Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Topical Dorzolamide 2%/Timolol 0.5% Ophthalmic Solution

A Review of its Use in the Treatment of Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension

  • Adis Drug Evaluation
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Abstract

Topically administered dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% (dorzolamide/timolol ophthalmic solution; Cosopt®) is a fixed combination of two ocular hypotensive drugs (the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor dorzolamide and the β-adrenoceptor antagonist timolol) that have an additive effect on lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) when administered together. This product is indicated for the treatment of elevated IOP in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (OH) who are insufficiently responsive to topical β-adrenoceptor antagonist monotherapy. As such, it can be considered for use in individuals who, as a consequence of failing to achieve target IOP with β-adrenoceptor antagonist monotherapy, require the addition or substitution of another class of topical antiglaucoma medication. Clinical trials have demonstrated that dorzolamide/timolol (1 drop per eye twice daily) is an effective and generally well tolerated fixed combination for lowering IOP in patients with open angle glaucoma or OH, including individuals uncontrolled on β-adrenoceptor antagonist monotherapy. Compared with concomitant therapy with the individual components, the primary advantage of fixed combination dorzolamide/timolol is convenience.

Pharmacological Properties

Dorzolamide/timolol comprises dorzolamide, a highly selective inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase isoenzyme II, and timolol, a nonselective β-adrenergic antagonist. Both components decrease elevated IOP by inhibiting aqueous humour production; they each achieve this by a different mechanism of action and have an additive effect when administered together. Dorzolamide/timolol also improves some markers of ocular blood flow (an effect likely attributable to the dorzolamide component).

After topical administration, both components enter the systemic circulation. Systemically absorbed dorzolamide undergoes slow hepatic metabolism; both the single N-desethyl metabolite and the parent drug accumulate in erythrocytes, although the resulting inhibition of carbonic anhydrase isoenzyme I and II (by N-desethyldorzolamide and dorzolamide, respectively) is not sufficient to disrupt normal physiological function. Dorzolamide and its metabolite are eliminated primarily by the kidneys.

Timolol has a high systemic bioavailability via the ocular route and may cause typical systemic β-adrenoceptor antagonist effects. The mean peak plasma timolol concentration was 0.46 and 0.35 μg/L after the morning and afternoon dose, respectively, in six subjects who received topical timolol 0.5% twice daily.

Therapeutic Efficacy

Randomised clinical trials of 1.5–6 months’ duration have compared the IOP-lowering efficacy of dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% 1 drop per eye twice daily with that of other topically administered ophthalmic therapies in patients with glaucoma (almost exclusively primary open angle glaucoma) or OH enrolled at one or more centres. All of these studies were preceded by a run-in period on timolol 0.5% twice daily or an ocular hypotensive medication washout period.

When evaluated in large, single- or double-masked, parallel-group comparisons, the IOP-lowering effect of dorzolamide/timolol was superior to that of monotherapy with each of the individual components (administered at their recommended dosing frequencies), equivalent to that of dorzolamide 2% two or three times daily plus timolol 0.5% twice daily given concomitantly, equivalent to that of monotherapy with latanoprost 0.005% once daily, and generally equivalent to that of brimonidine 0.2% twice daily plus timolol 0.5% twice daily given concomitantly. Whereas reductions in IOP significantly favoured monotherapy with bimatoprost 0.03% once daily (in patients inadequately controlled on β-adrenoceptor antagonist monotherapy) and fixed combination therapy with latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% once daily in large, double-masked, parallel-group comparisons, the IOP-lowering effect of dorzolamide/timolol was generally similar to that of these agents in small, single- or double-masked, cross-over comparisons. The IOP-lowering effect of dorzolamide/timolol was less than that of latanoprost 0.005% once daily plus brimonidine 0.2% twice daily given concomitantly in small, double-masked, parallel-group, comparisons.

Variable results were seen when dorzolamide/timolol was compared with monotherapy with travoprost 0.004% once daily or with fixed combination therapy with brimonidine 0.2%/timolol 0.5% (brimonidine/timolol) twice daily in small, single-blind, cross-over or parallel-group studies. Dorzolamide/timolol was either more or less effective than travoprost 0.004%, but similarly or less effective than brimonidine/timolol, in lowering IOP.

Reductions in IOP seen with the fixed combination were maintained for up to 1 year in a non-blind extension of one study.

