Drugs & Aging

, Volume 22, Issue 8, pp 627–639 | Cite as

Catheter-Related Urinary Tract Infection

  • Lindsay E. Nicolle
Therapy In Practice


Indwelling urinary catheters are used frequently in older populations. For either short- or long-term catheters, the infection rate is about 5% per day. Escherichia coli remains the most common infecting organism, but a wide variety of other organisms may be isolated, including yeast species. Bacteria tend to show increased resistance because of the repeated antimicrobial courses. Urinary tract infection (UTI) usually follows formation of biofilm on both the internal and external catheter surface. The biofilm protects organisms from both antimicrobials and the host immune response. Morbidity from UTI with short-term catheter use is limited if appropriate catheter care is practised. In patients with long-term catheters, fever from a urinary source is common with a frequency varying from 1 per 100 to 1 per 1000 catheter days. Long-term care facility residents with chronic indwelling catheters have a much greater risk for bacteraemia and other urinary complications than residents without catheters.

Asymptomatic catheter-acquired UTI should not be treated with antimicrobials. Antimicrobial treatment does not decrease symptomatic episodes but will lead to emergence of more resistant organisms. For treatment of symptomatic infection, many antimicrobials are effective. Wherever possible, antimicrobial selection should be delayed until culture results are available. Whether to administer initial treatment by an oral or parenteral route is determined by clinical presentation. If empirical therapy is required, antimicrobial selection is based on variables such as route of administration, anticipated infecting organism and susceptibility, and patient tolerance. Renal function, concomitant medications, local formulary and cost may also be considered in selection of the antimicrobial agent. The duration of therapy is usually 10–14 days, but patients who respond promptly and in whom the catheter must remain in situ may be treated with a shorter 7-day course to reduce antimicrobial pressure. Relevant clinical trials are necessary to define optimal antimicrobial regimens for the management of catheter-acquired UTI.

Prevention of catheter-acquired UTI and its complications is a major goal. With short-term catheters, avoiding their use or limiting the duration of use to as short a time as possible are the most effective prevention strategies. Maintaining a closed drainage system and adhering to appropriate catheter care techniques will also limit infection and complications. As the duration of catheterisation is the principal determinant of infection with long-term indwelling catheters, it is not clear that any interventions can decrease the prevalence of bacteriuria in this setting. Catheter flushing or daily perineal care do not prevent infection and may, in fact, increase the risk of infection. Complications of infection may be prevented by giving antibacterials for bacteriuria immediately prior to any invasive urological procedure, and by avoiding catheter blockage, twisting or trauma. The major focus of future advances in prevention of catheter-acquired UTI is the development of biomaterials resistant to biofilm formation. There is substantial current research addressing this issue, but current catheter materials all remain susceptible to biofilm formation.


