Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mammographic Screening in Older Women

Is It Worthwhile?

  • Review Article
  • Disease Management
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The optimal upper age limit in mammographic screening for breast cancer is still a matter for debate. The incidence of breast cancer rises gradually with increasing age and, without screening, breast cancer in elderly women is diagnosed at a more advanced stage than in younger women. After menopause, much of the glandular tissue of the breast is replaced by fat, which facilitates the mammographic detection of breast cancer in older women. Furthermore, the tumour growth rate decreases with increasing age.

Recently, a reduction in breast cancer mortality due to mammographic screening has been shown for women aged up to 75 years. There is a lack of data for women over the age of 75 years, however, because the number of women screened in the only study that included this age category is too small to give reliable results. We conclude that mammographic screening is beneficial at least up to the age of 75 years, and may also be beneficial up to age 85 years in healthy women with a good life expectancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van Dijck JAAM, Verbeek ALM, Hendriks JHCL, et al. Screening for breast cancer after the age of 70 years: a further reduction in breast cancer mortality? A review of the literature [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1995; 139: 428–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Harris JR, Lippman ME, Veronesi U, et al. Breast cancer (first of three parts). N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 319–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell MK, Feuer EJ, Wun LM. Cohort-specific risks of developing breast cancer to age 85 in Connecticut. Epidemiology 1994; 5: 290–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Parkin DM, Muir CS, Whelan SL, et al., editors. Cancer incidence in five continents. Vol. VI. Lyon: IARC Scientific Publications (No. 120), 1992

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hurley SF, Kaldor JM. The benefits and risks of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev 1992; 14: 101–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fletcher SW, Black W, Harris R, et al. Report of the international workshop on screening for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 1644–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. De Koning HJ, Boer R, Warmerdam PG, et al. Quantitative interpretation of age-specific mortality reductions from the Swedish breast cancer-screening trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 1217–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, et al. Efficacy of screening mammography. JAMA 1995; 273: 149–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller AB. Mammography screening guidelines for women 40 to 49 and over 65 years old. Ann Epidemiol 1994; 4: 96–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leitch MA. Controversies in breast cancer screening. Cancer 1995; 76: 2064–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shapiro S. Periodic breast cancer screening in seven foreign countries. Cancer 1992; 69: 1919–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Costanza ME. Breast cancer screening in older women: overview. J Gerontol 1992; 47: 1–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Forum on breast cancer screening in older women. Screening recommendations of the forum panel. J Gerontol 1992; 47: 5

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hankey BF, Miller B, Curtis R, et al. Trends in breast cancer in younger women in contrast to older women. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1994; 16: 7–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Feuer EJ, Wun L-M. How much of the recent rise in breast cancer incidence can be explained by increases in mammography utilization? A dynamic population model approach. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136: 1423–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Woolf SH. United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations on breast cancer screening. Cancer 1992; 69: 1913–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Peer PGM, Holland R, Hendriks JHCL, et al. Age-specific effectiveness of the Nijmegen population-based breast cancer-screening program: assessment of early indicators of screening effectiveness. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994; 86: 436–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Otten JDM, Van Dijck JAAM, Peer PGM, et al. Long-term breast cancer screening in Nijmegen: the 9 rounds from 1975–1992. J Epidemiol Comm Health 1996; 50: 353–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Dijck JAAM, Verbeek ALM, Hendriks JHCL, et al. Mammographic screening after the age of 65 years: early outcomes in the Nijmegen programme. Br J Cancer. In press

  20. Wegman ME. Annual summary of vital statistics: 1993. Pediatrics 1993; 92: 743–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kopans DB. Screening mammography in women over age 65. J Gerontol 1992; 47: 59–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Clark GM, Osborne CK, McGuire WL. Correlations between estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and patient characteristics in human breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1984; 2: 1102–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Clark GM. The biology of breast cancer in older women. J Gerontol 1992; 47: 19–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Peer PGM, Van Dijck JAAM, Hendriks JHCL, et al. Age-dependent growth rate of primary breast cancer. Cancer 1993; 71: 3547–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Peer PGM, Verbeek ALM, Straatman H, et al. Age-specific sensitivities of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1996; 38: 153–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Adami H-O, Malker B, Holmberg L, et al. The relation between survival and age at diagnosis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 559–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yancik R, Ries LG, Yates JW. Breast cancer in aging women: a population-based study of contrasts in stage, surgery, and survival. Cancer 1989; 63: 976–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bergman L, Kluck HM, Van Leeuwen FE, et al. The influence of age on treatment choice and survival of elderly breast cancer patients in South-Eastern Netherlands: a population-based study. Eur J Cancer 1992; 28A: 1475–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Satariano WA, Ragland DR. The effect of comorbidity on 3-year survival of women with primary breast cancer survival. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120: 104–10

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Goodwin JS, Hunt WC, Samet JM. Determinants of cancer therapy in elderly patients. Cancer 1993; 72: 594–601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Silliman RA, Balducci L, Goodwin JS, et al. Breast cancer care in old age: what we know, don’t know, and do. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 190–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Balducci L. Perspectives on quality of life of older patients with cancer. Drugs Aging 1994; 4: 313–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bergman L, Van Dongen JA, Van Ooijen B, et al. Should tamoxifen be a primary treatment choice for elderly breast cancer patients with locoregional disease? Breast Cancer Res Treat 1995; 34: 77–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Maher M, Dreyfus H, Campana F, et al. Management of breast cancer in the elderly. Eur J Cancer Care 1995; 4: 75–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nyström L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S, et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 1993; 341: 973–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Day NE. Screening for breast cancer. Br Med Bull 1991; 47: 400–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Morrison AS. Efficacy of screening for breast cancer in older women. J Gerontol 1992; 47: 80–4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen H-H, Tabár L, Fagerberg G, et al. Effect of breast cancer screening after age 65. J Med Screen 1995; 2: 10–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Van Dijck JAAM, Holland R, Verbeek ALM, et al. Efficacy of mammographic screening of the elderly: a case-referent study in the Nijmegen program in the Netherlands. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994; 86: 934–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Van Dijck JAAM, Verbeek ALM, Beex LVAM, et al. Mammographic screening after the age of 65 years: evidence for a reduction in breast cancer mortality. Int J Cancer 1996; 66: 727–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Moss SM. Case-control studies of screening. Int J Epidemiol 1991; 20: 1–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Morrison AS. Screening in chronic disease. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  43. Van Dijck JAAM, Verbeek ALM, Beex LVAM, et al. Breast cancer mortality in a non-randomised trial on mammographic screening in women over age 65. Int J Cancer. In press

  44. Auvinen A, Elovainio L, Hakama M. Breast self-examination and survival from breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1996; 38: 161–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Mittra I. Breast screening: the case for physical examination without mammography. Lancet 1994; 343: 342–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Miller AB, Baines CJ, Wall C. Canadian National Breast Screening Study, 2: breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50–59 years. Can Med Assoc J 1992; 147: 1477–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Boyd NF, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ, et al. A critical appraisal of the Canadian National Breast Cancer Screening Study. Radiology 1993; 189: 661–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Koroltchouk V, Stanly K, Stjernswärd J. The control of breast cancer: a World Health Organization perspective. Cancer 1990; 65: 2803–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Reintgen D, Berman C, Cox C, et al. The anatomy of missed breast cancers. Surg Oncol 1993; 2: 65–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Scaf-Klomp W, Van Sonderen FL, Stewart R, et al. Compliance after 17 years of breast cancer screening. J Med Screen 1995; 2: 195–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Costanza ME. The extent of breast cancer screening in older women. Cancer 1994; 74: 2046–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Zapka JG, Berkowitz E. A qualitative study about breast cancer screening in older women: implications for research. J Gerontol 1992; 47: 43–9

    Google Scholar 

  53. McCool WF. Barriers to breast cancer screening in older women: a review. J Nurse Midwifery 1994; 39: 283–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Blustein J. Medicare coverage, supplemental insurance, and the use of mammography by older women. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 1138–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Mor V, Pacala JT, Rakowski W. Mammography for older women: who uses? Who benefits? J Gerontol 1992; 47: 43–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lidbrink E, Frisell J, Brandberg Y, et al. Nonattendance in the Stockholm mammography screening trial: relative mortality and reasons for nonattendance. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1995; 35: 267–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Boer R, de Koning HJ, van Oortmarssen GJ, et al. In search of the best upper age limit for breast cancer screening. Eur J Cancer 1995; 31A: 2040–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Mandelblatt JS, Wheat ME, Monane M, et al. Breast cancer screening for elderly women with and without comorbid conditions. Ann Intern Med 1992; 116: 722–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Kattlove H, Liberati A, Keeler E, et al. Benefits and costs of screening and treatment for early breast cancer. J Am Med Assoc 1995; 273: 142–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. De Koning HJ, Van Ineveld BM, Van Oortmarssen GJ, et al. Breast cancer screening and cost-effectiveness: policy alternatives, quality of life considerations and the possible impact of uncertain factors. Int J Cancer 1991; 49: 531–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Van Ineveld BM, Van Oortmarssen GJ, De Koning HJ, et al. How cost-effective is breast cancer screening in different EC countries? Eur J Cancer 1993; 29A: 1663–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Carter R, Glasziou P, Van Oortmarssen G, et al. Cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening in Australia. Aust J Public Health 1993; 17: 42–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology, University of Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Jos A. A. M. van Dijck PhD, Mireille J. M. Broeders & André L. M. Verbeek

  2. National Expert and Training Centre for Breast Cancer Screening, University Hospital Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Jos A. A. M. van Dijck PhD, Mireille J. M. Broeders & André L. M. Verbeek

Authors
  1. Jos A. A. M. van Dijck PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mireille J. M. Broeders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. André L. M. Verbeek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jos A. A. M. van Dijck PhD.

Additional information

This text is an update of an article previously published in the Dutch language.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Dijck, J.A.A.M., Broeders, M.J.M. & Verbeek, A.L.M. Mammographic Screening in Older Women. Drugs & Aging 10, 69–79 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-199710020-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-199710020-00001

Keywords

Search

Navigation