Skip to main content
Log in

How Safe is the Readministration of Streptokinase?

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Streptokinase is an antigenic thrombolytic agent used for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. It reduces mortality as effectively as the nonantigenic alteplase in most infarct patients while having the advantage of being much less expensive. This cost implication is important since myocardial reinfarction is common, with fibrinolytic therapy indicated in many patients with reinfarction. Following streptokinase, antistreptokinase antibodies and neutralisation titres can rise to significant levels from 4 days after the initial dose. These antibodies can presist for at least 4 years in up to 50% of patients. It is possible that these antibodies may cause allergic reactions or neutralisation of a further dose of streptokinase, rendering it ineffective for the treatment of myocardial reinfarction. To date, 2 small studies of patients without previous streptokinase exposure suggest that higher antibody titres are associated with a lower rate of coronary reperfusion, while a further study suggests that high titres are associated with hypersensitivity reactions. At present the readministration of streptokinase cannot be recommended from 4 days after a first dose. Further larger studies are needed to assess the effect of high neutralisation titres on coronary reperfusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alpert JS. Coronary vasomotion, coronary thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and the camel’s back. J Am Col Cardiol 1985; 5: 617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Epstein SE, Palmeri ST. Mechanism contributing to precipitation of unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction: implications regarding therapy. Am J Cardiol 1984; 54: 1245–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Willerson JT, Campbell WB, Winniford MD, et al. Conversion from chronic to acute coronary artery disease: speculation regarding mechanisms. Am J Cardiol 1984; 54: 1349–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, et al. Effect of intravenous streptokinase on left ventricular function and early survival after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 850–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. GISSI (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell’ Infarto Miocardico). Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1986; 1: 397–402

    Google Scholar 

  6. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. Lancet 1988; 2: 349–60

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee HS, Cross SJ, Davidson R, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to streptokinase in patients with high pre-treatment antistreptokinase antibody and neutralisation titres. Eur Heart J 1993; 14: 1640–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Verstraete M, Vermylen J, Amery A, et al. Thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase using a standard dosage scheme. BMJ 1966; 1: 454–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee HS, Cross SJ, Davidson R, et al. Raised levels of antistreptokinase antibody and neutralisation titres from four days to 54 months after administration of streptokinase or anistreplase. Eur Heart J 1993; 14: 84–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jalihal S, Morris K. Antistreptokinase titres after intravenous streptokinase. Lancet 1990; 335: 184–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lynch M, Littler WA, Pentecost BL, et al. Immunoglobulin response to intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 1991; 66: 139–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. White HD, Cross DB, William BF, et al. Safety and efficacy of readministration of thrombolytic treatment after acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 1990; 64: 177–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fears R, Ferres H, Glasgow E, et al. Monitoring of streptokinase resistance titres in acute myocardial infarction patients up to 30 months after giving streptokinase or anistreplase and related studies to measure specific antistreptokinase IgG. Br Heart J 1992; 68: 167–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. GREAT Group. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners: Grampian region early anistreplase trial. BMJ 1992; 305: 548–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. British National Formulary. Number 29. London: British Medical Association and the Pharmaceutical Press, Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britian, March 1995

    Google Scholar 

  16. GISSI-2. A factorial randomised trial of alteplase versus streptokinase and heparin versus no heparin among 12,490 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1990; 336: 65–71

    Google Scholar 

  17. ISIS-3. A randomised comparison of streptokinase vs tissue plasminogen activator vs anistreplase and of aspirin plus heparin vs aspirin alone among 41,299 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1992; 339: 753–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. GUSTO Investigators. An international randomized trial comparing thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 673–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rivers JT, White HD, Cross DB, et al. Re-infarction after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction followed by conservative management: incidence and effect of smoking. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 340–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Elliott JM, Cross DB, Cederholm-Williams S, et al. Neutralizing antibodies to streptokinase four years after intravenous thrombolytic therapy. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 640–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Buchalter MB, Suntharalingam G, Jennings I, et al. Streptokinase resistance: when might streptokinase administration be ineffective? Br Heart J 1992; 68: 449–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Patel S, Jalihal S, Dutka DP, et al. Streptokinase neutralisation titres up to 866 days after intravenous streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 1993; 70: 119–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Massel D, Turpie AG, Cairns JA, et al. Persistence of neutralisation antibodies at one year following IV streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1990: 82Suppl. III: 254

    Google Scholar 

  24. Massel D, Turpie AG, Cairns JA, et al. Previous streptokinase therapy inhibits subsequent streptokinase thrombolysis. Circulation 1991; 84Suppl. II: 467

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brugemann J, Van de Meer J, Born VJJ, et al. Anti-streptokinase antibodies inhibit fibrinolytic effects of anistreplase in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1993; 72: 462–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gemmill JD, Hogg KJ, Dunn FG, et al. Pre-dosing antibody levels and efficacy of thrombolytic drugs containing streptokinase. Br Heart J 1994; 72: 222–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shaila G, Chandrashekhar YS, Kumar N, et al. Antistreptokinase antibodies before and after streptokinase therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction from area endemic for streptococcal infection and influence on reperfusion rates. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74: 187–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, H.S. How Safe is the Readministration of Streptokinase?. Drug-Safety 13, 76–80 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-199513020-00002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-199513020-00002

Navigation