Abstract
Natural health products are promoted to the public as equally or more effective and less toxic than conventional drugs. However, some ‘natural’ medicines are known to have adverse effects.
From April 2002 to August 2007, 18 suspected adverse reactions associated with propolis-containing products were reported to the national surveillance system of natural health products, coordinated by the Italian National Health Institute. Sixteen reports concerned allergic reactions (with dermatological or respiratory symptoms), while two concerned the digestive tract. Some of the reactions were serious: six patients were admitted to hospital or visited an emergency department and in two of these a life-threatening event was reported. In seven patients (four of whom were children), an allergic predisposition was indicated.
Propolis, a resinous substance collected by honeybees from the buds of living plants, has been used for several purposes (dermatitis, laryngitis, oral ulcers) because of its wide range of suggested activities (antibacterial, antiviral, anti-fungal, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and chemopreventive actions). However, propolis is also a potent sensitizer and should not be used in patients with an allergic predisposition, in particular an allergy to pollen.
In Italy, products containing bee derivatives (bee pollen, royal jelly or propolis) are available to the public as food supplements. No label warning of possible adverse reactions is found on the packaging, although it is well known that atopic and asthmatic individuals may be at an increased risk of allergic reactions after using these products. The public and healthcare practitioners should be aware of the risk of allergic reactions to products derived from bees and a warning should be added to the packaging of these products.
References
Capasso F, Gaginella TS, Grandolini G, et al. Phytotherapy: a quick reference to herbal medicine. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2003
Coelho LG, Bastos EM, Resende CC, et al. Brazilian green propolis on Helicobacter pylori infection: a pilot clinical study. Helicobacter 2007 Oct; 12(5): 572–4
Jasprica I, Mornar A, Debeljak Z, et al. In vivo study of propolis supplementation effects on antioxidative status and red blood cells. J Ethnopharmacol 2007 Apr 4; 110(3): 548–54
Kwon YS, Park DH, Shin EJ, et al. Antioxidant propolis attenuates kainate-induced neurotoxicity via adenosine A1 receptor modulation in the rat. Neurosci Lett 2004 Jan 30; 355(3): 231–5
Burdock GA. Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis (propolis). Food Chem Toxicol 1998 Apr; 36(4): 347–63
Gulbahar O, Ozturk G, Erdem N, et al. Psoriasiform contact dermatitis due to propolis in a beekeeper. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2005 Apr; 94(4): 509–11
Hausen BM. Evaluation of the main contact allergens in propolis (1995 to 2005). Dermatitis 2005 Sep; 16(3): 127–9
Greenberg PA, Flais MJ. Bee pollen-induced anaphylactic reaction in an unknowingly sensitised subject. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2001 Feb; 86(2): 239–42
Thien FCK, Leung R, Baldo BA, et al. Asthma and anaphylaxis induced by royal jelly. Clin Exp Allergy 1996 Feb; 26(2): 216–22
Hausen BM, Wollenweber E, Senff H, et al. Propolis allergy (1). Origin, properties, usage and literature review. Contact Dermatitis 1987 Sep; 17(3): 163–70
Acknowledgements
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this conference paper. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this conference paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Menniti-Ippolito, F., Mazzanti, G., Vitalone, A. et al. Surveillance of Suspected Adverse Reactions to Natural Health Products. Drug-Safety 31, 419–423 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200831050-00007
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200831050-00007