Sports Medicine

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 281–300 | Cite as

A Review of the Effectiveness of Physical Activity Interventions for Adult Males

  • Emma S. GeorgeEmail author
  • Gregory S. Kolt
  • Mitch J. Duncan
  • Cristina M. Caperchione
  • W. Kerry Mummery
  • Corneel Vandelanotte
  • Pennie Taylor
  • Manny Noakes
Review Article


Physical inactivity is one of the main modifiable risk factors for a range of noncommunicable diseases. Of particular interest are adult males, a hard-to- reach population group for health promotion interventions. The purpose of this review is to provide a critical evaluation of the published health-related physical activity interventions that have targeted adult males.

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, CINAHL®, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus™was conducted for intervention studies published in English, between January 1990 and August 2010. Studies including community-dwelling adult men (±18 years), or including both males and females where data on male parti- cipants could be extracted and examined, were included in this review. Studies assessing changes in levels of physical activity, physical fitness or changes in biomarkers of disease risk relevant to physical activity (e.g. body weight, waist circumference, lipids, blood pressure) were the primary focus.

A total of 14 studies focusing on physical activity only and nine combined physical activity and nutrition studies were also included in this review. Ten of the 14 physical activity only studies and four of the nine combined physical activity and nutrition studies demonstrated significant increases in physical activity outcomes. Face-to-face, group-based and print-based methods were most commonly employed in these interventions. Within each mode of de- livery, a number of elements including regular feedback, access to self- monitoring tools, elements of social support, variety in activities and a degree of friendly competition, were revealed as positive inclusions for this pop- ulation group.

Males are generally under-represented in health-promotion interven- tions and should therefore be targeted specifically, and while results of the included studies are encouraging, there is a lack of intervention studies tar- geting adult males. Further research into this population group is therefore required.


Physical Activity Male Participant Physical Activity Intervention Physical Activity Goal Nutrition Intervention Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Queensland Health provided funding to conduct this project. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review. C. Vandelanotte is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (#519778) and National Heart Foundation of Australia (#PH 07B 3303) post-doctoral research fellowship.


  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. World health statistics. 2010 [online]. Available from URL:( [Accessed 2010 Feb 18]Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Department of Health and Ageing. National male health policy: building on the strengths of Australian males. 2010 [online]. Available from URL:$File/MainDocument.pdf [Accessed 2010 May 25]Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Williams DR. The health of men: structured inequalities and opportunities. Am J Public Health 2003 May 1; 93 (5): 724–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The health of Australia’s males. Cat no. PHE 141. 2011 [online]. Available from URL: [Accessed 2011 Jun 28]Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Courtenay WH. Behavioral factors associated with disease, injury, and death among men: evidence and implications for prevention. J Mens Stud 2000; 9 (1): 81–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    World Health Organization. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. 2009 [online]. Available from URL: [Accessed 2010 Apr 9]Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilmore J, Costill D, Kenney W. Physiology of sport and exercise. 4th ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2008Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s health 2008. Cat. no. AUS 99. 2008 [online]. Available from URL: [Accessed 2010 Aug 10]Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    World Health Organization. Physical activity. Geneva: WHO; 2009 [online]. Available from URL: [Accessed 2009 Oct 18]Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Indicators for chronic diseases and their determinants, 2008. Cat. no. PHE 75 [online]. Available from: [Accessed 2010 May 5]Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bauman AE. Updating the evidence that physical activity is good for health: an epidemiological review 2000-2003. J Sci Med Sport 2004; 7 Suppl. 1: 6–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dunn AL, Trivedi MH, Kampert JB, et al. Exercise treatment for depression: efficacy and dose-response. Am J Prev Med 2005; 28 (1): S587–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paluska SA, Schwenk TL. Physical activity and mental health: current concepts. Sports Med 2000; 29 (3): 167–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Blumenthal JA, Babyak MA, Doraiswamy PM, et al. Exercise and pharmacotherapy in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Psychosom Med 2007, 2007; 69 (7): 587–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s health 2010. Australia’s health series no. 12. Cat no. AUS 122. 2010 [online]. Available from URL: [Accessed 2010 Jul 1]Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Waters L, Galichet B, Owen N, et al. Who participates in physical activity intervention trials? J Phys Act Health 2011; 8 (1): 85–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Foster C, Hillsdon M, Thorogood M. Interventions for promoting physical activity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (4): 1–88Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, et al. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA 2007; 298 (19): 2296–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eakin E, Glasgow R, Riley K. Review of primary care-based physical activity intervention studies: effectiveness and implications for practice and future research. J Fam Pract 2000; 49 (2): 158–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hutchison AJ, Breckon JD, Johnston LH. Physical activity behavior change interventions based on the transtheoretical model: a systematic review. Health Educ Behav 2009, 2009; 36 (5): 829–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jenkins A, Christensen H, Walker JG, et al. The effectiveness of distance interventions for increasing physical activity: a review. Am J Health Promot 2009; 24 (2): 102–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kahn EB, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC, et al. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2002; 22 (4 Suppl. 1): 173–107Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kroeze W, Werkman A, Brug J. A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. Ann Behav Med 2006 Jun; 31 (3): 205–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Müller-Riemenschneider F, Reinhold T, Nocon M, et al. Long-term effectiveness of interventions promoting physical activity: a systematic review. Prev Med 2008; 47 (4): 354–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Norman GJ, Zabinski MF, Adams MA, et al. A review of eHealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change. Am J Prev Med 2007 Oct; 33 (4): 336–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vandelanotte C, Spathonis KM, Eakin EG, et al. Website-delivered physical activity interventions: a review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 2007; 33 (1): 54–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aadahl M, Kjaer M, Jørgensen T. Associations between overall physical activity level and cardiovascular risk factors in an adult population. Eur J Epidemiol 2007; 22 (6): 369–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aadahl M, von Huth Smith L, Pisinger C, et al. Five-year change in physical activity is associated with changes in cardiovascular disease risk factors: the Inter99 study. Prev Med 2009; 48 (4): 326–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fung TT, Hu FB, Yu J, et al. Leisure-time physical activity, television watching, and plasma biomarkers of obesity and cardiovascular disease risk. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 152 (12): 1171–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Leahey T, Crane M, Pinto A, et al. Effect of teammates on changes in physical activity in a statewide campaign. Prev Med 2010; 51: 45–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Buis L, Poulton T, Holleman R, et al. Evaluating active U: an internet-mediated physical activity program. BMC Public Health 2009; 9 (1): 331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    De Cocker K, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Brown W, et al. Effects of “10,000 steps Ghent”: a whole-community intervention. Am J Prev Med 2007; 33 (6): 455–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McTiernan A, Sorensen B, Irwin M, et al. Exercise effect on weight and body fat in men and women. Obesity 2007; 15 (6): 1496–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Plotnikoff R, Brunet S, Courneya K, et al. The efficacy of stage-matched and standard public health materials for promoting physical activity in the workplace: the Physical Activity Workplace Study (PAWS). Am J Health Promot 2007; 21 (6): 501–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bolognesi M, Nigg C, Massarini M, et al. Reducing obesity indicators through brief physical activity counseling (PACE) in Italian primary care settings. Ann Behav Med 2006; 31 (2): 179–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brown WJ, Mummery K, Eakin E, et al. 10,000 steps Rockhampton: evaluation of a whole community approach to improving population levels of physical activity. J Phys Act Health 2006; 3 (1): 1–14Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Østeras H, Hammer S. The effectiveness of a pragmatic worksite physical activity program on maximal oxygen consumption and the physical activity level in healthy people. J Bodywork Mov Ther 2006; 10 (1): 51–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bjørgaas M, Vik J, Saeterhaug A, et al. Relationship between pedometer-registered activity, aerobic capacity and self-reported activity and fitness in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2005; 7 (6): 737–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Harrison RA, Roberts C, Elton PJ. Does primary care referral to an exercise programme increase physical activity one year later? A randomized controlled trial. J Pub Health 2005; 27 (1): 25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kaukiainen A, Nygard C-H, Virtanen P, et al. Physical activity intervention among unemployed male construction workers. Adv Physiother 2002; 4 (1): 3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    The Writing Group for the Activity Counseling Trial Research Group. Effects of physical activity counseling in primary care: the Activity Counseling Trial. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001; 286 (6): 677–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, et al. Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness: a randomized trial. JAMA 1999; 281 (4): 327–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Swinburn B, Walter L, Arroll B, et al. The Green Prescription study: a randomized controlled trial of written exercise advice provided by general practitioners. Am J Pub Health 1998; 88 (2): 288–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Morgan P, Lubans D, Callister R, et al. The ‘Healthy Dads, Healthy Kids’ randomized controlled trial: efficacy of a healthy lifestyle program for overweight fathers and their children. Int J Obes 2011; 35 (3): 436–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gray CM, Anderson AS, Clarke AM, et al. Addressing male obesity: an evaluation of a group-based weight management intervention for Scottish men. JMens Health 2009; 6 (1): 70–81Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Morgan PJ, Lubans DR, Collins CE, et al. The SHED-IT randomized controlled trial: evaluation of an internet-based weight-loss program for men. Obesity 2009 Nov; 17 (11): 2025–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Arao T, Oida Y, Maruyama C, et al. Impact of lifestyle intervention on physical activity and diet of Japanese workers. Prev Med 2007 Aug-Sep; 45 (2-3): 146–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Elliot D, Goldberg L, Kuehl K, et al. The PHLAME (Promoting Healthy Lifestyles: Alternative Models’ Effects) firefighter study: outcomes of two models of behavior change. J Occup Environ Med 2007; 49 (2): 204–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Burke V, Giangiulio N, Gillam HF, et al. Physical activity and nutrition programs for couples: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56 (5): 421–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Veverka D, Anderson J, Auld G, et al. Use of the stages of change model in improving nutrition and exercise habits in enlisted Air Force men. Mil Med 2003; 168 (5): 373–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Borg P, Kukkonen-Harjula K, Fogelholm M, et al. Effects of walking or resistance training on weight loss maintenance in obese, middle-aged men: a randomized trial. Int J Obes 2002; 26 (5): 676–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pritchard J, Nowson C, Wark J. A worksite program for overweight middle-aged men achieves lesser weight loss with exercise than with dietary change. J Am Diet Assoc 1997; 97 (1): 37–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Prochaska J, Velicer W. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot 1997; 12 (1): 38–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Morgan PJ, Lubans DR, Collins CE, et al. 12-month outcomes and process evaluation of the SHED-IT RCT: an internet-based weight loss program targeting men. Obesity 2011; 19 (1): 142–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kiefer I, Rathmanner T, Kunze M. Eating and dieting differences in men and women. J Mens Health Gend 2005; 2 (2): 194–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Courtenay W. Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: a theory of gender and health. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50 (10): 1385–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Burton N, Walsh A, Brown W. It just doesn’t speak to me: mid-aged men’s reactions to ‘10,000 steps a day’. Health Promot J Aust 2008; 19 (1): 52–9Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Schmidt MD, Cleland VJ, Thomson RJ, et al. A comparison of subjective and objective measures of physical activity and fitness in identifying associations with cardiometabolic risk factors. Ann Epidemiol 2008; 18 (5): 378–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    BrownW J, Trost SG, Bauman A, et al. Test-retest reliability of four physical activity measures used in population surveys. J Sci Med Sport 2004; 7 (2): 205–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35 (8): 1381–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Prince S, Adamo K, Hamel M, et al. A comparison of direct versus self-reportmeasures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008; 5 (1): 56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emma S. George
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gregory S. Kolt
    • 1
  • Mitch J. Duncan
    • 2
  • Cristina M. Caperchione
    • 3
  • W. Kerry Mummery
    • 4
  • Corneel Vandelanotte
    • 2
  • Pennie Taylor
    • 5
  • Manny Noakes
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Science and HealthUniversity of Western SydneyPenrith, SydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Central Queensland UniversityRockhamptonAustralia
  3. 3.University of British ColumbiaKelownaCanada
  4. 4.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  5. 5.CSIRO Food and Nutritional SciencesAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations