Summary
Many quantities assayed in clinical laboratories demonstrate age-related changes. Particularly important periods are early life, adolescence, old age, and after the menopause in females. The changes that occur until adulthood are well documented. Fewer data are available on elderly people even though they consume a large component of healthcare resources. In diagnosis, and prior to initiation of drug therapy, when no previous results are available, reference values must be available to aid interpretation. Reference intervals generated from elderly people are sometimes wider than in younger adults. It is suggested that conventional adult reference values should be used in general for the very elderly since, at least in part, the wider intervals are probably due to inclusion of individuals who are unhealthy in the reference sample group. Most quantities have marked individuality, and serial values for an individual span only a part of the reference interval. Individuals can have values which are very unusual for them but still lie within the reference limits; this implies that clinical laboratory tests will be less than ideal in the detection of latent or early disease. The average within-subject variation in healthy elderly people and younger adults is similar. Therefore, the large database on biological variation can be used, with analytical imprecision, to calculate critical differences for serial results in an elderly individual which must be exceeded before significance can be claimed. These critical differences are of value in monitoring the effects of drug therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert A, Harris EK. Multivariate interpretation of clinical laboratory data, Dekker, New York, 1987
Costongs GMPJ, Janson PCW, Bas BM, Hermans J, Van Wersch JJ, et al. Short-term and long-term intraindividual variations and critical differences of clinical chemical laboratory parameters. Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry 23: 7–16, 1985
Dybkaer R, Lauritzen M, Krakauer R. Relative reference values for clinical chemical and haematological quantities in ‘healthy’ elderly people. Acta Medica Scandinavica 209: 1–9, 1981
Fraser CG. Interpretation of clinical chemistry laboratory data, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 1986
Fraser CG. The application of theoretical goals based on biological variation in proficiency testing. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 112: 404–415, 1988
Fraser CG. Biological variation in clinical chemistry. An update: collated data, 1988–1991. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 116: 916–923, 1992
Fraser CG, Cummings ST, Wilkinson SP, Neville RG, Knox JDE, et al. Biological variability of 26 clinical chemistry analytes in elderly people. Clinical Chemistry 35: 783–786, 1989a
Fraser CG, Fogarty Y. Interpreting laboratory results. British Medical Journal 298: 1659–1660, 1989
Fraser CG, Harris EK. Generation and application of data on biological variation in clinical chemistry. CRC Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences 27: 409–437, 1989
Fraser CG, Wilkinson SP, Neville RG, Knox JDE, King JF, et al. Biologic variation of common haematologic laboratory quantities in the elderly. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 92: 465–470, 1989b
Garry PJ, Hunt WC, VanderJagt J, Rhyne RL. Clinical chemistry reference intervals for healthy elderly subjects. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 50: 1219–1230, 1989
Grasbeck R, Saris NE. Establishment and use of normal values. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation 26 (Suppl. 110): 62–63, 1969
Harris EK. Statistical aspects of reference values in clinical pathology. Progress in Clinical Pathology 8: 45–66, 1981
Harris EK, Boyd JC. On dividing reference data into subgroups to produce separate reference ranges. Clinical Chemistry 36: 265–270, 1990
Harris EK, Yasaka T (Eds). Maintaining a healthy state within the individual, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987
Hodkinson HM. Biochemical diagnosis of the elderly. Chapman and Hall, London, 1977
Kruger A. The limits of normality in elderly patients. In Hamblin (Ed.) Balliere’s clinical haematology. International practice and research, Vol. 1, pp. 271–289, Balliere Tindall, London, 1987
Lantz B, Molander A, Nilsson G. Observations on biochemical and haematological parameters in healthy people above 80 years of age. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation 50: 807–813, 1990
Lindeman RD. Changes in renal function with aging: implications for treatment. Drugs & Aging 2: 423–431, 1992
Meites S (Ed.). Paediatric clinical chemistry reference (normal) values, 3rd ed., American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Washington, 1989
Meites S, Faulkner WR. Clinical chemistry reference values in the elderly, American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Washington, in press, 1993
Morgan DB. The impact of aging — present and future. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry 20: 257–261, 1983
Murphy EA. The normal, and the perils of the sylleptic argument. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 15: 566–582 1972
PetitClerk C. Sherbrooke data: selected population percentile values. In Grasbeck & Alstrom (Eds) Reference values in laboratory medicine. The current state of the art, pp. 353–358, Wiley, Chichester, 1981
PetitClerk C, Solberg HE. Approved recommendation (1987) on the theory of reference values. Part 2. Selection of individuals for the production of reference values. Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry 25: 639–644, 1987
Rochman H. Clinical pathology in the elderly, Karger, Basel, 1988
Ross JW. Evaluation of precision. In Werner (Ed.) CRC Handbook of Clinical Chemistry, Vol. 1, pp. 391–422, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1982
Siest G, Henny J, Schiele F, Young DS (Eds). Interpretation of clinical laboratory tests, Biomedical Publications, Foster City, 1985
Solberg HE. Approved recommendation (1986) on the theory of reference values. Part 1. The concept of reference values. Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry 25: 337–342, 1987
Solberg HE, Grasbeck R. Reference values. Advances in Clinical Chemistry 27: 1–79, 1989
Tietz NW, Shirey DF, Wekstein DR. Laboratory values in fit aging individuals — sexagenarians through centenarians. Clinical Chemistry 38: 1167–1185, 1992
Trewin VF, Lawrence CJ, Veitch GBA, Luscombe DK. Biochemical reference ranges for the elderly. British Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice 12: 78–82, 1990
Williams GZ, Widdowson GM, Penton J. Individual character of variation in time-series of healthy people. II. Differences of values for clinical chemical analytes in serum among demographic groups by age and sex. Clinical Chemistry 24: 313–320, 1978
Young DS. Biological variability. In Brown et al. (Eds) Chemical diagnosis of disease, pp. 1–114, Elsevier, Amsterdam. 1979a
Young DS. Why there is a laboratory. In Young et al. (Eds) Clinician and chemist, pp. 3–22, American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Washington, 1979b
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fraser, C.G. Age-Related Changes in Laboratory Test Results. Drugs & Aging 3, 246–257 (1993). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-199303030-00006
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-199303030-00006