Summary
Age alone is a poor marker of disability. Decision making in medicine should be based on potential benefit to the individual. Most healthcare expenditure on the elderly is for routine care, which few could argue should be denied because of age. Healthcare reforms that encourage functional independence and community based care of the elderly are more likely to lead to cost savings than simple rationing according to age. Treatment options previously thought futile in the elderly, particularly surgical interventions and drug therapy for cardiovascular disease, have been shown to be effective in terms of improved health and cost benefit. Thus, discrimination on the basis of age (agism) is not only ethically unacceptable in a society embracing principles of justice and equity, but also unsupportable on scientific and/or economic analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Royal College of Physicians. Ensuring equity and quality of care for elderly people. London: Royal College of Physicians, 1994
Grimley Evans J. Aging and rationing: physiology not age should determine care. BMJ 1991; 303: 869–70
Fowles DG. A profile of older Americans: 1990. DHHS publication PF3029 (1290) D996. Washington, DC: American Association of Retired Persons, Administration on Aging, 1990: 13
Shaw AB. In defence of agism. J Med Ethics 1994; 20: 188–91
Deaths Australia 1994. Cat No. 3302.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1995
Manton KG, Vaupel J. Survival after the age of 80 in the United States, Sweden, France, England and Japan. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1232–5
Grundy E. The epidemiology of aging. In: Brocklehurst JC, Tallis RC, Fillit HM, editors. Textbook of geriatric medicine. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1992: 3–20
Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program Cooperative Research Group. Prevention of stroke by anti-hypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension: final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). JAMA 1991; 152: 1977–84
Lubitz J, Beebe J, Baker C. Longevity and Medicare expenditures. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 999–1003
Kramer AM. Healthcare for elderly persons — myths and realities. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 27–9
Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. The economics of dying — the illusion of cost savings at the end of life. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 540–4
Henderson J, Goldacre MJ, Griffith M. Hospital care for the elderly in the final year of life: a population based study. BMJ 1990; 301: 17–8
Stuck AE, Aronow HU, Steiner A, et al. A trial of annual in-home comprehensive geriatric assessments for elderly people living in the community. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1184–9
Rich MW, Beckham V, Wittenberg C, et al. A multidisciplinary intervention to prevent the readmission of elderly patients with congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1190–5
Krumholz HM, Pasternak RC, Weinstein M, et al. Cost effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase in elderly patients with suspected myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 7–13
Wong JB, Salem DN, Pauker SG. You’re never too old. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 971–5
Shah VZ, Rosenfeldt FL, Parkin GW, et al. Cardiac surgery in the very elderly. Med J Aust 1994; 160: 332–4
Bronner LL, Kanter DS, Manson JE. Primary prevention of stroke. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1392–1400
The management of hypertension: a consensus statement. Med J Aust 1994; 160 Suppl.: S1–16
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scharf, S., Flamer, H. & Christophidis, N. Age as a Basis for Healthcare Rationing. Drugs & Aging 9, 399–402 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-199609060-00002
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-199609060-00002