et al. Slower progression of Parkinson’s disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: the REAL-PET study. Ann Neurol 2003; 54(1): 93–101
Fahn S, Oakes D, Shoulson I, et al. Levodopa and the progression of Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 2004; 351(24): 2498–508
Agid Y, Olanow CW, Mizuno Y. Levodopa: why the controversy? [letter]. Lancet 2002; 360(9332): 575
Lees AJ, Katzenschlager R, Head J, et al. Ten-year follow-up of three different initial treatments in de-novo PD: a randomized trial. Neurology 2001; 57(9): 1687–94
Oertel WH, Wolters E, Sampaio C, et al. Pergolide versus levodopa monotherapy in early Parkinson’s disease patients: the PELMOPET study. Mov Disord 2006; 21(3): 343–53
Rascol O, Brooks DJ, Korczyn AD, et al. A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson’s disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa: 056 Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000; 342(20): 1484–91
Morrish PK. Real-PET and CONSORT. Ann Neurol 2003; 54(5): 692–3
Parkinson Study Group. Pramipexole vs levodopa as initial treatment for Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2000; 284(15): 1931–8
Arnulf I, Bonnet AM, Damier P, et al. Hallucinations, REM sleep, and Parkinson’s disease: a medical hypothesis. Neurology 2000; 55(2): 281–8
Fischer P, Danielczyk W, Simanyi M, et al. Dopaminergic psychosis in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Adv Neurol 1990; 53: 391–7
Giladi N, Treves TA, Paleacu D, et al. Risk factors for dementia, depression and psychosis in long-standing Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm 2000; 107(1): 59–71
Greene P, Cote L, Fahn S. Treatment of drug-induced psychosis in Parkinson’s disease with clozapine. Adv Neurol 1993; 60: 703–6
Goetz CG, Stebbins GT. Risk factors for nursing home placement in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 1993; 43(11): 2227–9
Miyawaki E, Lyons K, Pahwa R, et al. Motor complications of chronic levodopa therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 1997; 20(6): 523–30
Golbe LI. Young-onset Parkinson’s disease: a clinical review. Neurology 1991; 41 (2 Pt 1): 168–73
Grandas F, Galiano ML, Tabernero C. Risk factors for levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 1999; 246(12): 1127–33
Kumar N, Van Gerpen JA, Bower JH, et al. Levodopa-dyskinesia incidence by age of Parkinson’s disease onset. Mov Disord 2005; 20(3): 342–4
Quinn N, Critchley P, Marsden CD. Young onset Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 1987; 2(2): 73–91
Schrag A, Ben-Shlomo Y, Brown R, et al. Young-onset Parkinson’s disease revisited: clinical features, natural history, and mortality. Mov Disord 1998; 13(6): 885–94
Van Gerpen JA, Kumar N, Bower JH, et al. Levodopa-associated dyskinesia risk among Parkinson disease patients in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976–1990. Arch Neurol 2006; 63(2): 205–9
Saint-Hilaire MH, Feldman RG. The ‘on-off’ phenomenon in Parkinson’s disease. In: Joseph AB, Young RR, editors. Movement disorders in neurology and neuropsychiatry. Boston (MA): Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1999: 180–4
Chase TN, Oh JD. Striatal mechanisms and pathogenesis of parkinsonian signs and motor complications. Ann Neurol 2000; 47 (4 Suppl. 1): S122–30
de la Fuente-Fernandez R, Lu JQ, Sossi V, et al. Biochemical variations in the synaptic level of dopamine precede motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease: PET evidence of increased dopamine turnover. Ann Neurol 2001; 49(3): 298–303
Chase TN, Engber TM, Mouradian MM. Contribution of dopaminergic and glutamatergic mechanisms to the pathogenesis of motor response complications in Parkinson’s disease. Adv Neurol 1996; 69: 497–501
Sage JI, Sonsalla PK, McHale DM, et al. Clinical experience with duodenal infusions of levodopa for the treatment of motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease. Adv Neurol 1990; 53: 383–6
Hughes AJ, Bishop S, Kleedorfer B, et al. Subcutaneous apomorphine in Parkinson’s disease: response to chronic administration for up to five years. Mov Disord 1993; 8(2): 165–70
Acknowledgements
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review.
Dr Fernandez has served as a consultant, speaker, member of an advisory board or conducted clinical research under contract for Amarin, AstraZeneca, Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Life Sciences, Biogen Idec, Cephalon, Elan, Forest Laboratories, GlaxoSmithKline, Huntington Study Group, Ipsen, Kyowa, Merck KgaA, Merz, MylanBertek, National Parkinson Foundation, Neurotrax, National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Novartis, Parkinson Study Group, Solstice, Teva, United Biosource Corporation, Valeant and Vernalis. The other authors have no potential conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Halkias, I.A.C., Haq, I., Huang, Z. et al. When Should Levodopa Therapy be Initiated in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease?. Drugs Aging 24, 261–273 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200724040-00001
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200724040-00001