CNS Drugs

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 245–268 | Cite as

The Pharmacology and Clinical Outcomes of Amphetamines to Treat ADHD

Does Composition Matter?
  • Paul Hodgkins
  • Monica Shaw
  • Suzanne McCarthy
  • Floyd R. Sallee
Review Article

Abstract

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment options include pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches. In North America, psychostimulants (amphetamine and methylphenidate) are considered first-line pharmacological treatments for patients (children, adolescents and adults) with ADHD. However, in the UK, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines have placed short-acting d-amphetamine as a third-line treatment option due to a lack of contemporary, published clinical trials on its efficacy and the concerns from clinical and patient experts regarding the potential for increased abuse and/or misuse compared with methylphenidate. These guidelines do not account for some of the more recent amphetamine products that have been developed to alleviate some of these concerns, but that are not currently approved in the UK or other European countries. The purpose of this review is to describe the pharmacology and clinical efficacy of various amphetamine compositions, as well as to explore the apparent differences in these compositions and their associated risks and benefits. A PubMed literature search was conducted to investigate amphetamine pharmacology, clinical efficacy and safety and ADHD outcomes in the published literature from 1980 through March 2011. Search terms included the keywords ‘ADHD’ or ‘ADD’ or ‘hyperkinetic disorder’ and any of the following keywords combined with ‘or’: ‘amphetamine’, ‘dexamphetamine’, ‘mixed amphetamine salts’, ‘lisdexamfetamine’ and ‘methamphetamine’. The search included English-language primary research articles and review articles but excluded editorial articles and commentaries. The literature search resulted in 330 articles. Pertinent articles relating to amphetamine pharmacology, compositions, clinical efficacy and safety, effectiveness and tolerability, ADHD outcomes and abuse liability were included in this review. The different delivery profiles of amphetamine compositions result in pharmacological and pharmacokinetic differences that contribute to varying effects in the clinical treatment of ADHD, ADHD outcomes and abuse liability. The efficacy and safety of amphetamine compositions for the treatment of ADHD have been demonstrated in clinical trials and meta-analyses, and the long-acting amphetamine compositions have been widely studied and found efficacious without increased adverse effects. Long-acting amphetamine compositions offer the obvious advantage of enhanced duration of action over short-acting amphetamine compositions, and lisdexamfetamine has been shown to have reduced abuse liability compared with short-acting amphetamine.

References

  1. 1.
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed., text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000: 85–93Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biederman J, Faraone SV. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Lancet 2005; 366: 237–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Polanczyk G, de Lima MS, Horta BL, et al. The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164: 942–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Faraone SV, Sergeant J, Gillberg C, et al. The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: is it an American condition? World Psychiatry 2003; 2: 104–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barkley RA, Fischer M, Edelbrook CS, et al. The adolescent outcome of hyperactive children diagnosed by research criteria: I. An 8-year prospective follow-up study. J Am Acad Adolesc Psychiatry 1990; 29(4): 546–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barkley RA, Fischer M, Smallish L, et al. The persistence of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder into young adulthood as a function of reporting source and definition of disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 2002; 111: 279–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fayyad J, De Graaf R, Kessler R, et al. Cross-national prevalence and correlates of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 190: 402–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: diagnosis and management of ADHD in children, young people and adults. National Clinical Practice Guideline Number 72. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2009 MarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Designating September 7, 2004, as ‘National Attention Deficit Disorder Day.’ S Res 370, 108th Cong, 2nd Session (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Minde K, Lewin D, Weiss G, et al. The hyperactive child in elementary school: a 5 year, controlled, follow-up. Except Child 1971; 38: 215–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adesman AR. The diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in pediatric patients. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 3: 66–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mannuzza S, Klein RG. Long-term prognosis in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin North Am 2000; 9: 711–26Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spencer TJ, Biederman J, Mick E. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: diagnosis, lifespan, comor-bidities, and neurobiology. J Pediatr Psychol 2007; 32: 631–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Biederman J. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a life-span perspective. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59 Suppl. 7: S4–16Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Biederman J, Faraone S, Milberger S, et al. A prospective 4-year follow-up study of attention-deficit hyperactivity and related disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996; 53: 437–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Biederman J, Newcorn J, Sprich S. Comorbidity of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with conduct, depressive, anxiety, and other disorders. Am J Psychiatry 1991; 148: 564–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Johnston C, Mash EJ. Families of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: review and recommendations for future research. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2001; 4: 183–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harpin VA. The effect of ADHD on the life of an individual, their family, and community from preschool to adult life. Arch Dis Child 2005; 90 Suppl. 1: i2–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Swensen AR, Birnbaum HG, Secnik K, et al. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: increased costs for patients and their families. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2003; 42: 1415–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Biederman J, Faraone SV, Spencer T, et al. Patterns of psychiatric comorbidity, cognition, and psychosocial functioning in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatr 1993; 150: 1792–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Biederman J, Faraone SV, Spencer T, et al. Gender differences in a sample of adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Res 1994; 53: 13–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Murphy K, Barkley RA. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder adults: comorbidities and adaptive impairments. Compr Psychiatry 1996; 37: 393–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eakin L, Minde K, Hechtman L, et al. The marital and family functioning of adults with ADHD and their spouses. J Atten Disord 2004; 8(1): 1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barkley RA, Murphy KR, Fischer M. ADHD in adults: what the science says. New York (NY): Guilford Press, 2008Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Biederman J, Faraone SV. The effects of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in employment and household income. MedGenMed 2006; 8(3): 12 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.proxy.lib.umich.edu/pmc/articles/PMC1781280/?tool=pub [Accessed 2001 Mar 31]PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Faraone SV, Wilens TE, Petty C, et al. Substance use among ADHD adults: implications of late onset and subthreshold diagnoses. Am J Addict 2007; 16 Suppl. 1: 24–32, quiz 33-34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mick E, Faraone SV, Spencer T, et al. Assessing the validity of the quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction questionnaire short form in adults with ADHD. J Atten Dis 2008; 11: 504–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Coghill D. The impact of medications on quality of life in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. CNS Drugs 2010; 24(10): 843–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Barkley RA. Major life activity and health outcomes associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 63 Suppl. 12: 10–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nijmeijer JS, Minderaa RB, Buitelaar JK, et al. Attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder and social dysfunctioning. Clin Psychol Rev 2008; 28: 692–708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Escobar R, Hervas A, Soutullo CA, et al. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: burden of the disease according to subtypes in recently diagnosed children. Actas Esp Psiquiatr 2008; 36: 285–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Taylor E, Döpfner M, Sergeant J, et al. European clinical guidelines for hyperkinetic disorder: first upgrade. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2004; 13 Suppl. 1: 17–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of attention deficit and hyperkinetic disorders in children and young people: a national clinical guideline. Edinburgh: SIGN, 2009: publication 112Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pliszka SR, Crismon ML, Hughes CW, et al. The Texas children’s medication algorithm project: revision of the algorithm for pharmacotherapy of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006; 45: 642–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dulcan M. Practice parameters for the assessment and treatment of children, adolescents, and adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997; 36: 85S–121SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hosenbocus S, Chahal R. A review of long-acting medications for ADHD in Canada. J Can Acad Child Adoles Psychiatry 2009; 18(4): 331–9Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Swanson JM, Kraemer HC, Hinshaw SP, et al. Clinical relevance of the primary findings of the MTA: success rates based on severity of ADHD and ODD symptoms at the end of treatment. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001; 402: 168–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Scheffler RM, Brown TT, Fulton BD, et al. Positive association between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medication use and academic achievement during elementary school. Pediatrics 2009; 123: 1273–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jensen PS, Arnold LE, Swanson JM, et al. 3-year follow-up of the NIMH MTA study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007; 46: 989–1002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Powers RL, Marks DJ, Miller CJ, et al. Stimulant treatment in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder moderates adolescent academic outcome. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2008; 18: 449–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Biederman J, Monuteaux MC, Spencer T, et al. Do stimulants protect against psychiatric disorders in youth with ADHD? A 10-year follow-up study. Pediatrics 2009; 124: 71–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    King S, Griffin S, Hodges Z, et al. A systematic review and economic model of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of methylphenidate, dexamfetamine and atomoxetine for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Health Technol Assess 2006; 10(23): iii–iv, xiii-146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Methylphenidate, atomoxetine and dexamfetamine for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents. Review of technology appraisal 13. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2006 MarGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bradley C. The behavior of children receiving benzedrine. Am J Psychiatry 1937; 94: 577–85Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lisdexamfetamine: US prescribing information. Wayne (PA): Shire Pharmaceuticals, 2008 AprGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Greenhill LL, Pliska S, Dulcan MK, et al. Practice parameter for the use of stimulant medications in the treatment of children, adolescents, and adults. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002; 41 Suppl. 2: 26S–49SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Adderall XR®: US prescribing information. Wayne (PA): Shire Pharmaceuticals, 2010 NovGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pelham Jr WE, Greenslade KE, Vodde-Hamilton M, et al. Relative efficacy of long-acting stimulants on children with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: a comparison of standard methylphenidate, sustained-release methylphenidate, sustained-release dextroamphetamine, and pemoline. Pediatrics 1990; 86(2): 226–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Dexedrine®: US prescribing information. Middlesex (NJ): Amedra Pharmaceuticals, LLC, 2010 DecGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Weisler RH, Biederman J, Spencer TJ, et al. Mixed amphetamine salts extended-release in the treatment of adult ADHD: a randomized, controlled trial. CNS Spectr 2006; 11:625–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Adderall®: US prescribing information [online]. Shire Pharmaceuticals, Dec 2010. Available from URL: http://www.pdr.net [Accessed 2011 May 5]
  52. 52.
    Kuczenski R, Segal DS. Effects of methylphenidate on extracellular dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine: comparison with amphetamine. J Neurochem 1997 May; 68(5): 2032–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Desoxyn®: US prescribing information. Deerfield (IL): Ovation Pharmaceuticals, 2005 AprGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Pennick M. Absorption of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and its enzymatic conversion to d-amphetamine. Neuropsychiatr Disease Treat 2010; 6(1): 317–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Jasinski DR, Krishnan S. Human pharmacology of intravenous lisdexamfetamine dimesylate: abuse liability in adult stimulant abusers. J Psychopharmacol 2009; 23: 419–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rowley H, Heal D, Hackett D. Simultaneous measurement with hysteresis analyses of the effects of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and d-amphetamine on striatal levels of extracellular dopamine, locomotor activity, and plasma drug concentrations in freely-moving rats. Poster presented at the NCDEU Annual Meeting; 2011 Jun 13–16; Boca Raton (FL)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Heal DJ, Smith SL, Kulkarni RS, et al. New perspectives from microdialysis studies in freely-moving, spontaneously hypertensive rats on the pharmacology of drugs for the treatment of ADHD. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2008; 90: 184–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bymaster FP, Katner JS, Nelson DL, et al. Atomoxetine increases extracellular levels of norepinephrine and dopamine in prefrontal cortex of rat: a potential mechanism for efficacy in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 2002 Nov; 27(5): 699–711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Swanson CJ, Perry KW, Koch-Krueger S, et al. Effect of the attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder drug atomoxetine on extracellular concentrations of norepinephrine and dopamine in several brain regions of the rat. Neuropharmacology 2006 May; 50(6): 755–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Easton N, Steward C, Marshall F, et al. Effects of amphetamine isomers, methylphenidate and atomoxetine on synaptosomal and synaptic vesicle accumulation and release of dopamine and noradrenaline in vitro in the rat brain. Neuropharmacology 2007; 52: 405–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Heikkila RE, Orlansky H, Mytilineou C, et al. Amphetamine: evaluation of d- and lisomers as releasing agents and uptake inhibitors for [3H] dopamine and [3H] norepinephrine in slices of rat neostriatum and cerebral cortex. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1975; 194: 47–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Heal DJ, Cheetham SC, Prow MR, et al. A comparison of the effects on central 5-HT function of sibutramine hydrochloride and other weight-modifying agents. Br J Pharmacol 1998 Sep; 125(2): 301–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Fleckenstein AE, Haughey HM, Metzger RR, et al. Differential effects of psychostimulants and related agents on dopaminergic and serotonergic transporter function. Eur J Pharmacol 1999 Oct 1; 382(1): 45–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    James RS, Sharp WS, Bastain TM, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of single-dose amphetamine formulations in ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001; 40(11): 1268–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    McCracken JT, Biederman J, Greenhill LL, et al. Analog classroom assessment of once-daily mixed amphetamine formulation, SLI381 (Adderall XR) in children with ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2003; 42: 673–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Biederman J, Boellner SW, Childress A, et al. Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and mixed amphetamine salts extended-release in children with ADHD: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover analog classroom study. Biol Psychiatry 2007; 62: 970–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Faraone SV. Using meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of medications for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in youths. P T 2009 Dec; 34(12): 678–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Castells X, Ramos-Quiroga JA, Bosch R, et al. Amphetamines for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011 Jun; 15(6): CD007813Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Biederman J, Krishnan S, Zhang Y, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (NRP-104) in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, forced-dose, parallel-group study. Clin Ther 2007; 29: 450–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Adler LA, Goodman DW, Kollins SH, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2008; 69(9): 1364–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Wigal SB, Kollins SH, Childress AC, et al. A 13-hour laboratory school study of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in school-aged children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2009; 3: 17 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.capmh.com/content/3/1/17 [Accessed 2011 Mar 3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Wigal T, Brams M, Gasior M, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of the efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: novel findings using a simulated adult workplace environment design. Behav Brain Funct 2010; 6: 34 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/6/1/34 [Accessed 2011 Mar 31]PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Biederman J, Lopez FA, Boellner SW, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of SLI381 (Adderall XR) in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics 2002; 110: 258–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Spencer TJ, Wilens TE, Biederman J, et al. Efficacy and safety of mixed amphetamine salts extended release (Adderall XR) in the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adolescent patients: a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Clin Ther 2006; 28: 266–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Swanson JM, Wigal S, Greenhill LL, et al. Analog classroom assessment of Adderall in children with ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1998; 37: 519–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Pelham WE, Aronoff HR, Midlam JK, et al. A comparison of Ritalin and Adderall: efficacy and time-course in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics 1999; 103: e43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Pelham WE, Gnagy EM, Chronius AM, et al. A comparison of morning-only and morning/late afternoon Adderall to morning-only, twice-daily, and 3 times-daily methylphenidate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics 1999; 104: 1300–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Pliska SR, Browne RG, Olvera RL, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of Adderall and methylpheni-date in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000; 39: 619–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Ahmann PA, Theye FW, Berg R, et al. Placebo-controlled evaluation of amphetamine mixture-dextroamphetamine salts and amphetamine salts (Adderall): efficacy rate and side effects. Pediatrics 2001; 107: e10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Spencer T, Biederman J, Wilens T, et al. Efficacy of a mixed amphetamine salts compound in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001; 58(8): 775–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Greenhill LL, Swanson JM, Steinhoff K, et al. A pharma-cokinetic/pharmacodynamic study comparing a single morning dose of Adderall to twice-daily dosing in children with ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2003; 42(10): 1234–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Elia J, Borcherding BG, Rapoport JL, et al. Methylpheni-date and dextroamphetamine treatments of hyperactivity: are there true nonresponders? Psychiatry Res 1991; 36(2): 141–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Paterson R, Douglas C, Hallmayer J, et al. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of dexamphetamine in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1999; 33(4): 494–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Taylor FB, Russo J. Efficacy of modafinil compared to dextroamphetamine for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults. J Child Adolesc Psycho-pharmacol 2000; 10(4): 311–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Taylor FB, Russo J. Comparing guanfacine and dextroamphetamine for the treatment of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2001; 21(2): 223–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Krasnova IN, Cadet JL. Methamphetamine toxicity and messengers of death. Brain Res Rev 2009; 60: 379–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Findling RL, Childress AC, Krishnan S, et al. Long-term effectiveness and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in school-aged children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. CNS Spectr 2008; 13: 614–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Ambrosini PJ, Sallee FR, Lopez FA, et al. A community assessment, open-label study of the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of mixed amphetamine salts extended release in school-age children with ADHD. Curr Med Res Opin 2006; 22: 427–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    McGough JJ, Biederman J, Wigal SB, et al. Long-term tolerability and effectiveness of once-daily mixed amphetamine salts (Adderall XR) in children with ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2005; 44(6): 530–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Biederman J, Spencer TJ, Wilens TE, et al. Long-term safety and effectiveness of mixed amphetamine salts extended release in adults with ADHD. CNS Spectr 2005; 10 Suppl. 20: 16–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Goodman DW, Ginsberg L, Weisler RH, et al. An interim analysis of the quality of life, effectiveness, safety, and tolerability (QU.E.S.T.) evaluation of mixed amphetamine salts extended release in adults with ADHD. CNS Spectr 2005; 10 Suppl. 20: 26–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Weiss MD, Gibbins C, Goodman DW, et al. Moderators and mediators of symptoms and quality of life outcomes in an open-label study of adults treated for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2010 Apr; 71(4): 381–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Christensen L, Sasane R, Hodgkins P, et al. Pharmacological treatment patterns among patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: retrospective claims-based analysis of a managed care population. Curr Med Res Opin 2010; 26(4): 977–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Christensen LL, Sasane R, Hodgkins P, et al. Treatment burden and costs of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) users compared with users of other long-acting treatments in patients with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Poster presented at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 14th Annual International Meeting; 2009 May 16–20; Orlando (FL)Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Sanchez RJ, Crismon ML, Barner JC, et al. Assessment of adherence measures with different stimulants among children and adolescents. Pharmacotherapy 2005; 25(7): 909–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Narayan S, Hay J. Cost effectiveness of methylphenidate versus AMP/DEX mixed salts for the first-line treatment of ADHD. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res 2004; 4(6): 625–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Jasinski DR, Krishnan S. Abuse liability and safety of oral lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in individuals with a history of stimulant abuse. J Psychopharmacology 2009; 23(4): 419–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Parasrampuria DA, Schoedel KA, Schuller R, et al. Do formulation differences alter abuse liability of methylphenidate? A placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, crossover study in recreational drug users. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2007; 27(5): 459–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Jasinski DR, Faries DE, Moore RJ, et al. Abuse liability assessment of atomoxetine in a drug-abusing population. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008; 95(1–2): 140–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Lindholm A, Varughese S, Sembower MA, et al. Current trends in nonmedical use of prescription extended-release amphetamines and methylphenidate. Poster presented at the 18th European Congress of Psychiatry; 2010 Feb 27–Mar 2; MunichGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Varughese S, Rosen S, Lindholm A. Nonmedical use sur-veillance and signal identification of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, a prodrug stimulant for the treatment of ADHD. Poster presented at the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Annual Meeting; 2010 Oct 26–31; New York (NY)Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Pliszka SR, Bernet W, Bukstein O, et al. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry work group on quality issues: practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007; 46: 894–921PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Banaschewski T, Coghill D, Santosh P, et al. Long-acting medications for the hyperkinetic disorders: a systematic review and European treatment guideline. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006; 15: 476–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Lloyd A, Hodgkins P, Dewilde S, et al. Methylphenidate delivery mechanisms for the treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: heterogeneity in parent preferences. Int J Tech Assess Health Care 2011 Jul; 27(3): 215–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Medicines adherence: involving patients in decisions about prescribed medicines and supporting adherence. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2009 Jan: NICE publication no. CG76Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Busto U, Sellers EM. Pharmacokinetic determinants of drug abuse and dependence: a conceptual perspective. Clin Pharmacokinet 1986; 11: 144–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Volkow ND, Swanson JM. Variables that affect the clinical use and abuse of methylphenidate in the treatment of ADHD. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 60: 1909–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Farre M, Cami J. Pharmacokinetic considerations in abuse liability evaluation. Br J Addict 1991; 86: 1601–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Mumford GK, Evans SM, Fleishaker JC, et al. Alprazolam absorption kinetics affects abuse liability. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1995; 57: 356–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    O’Brien CP. Drug addiction and drug abuse. In: Hardman JG, Limbird LE, Goodman-Gilman A, editors. The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 10th ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill Book Co, 2001: 621–42Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Smith BJ, Jones HE, Griffiths RR. Physiological, subjective and reinforcing effects of oral and intravenous cocaine in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2001; 156:435–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Hodgkins
    • 1
  • Monica Shaw
    • 2
  • Suzanne McCarthy
    • 3
  • Floyd R. Sallee
    • 4
  1. 1.Shire PharmaceuticalsWayneUSA
  2. 2.Shire PharmaceuticalsBasingstokeUK
  3. 3.School of PharmacyUniversity College CorkCorkIreland
  4. 4.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral NeuroscienceUniversity of Cincinnati Academic Health CenterCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations