Abstract
Tumour-induced osteolysis or lytic bone disease is mediated by osteoclast activation. Osteoclasts can be activated directly by tumour products or indirectly through an influence on other cells. By reducing osteoclastic activity, bisphosphonates inhibit bone resorption. Pamidronate is a second-generation amino-bisphosphonate that is a potent inhibitor of osteoclastic activity. In multiple myeloma, a phase III study has shown that the proportion of patients at the end of 21 months who had any skeletal event was significantly lower in the pamidronate group (38%) than in the placebo group (58%). The therapeutic benefit was independent of the type of antimyeloma chemotherapy. Patients who received pamidronate had significant decrease in bone pain and delayed deterioration in performance status and quality of life. Overall there was no survival advantage in patients who received pamidronate. In similar fashion, in 2 phase III breast cancer trials, patients who received pamidronate had fewer skeletal events, decrease in bone pain and analgesic use, and slower deterioration of performance status that in those patients receiving placebo. Again, there was no survival advantage in these patients. Recent studies suggest that the bisphosphonates clodronate can prevent the development of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stashenko P, Dewhirst FE, Peros WJ, et al. Synergistic interactions between interleukin 1, tumor necrosis factor, and lymphotoxin in bone resorption. J Immunol 1987; 138: 1464–8
Mundy GR. Mechanisms of osteolytic bone destruction. Bone 1991; 12Suppl 1: 1–6
Lahtinen R, Laakso M, Palva I, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled multicentre trial of clodronic acid in multiple myeloma. Lancet 1992; 340: 1049–52
Man Z, Otero AB, Rendo P, et al. Use of pamidronate for multiple myeloma osteolytic lesions. Lancet 1990; 335: 663
Theibaud D, Leyuraz S, Von Fliedner V, et al. Treatment of bone metastases from breast cancer and myeloma with pamidronate. Eur J Cancer 1991; 27: 37–41
Belch AR, Bergsagel DE, Wilson K, et al. Effect of daily etidronate acid on the osteolysis of multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 1397–402
Heim ME, Clemens MR, Queisser W, et al. Prospective randomized trial of dichloromethylene bisphosphonate (clodronate) in patients with multiple myeloma requiring treatment: a multicenter study. Onkologie 1995; 18: 439–48
Berenson JR, Lichtenstein A, Porter L, et al. Efficacy of pamidronate in reducing the skeletal events in patients with advanced multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 488–93
Coleman RE, Rubens RD. The clinical course of bone metastases from breast cancer. Br J Cancer 1987, 55: 61–6
Siris ES, Hyman GA, Canfield RE. Effects of dichloromethylene diphosphonate in women with breast carcinoma metastatic to the skeleton. Am J Med 1983; 74: 401–6
Elomaa I, Blomqvist C, Grohn P, et al. Long-term controlled trial of bisphosphonate in patients with osteolytic bone metastases. Lancet 1983; I: 146–9
Paterson AHG, Powles TJ, Kanis TA, et al. Double-blind controlled trial of oral clodronic acid in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 59–65
van Breukern FJM, Bijroet OLM, VanOosterom AT. Inhibition of osteolytic bone lesions by (3-amino-1-hydroxypropylidene)-1, 1-bisphosphonate (APD). Lancet 1979; I: 805–6
Coleman RE, Woll PJ, Miles M, et al. Treatment of bone metastases from breast cancer with (3-amino-l-hydroxypropylidene)-1, 1-bisphosphonate (APD). Br J Cancer 1988; 48: 621–5
Morton AR, Cantrill JA, Pillai GV, et al. Sclerosis of lytic bone metastases after disodium aminohydroxypropylidene bisphosphonate (APD) in patients with breast carcinoma. BMJ 1988; 297: 772–3
Burckhardt P, Thiebaud D, Percy L, et al. Treatment of tumor-induced osteolysis by APD. Recent Results Cancer Res 1989; 116: 54–66
van Holten-Verzantvoort ATM, Zwinderman AH, Aaronson NK, et al. The effect of supportive pamidronate treatment on aspects of quality of life of patients with advanced breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 1991; 27: 544–9
van Holten-Verzantvoort ATM, Kroon HM, Bijvoet OLM, et al. Palliative pamidronate treatment in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 491–8
Glover D, Lipton A, Keller A, et al. Intravenous pamidronate disodium treatment of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer: a dose-seeking study. Cancer 1994; 74: 2949–55
Hortobagyi GN, Theriault RL, Porter L, et al. Efficacy of pamidronate in reducing skeletal complications in patients with breast cancer and lytic bone metastases. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1785–91
Lipton A, Theriault R, Leff R, et al. Long-term reduction of skeletal complications in breast cancer patients with osteolytic bone metastases receiving hormone therapy by monthly 90 mg pamidronate (Aredia) infusions [abstract no. 531]. Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO): 1997 May 17–20; Denver, 16
Conte PF, Latreille J, Maurik L, et al. Delay in progression of bone metastases in breast cancer patients treated with intravenous pamidronate: results from a multinational randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 2552–9
Lipton A, Hortobagyi G, Simeone J, et al. Progression of bone metastases in breast cancer patients receiving pamidronate [abstract no. 469]. Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO): 1998 May 16–19; Los Angeles
Kanis JA, Powles T, Paterson AHG, et al. Clodronate decreases the frequency of skeletal metastases in women with breast cancer. Bone 1996; 19: 663–7
van Holten-Verzantvoort ATM, Hermans J, Beex LVAM, et al. Does supportive pamidronate treatment prevent or delay the first manifestation of bone metastases in breast cancer patients? Eur J Cancer 1996; 32A: 450–4
Diel IJ, Solomayer EF, Costa SD, et al. Reduction in new metastases in breast cancer with adjuvant clodronate treatment. N Engle J Med 1998; 339: 357–63
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lipton, A., Berenson, J.R. Bisphosphonate Treatment of Lytic Bone Metastases. Drugs & Aging 14, 241–246 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-199914040-00001
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-199914040-00001