Tolerability

Topically administered dorzolamide/timolol is generally well tolerated and has an adverse event profile reflecting that of the individual components. No additional tolerability issues specific to the fixed combination have been identified. The most common adverse events in patients with glaucoma or OH who received dorzolamide/timolol in large, randomised clinical trials were ocular and local reactions, including burning and/or stinging of the eyes (mostly of mild or moderate intensity and transient; likely due to the dorzolamide component) and dysgeusia.

In large comparative trials, the incidences of drug-related ocular burning and/ or stinging and dysgeusia with dorzolamide/timolol were mostly higher than those with latanoprost 0.005% and consistently higher than those with bimatoprost 0.03% or brimonidine 0.2% plus timolol 0.5% given concomitantly. Similarly, ocular burning, ocular stinging and unusual taste were reported more often by dorzolamide/timolol recipients than brimonidine/timolol recipients, based on preliminary reports of small comparative studies. More dorzolamide/timolol than latanoprost/timolol recipients experienced transient eye pain, although conjunctival hyperaemia was less common with dorzolamide/timolol than with bimatoprost 0.03%. The tolerability profile of dorzolamide/timolol was similar to that of brimonidine 0.2% plus latanoprost 0.005% given concomitantly in small comparative studies.

Systemic adverse events such as headache, nausea and urolithiasis (likely due to the dorzolamide component) and bradycardia/sinus bradycardia, cardiac failure, heart block, hypotension, and respiratory symptoms/failure (likely due to the timolol component) have been reported, albeit infrequently, with dorzolamide/ timolol during clinical trials or post-marketing experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Table III

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

References

  1. World Health Organisation. Magnitude and causes of visual impairment [online]. Available from URL: http://www.who.int [Accessed 2005 Dec 19]

  2. Rouland JF, Berdeaux G, Lafuma A. The economic burden of glaucoma and ocular hypertension: implications for patient management. Drugs Aging 2005; 22(4): 315–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee AG, Beaver HA. Visual loss in the elderly — Part I: Chronic visual loss: what to recognize and when to refer. Clinical Geriatrics 2003; 11(6): 46–53

    Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman DS, Wolfs RC, O’Colmain BJ, et al. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004 Apr; 122(4): 532–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Minassian DC, Reidy A, Coffey M, et al. Utility of predictive equations for estimating the prevalence and incidence of primary open angle glaucoma in the UK. Br J Ophthalmol 2000 Oct; 84(10): 1159–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tuck MW, Crick RP. The age distribution of primary open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1998 Dec; 5(4): 173–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Balfour JA, Wilde MI. Dorzolamide: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in the management of glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Drugs Aging 1997; 10: 384–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. American Optometric Association. Glaucoma [online]. Available from URL: http://www.aoa.org [Accessed 2005 Dec 19]

  9. Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M., et al. Vascular risk factors for primary open angle glaucoma: the Egna-Neumarkt Study. Ophthalmology 2000 Jul; 107(7): 1287–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris A, Rechtman E, Siesky B, et al. The role of optic nerve blood flow in the pathogenesis of glaucoma. Ophthalmol Clin N Am 2005; 18: 345–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Costa VP, Harris A, Stefansson E, et al. The effects of antiglaucoma and systemic medications on ocular blood flow. Prog Retin Eye Res 2003 Nov; 22(6): 769–805

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwartz K, Budenz D. Current management of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004 Apr; 15(2): 119–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Guidelines for the management of open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension [online]. Available from URL: http://www.rcophth.ac.uk [Accessed 2005 Dec 19]

  14. Marquis RE, Whitson JT. Management of glaucoma: focus on pharmacological therapy. Drugs Aging 2005; 22(1): 1–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoyng PFJ, van Beek LM. Pharmacological therapy for glaucoma: a review. Drugs 2000; 59(3): 411–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ormrod D, McClellan K. Topical dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5%: a review of its use in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. Drugs Aging 2000 Dec; 17: 477–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kiland JA, Gabelt BT, Kaufman PL. Studies on the mechanism of action of timolol and on the effects of suppression and redirection of aqueous flow on outflow facility. Exp Eye Res 2004 Mar; 78(3): 639–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Toris CB, Zhan GL, Yablonski ME, et al. Effects on aqueous flow of dorzolamide combined with either timolol or acetazolamide. J Glaucoma 2004 Jun; 13(3): 210–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Heel RC, Brogden RN, Speight TM, et al. Timolol: a review of its therapeutic efficacy in the topical treatment of glaucoma. Drugs 1979; 17(1): 38–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Harris A, Jonescu-Cuypers CP, Kagemann L, et al. Effect of dorzolamide timolol combination versus timolol 0.5% on ocular bloodflow in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2001 Oct; 132(4): 490–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Januleviciene I, Harris A, Kagemann L, et al. A comparison of the effects of dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost on intraocular pressure and pulsatile ocular blood flow in primary open-angle glaucoma patients. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2004 Dec; 82(6): 730–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Manni G, Centofanti M, Gregori D, et al. The pulsatile ocular blood flow behaviour in open angle glaucoma patients after replacing timolol therapy with timolol and dorzolamide fixed combination: preliminary study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppi 2002; 236: 55–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Martinez A, Sanchez M. A comparison of the effects of 0.005% latanoprost and fixed combination dorzolamide/timolol on retrobulbar haemodynamics in previously untreated glaucoma patients. Curr Med Res Opin 2006; 22(1): 67–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Arend O, Harris A, Wolter P, et al. Evaluation of retinal haemodynamics and retinal function after application of dorzolamide, timolol and latanoprost in newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma patients. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003 Oct; 81(5): 474–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fuchsjager-Mayrl G, Wally B, Rainer G, et al. Effect of dorzolamide and timolol on ocular blood flow in patients with primary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 2005 Oct; 89(10): 1293–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Galassi F, Sodi A, Renieri G, et al. Effects of timolol and dorzolamide on retrobulbar hemodynamics in patients with newly diagnosed primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmologica 2002 Mar–Apr; 216(2): 123–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Avunduk AM, Sari A, Akyol N, et al. The one-month effects of topical betaxolol, dorzolamide and apraclonidine on ocular blood flow velocities in patients with newly diagnosed primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmologica 2001 Sep–Oct; 215(5): 361–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Martinez A, Ganzalez F, Capeans C, et al. Dorzolamide effect on ocular blood flow. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40(6): 1270–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Biollaz J, Munafo A, Buclin T, et al. Whole-blood pharmacokinetics and metabolic effects of the topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor dorzolamide. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 47(5): 453–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Maren TH, Conroy CW, Wynns GC, et al. Ocular absorption, blood levels, and excretion of dorzolamide, a topically active carbonic anhydrase inhibitor. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 1997; 13(1): 23–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Martens-Lobenhoffer J, Banditt P. Clinical pharmacokinetics of dorzolamide. Clin Pharmacokinet 2002; 41(3): 197–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cosopt® (dorzolamide hydrochloride-timolol maleate ophthalmic solution) prescribing information [online]. Available from URL: http://www.cosopt.com [Accessed 2005 Dec 6]