  1. 1.
    Warren JW. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1997; 11: 609–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Muncie HL, Warren JW. Long-term urethral catheters in older women. Am Fam Physician 1988; 37: 103–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Warren JW, Steinberg L, Hebel JR, et al. The prevalence of urethral catheterization in Maryland nursing homes. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 1535–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Terpenning MS, Allada R, Kauffman CA. Intermittent urethral catheterization in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 1989; 37: 411–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hebel JR, Warren JW. The use of urethral, condom, and suprapubic catheters in aged nursing home patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1990; 38: 777–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garibaldi RA, Burke JP, Dickman ML, et al. Factors predisposing to bacteriuria during indwelling urethral catheterization. N Engl J Med 1974; 291: 215–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hustinx WNM, Mintjes-de Groot AJ, Berkooyen RP, et al. Impact of concurrent antimicrobial therapy on catheter-associated urinary tract infection. J Hosp Infect 1991; 18: 45–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tambyah PA, Maki DG. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection is rarely symptomatic: a prospective study of 1497 catheterized patients. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 678–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Warren JW, Tenney JH, Hoopes JM, et al. A prospective microbiologic study of bacteriuria in patients with chronic indwelling urethral catheters. J Infect Dis 1982; 146: 719–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Platt R, Polk BF, Murdock B, et al. Mortality associated with nosocomial urinary tract infection. N Engl J Med 1982; 307: 637–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Warren JW, Damron D, Tenney JH, et al. Fever, bacteremia and death as complications of bacteriuria in women with long-term urethral catheters. J Infect Dis 1987; 155: 1151–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Orr P, Nicolle LE, Duckworth H, et al. Febrile urinary infection in the institutionalized elderly. Am J Med 1996; 100: 71–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Warren JW, Muncie Jr HL, Hall-Craggs M. Acute pyelonephritis associated with bacteriuria during long-term catheterization: a prospective, clinicopathological study. J Infect Dis 1988; 158: 1341–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rudman D, Hontanosas A, Cohen Z, et al. Clinical correlates of bacteremia in a Veterans Administration extended care facility. J Am Geriatr Soc 1988; 36: 726–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kunin CM, Douthitt S, Dancing J, et al. The association between the use of urinary catheters and morbidity and mortality among elderly patients in nursing homes. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 135: 291–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kunin CM, Chin QF, Chambers S. Morbidity and mortality associated with indwelling urinary catheters in elderly patients in a nursing home: confounding due to the presence of associated diseases. J Am Geriatr Soc 1987; 35: 1001–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Garibaldi RA, Burke JP, Britt MR, et al. Meatal colonization and catheter-associated bacteriuria. N Engl J Med 1980; 303: 316–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramsay JWA, Garnham AJ, Mulhall AB, et al. Biofilms, bacteria, and bladder catheters: a clinical study. Br J Urol 1989; 64: 395–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beiko DT, Knudsen BE, Watterson JD, et al. Urinary tract biomaterials. J Urol 2004; 171: 2438–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grahn D, Norman DC, White ML, et al. Validity of urinary catheter specimens for diagnosis of urinary tract infection in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 1985; 145: 1858–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tenney JH, Warren JW. Bacteriuria in women with long-term catheters: paired comparison of indwelling and replacement catheters. J Infect Dis 1988; 157: 199–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nicolle LE. A practical guide to the management of complicated urinary tract infection. Drugs 1997; 53: 583–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bjork DT, Pelletier LL, Tight RR. Urinary tract infections with antibiotic resistant organisms in catheterized nursing home residents. Infect Control 1984; 5: 173–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stark RP, Maki DG. Bacteriuria in the catheterized patient: what quantitative level or bacteriuria is relevant? N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 560–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    van der Wall E, Verkooyen RP, Mintjes-de Groot J, et al. Prophylactic ciprofloxacin for catheter-associated urinary-tract infection. Lancet 1992; 339: 946–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bregenzer T, Frei R, Widmer AF, et al. Low risk of bacteremia during catheter replacement in patients with long-term urinary catheters. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 521–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Breitenbucher RB. Bacterial changes in the urine samples of patients with long-term indwelling catheters. Arch Intern Med 1984; 144: 1585–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Warren JW, Muncie Jr HL, Bergquist EJ, et al. Sequelae and management of urinary infection in the patient requiring chronic catheterization. J Urol 1981; 125: 1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bergqvist D, Bronnestam R, Hedelin H, et al. The relevance of urinary sampling methods in patients with indwelling Foley catheters. Br J Urol 1980; 52: 92–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ouslander JG, Greengold B, Chen S. Complications of chronic indwelling urinary catheters among male nursing home patients: a prospective study. J Urol 1987; 138: 1191–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kunin CM. Blockage of urinary catheters: role of micro-organisms and constituents of urine on the formation of encrustations. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 835–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mobley HLT, Warren JW. Urease-positive bacteriuria and obstruction of long-term urinary catheters. J Clin Microbiol 1987; 25: 2216–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Getliffe KA, Mulhall AB. The encrustation of indwelling catheters. Br J Urol 1991; 67: 337–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kunin CM, Chin QF, Chambers S. Indwelling urinary catheters in the elderly: relation of ‘catheter life’ to formation of encrustations in patients with and without blocked catheters. Am J Med 1987; 82: 405–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mylotte JM, Tayara A, Goodnough S. Epidemiology of bloodstream infection in nursing home residents: evaluation in a large cohort from multiple homes. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 35: 1484–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Muder RR, Brennen C, Wagener MM, et al. Bacteremia in a long term care facility: a five year prospective study of 163 consecutive episodes. Clin Infect Dis 1992; 14: 647–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Raz R, Schiller D, Nicolle LE. Chronic indwelling catheter replacement before antimicrobial therapy for symptomatic urinary tract infection. J Urol 2000; 164: 1254–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tambyah PA, Maki DG. The relationship between pyuria and infection in patients with indwelling urinary catheters. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 673–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Steward DK, Wood GL, Cohen RL, et al. Failure of the urinalysis and quantitative urine culture in diagnosing symptomatic urinary tract infections in patients with long term urinary catheters. Am J Infect Control 1985; 13: 159–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Warren JW, Anthony WC, Hoopes JM, et al. Cephalexin for susceptible bacteriuria in afebrile, long-term catheterized patients. JAMA 1982; 248: 454–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ailing B, Brandberg A, Seeberg S, et al. Effect of consecutive antibacterial therapy on bacteriuria in hospitalized geriatric patients. Scand J Infect Dis 1975; 7: 201–7Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sobel JD, Kauffman CA, McKinsey D, et al. Candiduria: a randomized, double-blind study of treatment with fluconazole and placebo. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Mycoses Study Group. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 30: 19–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Harding GK, Nicolle LE, Ronald AR, et al. How long should catheter-acquired urinary tract infection in women be treated? A randomized controlled study. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114: 713–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cools HJM, van der Meer JWM. Restriction of long-term indwelling urethral catheterization in the elderly. Br J Urol 1986; 58: 683–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Duffy LM, Cleary J, Ahern S, et al. Clean intermittent catheterization: safe, cost-effective bladder management for male residents of VA nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995; 43: 865–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cornia PB, Amory JK, Fraser S, et al. Computer-based order entry decreases duration of indwelling urinary catheterization in hospitalized patients. Am J Med 2003; 114: 404–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gillespie WA, Jones JE, Teasdale C, et al. Does the addition of disinfectant to urine drainage bags prevent infection in catheterized patients? Lancet 1983; I: 1037–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Thompson RL, Haley CE, Searcy MA, et al. Catheter-associated bacteriuria: failure to reduce attack rates using periodic instillations of a disinfectant into urinary drainage systems. JAMA 1984; 251: 747–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Fryklund B, Haeggman S, Burman LG. Transmission of urinary bacterial strains between patients with indwelling catheters: nursing in the same room and in separate rooms compared. J Hosp Infect 1997; 36: 147–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Muncie Jr HL, Hoopes JM, Damron DJ, et al. Once-daily irrigation of long-term urethral catheters with normal saline: lack of benefit. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 441–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Burke JP, Garibaldi RA, Britt MR, et al. Prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections: efficacy of daily meatal care regimens. Am J Med 1981; 70: 655–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Nicolle LE. The chronic indwelling catheter and urinary infection in long-term care facility residents. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001; 22: 316–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Cafferkey MT, Falkiner FR, Gillespie WA, et al. Antibiotics for the prevention of septicemia in urology. J Antimicrob Chemother 1982; 9: 471–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Jewes LA, Gillespie WA, Leadbetter A, et al. Bacteriuria and bacteremia in patients with long-term indwelling catheters: a domiciliary study. J Med Microbiol 1988; 26: 61–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Nicolle LE, SHEA Long Term Care Committee. Urinary tract infections in long term care facilities. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001; 22: 167–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wyndaele JJ. Intermittent catheterization: which is the optimal technique? Spinal Cord 2002; 40: 432–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Brosnahan J, Jull A, Tracy C. Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalized patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (1): CD004013Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kunin CM, Chin QF, Chambers S. Formation of encrustations on indwelling urinary catheters in the elderly: a comparison of different types of catheter materials in ‘blockers’ and ‘non-blockers’. J Urol 1987; 138: 899–902PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Maki DG, Tambyah PA. Engineering out the risk for infection with urinary catheters. Emerg Infect Dis 2001; 7: 342–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lindsay E. Nicolle
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Internal Medicine and Medical MicrobiologyUniversity of Manitoba, Health Sciences CentreWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations