Skip to main content
Log in

Safety and Tolerability of Eprosartan in Combination with Hydrochlorothiazide

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ideal antihypertensive drug should be effective in reducing blood pressure, but have a low incidence of adverse effects. Angiotensin II receptor blockers, such as eprosartan, are as effective as ACE inhibitors in reducing blood pressure, but lack the main adverse effect of ACE inhibitors, namely cough. Eprosartan has been shown to be well tolerated with a placebo-like adverse-effect profile. When given as monotherapy it is effective in reducing blood pressure; however, some patients require additional blood pressure control, which may be provided by combination therapy. Indeed, the combination of eprosartan and the thiazide diuretic hydrochlorothiazide has been shown to be effective in further reducing blood pressure in patients not optimally responding to eprosartan monotherapy.

This article reviews the safety and tolerability of eprosartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide from 17 studies of 1899 patients with hypertension and normotensive volunteers. Of these studies, four were controlled with patients receiving a fixed-dose combination, six were long-term, open-label, and another four were controlled studies with hydrochlorothiazide being given to eprosartan non-responders. The other three studies included healthy subjects receiving the combination of eprosartan and hydrochlorothiazide. There was a high completion rate in all studies evaluated. Most of the patients receiving eprosartan 600mg in combination with hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg daily completed the studies, which supports acceptance of this combination therapy by patients. The most frequently reported adverse events in these combination studies were headache, dizziness, myalgia, and upper respiratory tract infection in patients with hypertension. The majority of adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity, and were not considered to be related to study treatment. The adverse event that was more common in patients receiving combination therapy compared with those receiving monotherapy was dizziness. This adverse event may be due to hydrochlorothiazide as it has previously been observed in patients taking thiazide diuretics. In healthy volunteers, the most frequently reported adverse events were headache, dizziness, and upper respiratory tract infection. However, none of these adverse events were considered related to study medication.

In summary, the combination of eprosartan/hydrochlorothiazide is well tolerated, both as short- and long-term therapy, with most adverse events occurring early. The most frequent adverse events were headache, dizziness, and upper respiratory infection, which would be expected based on the safety profile of each of the components. Therefore, the combination of eprosartan with hydrochlorothiazide can be effectively and safely used in patients not adequately responding to eprosartan monotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moser M, Hebert PR. Prevention of disease progression, left ventricular hypertrophy and congestive heart failure in hypertension treatment trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 1214–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Psaty BM, Smith NL, Siscovick DS, et al. Health outcomes associated with antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 1997; 277: 739–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moore MA. Choosing initial antihypertensive drug therapy for the uncomplicated hypertensive patient. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2001; 3: 37–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller NH, Hill M, Kottke T, et al. The multilevel compliance challenge: recommendations for a call to action. A statement for healthcare professionals. Circulation 1997; 95: 1085–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hosie J, Wiklund I. Managing hypertension in general practice: can we do better? J Hum Hypertens 1995; 9Suppl. 2: S15–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cruickshank JM, McAinsh J. Patient compliance on taking cardiovascular drug therapy. Acta Ther 1992; 18: 53–60

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johnston CI, Burrell LM. Evolution of blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. J Hum Hypertens 1995; 9: 375–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Israili ZH, Hall WD. Cough and angioneurotic edema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117: 234–42

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Takai S, Jin D, Sakaguchi M. Chymase-dependent angiotensin II formation in human vascular tissue. Circulation 1999; 100: 654–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nishimoto M, Takai S, Kim S, et al. Significance of chymase-dependent angiotensin II-forming pathway in the development of vascular proliferation. Circulation 2001; 104: 1274–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Edwards RM, Aiyer N, Chilstein EH, et al. Pharmacological characterisation of the non-peptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist SKANDF 108566. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1992; 260: 175–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hollenberg NK. Renal implications of angiotensin receptor blockers. Am J Hypertens 2001; 14(7 Pt 2): 237S–41S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ilson B. Drug interaction studies with eprosartan, a novel angiotensin II receptor antagonist [abstract]. Am J Hypertens 1998; 11(4 pt 2): 108A

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blum RA, Kazierad D, Tenero DM. A review of eprosartan pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interaction studies. Pharmacother 1999; 19: 79S–85S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Elliott WJ. Double-blind comparison of eprosartan and enalapril on cough and blood pressure in unselected hypertensive patients. J Hum Hypertens 1999; 13: 413–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Oparil S. Eprosartan vs enalapril in hypertensive patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced cough. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 1999; 60: 1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sega R. Efficacy and safety of eprosartan in severe hypertension. Blood Press 1999; 8: 114–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gradman AH, Gray J, Maggiacomo F, et al. Assessment of once-daily eprosartan, an angiotensin II antagonist, in patients with systemic hypertension. Clin Ther 1999; 21: 442–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Argenziano L, Trimarco B. Effect of eprosartan and enalapril in the treatment of elderly hypertensive patients: subgroup analysis of a 26-week, double-blind, multicentre study. Curr Med Res Opin 1999; 15: 9–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hedner T, Himmelmann A, for the Eprosartan Multinational Study Group. The efficacy and tolerance of one and two daily doses of eprosartan in essential hypertension. J Hypertens 1999; 17: 129–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruilope L, Jäger B, Prichard B. Eprosartan versus enalapril in elderly patients with hypertension: a double-blind, randomized trial. Blood Press 2001; 10: 223–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Levine B. Eprosartan provides safe and effective long-term maintenance of blood pressure control in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Curr Med Res Opin 2001; 17: 8–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gavras I, Gavras H. Effects of eprosartan vs enalapril in hypertensive patients on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and safety parameters: results from a 26-week, double-blind, multicentre study. Curr Med Res Opin 1999; 15: 15–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Frishman WH, Bryzinski BS, Coulson LR, et al. A multifactorial trial design to assess combination therapy in hypertension: treatment with bisoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 1461–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sachse A, Verboom CN, Jager B. Efficacy of eprosartan in combination with HCTZ in patients with essential hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 2002; 16: 169–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Eprosartan/hydrochlorothiazide — integrated summary of safety. Solvay Pharmaceuticals Limited, 2000 May 23. (Data on file)

  27. Weir MR, Flack JM, Applegate WB. Tolerability, safety, and quality of life and hypertensive therapy: the case for low-dose diuretics. Am J Med 1996; 101: 83S–92S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Weber M. Clinical efficacy of eprosartan. Pharmacotherapy 1999; 19: 95S–101S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Reid JL. First-line and combination treatment for hypertension. Am J Med 1989; 86: 2–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Waeber B, Brunner HR. The multifactorial nature of hypertension: the greatest challenge for its treatment? J Hypertens Suppl 2001; 19Suppl. 3: S9–16

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Piot O, Gallois H, Baguet JP, Mallion JM. First-line treatment of hypertension: from monotherapy to fixed low-dose combination therapy J Hum Hypertens 2001; 15: 443–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group. Lancet 1998; 351: 1755–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Flack JM, Cushman WC. Evidence for the efficacy of low-dose diuretic monotherapy. Am J Med 1996; 101: 53S–60S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Neutel JM, Black HR, Weber MA. Combination therapy with diuretics: an evolution of understanding. Am J Med 1996; 101: 61S–70S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. McVeigh GE, Flack J, Grimm R. Goals of antihypertensive therapy. Drugs 1995; 49: 161–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Plat F, Saini R. Management of hypertension - the role of combination therapy. Am J Hypertens 1997; 10: 262S–71S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Langtry H, McClellan K. Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide. Drugs 1999; 57: 751–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alisia Sachse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Böhm, M., Sachse, A. Safety and Tolerability of Eprosartan in Combination with Hydrochlorothiazide. Drug-Safety 25, 599–611 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200225080-00005

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200225080-00005

Keywords

Navigation