Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Epidemiology and Management of Diverticular Disease of the Colon

  • Therapy In Practice
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Colonic diverticula are protrusions of the mucosa through the outer muscular layers, which are usually abnormally thickened, to form narrow necked pouches. Diverticular disease of the colon covers a wide clinical spectrum: from an incidental finding to symptomatic uncomplicated disease to diverticulitis. A quarter of patients with diverticulitis will develop potentially life-threatening complications including perforation, fistulae, obstruction or stricture. In Western countries diverticular disease predominantly affects the left colon, its prevalence increases with age and its causation has been linked to a low dietary fibre intake. Right-sided diverticular disease is more commonly seen in Asian populations and affects younger patients. Its pathogenesis and relationship to left-sided diverticular disease remains unclear. Diverticular disease of the colon is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the Western world and its frequency has increased throughout the whole of the 20th century. Since it is a disease of the elderly, and with an aging population, it can be expected to occupy an increasing portion of the surgical and gastroenterological workload. It is uncertain what symptoms uncomplicated diverticular disease gives rise to: there is an overlap with irritable bowel syndrome. Diagnosis is primarily by barium enema and colonoscopy, but more sophisticated imaging procedures such as computed tomography (CT) are increasingly being used to assess and treat complications such as abscess or fistula, or to provide alternative diagnoses if diverticulosis is not confirmed.

Initial therapy for uncomplicated diverticulitis is supportive, including monitoring, bowel rest and antibacterials. CT is used to guide percutaneous drainage of abscesses to avoid surgery or allow it to be performed as an elective procedure. Surgery is indicated for complications of acute diverticulitis, including failure of medical treatment, gross perforation, and abscess formation that cannot be resolved by percutaneous drainage. Complications of chronic diverticulitis (fistula formation, stricture and obstruction) are also usually treated surgically. However, the indications for, and the timing and staging of operations for diverticular disease are often difficult decisions requiring sound clinical judgement. Factors such as the number of episodes of inflammation, the age of the patient, and his/her overall medical condition play a role in determining whether or not a patient should undergo surgical resection. Laparoscopic surgery may be associated with less pain, less morbidity and shorter hospital stays, but its exact role is yet to be defined. Diverticular disease of the colon is the most common cause of acute lower gastrointestinal haemorrhage, which can be massive. Although the majority of patients stop bleeding spontaneously, angiographic and surgical treatment may be required, while the place of endoscopic haemostasis remains to be established.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Farrell RJ, Farrell JJ, Morrin MM. Diverticular disease in the elderly. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2001; 30: 475–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morson BC. Pathology of diverticular disease of the colon. Clin Gastroenterol 1975; 4: 37–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Torsoli A, Inoue M, Manousos O, et al. Diverticular disease of the colon: data relevant to management. Gastroenterol Int 1991; 4: 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hughes LE. Postmortem survey of diverticular disease of the colon: I. diverticulosis and diverticulitis. Gut 1969; 10(5): 336–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Parks TG. Post-mortem studies on the colon with special reference to diverticular disease. Proc R Soc Med 1968; 61(9): 932–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Perry PM, Morson BC. Right-sided diverticulosis of the colon. Br J Surg 1971; 58(12): 902–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chia JG, Wilde CC, Ngoi SS, et al. Trends of diverticular disease of the large bowel in a newly developed country. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34(6): 498–501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Graham SM, Ballantyne GH. Cecal diverticulitis: a review of the American experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1987; 30: 821–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miura S, Kodaira S, Shatari T, et al. Recent trends in diverticulosis of the right colon in Japan: retrospective review in a regional hospital. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1383–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Painter NS, Burkitt DP. Diverticular disease of the colon: a 20th century problem. Clin Gastroenterol 1975; 4: 3–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schoetz Jr DJ. Diverticular disease of the colon: a century-old problem. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 703–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hughes LE. Postmortem survey of diverticular disease of the colon: II. the muscular abnormality of the sigmoid colon. Gut 1969; 10: 344–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Connell AM. Applied physiology of the colon: factors relevant to diverticular disease. Clin Gastroenterol 1975; 4: 23–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Golder M, Burleigh DE, Belai A, et al. Smooth muscle cholinergic denervation hypersensitivity in diverticular disease. Lancet 2003; 361: 1945–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Whiteway J, Morson BC. Elastosis in diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon. Gut 1985; 26: 258–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Langman MJS. The epidemiology of digestive disease. London: Edward Arnold, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  17. Welch CE, Allen AW, Donaldson GA. An appraisal of resection of the colon for diverticulitis of the sigmoid. Ann Surg 1953; 138: 332–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Parks TG. Natural history of diverticular disease of the colon. Clin Gastroenterol 1975; 4: 53–69

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Manousos ON, Truelove SC, Lumsden K. Prevalence of colonic diverticulosis in general population of Oxford area. BMJ 1967; 3: 762–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sandler RS, Everhart JE, Donowitz M, et al. The burden of selected digestive diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology 2002; 122: 1500–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Painter NS, Burkitt DP. Diverticular disease of the colon: a deficiency disease of Western civilization. BMJ 1971; 2: 450–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ohi G, Minowa K, Oyama T, et al. Changes in dietary fiber intake among Japanese in the 20th century: a relationship to the prevalence of diverticular disease. Am J Clin Nutr 1983; 38: 115–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brodribb AJ, Humphreys DM. Diverticular disease: three studies: Part I. relation to other disorders and fibre intake. BMJ 1976; I: 424–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Manousos O, Day NE, Tzonou A, et al. Diet and other factors in the aetiology of diverticulosis: an epidemiological study in Greece. Gut 1985; 26: 544–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin OS, Soon MS, Wu SS, et al. Dietary habits and right-sided colonic diverticulosis. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1412–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Aldoori WH, Giovannucci EL, Rockett HR, et al. A prospective study of dietary fiber types and symptomatic diverticular disease in men. J Nutr 1998; 128: 714–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Aldoori WH, Giovannucci EL, Rimm EB, et al. Prospective study of physical activity and the risk of symptomatic diverticular disease in men. Gut 1995; 36: 276–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kasper H, Bach M. Prevalence of colon diverticulosis in Europe. Bibl Nutr Dieta 1989; (44): 144–50

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kyle J, Davidson AI. The changing pattern of hospital admissions for divertical disease of the colon. Br J Surg 1975; 62: 537–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Makela J, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S. Prevalence of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis is increasing. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 955–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hart AR, Kennedy HJ, Stebbings WS, et al. How frequently do large bowel diverticula perforate: an incidence and cross-sectional study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000; 12(6): 661–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kang JY, Hoare J, Tinto A, et al. Diverticular disease of the colon: on the rise: a study of hospital admissions in England between 1989/1990 and 1999/2000. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 17(9): 1189–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Goh H, Bourne R. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and perforated diverticular disease: a case-control study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2002; 84(2): 93–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Higham J, Kang JY, Majeed A. Recent trends in admissions and mortality due to peptic ulcer in England: increasing frequency of haemorrhage among older subjects. Gut 2002; 50: 460–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kyle J, Adesola AO, Tinckler LF, et al. Incidence of diverticulitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1967; 2: 77–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kang J-Y, Dhar A, Pollok R. Diverticular disease of the colon: ethnic differences in frequency. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004. In press

    Google Scholar 

  37. Boulos PB. Complicated diverticulosis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2002; 16(4): 649–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Thompson WG, Longstreth GF, Drossman DA, et al. Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gut 1999; 45Suppl. 2: II43–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Parks TG. Natural history of diverticular disease of the colon: a review of 521 cases. BMJ 1969; 4: 639–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Fearnhead NS, Mortensen NJ. Clinical features and differential diagnosis of diverticular disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2002; 16: 577–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Domjan J, Blaquiere R, Odurny A. Is minimal preparation computed tomography comparable with barium enema in elderly patients with colonic symptoms? Clin Radiol 1998; 53: 894–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Robinson P, Burnett H, Nicholson DA. The use of minimal preparation computed tomography for the primary investigation of colon cancer in frail or elderly patients. Clin Radiol 2002; 57: 389–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Beall DP, Fortman BJ, Lawler BC, et al. Imaging bowel obstruction: a comparison between fast magnetic resonance imaging and helical computed tomography. Clin Radiol 2002; 57: 719–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Boulos PB, Karamanolis DG, Salmon PR, et al. Is colonoscopy necessary in diverticular disease? Lancet 1984; I: 95–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Schnyder P, Moss AA, Thoeni RF, et al. A double-blind study of radiologic accuracy in diverticulitis, diverticulosis, and carcinoma of the sigmoid colon. J Clin Gastroenterol 1979; 1: 55–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Stefansson T, Ekbom A, Sparen P, et al. Increased risk of left sided colon cancer in patients with diverticular disease. Gut 1993; 34: 499–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Aldoori W, Ryan-Harshman M. Preventing diverticular disease: review of recent evidence on high-fibre diets. Can Fam Physician 2002; 48: 1632–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Marlett JA, McBurney MI, Slavin JL. Position of the American Dietetic Association: health implications of dietary fiber. J Am Diet Assoc 2002; 102: 993–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Morris CR, Harvey IM, Stebbings WSL, et al. Do calcium antagonists protect against perforated colonic diverticular disease: a case control study. Gut 2003; 52Suppl. 1: A27

