Sports Medicine

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 381–398 | Cite as

Using Cadence to Study Free-Living Ambulatory Behaviour

Review Article Free-Living Cadence

Abstract

The health benefits of a physically active lifestyle across a person’s lifespan have been established. If there is any single physical activity behaviour that we should measure well and promote effectively, it is ambulatory activity and, more specifically, walking. Since public health physical activity guidelines include statements related to intensity of activity, it follows that we need to measure and promote free-living patterns of ambulatory activity that are congruent with this intent. The purpose of this review article is to present and summarize the potential for using cadence (steps/minute) to represent such behavioural patterns of ambulatory activity in free-living. Cadence is one of the spatio-temporal parameters of gait or walking speed. It is typically assessed using short-distance walks in clinical research and practice, but freeliving cadence can be captured with a number of commercially available accelerometers that possess time-stamping technology. This presents a unique opportunity to use the same metric to communicate both ambulatory performance (assessed under testing conditions) and behaviour (assessed in the real world). Ranges for normal walking cadence assessed under laboratory conditions are 96–138 steps/minute for women and 81–135 steps/minute for men across their lifespan. The correlation between mean cadence and intensity (assessed with indirect calorimetry and expressed as metabolic equivalents [METs]) based on five treadmill/overground walking studies, is r = 0.93 and 100 steps/minute is considered to be a reasonable heuristic value indicative of walking at least at absolutely-defined moderate intensity (i.e. minimally, 3 METs) in adults. The weighted mean cadence derived from eight studies that have observed pedestrian cadence under natural conditions was 115.2 steps/minute, demonstrating that achieving 100 steps/minute is realistic in specific settings that occur in real life. However, accelerometer data collected in a large, representative sample suggest that self-selected walking at a cadence equivalent to ≥100 steps/minute is a rare occurrence in free-living adults. Specifically, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data show that US adults spent ≅4.8 hours/day in non-movement (i.e. zero cadence) during wearing time, ≅8.7 hours at 1–59 steps/minute, ≅16 minutes/day at cadences of 60–79 steps/minute,≅8 minutes at 80–99 steps/minute,≅5 minutes at 100–119 steps/minute, and ≅2 minutes at 120+ steps/minute. Cadence appears to be sensitive to change with intervention, and capitalizing on the natural tempo of music is an obvious means of targeting cadence. Cadence could potentially be used effectively in epidemiological study, intervention and behavioural research, dose-response studies, determinants studies and in prescription and practice. It is easily interpretable by researchers, clinicians, programme staff and the lay public, and therefore offers the potential to bridge science, practice and real life.

Notes

Acknowledgements

No funding was provided for the preparation of this paper. The authors have no conflicts of interest to report. The listed authors are publicly responsible for the content of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2008Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ham SA, Kruger J, Tudor-Locke C. Participation by US adults in sports, exercise, and recreational physical activities. J Phys Act Health 2009; 6: 1–10Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rafferty AP, Reeves MJ, McGee HB, et al. Physical activity patterns among walkers and compliance with public health recommendations. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002 Aug; 34 (8): 1255–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tudor-Locke C, Ham SA. Walking behaviors reported in the American Time Use Survey 2003-2005. J Phys Act Health 2008 Sep; 5 (5): 633–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miller R, Brown W, Tudor-Locke C. But what about swimming and cycling? How to ‘count’ non-ambulatory activity when using pedometers to assess physical activity. J Phys Act Health 2006; 3 (3): 257–66Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical Activity Guidelines Report, 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2008Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kemi OJ, Wisloff U. High-intensity aerobic exercise training improves the heart in health and disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2010 Jan-Feb; 30 (1): 2–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Waters RL, Lunsford BR, Perry J, et al. Energy-speed relationship of walking: standard tables. J Orthop Res 1988; 6: 215–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, et al. Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk. Diabetes Care 2008 Apr; 31 (4): 661–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Powell KE, Paluch AE, Blair SN. Physical activity for health: what kind? How much? How intense? On top of what? Annu Rev Public Health 2011 Apr 21; 32: 349–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000 Sep; 32 (9 Suppl.): S498–504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mekary RA, Willett WC, Hu FB, et al. Isotemporal substitution paradigm for physical activity epidemiology and weight change. Am J Epidemiol 2009 Aug 15; 170 (4): 519–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Berrigan D, et al. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008 Jan; 40 (1): 181–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Puthoff ML, Darter BJ, Nielsen DH, et al. The effect of weighted vest walking on metabolic responses and ground reaction forces. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006 Apr; 38 (4): 746–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Church TS, Earnest CP, Morss GM. Field testing of physiological responses associated with Nordic walking. Res Q Exerc Sport 2002 Sep; 73 (3): 296–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zatsiorky VM, Werner SL, Kaimin MA. Basic kinematics of walking. Step length and step frequency: a review J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1994 Jun; 34 (2): 109–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Beets MW, Agiovlasitis S, Fahs CA, et al. Adjusting step count recommendations for anthropometric variations in leg length. J Sci Med Sport 2010 Jan 21; 13 (5): 509–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Collins CE, et al. The relationship between heart rate intensity and pedometer step counts in adolescents. J Sports Sci 2009 Apr; 27 (6): 591–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Auvinet B, Berrut G, Touzard C, et al. Reference data for normal subjects obtained with an accelerometric device. Gait Posture 2002; 16 (2): 124–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saunders PU, Pyne DB, Telford RD, et al. Reliability and variability of running economy in elite distance runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004 Nov; 36 (11): 1972–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Styns F, van Noorden L, Moelants D, et al. Walking on music. Hum Mov Sci 2007 Oct; 26 (5): 769–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hatano Y. Prevalence and use of the pedometer. Res J Walking 1997; 1: 45–54Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Terrier P, Schutz Y. Variability of gait patterns during unconstrained walking assessed by satellite positioning (GPS). Eur J Appl Physiol 2003 Nov; 90 (5-6): 554–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Graham JE, Ostir GV, Fisher SR, et al. Assessing walking speed in clinical research: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract 2008 Aug; 14 (4): 552–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Himann JE, Cunningham DA, Rechnitzer PA, et al. Agerelated changes in speed of walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1988 Apr; 20 (2): 161–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 1994 Mar; 49 (2): M85–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stillman B, McMeeken J. Use of a video time display in determining general gait measures. Aust J Physiother 1996; 42 (3): 213–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McDonough AL, Batavia M, Chen FC, et al. The validity and reliability of the GAIT Rite system’s measurements: A preliminary evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001 Mar; 82 (3): 419–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Whittle MW. Gait analysis: an introduction. Edinburgh: Elselvier, 2007Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Norton K, Norton L, Sadgrove D. Position statement on physical activity and exercise intensity terminology. J Sci Med Sport 2010 Sep; 13 (5): 496–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s Guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 8th ed. New York (NY): Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2010Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007 Aug; 39 (8): 1423–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    O’Donovan G, Blazevich AJ, Boreham C, et al. The ABC of physical activity for health: a consensus statement from the British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences. J Sports Sci 2010 Apr; 28 (6): 573–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hatano Y. Use of the pedometer for promoting daily walking exercise. ICHPER 1993; 29: 4–8Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tudor-Locke C, Sisson SB, Collova T, et al. Pedometerdetermined step count guidelines for classifying walking intensity in a young ostensibly healthy population. Can J Appl Physiol 2005 Dec; 30 (6): 666–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Marshall SJ, Levy SS, Tudor-Locke CE, et al. Translating physical activity recommendations into a pedometerbased step goal: 3000 steps in 30 minutes. Am J Prev Med 2009 May; 36 (5): 410–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rowe DA, Welk GJ, Heil DP, et al. Stride rate recommendations for moderate intensity walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011 Jun 11; 43 (2): 312–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Abel M, Hannon J, Mullineaux D, et al. Determination of step rate thresholds corresponding