  33. Strahlman E, Tipping R, Vogel R. A six-week dose-response study of the ocular hypotensive effect of dorzolamide with a one-year extension. Am J Ophthalmol 1996; 122: 183–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Korte JM, Kaila T, Saari KM. Systemic bioavailability and cardiopulmonary effects of 0.5% timolol eyedrops. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002 Jun; 240(6): 430–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Phillips CJ, Bartholemew RS, Kazl G, et al. Penetration of timolol eye drops into human aqueous humour. Br J Ophthalmol 1981; 65: 593–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Clineschmidt CM, Williams RD, Snyder E, et al. A randomized trial in patients inadequately controlled with timolol alone comparing the dorzolamide-timolol combination to monotherapy with timolol or dorzolamide. Dorzolamide-Timolol Combination Study Group. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1952–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Boyle JE, Ghosh K, Gieser DK, et al. A randomized trial comparing the dorzolamide-timolol combination given twice daily to monotherapy with timolol and dorzolamide. Dorzolamide-Timolol Study Group. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1945–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Fechtner RD, Airaksinen PJ, Getson AJ, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of the dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% combination (COSOPT) versus 0.005% (XALATAN) in the treatment of ocular hypertension or glaucoma: results from two randomized clinical trials. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2004 Feb; 82(1): 42–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Susanna R Jr, Sheu WP. Comparison of latanoprost with fixed-combination dorzolamide and timolol in adult patients with elevated intraocular pressure: an eight-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study in Latin America. Clin Ther 2004 May; 26(5): 755–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Honrubia FM, Larsson LI, Spiegel D, et al. A comparison of the effects on intraocular pressure of latanoprost 0.005% and the fixed combination of dorzolamide 2% and timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2002; 80(6): 635–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Konstas AG, Papapanos P, Tersis I, et al. Twenty-four-hour diurnal curve comparison of commercially available latanoprost 0.005% versus the timolol and dorzolamide fixed combination. Ophthalmology 2003 Jul; 110(7): 1357–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chiselita D, Antohi I, Medvichi R, et al. Comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of latanoprost, travoprost and the fixed combination timolol-dorzolamide; a prospective, randomized, masked, cross-over design study. Oftalmologia 2005; 49(3): 39–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Parmaksiz S, Yuksel N, Karabas VL, et al. A comparison of travoprost, latanoprost, and the fixed combination of dorzolamide and timolol in patients with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 2006 Jan–Feb; 16(1): 73–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Coleman AL, Lerner F, Bernstein P, et al. A 3-month randomized controlled trial of bimatoprost (LUMIGAN) versus combined timolol and dorzolamide (Cosopt) in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Ophthalmology 2003 Dec; 110(12): 2362–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Day DG, Sharpe ED, Beischel CJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03% versus timolol maleate 0.5%/dorzolamide 2% fixed combination. Eur J Ophthalmol 2005 May–Jun; 15(3): 336–42

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Suzuki ERJ, Franklin LM, da Silva LJ, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of travoprost with a fixed-combination of dorzolamide and timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Curr Med Res Opin 2006 Sep; 22(9): 1799–805

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Hutzelmann J, Owens S, Shedden A, et al. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of the fixed combination of dorzolamide/ timolol and the concomitant administration of dorzolamide and timolol: a clinical equivalence study. International Clinical Equivalence Study Group. Br J Ophthalmol 1998; 82: 1249–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Strohmaier K, Snyder E, DuBiner H, et al. The efficacy and safety of the dorzolamide-timolol combination versus the concomitant administration of its components. Dorzolamide-Timolol Study Group [see comments]. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1936–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Sall KN, Greff LJ, Johnson-Pratt LR, et al. Dorzolamide/timolol combination versus concomitant administration of brimonidine and timolol: six-month comparison of efficacy and tolerability. Ophthalmology 2003 Mar; 110(3): 615–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Solish AM, DeLucca FT, Cassel DA, et al. Dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination versus concomitant administration of brimonidine and timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a 3-month comparison of efficacy, tolerability, and patient-reported measures. J Glaucoma 2004 Apr; 13(2): 149–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Zabriskie N, Netland PA. Comparison of brimonidine/latanoprost and timolol/dorzolamide: two randomized, double-masked, parallel clinical trials. Adv Ther 2003 Mar–Apr; 20(2): 92–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Shin DH, Feldman RM, Sheu WP. Efficacy and safety of the fixed combinations latanoprost/timolol versus dorzolamide/ timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure. Ophthalmology 2004 Feb; 111(2): 276–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Konstas AG, Kozobolis VP, Lallos N, et al. Daytime diurnal curve comparison between the fixed combinations of latanoprost 0.005%/timolol maleate 0.5% and dorzolamide 2%/ timolol maleate 0.5%. Eye 2004 Dec; 18(12): 1264–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Nixon DR. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of brimonidine tartrate-timolol maleate ophthalmic solution (Combigan®) and dorzolamide hydrochloride-timolol maleate ophthalmic solution (Combigan®) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension [abstract no. 453-B188 plus poster]. In: the Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO); April 30–May 4, 2006; Ft Lauderdale (FL). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.iovs.org [Accessed 2006 Jun 6]

  55. Arcieri ES, Pereira ACA, Andreo EGV, et al. Fixed combination brimonidine-timolol (Combigan®) versus fixed combination dorzolamide-timolol (Cosopt®) each given twice daily to reduce intraocular pressure in subjects with glaucoma or ocular hypertension [abstract no. E434-B169]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.iovs.org [Accessed 2006 Jun 6]

  56. Fechtner RD, McCarroll KA, Lines CR, et al. Efficacy of the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in the treatment of ocular hypertension or glaucoma: combined analysis of pooled data from two large randomized observer and patient-masked studies. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2005 Jun; 21(3): 242–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Lass JH, Khosrof SA, Laurence JK, et al. A double-masked, randomized, 1-year study comparing the corneal effects of dorzolamide, timolol, and betaxolol. Dorzolamide Corneal Effects Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116: 1003–10

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Cosopt Ophthalmic Solution — summary of product characteristics [online]. Available from URL: http://emc.medicines.org.uk/ [Accessed 2005 Dec 6]

  59. American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Patterns Committee Glaucoma Panel. Preferred practice patternTM: primary open angle glaucoma. San Francisco (CA): American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  60. Goldberg I. Drugs for glaucoma. Aust Prescr 2002; 25: 142–6

    Google Scholar 

  61. Nordstrom BL, Friedman DS, Mozaffari E, et al. Persistence and adherence with topical glaucoma therapy. Am J Ophthalmology 2005 Oct; 140(4): 598–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Perry CM, McGavin JK, Culy CR, et al. Latanoprost: an update of its use in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Drugs Aging 2003; 20(8): 597–630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Cvetkovic RS, Perry CM. Brinzolamide: a review of its use in the management of primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Drugs Aging 2003; 20(12): 919–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Kaluzny JJ, Szaflik J, Czechowicz-Janicka K, et al. Timolol 0.5%/dorzolamide 2% fixed combination versus timolol 0.5%/ pilocarpine 2% fixed combination in primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertensive patients. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003 Aug; 81(4): 349–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Stewart WC. Combination therapy: is the whole greater? [online]. Available from URL: http://www.revophth.com [Accessed 2006 Jan 6]

  66. Fechtner R, Realini T. Fixed combinations of topical glaucoma medications. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004; 15: 132–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Anon. Combination glaucoma medications. Clin Exp Optom 2005; 88(2): 119–20

  68. Asrani S, Zeimer R, Wilensky J, et al. Large diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure are an independant risk factor in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2000 Apr; 9(2): 134–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Pajic B. Experience with COSOPT, the fixed combination of timolol and dorzolamide, gained in Swiss ophthalmologists’ offices. Curr Med Res Opin 2003; 19(2): 95–101

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Henderer JD, Wilson RP, Moster MR, et al. Timolol/dorzolamide combination therapy as initial treatment for intraocular pressure over 30 mm Hg. J Glaucoma 2005 Aug; 14(4): 267–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Akman A, Cetinkaya A, Akova YA, et al. Comparison of additional intraocular pressure-lowering effects of latanoprost vs brimonidine in primary open-angle glaucoma patients with intraocular pressure uncontrolled by timolol-dorzolamide combination. Eye 2005 Feb; 19(2): 145–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Gugleta K, Orgul S, Flammer J. Experience with Cosopt, the fixed combination of timolol and dorzolamide, after switch from free combination of timolol and dorzolamide, in Swiss ophthalmologists’ offices. Curr Med Res Opin 2003; 19(4): 330–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Choudhri S, Wand M, Shields MB. A comparison of dorzolamide-timolol combination versus the concomitant drugs. Am J Ophthalmol 2000 Dec; 130(6): 832–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Goldberg LD, Walt J. Cost considerations in the medical management of glaucoma in the US: estimated yearly costs and cost effectiveness of bimatoprost compared with other medications. Pharmacoeconomics 2006; 24(3): 251–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Doyle JJ, Casciano JC, Walt JG. Cost-effectiveness of bimatoprost 0.03% versus a combination product of timolol 0.5% and dorzolamide 2.0% for glaucoma [abstract no. PES4 plus poster]. Value Health 2003 May–Jun; 6: 238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Soto J, De Miguel V. A pharmacoeconomic analysis of the fixed combination latanoprost/timolol versus dorzolamide/timolol in the treatment of patients with glaucoma in Spain [abstract no. PES7 plus poster]. Value Health 2004 Nov-2004; 7: 747

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James E. Frampton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frampton, J.E., Perry, C.M. Topical Dorzolamide 2%/Timolol 0.5% Ophthalmic Solution. Drugs Aging 23, 977–995 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200623120-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200623120-00005

Keywords

Navigation