Understanding consumer preferences in the context of managed competition
- 73 Downloads
In many countries, health insurance coverage is the primary way for individuals to access care. Governments can support access through social insurance programmes; however, after a certain period, governments struggle to achieve universal coverage. Evidence suggests that complex individual behaviour may play a role.
Using a choice experiment, this research explored consumer preferences for health insurance in Colombia. We also evaluated whether preferences differed across consumers with differing demographic and health status factors.
A household field experiment was conducted in Bogotá in 2010. The sample consisted of 109 uninsured and 133 low-income insured individuals. Each individual evaluated 12 pair-wise comparisons of hypothetical health plans. We focused on six characteristics of health insurance: premium, out-of-pocket expenditure, chronic condition coverage, quality of care, family coverage and sick leave. A main effects orthogonal design was used to derive the 72 scenarios used in the choice experiment. Parameters were estimated using conditional logit models. Since price data were included, we estimated respondents’ willingness to pay for characteristics.
Consumers valued health benefits and family coverage more than other attributes. Additionally, differences in preferences can be exploited to increase coverage. The willingness to pay for benefits may partially cover the average cost of providing them.
Policy makers might be able to encourage those insured via the subsidized system to enrol in the next level of the social health insurance scheme through expanding benefits to family members and expanding the level of chronic condition coverage.
This project was financed by Asocajas, Fundación Corona and Gestar Salud as a part of the project “New Strategies for Health Universalization in Colombia”. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.
- 1.Wagner AK, Graves AJ, Reiss SK, et al. Access to care and medicines, burden of health care expenditures, and risk protection: results from the World Health Survey. Amsterdam: Health Policy, 2010Google Scholar
- 3.Institute of Medicine. America’s uninsured crisis: consequences for health and health care. Consensus report, 2009 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2009/Americas-Uninsured-Crisis-Consequences-for-Health-and-Health-Care.aspx [Accessed 2010 Jun 3]
- 8.Glassman AL, Escobar M-L, Giuffrida A, et al. From few to many: ten years of health insurance expansion in Colombia. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank-The Brooking Institution Press, 2009Google Scholar
- 10.Chakraborty G, Ettenson R, Gaeth G. How consumers choose health insurance. J Health Care Market 1994; 14: 21–33Google Scholar
- 22.Manski CF. The structure of random utility models. Theory Decis 1977; 8: 229–54Google Scholar
- 23.McFadden D. Conditional Logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zaremba Paul, editor. Frontiers in econometrics. New York: Academic Press, 1974: 105–42Google Scholar
- 25.de Bekker-Grob EW, Ryan M, Gerard K. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ. Epub 2010 Dec 19Google Scholar
- 33.Chrzan K, Orme B. An overview and comparison of design strategies for choice-based conjoint analysis. Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series. Sequim (WA): Sawtooth Software, Inc., 2000Google Scholar
- 38.Cendex. Encuesta Nacional de Salud Colombia 2007. Ministerio de la Protección Social, Colciencias, Javegraf, 2009Google Scholar
- 39.Stata Corporation. Stata statistical software: version 10. Reference volumes. College Station (TX): STATA Corporation, 2008Google Scholar
- 40.Orme BK. Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. Madison (WI): Research Publishers LLC, 2006Google Scholar