PharmacoEconomics

, Volume 29, Issue 9, pp 753–769 | Cite as

Decision-Analytic Models to Simulate Health Outcomes and Costs in Heart Failure

A Systematic Review
  • Alexander Goehler
  • Benjamin P. Geisler
  • Jennifer M. Manne
  • Beate Jahn
  • Annette Conrads-Frank
  • G. Scott Gazelle
  • Uwe Siebert
Review Article

Abstract

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a critical public health issue with increasing effect on the healthcare budgets of developed countries. Various decisionanalytic modelling approaches exist to estimate the cost effectiveness of health technologies for CHF. We sought to systematically identify these models and describe their structures.

We performed a systematic literature review in MEDLINE/PreMEDLINE, EMBASE, EconLit and the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry using a combination of search terms for CHF and decision-analytic models. The inclusion criterion required ‘use of a mathematical model evaluating both costs and health consequences for CHF management strategies’. Studies that were only economic evaluations alongside a clinical trial or that were purely descriptive studies were excluded.

We identified 34 modelling studies investigating different interventions including screening (n = 1), diagnostics (n = 1), pharmaceuticals (n = 15), devices (n = 13), disease management programmes (n = 3) and cardiac transplantation (n = 1) in CHF. The identified models primarily focused on middle-aged to elderly patients with stable but progressed heart failure with systolic left ventricular dysfunction. Modelling approaches varied substantially and included 27 Markov models, three discrete-event simulation models and four mathematical equation sets models; 19 studies reported QALYs. Three models were externally validated. In addition to a detailed description of study characteristics, the model structure and output, the manuscript also contains a synthesis and critical appraisal for each of the modelling approaches.

Well designed decision models are available for the evaluation of different CHF health technologies. Most models depend on New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes or number of hospitalizations as proxy for disease severity and progression. As the diagnostics and biomarkers evolve, there is the hope for better intermediate endpoints for modelling disease progression as those that are currently in use all have limitations.

References

  1. 1.
    McFate SW. Epidemiology of congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55 Suppl. A: 3–8Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cleland JG. Health economic consequences of the pharmacological treatment of heart failure. Eur Heart J 1998; 19 Suppl. P: P32–9Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berry C, Murdoch DR, McMurray JJ. Economics of chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2001; 3 (3): 283–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gold MR. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Drummond MF, McGuire A. Economic evaluation in health care: merging theory with practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Siebert U. When should decision-analytic modeling be used in the economic evaluation of health care? Eur J Health Econ 2003; 4 (3): 143–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cost-effectiveness Analysis Registry [online]. Available from URL: https://research.tufts-nemc.org/cear4/default.aspx [Accessed 2007 May 29]
  8. 8.
    Weinstein MC, O’Brien B, Hornberger J, et al. Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices — Modeling Studies. Value Health 2003; 6 (1): 9–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Owens DK, Sanders GD, Harris RA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators relative to amiodarone for prevention of sudden cardiac death. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126 (1): 1–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Owens DK, Sanders GD, Heidenreich PA, et al. Effect of risk stratification on cost-effectiveness of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Am Heart J 2002; 144 (3): 440–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anderson AN, Moodley I, Kropman K. A South African pharmaco-economic analysis of theAcute lnfarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) Study. Cardiovasc J S Afr 2000; 11 (2): 89–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carroll CA, Coen MM, Piepho RW. Economic impact of ramipril on hospitalization of high-risk cardiovascular patients. Ann Pharmacother 2003; 37 (3): 327–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sanders GD, Hlatky MA, Every NR, et al. Potential cost-effectiveness of prophylactic use of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator or amiodarone after myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135 (10): 870–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weintraub WS, Zhang Z, Mahoney EM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of eplerenone compared with placebo in patients with myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure. Circulation 2005; 111 (9): 1106–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Tam SW, et al. Costeffectiveness of fixed-dose combination of isosorbide dinitrate and hydralazine therapy for blacks with heart failure. Circulation 2005; 112 (24): 3745–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Calvert MJ, Freemantle N, Yao G, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the CARE-HF trial. Eur Heart J 2005; 26 (24): 2681–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Capomolla S, Febo O, Ceresa M, et al. Cost/utility ratio in chronic heart failure: comparison between heart failure management program delivered by day-hospital and usual care. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40 (7): 1259–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schadlich PK, Huppertz E, Brecht JG. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ramipril in heart failure after myocardial infarction: economic evaluation of the Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) study for Germany from the perspective of Statutory Health Insurance. Pharmacoeconomics 1998; 14 (6): 653–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    van Hout BA, Wielink G, Bonsel GJ, et al. Effects of ACE inhibitors on heart failure in the Netherlands: a pharmacoeconomic model. Pharmacoeconomics 1993; 3 (5): 387–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paul SD, Kuntz KM, Eagle KA, et al. Costs and effectiveness of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in patients with congestive heart failure. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154 (10): 1143–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Glick H, Cook J, Kinosian B, et al. Costs and effects of enalapril therapy in patients with symptomatic heart failure: an economic analysis of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Treatment Trial. J Card Fail 1995; 1 (5): 371–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cook JR, Glick HA, Gerth W, et al. The cost and cardioprotective effects of enalapril in hypertensive patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Am J Hypertens 1998; 11 (12): 1433–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Delea TE, Vera-Llonch M, Richner RE, et al. Cost effectiveness of carvedilol for heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83 (6): 890–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gregory D, Udelson JE, Konstam MA. Economic impact of beta blockade in heart failure. Am J Med 2001; 110 Suppl. 7A: 74S–80SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Varney S. A cost-effectiveness analysis of bisoprolol for heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2001; 3 (3): 365–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Levy AR, Briggs AH, Demers C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of beta-blocker therapy with metoprolol or with carvedilol for treatment of heart failure in Canada. Am Heart J 2001; 142 (3): 537–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Glick HA, Orzol SM, Tooley JF, et al. Economic evaluation of the randomized aldactone evaluation study (RALES): treatment of patients with severe heart failure. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2002; 16 (1): 53–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barry M. Cost effectiveness of beta blocker therapy for patients with chronic severe heart failure in Ireland. Ir Med J 2002; 95 (6): 174, 176–7Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tilson L, McGowan B, Ryan M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of spironolactone in patients with severe heart failure. Ir J Med Sci 2003; 172 (2): 70–2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Inomata T, Izumi T, Kobayashi M. Cost-effectiveness analysis of carvedilol for the treatment of chronic heart failure in Japan. Circ J 2004; 68 (1): 35–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cowper PA, DeLong ER, Whellan DJ, et al. Economic effects of beta-blocker therapy in patients with heart failure. Am J Med 2004; 116 (2): 104–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chen L, Hay JW. Cost-effectiveness of primary implanted cardioverter defibrillator for sudden death prevention in congestive heart failure. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2004; 18 (2): 161–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Heidenreich PA, Gubens MA, Fonarow GC, et al. Costeffectiveness of screening with B-type natriuretic peptide to identify patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43 (6): 1019–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Morimoto T, Hayashino Y, Shimbo T, et al. Is B-type natriuretic peptide-guided heart failure management cost-effective? Int J Cardiol 2004; 96 (2): 177–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nichol G, Kaul P, Huszti E, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with symptomatic heart failure. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141 (5): 343–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Banz K. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure: a model to assess the economic value of this new medical technology. Value Health 2005; 8 (2): 128–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sanders GD, Hlatky MA, Owens DK. Cost-effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. N Engl J Med 2005; 353 (14): 1471–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Caro JJ, Migliaccio-Walle K, O’Brien JA, et al. Economic implications of extended-release metoprolol succinate for heart failure in the MERIT-HF trial: a US perspective of the MERIT-HF trial. J Card Fail 2005; 11 (9): 647–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Clegg AJ, Scott DA, Loveman E, et al. The clinical and costeffectiveness of left ventricular assist devices for end-stage heart failure: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2005; 9 (45): 1–132, iii-ivGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Caro JJ, Guo S, Ward A, et al. Modelling the economic and health consequences of cardiac resynchronization therapy in the UK. Curr Med Res Opin 2006; 22 (6): 1171–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Freudenberger RS, Kim J, Tawfik I, et al. Optimal medical therapy is superior to transplantation for the treatment of class I, II, and III heart failure: a decision analytic approach. Circulation 2006; 114 (1 Suppl.): I62–6Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mark DB, Nelson CL, Anstrom KJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of defibrillator therapy or amiodarone in chronic stable heart failure: results from the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT). Circulation 2006; 114 (2): 135–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Caro JJ, Ward A, Deniz HB, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of preventing sudden cardiac deaths with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator versus amiodarone. Value Health 2007; 10 (1): 13–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yao G, Freemantle N, Calvert MJ, et al. The long-term costeffectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Eur Heart J 2007; 28 (1): 42–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Girling AJ, Freeman G, Gordon JP, et al. Modeling payback from research into the efficacy of left-ventricular assist devices as destination therapy. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2007; 23 (2): 269–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fox M, Mealing S, Anderson R, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess 2007; 11 (47): iii-iv, ix–248Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Chan DC, Heidenreich PA, Weinstein MC, et al. Heart failure disease management programs: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am Heart J 2008; 155 (2): 332–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Aidelsburger P, Grabein K, Klauss V, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in combination with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (CRT-D) for the treatment of chronic heart failure from a German health care system perspective. Clin Res Cardiol 2008; 97 (2): 89–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Göhler A, Conrads-Frank A, Worrell SS, et al. Decisionanalytic evaluation of the clinical effectiveness and costeffectiveness of management programmes in chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2008; 10 (10): 1026–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Miller G, Randolph S, Forkner E, et al. Long-term costeffectiveness of disease management in systolic heart failure. Med Decis Making 2009; 29 (3): 325–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ribeiro RA, Stella SF, Camey SA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in Brazil: primary prevention analysis in the public sector. Value Health 2010 Mar-Apr; 13 (2): 160–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Rosen VM, Taylor DC, Parekh H, et al. Cost effectiveness of intensive lipid-lowering treatment for patients with congestive heart failure and coronary heart disease in the US. Pharmacoeconomics 2010; 28 (1): 47–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Caro JJ. Pharmacoeconomic analyses using discrete event simulation. Pharmacoeconomics 2005; 23 (4): 323–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Drummond M, Schwartz JS, Jonsson B, et al. Response from the authors of “Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions”. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2008; 24 (3): 367–8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Goehler
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Benjamin P. Geisler
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jennifer M. Manne
    • 5
  • Beate Jahn
    • 3
  • Annette Conrads-Frank
    • 3
  • G. Scott Gazelle
    • 1
    • 6
  • Uwe Siebert
    • 1
    • 3
    • 6
  1. 1.Institute for Technology Assessment & Cardiac MR, PET, CT Program, and Department of RadiologyMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.Cardiac MR, PET, CT Program, Department of RadiologyMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology AssessmentDepartment of Public Health, Information Systems, and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT — University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall iTAustria
  4. 4.Alfried Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach Foundation-Institute for Health Systems ManagementUniversity of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany
  5. 5.Department of Population and International HealthHarvard School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  6. 6.Center for Health Decision Science, Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard School of Public HealthBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations