Uterine Perforation with the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device
- 220 Downloads
Background: Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices (LNG-IUD) are commonly used for contraception and other indications in many countries. National pharmacovigilance centres have been receiving reports from healthcare professionals and patients of uterine perforation associated with the use of these LNG-IUDs.
Methods: National pharmacovigilance centres in the Netherlands, New Zealand, Switzerland and Germany did a search on their adverse drug reaction databases for reports of cases of uterine perforation after insertion of a LNG-IUD received between the introduction of the LNG-IUD onto the market in the late 1990s and 15 July 2007.
The number of women affected and patient characteristics such as age, parity and breastfeeding status were examined. In addition, the method of detection of the perforation and the time until discovery of the perforation were analysed.
Results: Between the introduction of the LNG-IUD onto the market in each country and 15 July 2007, 701 cases of uterine perforation with a LNG-IUD were reported; 8.5% of the perforations were detected at the time of insertion. Abdominal pain and control/check-up visits were the most common events that lead to the detection of a perforation. Of 462 women known to be parous, 192 (42%) were breastfeeding at the time the perforation was discovered.
Conclusions: Uterine perforations can be asymptomatic and may remain undetected for a long time after IUD insertion. Abdominal pain, control/ check-up visits or changes in bleeding patterns are triggers for detection of perforation and should therefore be taken seriously.
A.C. van Grootheest and B. Sachs contributed equally to the manuscript.
No sources of funding were used to conduct this study or prepare this manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.
- 2.French R, Van VH, Cowan F, et al. Hormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (3): CD001776Google Scholar
- 3.Abou-Setta AM, Al-Inany HG, Farquhar CM. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) for symptomatic endometriosis following surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (4): CD005072Google Scholar
- 4.Lethaby AE, Cooke I, Rees M. Progesterone or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (4): CD002126Google Scholar
- 11.Gaffen A, Coleman G. Levonorgestre-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena®) and uterine perforation. Can Adverse React Newsl 2006; 16(1): 2Google Scholar
- 14.Health Canada. MIRENA (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system): potential risk of uterine perforation —for health professionals. 15 June 2010 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/medeff/advisoriesavis/prof/_2010/mirena_hpc-cps-eng.php [Accessed 2010 Sep 15]
- 15.Swissmedic, Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products. Uterine perforation with the use of Mirena®: Swissmedic issues a reminder regarding essential precautions. 28 June 2010. [online]. Available form URL: http://www.swissmedic.ch/aktuell/00003/01300/index.html?lang=en [Accessed 2010 Sep 15]
- 16.Harrison-Woolrych ML, Coulter DM. PEM in New Zealand. In: Mann RT, Andrews E, et al., editors. Pharmacovigilance. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sonns Ltd, 2007: 317–32Google Scholar
- 17.Haramburu F. Estimation of underreporting. Post-Marketing Surveill 1993; 7: 39–49Google Scholar
- 19.Zijlmans M, van Vliet W, Schöls WA. Op zoek naar in de buikholte: laparoscopie bij een intra-abdominale levonorgestrel-houdende spiraal. Ned Tijdschr Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 116: 200–3Google Scholar
- 23.Heinemann K, Assmann A, Dinger JC, et al. Intrauterine devices and the risk of uterine perforations: interim results form the EURAS-IUD study [poster]. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 58th Annual Clinical Meeting; 2010 May 15–19; San Francisco (CA)Google Scholar