American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 197–206

Consistency of Extended-Release Niacin/Laropiprant Effects on Lp(a), ApoB, non-HDL-C, Apo A1, and ApoB/ApoA1 Ratio Across Patient Subgroups

  • Harold E. Bays
  • Arvind Shah
  • Jianxin Lin
  • Christine McCrary Sisk
  • Qian Dong
  • Darbie Maccubbin
Original Research Article

Abstract

Background

According to prior analyses, extended-release niacin/laropiprant (ERN/LRPT) consistently reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides (TG) and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels across a wide range of dyslipidemic patient subgroups.

Objectives

This analysis examined ERN/LRPT’s consistency across four phase III, randomized, double-blind trials in improving other lipid/lipoprotein parameters associated with cardiovascular risk, across several key dyslipidemic patient subgroups.

Methods

In three of the studies, the randomized population included patients with primary hypercholesterolemia or mixed hyperlipidemia; in the remaining study, the population included patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The lipid-altering consistency of ERN/LRPT’s efficacy was evaluated versus the predefined comparator (placebo or active control) among key subgroups of sex, race (White, non-White), region (US, ex-US), baseline age (<65 years, ≥65 years), use of statin therapy (yes, no), coronary heart disease (yes, no), risk status (low, multiple, high), and type of hyperlipidemia (primary hypercholesterolemia, mixed dyslipidemia), as well as across baseline LDL-C, HDL-C, and TG levels. The consistency of the treatment effects on lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], apolipoprotein B (ApoB), non-HDL-C, ApoA1, and ApoB/ApoA1 ratio was evaluated by examining treatment difference estimates of the percentage change from baseline with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Treatment with ERN/LRPT produced significantly greater improvements in Lp(a), ApoB, non-HDL-C, ApoA1, and ApoB/ApoA1 ratio compared with placebo/active comparator in each study. These effects were generally consistent across key subgroups within each study.

Conclusion

ERN/LRPT produced lipid-altering efficacy on the parameters evaluated in four controlled studies; these effects were generally consistent across all examined subgroups. ERN/LRPT represents an effective and reliable therapeutic option for the treatment of dyslipidemia in a wide range of patient types.

Clinical Trial Registration

Registered as Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00269204, NCT00269217, NCT00479388, and NCT00485758.

References

  1. 1.
    De Backer G, Ambrosioni E, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Third Joint Task Force of European and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 1601–10Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Expert Panel on Detection EATOHBCIA. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001; 285: 2486–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gotto Jr AM. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides as therapeutic targets for preventing and treating coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 2002; 144: S33–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shah PK, Kaul S, Nilsson J, et al. Exploiting the vascular protective effects of high-density lipoprotein and its apolipoproteins: an idea whose time for testing is coming. Part I. Circulation 2001; 104: 2376–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Birjmohun RS, Hutten BA, Kastelein JJ, et al. Increasing HDL cholesterol with extended-release nicotinic acid: from promise to practice. Neth J Med 2004; 62: 229–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheng K, Wu TJ, Wu KK, et al. Antagonism of the prostaglandin D2 receptor 1 suppresses nicotinic acid-induced vasodilation in mice and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 6682–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Illingworth DR, Stein EA, Mitchel YB, et al. Comparative effects of lovastatin and niacin in primary hypercholesterolemia: a prospective trial. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 1586–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knopp RH, Ginsberg J, Albers JJ, et al. Contrasting effects of unmodified and time-release forms of niacin on lipoproteins in hyperlipidemic subjects: clues to mechanism of action of niacin. Metabolism 1985; 34: 642–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mills E, Prousky J, Raskin G, et al. The safety of over-the-counter niacin: a randomized placebo-controlled trial [ISRCTN18054903]. BMC Clin Pharmacol 2003; 3: 4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paolini JF, Mitchel YB, Reyes R, et al. Effects of laropiprant on nicotinic acid-induced flushing in patients with dyslipidemia. Am J Cardiol 2008; 101: 625–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sturino CF, O’Neill G, Lachance N, et al. Discovery of a potent and selective prostaglandin D2 receptor antagonist, [(3R)-4-(4-chloro-benzyl)-7-fluoro-5-(methylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrocy clopenta[b]indol-3-yl]-acetic acid (MK-0524). J Med Chem 2007; 50: 794–806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gleim G, Ballantyne CM, Liu N, et al. Efficacy and safety profile of coadministered ER niacin/laropiprant and simvastatin in dyslipidaemia. Br J Cardiol 2009; 16: 90–7Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maccubbin D, Bays HE, Olsson AG, et al. Lipid-modifying efficacy and tolerability of extended-release niacin/laropiprant in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia. Int J Clin Pract 2008; 62: 1959–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    MacLean A, McKenney JM, Scott R, et al. Efficacy and safety of extendedrelease niacin/laropiprant in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Br J Cardiol 2011; 18: 37–45Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shah S, Ceska R, Gil-Extremera B, et al. Efficacy and safety of extended-release niacin/laropiprant plus statin vs. doubling the dose of statin in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia. Int J Clin Pract 2010; 64: 727–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics — 2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010; 121: e46–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, et al. Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 229–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 7–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pekkanen J, Linn S, Heiss G, et al. Ten-year mortality from cardiovascular disease in relation to cholesterol level among men with and without preexisting cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1700–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bays H, Shah A, Dong Q, et al. Extended-release niacin/laropiprant lipid-altering consistency across patient subgroups. Int J Clin Pract 2011; 65: 436–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bays HE, Shah A, Lin J, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of extended-release niacin/laropiprant in dyslipidemic patients with metabolic syndrome. J Clin Lipidol 2010; 4: 515–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maccubbin D, Koren MJ, Davidson M, et al. Flushing profile of extended-release niacin/laropiprant versus gradually titrated niacin extended-release in patients with dyslipidemia with and without ischemic cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol 2009; 104: 74–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holme I, Aastveit AH, Hammar N, et al. Inflammatory markers, lipoprotein components and risk of major cardiovascular events in 65,005 men and women in the Apolipoprotein MOrtality RISk study (AMORIS). Atherosclerosis 2010; 213: 299–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTER-HEART study): case-control study. Lancet 2004; 364: 937–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bays HE, Ballantyne C. What’s the deal with niacin development: is laropiprant add-on therapy a winning strategy to beat a straight flush?. Curr Opin Lipidol 2009; 20: 467–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harold E. Bays
    • 1
  • Arvind Shah
    • 2
  • Jianxin Lin
    • 2
  • Christine McCrary Sisk
    • 2
  • Qian Dong
    • 2
  • Darbie Maccubbin
    • 2
  1. 1.Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center Inc. (L-MARC)LouisvilleUSA
  2. 2.Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.Whitehouse StationUSA

Personalised recommendations