Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the Risk of Fragrance Allergy in the General Population

Challenges and Methodological Issues

  • Conference Paper
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are still unanswered questions about the safety of fragrances. In this conference paper, fragrance allergy will be considered in the context of a wider discussion concerning the prevalence and causes of contact dermatitis.

No criteria for a reliable diagnosis of ‘contact dermatitis’ are available. International recommendations and standardization for the patch test method exist; however, the question of whether agents that are positive are causally linked to contact dermatitis remains fraught with uncertainties concerning false-positive rates and clinical relevance. Most of the discussion concerning prevalence or incidence variations of allergic contact dermatitis to fragrances concentrate on the frequency of positive patch tests in clinical series, i.e. ‘floating numerators’.

Risk assessment requires that data from different sources are integrated and compared. Therefore, both a ‘sentinel surveillance’ system and more refined epidemiological studies in well defined populations are needed to reliably assess risks associated with fragrance exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Pauwels M, Rogiers V. Safety evaluation of cosmetics in the EU. Reality and challenges for the toxicologist. Toxicol Lett 2004; 151: 7–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mortz CG, Andersen KE. Allergic contact dermatitis in children and adolescents. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 41: 121–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Naldi L. The epidemiology of fragrance allergy: questions and needs. Dermatology 2002; 205: 89–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Menne T, et al. The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population: prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 57: 287–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mortz CG, Lauritsen JM, Bindslev-Jensen C, et al. Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in adolescents: prevalence measures and associations. The Odense Adolescence Cohort Study on Atopic Diseases and Dermatitis (TOACS). Acta Derm Venereol 2002; 82: 352–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Diepgen TL, Weisshaar E. Contact dermatitis: epidemiology and frequent sensitizers to cosmetics. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2007; 21 Suppl. 2: 9–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Timothy B, Graham C. Postmarketing surveillance and adverse drug reactions: current perspectives and future trends. JAMA 1999; 281: 824–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Uter W, Schnuch A, Geier J, et al. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis: the information network of departments of dermatology (IVDK) in Germany. Eur J Dermatol 1998; 8: 36–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tubert P, Bégaud B, Haramburu F, et al. Spontaneous reporting: how many cases are required to trigger a warning? Br J Clin Pharmacol 1991; 32: 407–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Heydorn S, Menné T, Johansen JD. Fragrance allergy and hand eczema: a review. Contact Dermatitis 2003; 48: 59–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this conference paper. The author has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this conference paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Naldi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Naldi, L. Assessment of the Risk of Fragrance Allergy in the General Population. Drug-Safety 31, 440–443 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200831050-00012

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200831050-00012

Keywords

Navigation