to physical activity classifications in adults. J Phys Act Health 2011; 8: 45–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Park J, Ishikawa-Takata K, Tanaka S, et al. Effects of walking speed and step frequency on estimation of physical activity using accelerometers. J Physiol Anthropol 2011; 30 (3): 119–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Spelman CC, Pate RR, Macera CA, et al. Self-selected exercise intensity of habitual walkers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993 Oct; 25 (10): 1174–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Murtagh EM, Boreham CA, Murphy MH. Speed and exercise intensity of recreational walkers. Prev Med 2002 Oct; 35 (4): 397–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Drillis RJ. Objective recording and biomechanics of pathological gait. Ann New York Acad Sciences 1958; 74: 86–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Molen NH, Rozendal RH. Some factors of human gait. Proc K Ned Akad Wet C 1966; 69 (4): 522–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Finley FR, Cody KA. Locomotive characteristics of urban pedestrians. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1970 Jul; 51 (7): 423–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Molen NH, Rozendal RH, Boon W. Fundamental characteristics of human gait in relation to sex and location. Proc K Ned Akad Wet C 1972; 45 (3): 215–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Eke-Okoro ST, Sandlund B. The effects of load, shoes, sex and direction on the gait characteristics of street pedestrians. J Hum Movement Stud 1984; 10: 107–14Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sato H, Ishizu K. Gait patterns of Japanese pedestrians. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo) 1990 Jun; 19 (1): 13–22Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sato H, Sako H, Mukae H, et al. Gait patterns of young Japanese women. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo) 1991 Jun; 20 (1): 85–8Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hangland A, Cimbalo RS. Human ethology: age and sex differences in mall walking. Percept Mot Skills 1997 Dec; 85 (3Pt1): 845–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Johnson ST, Tudor-Locke C, McCargar LJ, et al. Measuring habitual walking speed of people with type 2 diabetes: are they meeting recommendations? Diabetes Care 2005 Jun; 28 (6): 1503–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lord SE, Rochester L, Weatherall M, et al. The effect of environment and task on gait parameters after stroke: a randomized comparison of measurement conditions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006 Jul; 87 (7): 967–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Donovan K, Lord SE, McNaughton HK, et al. Mobility beyond the clinic: the effect of environment on gait and its measurement in community-ambulant stroke survivors. Clin Rehabil 2008 Jun; 22 (6): 556–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Tudor-Locke C, Camhi SM, Leonardi C, et al. Patterns of adults stepping cadence in the 2005-2006 NHANES. Prev Med 2011; 53: 178–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Cavanaugh JT, Coleman KL, Gaines JM, et al. Using step activity monitoring to characterize ambulatory activity in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007 Jan; 55 (1): 120–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Gardner AW, Montgomery PS, Scott KJ, et al. Patterns of ambulatory activity in subjects with and without intermittent claudication. J Vasc Surg 2007 Dec; 46 (6): 1208–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tyo BM, Fitzhugh EC, Bassett Jr DR, et al. Effects of body mass index and step rate on pedometer error in a freeliving environment. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43 (2): 350–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ayabe M, Aoki J, Kumahara H, et al. Assessment of minute- by-minute stepping rate of physical activity under free-living conditions in female adults. Gait Posture 2011; 34 (2): 292–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Orendurff MS, Schoen JA, Bernatz GC, et al. How humans walk: bout duration, steps per bout, and rest duration. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008; 45 (7): 1077–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Benedetti MG, Di Gioia A, Conti L, et al. Physical activity monitoring in obese people in the real life environment. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009; 6: 47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ayabe M, Aoki J, Kumahara H, et al. Minute-by-minute stepping rate of daily physical activity in normal and overweight/obese adults. Obes Res Clin Pract 2011; 5: e151–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Aoyagi Y, Park H, Watanabe E, et al. Habitual physical activity and physical fitness in older Japanese adults: the Nakanojo Study. Gerontology 2009; 55 (5): 523–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Mudge S, Stott NS. Timed walking tests correlate with daily step activity in persons with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009 Feb; 90 (2): 296–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Gerdhem P, Dencker M, Ringsberg K, et al. Accelerometer- measured daily physical activity among octogenerians: results and associations to other indices of physical performance and bone density. Eur J Appl Physiol 2008 Jan; 102 (2): 173–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Fiser WM, Hays NP, Rogers SC, et al. Energetics of walking in elderly people: factors related to gait speed. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2010; 65 (12): 1332–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Pruitt LA, Glynn NW, King AC, et al. Use of accelerometry to measure physical activity in older adults at risk for mobility disability. J Aging Phys Act 2008 Oct; 16 (4): 416–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Barnett A, Cerin E. Individual calibration for estimating free-living walking speed using the MTI monitor. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006 Apr; 38 (4): 761–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Bereket S. Effects of anthropometric parameters and stride frequency on estimation of energy cost of walking. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2005 Jun; 45 (2): 152–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Rodgers CD, Paterson DH, Cunningham DA, et al. Sleep deprivation: effects on work capacity, self-paced walking, contractile properties and perceived exertion. Sleep 1995 Jan; 18 (1): 30–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Malatesta D, Simar D, Saad HB, et al. Effect of an overground walking training on gait performance in healthy 65- to 80-year-olds. Exp Gerontol 2010 Jun; 45 (6): 427–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Hunter GR, Treuth MS, Weinsier RL, et al. The effects of strength conditioning on older women’s ability to perform daily tasks. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995 Jul; 43 (7): 756–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Lord SR, Lloyd DG, Nirui M, et al. The effect of exercise on gait patterns in older women: a randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1996 Mar; 51 (2): M64–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Allet L, Armand S, Aminian K, et al. An exercise intervention to improve diabetic patients’ gait in a real-life environment. Gait Posture 2010 Jun; 32 (2): 185–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Kirk A, Mutrie N, MacIntyre P, et al. Increasing physical activity in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003 Apr; 26 (4): 1186–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Rogers LQ, Hopkins-Price P, Vicari S, et al. Physical activity and health outcomes three months after completing a physical activity behavior change intervention: persistent and delayed effects. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009 May; 18 (5): 1410–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Mudge S, Barber PA, Stott NS. Circuit-based rehabilitation improves gait endurance but not usual walking activity in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009 Dec; 90 (12): 1989–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Gardner AW, Parker DE, Montgomery PS, et al. Efficacy of quantified home-based exercise and supervised exercise in patients with intermittent claudication: a randomized controlled trial. Circulation 2011 Feb 8; 123 (5): 491–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Hartmann A, Luzi S, Murer K, et al. Concurrent validity of a trunk tri-axial accelerometer system for gait analysis in older adults. Gait Posture 2009 Apr; 29 (3): 444–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Lord S, Rochester L, Baker K, et al. Concurrent validity of accelerometry to measure gait in Parkinsons Disease. Gait Posture 2008 Feb; 27 (2): 357–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    McClain JJ, Hart TL, Getz RS, et al. Convergent validity of 3 low cost motion sensors with the Acti Graph accelerometer. J Phys Act Health 2010 Sep; 7 (5): 662–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Holbrook EA, Barreira TV, Kang M. Validity and reliability of Omron pedometers for prescribed and self-paced walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009 Mar; 41 (3): 670–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Hasson RE, Haller J, Pober DM, et al. Validity of the Omron HJ-112 pedometer during treadmill walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009 Apr; 41 (4): 805–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Schneider PL, Crouter SE, Lukajic O, et al. Accuracy and reliability of 10 pedometers for measuring steps over a 400-m walk. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003 Oct; 35 (10): 1779–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Abel M. The effect of pedometer tilt angle on pedometer accuracy. Int J Fit 2008; 4 (1): 51–7Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Kanoun N. Validation of the ActivPAL activity monitor as a measure of walking at pre-determined slow walking speeds in a healthy population in a controlled setting. Reinvention: a Journal of Undergraduate Research 2009; 2 (2) [online]. Available from URL: http://www.warwick.ac.uk/go/reinventionjournal/issues/Vol.2issue2/kanoun [Accessed 2012 Feb 29]
  85. 85.
    Ryan CG, Grant PM, Tigbe WW, et al. The validity and reliability of a novel activity monitor as a measure of walking. Br J Sports Med 2006 Sep; 40 (9): 779–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Maddocks M, Petrou A, Skipper L, et al. Validity of three accelerometers during treadmill walking and motor vehicle travel. Br J Sports Med 2010 Jun; 44 (8): 606–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Dwyer TJ, Alison JA, McKeough ZJ, et al. Evaluation of the Sense Wear activity monitor during exercise in cystic fibrosis and in health. Respir Med 2009 Oct; 103 (10): 1511–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Furlanetto KC, Bisca GW, Oldemberg N, et al. Step counting and energy expenditure estimation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and healthy elderly: accuracy of 2 motion sensors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010 Feb; 91 (2): 261–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Foster RC, Lanningham-Foster LM, Manohar C, et al. Precision and accuracy of an ankle-worn accelerometerbased pedometer in step counting and energy expenditure. Prev Med 2005 Sep-Oct; 41 (3-4): 778–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Abel MG, Hannon JC, Sell K, et al. Validation of the Kenz Lifecorder EX and ActiGraph GT1M accelerometers for walking and running in adults. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2008 Dec; 33 (6): 1155–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Esliger DW, Probert A, Gorber SC, et al. Validity of the Actical accelerometer step-count function. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007 Jul; 39 (7): 1200–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Le Masurier GC, Lee SM, Tudor-Locke C. Motion sensor accuracy under controlled and free-living conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004 May; 36 (5): 905–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Le Masurier GC, Tudor-Locke C. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003 May; 35 (5): 867–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Crouter SE, Schneider PL, Karabulut M, et al. Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003 Aug; 35 (8): 1455–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    McClain JJ, Craig CL, Sisson SB, et al. Comparison of Lifecorder EX and Acti Graph accelerometers under freeliving conditions. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2007 Aug; 32 (4): 753–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Johnson ST, McCargar LJ, Bell GJ, et al. Walking faster: distilling a complex prescription for type 2 diabetes management through pedometry. Diabetes Care 2006 Jul; 29 (7): 1654–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Lim I, van Wegen E, de Goede C, et al. Effects of external rhythmical cueing on gait in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2005 Oct; 19 (7): 695–713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Conklyn D, Stough D, Novak E, et al. A home-based walking program using rhythmic auditory stimulation improves gait performance in patients with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010; 24 (9): 835–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Bauldoff GS, Hoffman LA, Zullo TG, et al. Exercise maintenance following pulmonary rehabilitation: effect of distractive stimuli. Chest 2002 Sep; 122 (3): 948–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Yamashita S, Iwai K, Akimoto T, et al. Effects of music during exercise on RPE, heart rate and the autonomic nervous system. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2006 Sep; 46 (3): 425–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Potteiger JA, Schroeder JM, Goff KL. Influence of music on ratings of perceived exertion during 20 minutes of moderate intensity exercise. Percept Mot Skills 2000 Dec; 91 (3Pt1): 848–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Thaut MH, McIntosh GC, Rice RR, et al. Rhythmic auditory stimulation in gait training for Parkinson’s disease patients. Mov Disord 1996 Mar; 11 (2): 193–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Sun J, Walters M, Svensson N, et al. The influence of surface slope on human gait characteristics: a study of urban pedestrians walking on an inclined surface. Ergonomics 1996 Apr; 39 (4): 677–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Tudor-Locke C, Brashear MM, Katzmarzyk PT, et al. Peak stepping cadence in free-living adults: 2005-2006 NHANES. J Phys Act Health. In pressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Walking Behavior LaboratoryPennington Biomedical Research CenterBaton RougeUSA
  2. 2.School of Psychological Sciences and HealthUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations