Skip to main content
Log in

When Drug Treatment in the Elderly Is Not Cost Effective

An Ethical Dilemma in An Environment of Healthcare Rationing

  • Leading Article
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In light of moves towards the view that rationing of healthcare resources is inevitable, the question arises as to whether age is a relevant consideration. To hold age as relevant in this context attracts the charge of agism; however, age may be related to some other characteristic(s) that are pertinent.

In the context of drug treatment of the elderly, there is evidence to suggest that there are important differences between older and younger patients in terms of adverse responses to drugs because of factors such as physiological changes and multiple health problems, which occur with aging. On the other hand, some studies show beneficial effects of drug therapy.

There is a need for more empirical data on cost effectiveness. Ethics arguably have to take into account factors other than cost effectiveness, such as equity. A central question is whether what is required is a set of criteria in addition to cost effectiveness, or an interpretation of cost effectiveness sensitive to broader considerations, such as quality of life (QOL). In relation to the latter, the issue of age-specific measurements of QOL remains problematic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gennery B. The role of pharmacoeconomics. Br J Med Econ 1993; 6A: 3–4

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goldstein MK. Cost-utility estimates for geriatric medicine interventions: allocation of resources under health care reform. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994; 42: SA85

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berger A. Ageing world heads for health crisis. New Scientist 1995; 146(1976): 8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Niskanen M, Niskanen L. Is the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) scale agist? Drugs Aging 1994; 5(3): 153–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. The Netherlands Government Committee on Choices in Health Care. Choices in health care. The Netherlands: Zoetermeer, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harris J. The value of life. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  7. Callahan D. Setting limits: medical goals in an aging society. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  8. Callahan D. Should health care for the elderly be rationed? Coron Artery Dis 1993; 4: 393–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Porzsolt F, Zeeh J, Platt D. Palliative therapies in elderly cancer patients. Drug Ther 1995; 6(3): 192–209

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Adamcik B, Rhodes R. The pharmacist’s role in rational drug therapy of the aged. Drugs Aging 1993; 3(6): 481–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerety M, Cornell J, Plichta T, et al. Adverse events related to drugs and drug withdrawal in nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993; 41: 1326–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Balducci L. Perspectives on quality of life of older patients with cancer. Drugs Aging 1994; 4(4): 313–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bearden D, Allman R. Should hyperlipidemia in the elderly be treated? Drug Ther 1992; 22: 41–52, 88

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fletcher A, Bulpitt C. Quality of life and antihypertensive drugs in the elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res 1992; 4(2): 115–23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fletcher A, Dickinson E, Philp I. Review: audit measures: quality of life instruments for everyday use with elderly patients. Age Ageing 1992; 21: 142–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tindall H, Paynter S, Henderson M. Improvement in quality of life with insulin therapy given to older patients with poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes. Diabetic Med 1991; 8 (1 Suppl.): 31

    Google Scholar 

  17. Balducci L, Schapira D, Lyman G. Adjuvant treatment of breast cancer with tamoxifen in women aged 75 and older: a decision analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39(8): A67

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chadwick R. Justice in priority setting. In: Smith R, editor. Rationing in action. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1993: 85–95

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schneider J, Kavanagh S, Knapp M, et al. Elderly people with advanced cognitive impairment in England: resource use and costs. Ageing Society 1993; 13: 27–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Phillimore P, Beattie A. Health and inequality in the northern region 1981–1991. Newcastle: Newcastle Department of Social Policy, Newcastle University, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mackenbeth JP. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in the Netherlands: effect of a five-year research programme. BMJ 1994; 309: 1487–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kronenfeld JJ. Controversial issues in health care policy. London: Sage Publications, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  23. Davey P, Malek M, McMurdo M, et al. Economics of infection at the extremes of age. J Antimicrob Chemother 1994; 34 (A Suppl.): 129–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zirker W, Gaffney J, Ouslander J. Effects of terodiline on the quality of life in older women with urge incontinence. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40: SA37

    Google Scholar 

  25. Recchia G, de Carli G, Parise G, et al. Quality of life: a new approach to the assessment of the pharmacological treatment in the elderly patient. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 1991; 2 Suppl.: 33–8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chadwick, R., Levitt, M. When Drug Treatment in the Elderly Is Not Cost Effective. Drugs & Aging 7, 416–419 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-199507060-00002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-199507060-00002

Keywords

Navigation