High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 187–193 | Cite as

Role of Tissue Doppler Imaging for Detection of Diastolic Dysfunction in the Elderly

A Study in Clinical Practice
  • Francesca Negri
  • Carla Sala
  • Cristiana Valerio
  • Giuseppe Mancia
  • Cesare Cuspidi
Original Research Article


Background: The role of tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) in the assessment of diastolic dysfunction in elderly patients seen in echocardiographic practice is poorly defined.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in a cohort of elderly patients referred to an echocardiographic examination for routine clinical indications and to compare the findings obtained by conventional Doppler with those obtained by TDI.

Methods: A total of 457 elderly patients with preserved left ventricular (LV) systolic function (mean age 73±5 years, 45% men, 76% with hypertension) underwent a comprehensive echo-Doppler examination; diastolic dysfunction was defined by the following conventional and TDI criteria: E/A ratio (ratio between transmitral peak velocity of E and A waves) <0.7 or >1.5 and lateral annular early diastolic peak velocity (Ei) <8 cm/sec, respectively.

Results: Diastolic dysfunction was present in 130 patients (28.4%) according to the conventional Doppler criterion, namely 119 (26.0%) because of E/A <0.7 and 11 because of E/A >1.5. A higher proportion of participants (60.1%) had LV diastolic dysfunction according to TDI. Notably, more than one-half of the patients with ‘normal’ diastolic function by conventional criterion exhibited an abnormal Ei value.

Conclusions: A large proportion of elderly patients with normal E/A ratios may have more subtle alterations in LV diastolic mechanics characterized by a reduced annular motion velocity. Thus, evaluation of diastolic function by the simple E/Aratio may markedly underestimate diastolic abnormalities. This finding supports the view that diastolic function should be routinely assessed by comprehensive Doppler methodologies including both conventional and tissue Doppler measurements in order to improve the management of elderly patients seen in clinical practice.


conventional Doppler tissue Doppler imaging diastolic function elderly 



No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the contents of this article. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.


  1. 1.
    Koelling TM, Chen RS, Lubwama RN, et al. The expanding national burden of heart failure in the United States: the influence of heart failure in women. Am Heart J 2004; 147: 74–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fang J, Mensah GA, Croft JB, et al. Heart failure-related hospitalization in the US 1979 to 2004. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 428–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu L. Changes in cardiovascular hospitalization and comorbidity of heart failure in the United States: findings from the national hospital discharge surveys 1980-2006. Int J Cardiol 2011; 149: 39–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jugdutt BI. Aging and heart failure: changing demographics and implications for therapy in elderly. Heart Fail Rev 2010; 15: 401–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pagé M, Doucet M, Eisenberg MJ, et al. Temporal trends in revascularization and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction among the very elderly. CMAJ 2010; 182: 1415–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Owan TE, Hodge DO, Herges RM, et al. Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 251–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abhayaratna WP, Marwick TH, Smith WT, et al. Characteristics of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in the community: an echocardiographic survey. Heart 2006; 92: 1259–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheng S, Xanthakis V, Sullivan LM, et al. Correlates of echocardiographic indices of cardiac remodeling over the adult life course: longitudinal observations from the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2010; 122: 570–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paulus WJ, Tschope C, Sanderson JE, et al. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 2539–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bella JN, Palmieri V, Roman MJ, et al. Mitral ratio of peak early to late diastolic filling velocity as a predictor of mortality in middle-aged and elderly adults. The Strong Heart Study. Circulation 2002; 105: 1928–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Temporelli PL, Giannuzzi P, Nicolosi GL, et al. Doppler-derived mitral deceleration time as a strong prognostic marker of left ventricular remodeling and survival after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1646–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang M, Yip GWK, Wang AYM, et al. Peak early diastolic mitral annulus velocity by tissue Doppler imaging adds independent and incremental prognostic value. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 46: 272–7Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sutherland GR, Bijnens B, McDicken WN. Tissue Doppler echocardiography: historical perspective and technological considerations. Echocardiography 1999; 16: 445–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abraham TP, Dimano VL, Liang HY. Role of tissue Doppler and strain echocardiography in current clinical practice. Circulation 2007; 116: 2597–609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kasner M, Westerman D, Steendijk P, et al. Utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of diastolic function in heart failure with normal ejection fraction: a comparative Doppler-conductance catheterization study. Circulation 2007; 116: 637–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Devereux RB, Reickek N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man: anatomic validation of the method. Circulation 1977; 55: 613–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Verdecchia P, Angeli F, Gattobigio R, et al. Asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction in essential hypertension: prevalence, determinants, and prognostic value. Hypertension 2005; 45: 412–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al., Chamber Quantification Writing Group; American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee; European Association of Echocardiography. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 1440–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aurigemma GP, Gottdiener JS, Shemanski L, et al. Predictive value of systolic and diastolic function for incident congestive heart failure in the elderly: the Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1042–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Janardhan R, Daley WL, Naqvi TZ, et al. Rationale and design: the VAL-sartan In Diastolic Dysfunction (VALIDD) trial: evolving the management of diastolic dysfunction in hypertension. Am Heart J 2006; 152: 246–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ommen SR, Nishimurua RA, Appleton CP, et al. Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparative simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study. Circulation 2000; 102: 1788–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Appleton CP, Hatle LH, Popp RL. Relation of transmitral flow velocity patterns to left ventricular diastolic function: new insights from a combined hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 425–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fischer M, Baessler A, Hense HW, et al. Prevalence of left ventricular echocardiographic-based survey of a population sample. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 320–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Redfield MM, Jacobsen SJ, Burnett Jr JC, et al. Burden of systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction in the community: appreciating the scope of the heart failure epidemic. JAMA 2003; 289: 194–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang Y, Safar MJ, Iaria P, et al. Prevalence and prognosis of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in the elderly: the PROTEGER study. Am Heart J 2010; 160: 471–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zanchetti A, Cuspidi C, Comarella L, et al. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in elderly hypertensives: results of the APROS-diadys study. J Hypertens 2007; 25: 2158–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nagueh SF, Middleton KJ, Kopelen HA, et al. Doppler tissue imaging: a noninvasive technique for evaluation of left ventricular relaxation and estimation of filling pressures. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30: 1527–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang M, Yip G, Yu CM, et al. Independent and incremental prognostic value of early mitral annulus velocity in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 272–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang M, Yip GW, Wang AY, et al. Tissue Doppler imaging provides incremental prognostic value in patients with systemic hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. J Hypertens 2005; 23: 183–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liang HY, Cauduro SA, Pellikka PA, et al. Comparison of usefulness of echocardiographic Doppler variables to left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in predicting future heart failure events. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 866–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesca Negri
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carla Sala
    • 3
  • Cristiana Valerio
    • 2
  • Giuseppe Mancia
    • 1
  • Cesare Cuspidi
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Clinical Medicine and PreventionUniversity of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly
  2. 2.Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCSClinical Research UnitMeda, MilanItaly
  3. 3.Heart and Lung DepartmentUniversity of Milano and Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations