References
Hauben M, Reich L. Communication of findings in pharmacovigilance: use of the term “signal” and the need for precision in its use. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 61: 479–80
CDER Guidance. Guidance for industry: guideline for postmarketing reporting of adverse drug experiences, 85D-0249 [online]. Available at URL: http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/REPORT/Mfg.htm [Accessed 2006 Dec 28]
Preparing FOI Drug Safety Data for WebVDME Data Mining, Lincoln Technologies Inc., 2005
Norén GN, Orre R, Bate A, et al. Duplicate detection in adverse drug reaction surveillance. Data Min Knowl Disc 2007; 14(3): 305–28
Strom BL. Evaluation of suspected adverse drug reactions. JAMA 2005; 293(11): 1324–5
Hauben M, Patadia V, Gerrits CM, et al. Data mining in pharmacovigilance: the need for a balanced perspective. Drug Saf 2005; 28(10): 835–42
Bate A, Edwards IR. Data mining in spontaneous reports. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2006; 98(3): 324–30
Acknowledgements
Pfizer markets/co-markets one or more of the drugs cited in this letter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hauben, M., Reich, L., De Micco, J. et al. ‘Extreme Duplication’ in the US FDA Adverse Events Reporting System Database. Drug-Safety 30, 551–554 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200730060-00009
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200730060-00009