Sports Medicine

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 489–509 | Cite as

The Potential for High-Intensity Interval Training to Reduce Cardiometabolic Disease Risk

  • Holly S. KesslerEmail author
  • Susan B. Sisson
  • Kevin R. Short
Review Article


In the US, 34% of adults currently meet the criteria for the metabolic syndrome defined by elevated waist circumference, plasma triglycerides (TG), fasting glucose and/or blood pressure, and decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). While these cardiometabolic risk factors can be treated with medication, lifestyle modification is strongly recommended as a first-line approach. The purpose of this review is to focus on the effect of physical activity interventions and, specifically, on the potential benefits of incorporating higher intensity exercise. Several recent studies have suggested that compared with continuous moderate exercise (CME), high-intensity interval training (HIT) may result in a superior or equal improvement in fitness and cardiovascular health. HIT is comprised of brief periods of high-intensity exercise interposed with recovery periods at a lower intensity. The premise of using HIT in both healthy and clinical populations is that the vigorous activity segments promote greater adaptations via increased cellular stress, yet their short length, and the ensuing recovery intervals, allow even untrained individuals to work harder than would otherwise be possible at steady-state intensity. In this review, we examine the impact of HIT on cardiometabolic risk factors, anthropometric measures of obesity and cardiovascular fitness in both healthy and clinical populations with cardiovascular and metabolic disease. The effects of HIT versus CME on health outcomes were compared in 14 of the 24 studies featuring HIT. Exercise programmes ranged from 2 weeks to 6 months. All 17 studies that measured aerobic fitness and all seven studies that measured insulin sensitivity showed significant improvement in response to HIT, although these changes did not always exceed responses to CME comparison groups. A minimum duration of 12 weeks was necessary to demonstrate improvement in fasting glucose in four of seven studies (57%). A minimum duration of 8 weeks of HIT was necessary to demonstrate improvement in HDL-C in three of ten studies (30%). No studies reported that HIT resulted in improvement of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), or TG. At least 12 weeks of HIT was required for reduction in blood pressure to emerge in five studies of participants not already being treated for hypertension. A minimum duration of 12 weeks was necessary to see consistent improvement in the six studies that examined anthropometric measures of obesity in overweight/obese individuals. In the 13 studies with a matched-exercise-volume CME group, improvement in aerobic fitness in response to HIT was equal to (5 studies), or greater than (8 studies) in response to CME. Additionally, HIT has been shown to be safe and effective in patients with a range of cardiac and metabolic dysfunction. In conclusion, HIT appears to promote superior improvements in aerobic fitness and similar improvements in some cardiometabolic risk factors in comparison to CME, when performed by healthy subjects or clinical patients for at least 8–12 weeks. Future studies need to address compliance and efficacy of HIT in the real world with a variety of populations.


Metabolic Syndrome Waist Circumference Cardiometabolic Risk Aerobic Fitness Cardiometabolic Risk Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Susan B. Sisson is supported by a University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Vice President of Research Seed Grant for study entitled Sitting Versus Light Activity and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Influence of a High Fat Meal. Kevin R. Short is supported by grant number P20RR024215 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Holly S. Kessler has received no funding and the authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are directly relevant to the content of this review.