    Google Scholar 

  50. Brodribb AJ. Treatment of symptomatic diverticular disease with a high-fibre diet. Lancet 1977; I: 664–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Papi C, Ciaco A, Koch M, et al. Efficacy of rifaximin in the treatment of symptomatic diverticular disease of the colon: a multicentre double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1995; 9: 33–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Makela J, Vuolio S, Kiviniemi H, et al. Natural history of diverticular disease: when to operate? Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 1523–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Faucheron JL. Toxicity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the large bowel. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999; 11: 389–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Bartlett JG. Clostridium difficile-associated enteric disease. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2002; 4(6): 477–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Vernava III AM, Moore BA, Longo WE, et al. Lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 846–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. McGuire Jr HH. Bleeding colonic diverticula: a reappraisal of natural history and management. Ann Surg 1994; 220: 653–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Suzman MS, Talmor M, Jennis R, et al. Accurate localization and surgical management of active lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage with technetium-labeled erythrocyte scintigraphy. Ann Surg 1996; 224: 29–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Ng DA, Opelka FG, Beck DE, et al. Predictive value of technetium Tc 99m-labeled red blood cell scintigraphy for positive angiogram in massive lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 471–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Cohn SM, Moller BA, Zieg PM, et al. Angiography for preoperative evaluation in patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding: are the benefits worth the risks? Arch Surg 1998; 133: 50–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Eggenberger JC. Diverticular disease. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 1999; 2(6): 507–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Jensen DM, Machicado GA, Jutabha R, et al. Urgent colonoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of severe diverticular hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 78–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Farivar M, Perrotto JL. Urgent colonoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of severe diverticular hemorrhage [letter]. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1609

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Jensen DM, Machicado GA. Diagnosis and treatment of severe hematochezia: the role of urgent colonoscopy after purge. Gastroenterology 1988; 95: 1569–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Wong JL, Dalton HR. Urgent endoscopy in lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Gut 2001; 48(2): 155–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Koperna T, Kisser M, Reiner G, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of bleeding colonic diverticula. Hepatogastroenterology 2001; 48: 702–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Hinchey EJ, Schaal PG, Richards GK. Treatment of perforated diverticular disease of the colon. Adv Surg 1978; 12: 85–109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Akle CA. Endoprostheses for colonic strictures. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 310–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Paul L, Pinto I, Gomez H, et al. Metallic stents in the treatment of benign diseases of the colon: preliminary experience in 10 cases. Radiology 2002; 223: 715–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Tamim WZ, Ghellai A, Counihan TC, et al. Experience with endoluminal colonic wall stents for the management of large bowel obstruction for benign and malignant disease. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 434–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Efron JE, Nogueras JJ. Controversies in diverticular disease: indications for surgery and surgical options. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 2000; 11: 206–13

    Google Scholar 

  71. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on the use of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. London: NICE, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  72. Wexner SD, Moscovitz ID. Laparoscopic colectomy in diverticular and Crohn’s disease. Surg Clin North Am 2000; 80: 1299–319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Kronborg O. Treatment of perforated sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Surg 1993; 80: 505–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Zeitoun G, Laurent A, Rouffet F, et al. Multicentre, randomized clinical trial of primary versus secondary sigmoid resection in generalized peritonitis complicating sigmoid diverticulitis. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 1366–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Lewis SL, Abercrombie GF. Conservative surgery for vesicocolic fistula. J R Soc Med 1984; 77(2): 102–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the editor of Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics for permission to reproduce figure 1, and Dr Alan Grundy for permission to reproduce CT and barium enema images.

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, St George’s Hospital and Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, England

    Jin-Yong Kang &  J. Douglas Maxwell

  2. Department of Colorectal Surgery, St George’s Hospital and Medical School, London, England

    David Melville

Authors
  1. Jin-Yong Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Melville
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Douglas Maxwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Douglas Maxwell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kang, JY., Melville, D. & Maxwell, J.D. Epidemiology and Management of Diverticular Disease of the Colon. Drugs Aging 21, 211–228 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200421040-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200421040-00001

Keywords

Search

Navigation