Sports Medicine

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 199–220

Physiology of Small-Sided Games Training in Football

A Systematic Review
  • Stephen V. Hill-Haas
  • Brian Dawson
  • Franco M. Impellizzeri
  • Aaron J. Coutts
Review Article

Abstract

Small-sided games (SSGs) are played on reduced pitch areas, often using modified rules and involving a smaller number of players than traditional football. These games are less structured than traditional fitness training methods but are very popular training drills for players of all ages and levels. At present, there is relatively little information regarding how SSGs can best be used to improve physical capacities and technical or tactical skills in footballers. However, many prescriptive variables controlled by the coach can influence the exercise intensity during SSGs. Coaches usually attempt to change the training stimulus in SSGs through altering the pitch area, player number, coach encouragement, training regimen (continuous vs interval training), rules and the use of goalkeepers. In general, it appears that SSG exercise intensity is increased with the concurrent reduction in player number and increase in relative pitch area per player. However, the inverse relationship between the number of players in each SSG and exercise intensity does not apply to the time-motion characteristics. Consistent coach encouragement can also increase training intensity, but most rule changes do not appear to strongly affect exercise intensity. The variation of exercise intensity measures are lower in smaller game formats (e.g. three vs three) and have acceptable reproducibility when the same game is repeated between different training sessions or within the same session. The variation in exercise intensity during SSGs can also be improved with consistent coach encouragement but it is still more variable than traditional generic training methods. Other studies have also shown that SSGs containing fewer players can exceed match intensity and elicit similar intensities to both long- and short-duration highintensity interval running. It also appears that fitness and football-specific performance can be improved equally with SSG and generic training drills. Future research is required to examine the optimal periodization strategies of SSGs training for the long-term development of physiological capacity, technical skill and tactical proficiency.

References

  1. 1.
    Gabbett T. Skill-based conditioning games as an alternative to traditional conditioning for rugby league players. JStrength Cond Res 2006; 20 (2): 309–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gabbett T, Jenkins D, Abernethy B. Game-based training for improving skill and physical fitness in team sport athletes. Int J Sports Sci Coach 2009; 4 (2): 273–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Football Federation Australia. Small-sided games handbook [online]. Available from URL: http://www.penrithfc.com/SSG%20Handbook%20for%20clubs%2019Dec07.pdf [Accessed 2010 Dec 10]
  4. 4.
    Gamble P. A skill-based conditioning games approach to metabolic conditioning for elite rugby football players. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18 (3): 491–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Owen A. Physiological and technical analysis of small-sided conditioned training games within professional football. Wrexham: SAGE Publications, 2003Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gregson W, Drust B. The physiology of football drills. Insight 2000; 3 (4): 1–2Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Little T. Optimizing the use of soccer drills for physiological development. Strength Cond J 2009; 31 (3): 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gabbett T, Mulvey M. Time-motion analysis of small-sided training games and competition in elite women soccerplayers. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22 (2): 543–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Allison S, Thorpe R. A comparison of the effectiveness of two approaches to teaching games within physical education:a skills approach versus a games for understandingapproach. Br J Phys Ed 1997; 28 (3): 9–13Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Achten J, Jeukendrup A. Heart rate monitoring-applications and limitations. Sports Med 2003; 33 (7): 517–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Drust B, Reilly T, Cable N. Physiological responses to laboratory-based soccer-specific intermittent and continuousexercise. J Sports Sci 2000; 18 (11): 885–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Esposito F, Impellizzeri FM, Margonato V, et al. Validity of heart rate as an indicator of aerobic demand during socceractivities in amateur soccer players. Eur J Appl Physiol 2004; 93: 167–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoff J, Wisløff U, Engen L, et al. Soccer specific aerobic endurance training. Br J Sports Med 2002; 36: 218–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Castagna C, Belardinelli R, Abt G. The oxygen uptake and heart rate response to training with a ball in youth soccerplayers. J Sports Sci 2004; 22: 532–3Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bangsbo J. The physiology of soccer: with special reference to intense intermittent exercise. Acta Physiol Scand 1994; 619: 1–155Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Little T, Williams A. Measures of exercise intensity during soccer training drills with professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2007; 21 (2): 367–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krustrup P, Mohr M, Steensberg A, et al. Muscle and blood metabolites during a soccer game: implications for sprintperformance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006; 38 (6): 1165–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Borg G. Psychophysical basis of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14 (5): 377–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Coutts AJ, Rampinini E, Marcora S, et al. Heart rate and blood lactate correlates of perceived exertion during smallsidedsoccer games. J Sci Med Sport 2009; 12 (1): 79–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Impellizzeri FM, Rampinini E, Coutts AJ, et al. Use of RPE based training load in soccer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36 (6): 1042–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alexiou H, Coutts AJ. A comparison of methods used for quantifying internal training load in women soccer players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2008; 3: 1–12Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Foster C, Florhaug J, Franklin J, et al. A new approach to monitoring exercise training. J Strength Cond Res 2001; 15 (1): 109–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Carling C, Bloomfield J, Nelsen L, et al. The role of motion analysis in elite soccer. Sports Med 2008; 38 (10): 839–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Coutts AJ, Duffield R. Validity and reliability of GPS units for measuring movement demands of team sports. J Sci Med Sport 2010; 13 (1): 133–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Macleod H, Morris J, Nevill A, et al. The validity of a nondifferential global positioning system for assessing playermovement patterns in field hockey. J Sports Sci 2009; 27 (2): 121–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Townsend A, Worringham C, Stewart I. Assessment of speed and position during human locomotion using nondifferentialGPS. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40: 124–32Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Edgecomb S, Norton K. Comparison of global positioning and computer-based tracking systems for measuring playermovement distance during Australian Football. J Sci Med Sport 2006; 9: 25–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Petersen C, Pyne D, Portus M, et al. Validity and reliability of GPS units to monitor cricket-specific movement patterns. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2009; 4: 381–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Barbero Álvarez, Coutts AJ, Granda J, et al. The validity and reliability of a Global Positioning Satellite system deviceto assess speed and repeated sprint ability (RSA) inathletes. J Sci Med Sport 2010; 13 (2): 232–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Balsom P, Lindholm T, Nilsson J, et al. Precision football. Kempele: Polar Electro Oy, 1999Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jeffreys I. The use of small-sided games in the metabolic training of high school soccer players. Strength Cond J 2004; 26 (5): 77–8Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rampinini E, Impellizzeri FM, Castagna C, et al. Factors influencing physiological responses to small-sided soccergames. J Sports Sci 2007; 25 (6): 659–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Aroso J, Rebelo A, Gomes-Pereira J. Physiological impact of selected game-related exercises [abstract]. J Sports Sci 2004; 22 (6): 522Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Owen A, Twist C, Ford P. Small-sided games: the physiological and technical effect of altering pitch size and playernumbers. Insight FACA J 2004; 7 (2): 50–3Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Williams K, Owen A. The impact of player numbers on the physiological responses to small sided games [abstract]. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6 Suppl.10: 100Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kelly D, Drust B. The effect of pitch dimensions on heart rate responses and technical demands of small-sided soccergames in elite players. J Sci Med Sport 2009; 12 (4): 475–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sampaio J, Garcia G, Macas V, et al. Heart rate and perceptual responses to 2×2 and 3×3 small-sided youth soccergames. J Sports Sci Med 2007; 6 Suppl.10: 121–2Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hill-Haas S, Coutts AJ, Dawson B, et al. Time-motion characteristics and physiological responses of small-sidedgames in elite youth players: the influence of player numberand rule changes. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24 (8): 2149–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Duarte R, Batalha N, Folgado H, et al. Effects of exercise duration and number of players in heart rate responses andtechnical skills during Futsal small-sided games. Open Sports Sci J 2009; 2: 37–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Little T, Williams A. Suitability of soccer training drills for endurance training. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20 (2): 316–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jones S, Drust B. Physiological and technical demands of 4 v 4 and 8 v 8 games in elite youth soccer players. Kinesiology 2007; 39 (2): 150–6Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Katis A, Kellis E. Effects of small-sided games on physical conditioning and performance in young soccer players. JSports Med 2009; 8: 374–80Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Platt D, Maxwell A, Horn R, et al. Physiological and technical analysis of 3 v 3 and 5 v 5 youth football matches. Insight FACA J 2001; 4 (4): 23–5Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dellal A, Chamari K, Pintus A, et al. Heart rate responses during small-sided games and short intermittent runningtraining in elite soccer players: a comparative study. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22 (5): 1449–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hill-Haas S, Dawson B, Coutts AJ, et al. Physiological responses and time-motion characteristics of various smallsidedsoccer games in youth players. J Sports Sci 2009; 27 (1): 1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Impellizzeri FM, Rampinini E, Marcora SM. Physiological assessment of aerobic training in soccer. J Sports Sci 2005; 23 (6): 583–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sassi R, Reilly T, Impellizzeri FM. A comparison of smallsided games and interval training in elite professional soccerplayers [abstract]. J Sports Sci 2004; 22: 562Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mallo J, Navarro E. Physical load imposed on soccer players during small-sided training games. J Sports Med Phys Fit 2008; 48 (2): 166–72Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hill-Haas S, Rowsell G, Coutts AJ, et al. Acute physiological responses and time-motion characteristics of two smallsidedtraining regimes in youth soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22 (6): 1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Fanchini M, Azzalin A, Castagna C, et al. Effect of bout duration on exercise intensity and technical performance ofsmall-sided games in soccer. J Strength Cond Res. Epub 2010 MayGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Coutts AJ, Murphy A, Dascombe B. Effect of direct supervision of a strength coach on measures of muscular strengthand power in young rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18 (2): 316–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mazzetti S, Kraemer W, Volek J, et al. The influence of direct supervision on strength performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 1175–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hill-Haas S, Coutts AJ, Rowsell G, et al. Variability of acute physiological responses and performance profiles of youthsoccer players in small-sided games. J Sci Med Sport 2008; 11: 487–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hill-Haas S, Rowsell G, Coutts AJ, et al. The reproducibility of physiological responses and performance profiles ofyouth soccer players in small-sided games. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2008; 3 (3): 393–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Allen J, Butterly R, Welsch M, et al. The physical and physiological value of 5-a-side soccer training to 11-a-sidematch play. J Hum Movement Stud 1998; 34: 1–11Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Capranica L, Tessitore A, Guidetti L, et al. Heart rate and match analysis in pre-pubescent soccer players. J Sports Sci 2001; 19: 379–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Reilly T, White C. Small-sided games as an alternative to interval-training for soccer players [abstract]. J Sports Sci 2004; 22 (6): 559Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Impellizzeri FM, Marcora S, Castagna C, et al. Physiological and performance effects of generic versus specific aerobictraining in soccer players. Int J Sports Med 2006; 27 (6): 483–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hill-Haas S, Coutts AJ, Rowsell G, et al. Generic versus small-sided game training in soccer. Int J Sports Med 2009; 30 (9): 636–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Buchheit M, Laursen P, Kuhnle J, et al. Game-based training in young elite handball players. Int J Sports Med 2009; 30: 251–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hoff J, Helgerud J. Endurance and strength training for soccer players. Sports Med 2004; 34 (3): 165–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Issurin VB. New horizons for themethodology and physiology of training periodization. Sports Med 2010; 40 (3): 189–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Grant A, Williams M, Johnson S. Technical demands of 7 v 7 and 11 v 11 youth football matches. Insight FACA J 1999; 2 (4): 1–2Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Grant A, Williams M, Dodd R, et al. Physiological and technical analysis of 11 v 11 and 8 v 8 youth football matches. Insight FACA J 1999; 2 (3): 3–4Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen V. Hill-Haas
    • 1
  • Brian Dawson
    • 1
  • Franco M. Impellizzeri
    • 2
    • 3
  • Aaron J. Coutts
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Sports Science, Exercise & HealthUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, Schulthess ClinicFIFA Centre of ExcellenceZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Research Centre for Sport, Mountain and Health (CSMS) of RoveretoUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly
  4. 4.School of Leisure, Sport & TourismUniversity of Technology, Sydney, Kuring-gai CampusLindfieldAustralia

Personalised recommendations