Sports Medicine

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 1–10 | Cite as

The Role of Ecological Dynamics in Analysing Performance in Team Sports

  • Luís Vilar
  • Duarte Araújo
  • Keith Davids
  • Chris Button
Current Opinion Performance Analysis in Team Sports

Abstract

Performance analysis is a subdiscipline of sports sciences and one-approach, notational analysis, has been used to objectively audit and describe behaviours of performers during different subphases of play, providing additional information for practitioners to improve future sports performance. Recent criticisms of these methods have suggested the need for a sound theoretical rationale to explain performance behaviours, not just describe them. The aim of this article was to show how ecological dynamics provides a valid theoretical explanation of performance in team sports by explaining the formation of successful and unsuccessful patterns of play, based on symmetrybreaking processes emerging from functional interactions between players and the performance environment. We offer the view that ecological dynamics is an upgrade to more operational methods of performance analysis that merely document statistics of competitive performance. In support of our arguments, we refer to exemplar data on competitive performance in team sports that have revealed functional interpersonal interactions between attackers and defenders, based on variations in the spatial positioning of performers relative to each other in critical performance areas, such as the scoring zones. Implications of this perspective are also considered for practice task design and sport development programmes.

Keywords

Team Sport Sport Performance Ecological Dynamic Notational Analysis Team Game 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Luís Vilar was supported by a financial grant from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (SFRH/BD/43251/2008). The authors would like to acknowledge the three anonymous reviewers for their insightful and valuable comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are directly relevant to the content of this article. No funding was received by Duarte Araújo, Keith Davids and Chris Button to assist them in the preparation of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    McGarry T. Applied and theoretical perspectives of performance analysis in sport: scientific issues and challenges. Int J Perform Anal Sport 2009; 9: 128–40Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hughes M, Franks I. Notational analysis: a review of the literature. In: Hughes M, Franks I, editors. Notational analysis of sport. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2004; 59–106Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Glazier P. Game, set and match? Substantive issues and future direction in performance analysis. Sports Med 2010; 40 (8): 625–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hughes M, Bartlett R. The use of performance indicators in performance analysis. J Sports Sci 2002; 20: 739–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lago C, Martin R. Determinants of possession of the ball in soccer. J Sports Sci 2007; 25 (9): 969–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hughes M, Franks I. Analysis of passing sequences, shots and goals in soccer. J Sports Sci 2005; 23 (5): 509–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reep C, Benjamin B. Skill and chance in association football. J R Stat Soc 1968; 131 (4): 581–5Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reep C, Pollard R, Benjamin B. Skill and chance in ball games. J R Stat Soc 1971; A (134): 623–9Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Franks I, Goodman D, Miller G. Human factors in sport systems: an empirical investigation of events in team games. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 27th Annual Meeting; 1983 Oct 10-14. Hum Fac Soc 1983; 27 (5) 383–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Franks I, Partridge D, Nagelkerke P. World Cup 90: a computer assisted technical analysis of team performance. Technical report for the Canadian Soccer Association. Vancouver (BC): University of British Columbia, 1990Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hughes M, Robertson K, Nicholson A. An analysis of the 1984 World Cup of Association Football. In: Reilly T, Lees A, Davids K, Murphy W, editors. Science and football. London: E & FN Spon, 1988: 363–7Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Partridge D, Franks I. A detailed analysis of crossing opportunities from the 1986 World Cup (part I). Soccer J 1989 May-Jun: 47–50Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Partridge D, Franks I. A detailed analysis of crossing opportunities from the 1986 World Cup (part II). Soccer J 1989 Jun-Jul: 45–8Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grehaigne J. Systemic approach and soccer. In: Hughes M, editor. Notation of sport III. Cardiff: Centre for Performance Analysis, UWIC, 1999; 1–8Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scholz JP, Schoner G, Latash ML. Identifying the control structure of multijoint coordination during pistol shooting. Exp Brain Res 2000 Dec; 135 (3): 382–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Davids K, Araújo D. The concept of ‘Organismic Asymmetry’ in sport science. J Sci Med Sport 2010; 13 (6): 663–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Araújo D, Davids K, Hristovski R. The ecological dynamics of decision making in sport. Psychol Sport Exerc 2006; 7: 653–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Araújo D, Davids K, Bennett S, et al. Emergence of sport skills under constraints. In: Williams AM, Hodges NJ, editors. Skill acquisition in sport: research, theory and practice. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis, 2004; 409–33Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Davids K, Button C, Araújo D, et al. Movement models from sports provide representative task constraints for studying adaptive behavior in human movement systems. Adapt Behav 2006; 14 (1): 73–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Davids K, Handford C, Williams M. The natural physical alternative to cognitive theories of motor behaviour: an invitation for interdisciplinary research in sports science? J Sports Sci 1994; 12 (6): 495–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Handford C, Davids K, Bennett S, et al. Skill acquisition in sport: some applications of an evolving practice ecology. J Sports Sci 1997; 15: 621–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gréhaigne J, Bouthier D, David B. Dynamic-system analysis of opponent relationships in collective actions in soccer. J Sports Sci 1997; 15 (2): 137–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Davids K, Glazier P, Araujo D, et al. Movement systems as dynamical systems: the functional role of variability and its implications for sports medicine. Sports Med 2003; 33 (4): 245–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hristovski R, Davids K, Araújo D, et al. How boxers decide to punch a target: emergent behavior in nonlinear dynamical movement systems [combat sports special issue]. J Sports Sci Med 2006; 60–73Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Richardson M, Marsh K, Baron R. Judging and actualizing intrapersonal and interpersonal affordances. J Exp Psychol Human 2007; 33 (4): 845–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Araújo D, Davids K. Ecological approaches to cognition and action in sport and exercise: ask not only what you do, but where you do it. Int J Sport Psychol 2009; 40 (1): 5–1Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    McGarry T, Anderson D, Wallace S, et al. Sport competition as a dynamical self-organizing system. J Sports Sci 2002; 20: 771–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Davids K, Araújo D, Shuttleworth R. Applications of dynamical systems theory to football. In: Reilly T, Cabri J, Araújo D, editors. Science and football V. London: Routledge, 2005; 547–60Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Passos P, Araujo D, Davids K, et al. Information-governing dynamics of attacker-defender interactions in youth rugby union. J Sports Sci 2008; 26 (13): 1421–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Passos P, Araújo D, Davids K, et al. Interpersonal pattern dynamics and adaptive behavior in multiagent neurobiological systems: conceptual model and data. J Motor Behav 2009; 41 (5): 445–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Duarte R, Araújo D, Gazimba V, et al. The ecological dynamics of 1v1 sub-phases in Association Football. Open Sports Sci J 2010; 3: 16–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bourbousson J, Seve C, McGarry T. Space-time coordination dynamics in basketball: part 1. Intra- and inter-couplings among player dyads. J Sports Sci 2010; 28 (3): 339–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Palut Y, Zanone P. A dynamical analysis of tennis: concepts and data. J Sports Sci 2005; 23 (10): 1021–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vilar L, Araújo D, Davids K, et al. Constraints on competitive performance of attacker-defender dyads in team sports. J Sports Sci. In pressGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vilar L, Araújo D, Davids K, et al. Interdependence between perceptual and motor sub-systems in pattern-forming dynamics in team sports [abstract]. In: Sayama H, Minai A, Braha D, et al., editors. Eighth International Conference on Complex Systems; 2011 Jun 26-Jul 1; Boston (MA): NECSI 2011; 1601Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Peper C, Bootsma R, Mestre D, et al. Catching balls: how to get the hand to the right place at the right time. J Exp Psychol Human 1994; 20: 591–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Davids K, Renshaw I, Glazier P. Movement models from sports reveal fundamental insights into coordination processes. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2005; 33 (1): 36–42PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luís Vilar
    • 1
    • 2
  • Duarte Araújo
    • 1
  • Keith Davids
    • 3
  • Chris Button
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of Human KineticsTechnical University of LisbonLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Faculty of Physical Education and SportsLusófona University of Humanities and TechnologiesLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.School of Human Movement StudiesQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  4. 4.School of Physical EducationUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations