Skip to main content
Log in

Incidence of Thrombotic Cardiovascular Events in Patients Taking Celecoxib Compared with Those Taking Rofecoxib

Interim Results from the New Zealand Intensive Medicines Monitoring Programme

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Rofecoxib was withdrawn from the market worldwide because of concerns relating to cardiovascular safety. There is conflicting evidence as to whether celecoxib, the most popular alternative to rofecoxib, carries the same cardiovascular risks. This study’s aim was to compare the incidence of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients taking celecoxib with patients taking rofecoxib.

Methods: Prescription event monitoring methodology was used in this prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study, in which cohorts of patients were established from prescription data and thrombotic cardiovascular events were identified from follow-up questionnaires to patients’ doctors and other sources.

Subjects: New Zealand patients with at least one prescription for either rofecoxib or celecoxib between 1 December 2000 and 30 November 2001.

Analysis: For this interim analysis the total cohorts were separated into three groups at different stages of follow-up: complete, incomplete and no follow-up. Cox’s proportional hazards models were applied to calculate hazard ratios for celecoxib compared with rofecoxib.

Results: The total cohorts included 26 403 patients receiving rofecoxib and 32 446 patients receiving celecoxib. 4882 (18%) rofecoxib and 6267 (19%) celecoxib patients had been completely followed up. In this group the unadjusted hazard ratio for celecoxib compared with rofecoxib was 1.07 (95% CI 0.59, 1.93). After adjustment for age this hazard ratio was 0.94 (95% CI 0.51, 1.70). Further adjustment for sex, ‘as required’ use, indication for use, concomitant NSAID use and pre-existing cardiovascular disease resulted in only minor changes to the hazard ratio.

Conclusion: This interim analysis of the Intensive Medicines Monitoring Programme data suggests that in ‘real-life’ postmarketing use in New Zealand there is no significant difference in the risk of cardiovascular thrombotic events in patients taking celecoxib compared with those taking rofecoxib.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV
Table V
Table VI

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.

References

  1. Singh D. Merck withdraws arthritis drug worldwide. BMJ 2004; 329: 816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bresalier RS, Sandler RS, Quan H, et al. Cardiovascular events associated with rofecoxib in a colorectal adenoma chemoprevention trial. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1092–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Pfeffer MA, et al. Cardiovascular risk associated with celecoxib in a clinical trial for colorectal adenoma prevention. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1071–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ketelbey B (Pfizer NZ Ltd). Letter to New Zealand doctors. 2004 Dec 23

    Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organisation. Information exchange system: cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor medicines. 2005 Feb 28. QSM/MC/IEA.111

  6. Coulter DM. The New Zealand intensive medicines monitoring programme in pro-active safety surveillance. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2000; 9: 273–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. White WB, Faich G, Borer JS, et al. Cardiovascular thrombotic events in arthritis trials of the cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92: 411–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bombardier C, Laine L, Reicin A, et al. Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1520–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Solomon DH, Schneeweiss S, Glynn RJ, et al. Relationship between selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and acute myocardial infarction in older adults. Circulation 2004; 109: 2068–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Clark DWJ, Layton D, Shakir SAW. Do some inhibitors of COX-2 increase the risk of thromboembolic events? Linking pharmacology with pharmacoepidemiology. Drug Saf 2004; 27(7): 427–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Drazen JM. COX II inhibitors: a lesson in unexpected problems [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nejm.org [Accessed 2005 Feb 15]

  12. Ray WA, Stein CM, Hall K, et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of serious coronary heart disease: an observational cohort study. Lancet 2002; 359: 118–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mamdani M, Rochon P, Juurlink DN, et al. Effect of selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and naproxen on the short term risk of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163(4): 481–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kimmel SE, Berlin JA, Reilly M, et al. Patients exposed to rofecoxib and celecoxib have different odds of nonfatal myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 157–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Graham DJ, Campen D, Hui R, et al. Risk of acute myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death in patients treated with cyclo-oxygenase 2 selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: nested case-control study [online]. Available from URL: http://image.thelancet.com [Accessed 2005 Jan 25]

  16. Topol EJ. Arthritis medicines and cardiovascular events: “house of coxibs”. JAMA 2005; 293(3): 366–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding statement: the IMMP receives the majority of its funding from the New Zealand Ministry of Health and the work presented in this report has largely been funded by this source. General donations towards the work of the IMMP are also received from some pharmaceutical companies. However, these donations are unconditional and the companies have no role in the analysis or interpretation of IMMP data and are not involved in the decision to publish results.

Conflict of interests statement: the authors declare that they have no competing interests that might affect this report.

We would like to acknowledge David Coulter, who as former Director of the IMMP initiated the IMMP monitoring of the cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors and performed all of the initial clinical coding of events for this study. The data processors of the IMMP contributed a huge effort in entering all of the data analysed in this report. We thank them for their commitment to the programme, especially during a time when its future was under threat. We also thank Ruth Savage for her help and rheumatology expertise in assessing the indications for use of COX-2 inhibitors and David Clark for his advice. In addition, we are most grateful to Lianne Parkin and Charlotte Paul for their advice regarding design for this study and for reviewing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mira Harrison-Woolrych.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harrison-Woolrych, M., Herbison, P., McLean, R. et al. Incidence of Thrombotic Cardiovascular Events in Patients Taking Celecoxib Compared with Those Taking Rofecoxib. Drug-Safety 28, 435–442 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200528050-00006

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200528050-00006

Keywords

Navigation