  1. 1.
    Ervin RB. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among adults 20 years of age and over, by sex, age, race and ethnicity, and body mass index: United States, 2003–2006. Natl Health Stat Report 2009 May 5; (13): 1–7Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grundy SM, Brewer Jr HB, Cleeman JI, et al. Definition of metabolic syndrome: report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association conference on scientific issues related to definition. Circulation 2004 Jan 27; 109 (3): 433–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    NCEP. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001 May 16; 285 (19): 2486–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carroll S, Dudfield M. What is the relationship between exercise and metabolic abnormalities? A review of the metabolic syndrome. Sports Med 2004; 34 (6): 371–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    USDHHS. Physical activity guidelines for Americans. Hyattsville (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008 [online]. Available from URL: [Accessed 2008 Jul 10]Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Church TS, Earnest CP, Skinner JS, et al. Effects of different doses of physical activity on cardiorespiratory fitness among sedentary, overweight or obese postmenopausal women with elevated blood pressure: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007 May 16; 297 (19): 2081–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duscha BD, Slentz CA, Johnson JL, et al. Effects of exercise training amount and intensity on peak oxygen consumption in middle-age men and women at risk for cardiovascular disease. Chest 2005 Oct; 128 (4): 2788–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee DC, Artero EG, Sui X, et al. Mortality trends in the general population: the importance of cardiorespiratory fitness. J Psychopharmacol 2010 Nov; 24 (4 Suppl.): 27–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blair SN, Kohl 3rd HW, Barlow CE, et al. Changes in physical fitness and all-cause mortality: a prospective study of healthy and unhealthy men. JAMA 1995 Apr 12; 273 (14): 1093–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blair SN, Kohl 3rd HW, Paffenbarger Jr RS, et al. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality: a prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA 1989 Nov 3; 262 (17): 2395–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Center for Disease Control and Prevention. State indicator report on physical activitiy, 2010. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2010Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reichert FF, Barros AJ, Domingues MR, et al. The role of perceived personal barriers to engagement in leisure-time physical activity. Am J Public Health 2007 Mar; 97 (3): 515–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gibala MJ. High-intensity interval training: a time-efficient strategy for health promotion? Curr Sports Med Rep 2007 Jul; 6 (4): 211–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Burgomaster KA, Howarth KR, Phillips SM, et al. Similar metabolic adaptations during exercise after low volume sprint interval and traditional endurance training in humans. J Physiol 2008 Jan 1; 586 (1): 151–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nybo L, Sundstrup E, Jakobsen MD, et al. High-intensity training versus traditional exercise interventions for promoting health. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010 Oct; 42 (10) 1951–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Laursen PB, Jenkins DG. The scientific basis for high-intensity interval training: optimising training programmes and maximising performance in highly trained endurance athletes. Sports Med 2002; 32 (1): 53–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gibala MJ, McGee SL. Metabolic adaptations to short-term high-intensity interval training: a little pain for a lot of gain? Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2008 Apr; 36 (2): 58–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tjonna AE, Stolen TO, Bye A, et al. Aerobic interval training reduces cardiovascular risk factors more than a multitreatment approach in overweight adolescents. Clin Sci (Lond) 2009 Feb; 116 (4): 317–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moholdt TT, Amundsen BH, Rustad LA, et al. Aerobic interval training versus continuous moderate exercise after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized study of cardiovascular effects and quality of life. Am Heart J 2009 Dec; 158 (6): 1031–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rognmo O, Hetland E, Helgerud J, et al. High intensity aerobic interval exercise is superior to moderate intensity exercise for increasing aerobic capacity in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2004 Jun; 11 (3): 216–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wisloff U, Stoylen A, Loennechen JP, et al. Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients: a randomized study. Circulation 2007 Jun 19; 115 (24): 3086–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Warburton DE, McKenzie DC, Haykowsky MJ, et al. Effectiveness of high-intensity interval training for the rehabilitation of patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2005 May 1; 95 (9): 1080–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Munk PS, Staal EM, Butt N, et al. High-intensity interval training may reduce in-stent restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the relationship to endothelial function and inflammation. Am Heart J 2009 Nov; 158 (5): 734–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tjonna AE, Lee SJ, Rognmo O, et al. Aerobic interval training versus continuous moderate exercise as a treatment for the metabolic syndrome: a pilot study. Circulation 2008 Jul 22; 118 (4): 346–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Little JP, Gillen JB, Percival M, et al. Low-volume high-intensity interval training reduces hyperglycemia and increases muscle mitochondrial capacity in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Appl Physiol 2011; 111 (6) 1554–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wallman K, Plant LA, Rakimov B, et al. The effects of two modes of exercise on aerobic fitness and fat mass in an overweight population. Res Sports Med 2009; 17 (3): 156–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Richards JC, Johnson TK, Kuzma JN, et al. Short-term sprint interval training increases insulin sensitivity in healthy adults but does not affect the thermogenic response to beta-adrenergic stimulation. J Physiol 2010 Aug 1; 588 (Pt 15): 2961–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Babraj JA, Vollaard NB, Keast C, et al. Extremely short duration high intensity interval training substantially improves insulin action in young healthy males. BMC Endocr Disord 2009; 9: 3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Whyte LJ, Gill JM, Cathcart AJ. Effect of 2 weeks of sprint interval training on health-related outcomes in sedentary overweight/obese men. Metabolism 2010 Oct; 59 (10): 1421–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Macpherson RE, Hazell TJ, Olver TD, et al. Run sprint interval training improves aerobic performance but not maximal cardiac output. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011 Jan; 43 (1): 115–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Guiraud T, Nigam A, Juneau M, et al. Acute responses to high-intensity intermittent exercise in CHD patients. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011 Feb; 43 (2): 211–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hood MS, Little JP, Tarnopolsky MA, et al. Low-volume interval training improves muscle oxidative capacity in sedentary adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011 Oct; 43 (10): 1849–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Musa DI, Adeniran SA, Dikko AU, et al. The effect of a high-intensity interval training program on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in young men. J Strength Cond Res 2009 Mar; 23 (2): 587–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tsekouras YE, Magkos F, Kellas Y, et al. High-intensity interval aerobic training reduces hepatic very low-density lipoprotein-triglyceride secretion rate in men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2008 Oct; 295 (4): E851–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Thomas TR, Adeniran SB, Iltis PW, et al. Effects of interval and continuous running on HDL-cholesterol, apoproteins A-1 and B, and LCAT. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1985 Mar; 10 (1): 52–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Moreira MM, Souza HP, Schwingel PA, et al. Effects of aerobic and anaerobic exercise on cardiac risk variables in overweight adults. Arq Bras Cardiol 2008 Oct; 91 (4): 200–6, 19–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schjerve IE, Tyldum GA, Tjonna AE, et al. Both aerobic endurance and strength training programmes improve cardiovascular health in obese adults. Clin Sci (Lond) 2008 Nov; 115 (9): 283–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Thomas TR, Adeniran SB, Etheridge GL. Effects of different running programs on VO2 max, percent fat, and plasma lipids. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1984 Jun; 9 (2): 55–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ciolac EG, Bocchi EA, Bortolotto LA, et al. Effects of high-intensity aerobic interval training vs. moderate exercise on hemodynamic, metabolic and neuro-humoral abnormalities of young normotensive women at high familial risk for hypertension. Hypertens Res 2010 Aug; 33 (8): 836–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Guimaraes GV, Ciolac EG, Carvalho VO, et al. Effects of continuous vs. interval exercise training on blood pressure and arterial stiffness in treated hypertension. Hypertens Res 2010 Jun; 33 (6): 627–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tambalis K, Panagiotakos DB, Kavouras SA, et al. Responses of blood lipids to aerobic, resistance, and combined aerobic with resistance exercise training: a systematic review of current evidence. Angiology 2009 Oct–Nov; 60 (5): 614–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Houston MC, Fazio S, Chilton FH, et al. Non-pharmacologic treatment of dyslipidemia. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2009 Sep–Oct; 52 (2): 61–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cochran AJ, Little JP, Tarnopolsky MA, et al. Carbohydrate feeding during recovery alters the skeletal muscle metabolic response to repeated sessions of high-intensity interval exercise in humans. J Appl Physiol 2010 Mar; 108 (3): 628–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rakobowchuk M, Tanguay S, Burgomaster KA, et al. Sprint interval and traditional endurance training induce similar improvements in peripheral arterial stiffness and flow-mediated dilation in healthy humans. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2008 Jul; 295 (1): R236–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Trilk JL, Singhal A, Bigelman KA, et al. Effect of sprint interval training on circulatory function during exercise in sedentary, overweight/obese women. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011 Aug; 111 (8): 1591–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Daussin FN, Zoll J, Dufour SP, et al. Effect of interval versus continuous training on cardiorespiratory and mitochondrial functions: relationship to aerobic performance improvements in sedentary subjects. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2008 Jul; 295 (1): R264–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Holly S. Kessler
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Susan B. Sisson
    • 2
  • Kevin R. Short
    • 3
  1. 1.Section of Pediatric Emergency MedicineUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences CenterOklahoma CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Nutritional SciencesUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences CenterOklahoma CityUSA
  3. 3.Section of Pediatric Diabetes and EndocrinologyUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences CenterOklahoma CityUSA

Personalised recommendations