Summary
Nifedipine, the prototype for the dihydropyridine class of calcium antagonists, has been available for 20 years and its efficacy as a vasodilator and an antihypertensive agent is well recognised. The development of the so-called nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS), which allows once-daily administration, has modified and improved the overall therapeutic profile of nifedipine to such a significant extent that it might almost be considered a new drug entity. The nifedipine GITS is associated with distinct improvements in terms of patient compliance and convenience, and a reduced incidence of adverse effects. With regard to the care of the elderly, this ‘new’ drug offers the prospect of a well tolerated and effective treatment without major cost implications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Swanson DR, Barclay BL, Wong PS, et al. Nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system. Am J Med 1987; 83 Suppl. 6B: 3–9
Chung M, Reitberg DP, Gaffney M, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system: a controlled release formulation of nifedipine. Am J Med 1987; 83 Suppl. 6B: 10–4
Brogden RN, McTavish D. Nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS): a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in hypertension and angina pectoris. Drugs 1995; 50_(3): 495–512
Grundy JS, Foster RT. The nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS): evaluation of pharmaceutical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacological properties. Clin Pharmacokinet 1996 Jan; 30(1): 28–51
Robertson DRC, Waller DG, Renwick AG, et al. Age related changes in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nifedipine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1988; 25: 297–305
Crome P, Muller FO, Wijayawardhana P, et al. Single dose and steady state pharmacokinetic profiles of nifedipine GITS tablets in healthy elderly and young volunteers. Drug Invest 1993; 5(4): 193–9
Kleinbloesem CH, van Brummelen P, Danhof M, et al. Rate of increase in the plasma concentration of nifedipine as a major determinant of its haemodynamic effects in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1987; 41: 26–30
Ruzicka M, Leenen FHH. Relevance of intermittent increases in sympathetic activity for adverse outcome on short-acting calcium antagonists. In: Laragh JH, Bremner BM, editors. Hypertension: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press Ltd, 1995: 2815–25
Fröhlich ED, McLoughlin MJ, Losem CJ, et al. Hemodynamic comparison of two nifedipine formulations in patients with essential hypertension. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68: 1346–50
Donnelly R, Elliott HL, Meredith PA, et al. Nifedipine: individual responses and concentration-effect relationships. Hypertension 1988; 12: 443–9
Blychert E, Edgar B, Elmfeldt D, et al. Plasma concentration-effect relationships for felodipine: a meta-analysis. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992; 52: 80–9
Donnelly R, Meredith PA, Miller SHK, et al. Pharmacodynamic modeling of the antihypertensive response to amlodipine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993; 54: 303–10
Ueda S, Meredith PA, Howie CA, et al. A comparative assessment of the duration of action of amlodipine and nifedipine GITS in normotensive subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1993; 36: 561–6
Bainbridge AD, Herlihy O, Meredith PA, et al. A comparative assessment of amlodipine and felodipine ER: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic indices. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1993; 45: 425–30
Gong L, Zhang W, Zhu Y, et al. Shanghai Trial of Nifedipine in the Elderly (STONE). J Hypertens 1996; 14: 1237–45
Lever AF, Ramsay LE. Treatment of hypertension in the elderly. J Hypertens 1995; 13: 571–9
Col N, Fanale JE, Kronholm P. The role of medication noncompliance and adverse drug reactions in hospitalizations of the elderly. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 841–5
Schwartz D, Wang M, Zeitz L, et al. Medication errors made by elderly, chronically ill patients. Am J Public Health 1962; 52: 2018–29
Cooper JK, Love DW, Raffoul PR. Intentional prescription non-adherence (noncompliance) by the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 1982; 30: 229–33
Monane M, Bohn RL, Gurwitz JH, et al. Noncompliance with congestive heart failure therapy in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 433–6
Klein LE. Compliance and BP control. Hypertension 1988; 11 Suppl. 1: 61–4
Toal CB, Laplante L. Is there a difference in hypertensive patient compliance between a once a day or twice a day nifedipine? Am J Hypertens 1995; 8(4 pt 2): D17
Ekbom T, Dahlof B, Hansson L, et al. Antihypertensive efficacy and side effects of three beta blockers and a diuretic in elderly hypertensives: a report from the STOP-Hypertension study. J Hypertens 1992; 10: 1525–30
Johannesson M, Jönsson B. A review of cost-effectiveness analyses of hypertension treatment. Pharmacoeconomics 1992; 1: 250–64
Skaer TL, Sclar DA, Robison LM, et al. Effect of pharmaceutical formulation on health care expenditures for hypertension: a study of verapamil in a medical population. Curr Ther Res 1993; 53: 256–64
Hilleman DE, Mohiuddin SM, Lucas BD, et al. Cost minimization analysis of initial antihypertensive therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate essential diastolic hypertension. Clin Ther 1994; 16(1): 88–102
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elliott, H.L., Meredith, P.A. Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Nifedipine. Drugs & Aging 11, 470–479 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-199711060-00006
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-199711060-00006