Sports Medicine

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 125–146

Developing Maximal Neuromuscular Power

Part 2 — Training Considerations for Improving Maximal Power Production
  • Prue Cormie
  • Michael R. McGuigan
  • Robert U. Newton
Review Article

Abstract

This series of reviews focuses on the most important neuromuscular function in many sport performances: the ability to generate maximal muscular power. Part 1, published in an earlier issue of Sports Medicine, focused on the factors that affect maximal power production while part 2 explores the practical application of these findings by reviewing the scientific literature relevant to the development of training programmes that most effectively enhance maximal power production. The ability to generate maximal power during complex motor skills is of paramount importance to successful athletic performance across many sports. A crucial issue faced by scientists and coaches is the development of effective and efficient training programmes that improve maximal power production in dynamic, multi-joint movements. Such training is referred to as ‘power training’ for the purposes of this review. Although further research is required in order to gain a deeper understanding of the optimal training techniques for maximizing power in complex, sportsspecific movements and the precise mechanisms underlying adaptation, several key conclusions can be drawn from this review. First, a fundamental relationship exists between strength and power, which dictates that an individual cannot possess a high level of power without first being relatively strong. Thus, enhancing and maintaining maximal strength is essential when considering the long-term development of power. Second, consideration of movement pattern, load and velocity specificity is essential when designing power training programmes. Ballistic, plyometric and weightlifting exercises can be used effectively as primary exercises within a power training programme that enhances maximal power. The loads applied to these exercises will depend on the specific requirements of each particular sport and the type of movement being trained. The use of ballistic exercises with loads ranging from 0% to 50% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) and/or weightlifting exercises performed with loads ranging from 50% to 90% of 1RM appears to be the most potent loading stimulus for improving maximal power in complex movements. Furthermore, plyometric exercises should involve stretch rates as well as stretch loads that are similar to those encountered in each specific sport and involve little to no external resistance. These loading conditions allow for superior transfer to performance because they require similar movement velocities to those typically encountered in sport. Third, it is vital to consider the individual athlete’s window of adaptation (i.e. the magnitude of potential for improvement) for each neuromuscular factor contributing to maximal power production when developing an effective and efficient power training programme. A training programme that focuses on the least developed factor contributing to maximal power will prompt the greatest neuromuscular adaptations and therefore result in superior performance improvements for that individual. Finally, a key consideration for the long-term development of an athlete’s maximal power production capacity is the need for an integration of numerous power training techniques. This integration allows for variation within power meso-/micro-cycles while still maintaining specificity, which is theorized to lead to the greatest long-term improvement in maximal power.

References

  1. 1.
    Cormie P, McGuigan MR, Newton RU. Developing maximal neuromuscular power. Part I: biological basis ofmaximal power production. SportsMed 2010; 41 (1): 17–38Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker D, Nance S. The relation between strength and power in professional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res 1999; 13 (3): 224–9Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blackburn JR, Morrissey MC. The relationship between open and closed kinetic chain strength of the lower limband jumping performance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 27: 430–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carlock JM, Smith SL, Hartman MJ, et al. The relationship between vertical jump power estimates and weight lifting ability: a field-test approach. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18 (3): 534–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miyaguchi K, Demura S. Relationships between stretch shortening cycle performance and maximum muscle strength. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22 (1): 19–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nuzzo JL, McBride JM, Cormie P, et al. Relationship between countermovement jump performance and multijointisometric and dynamic tests of strength. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22 (3): 699–707PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stone MH, O’Bryant HS, McCoy L, et al. Power and maximum strength relationships during performance ofdynamic and static weighted jumps. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17 (1): 140–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wisloff U, Castagna C, Helgerud J, et al. Strong correlation of maximal squat strength with sprint performance and vertical jump height in elite soccer players. Br J Sports Med 2004; 38 (3): 285–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moss BM, Refsnes PE, Abildgaard A, et al. Effects of maximal effort strength training with different loads ondynamic strength, cross-sectional area, load-power andload-velocity relationships. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1997; 75 (3): 193–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bourque PJ. Determinant of load at peak power during maximal effort squat jumps in endurance and power trained athletes [dissertation]. Fredericton (NB): Universityof New Brunswick, 2003Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cormie P, McBride JM, McCaulley GO. Power-time, force-time, and velocity-time curve analysis of the counter movement jump: impact of training. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23 (1): 177–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McBride JM, Triplett-McBride NT, Davie A, et al. A comparison of strength and power characteristics between power lifters, Olympic lifters, and sprinters. J Strength Cond Res 1999; 13 (1): 58–66Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stoessel L, Stone ME, Keith R, et al. Selected physiological, psychological and performance characteristics of national-caliber United States women weight lifters. J Appl Sport Sci Res 1991; 5 (2): 87–95Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baker DG, Newton RU. Adaptations in upper-body maximal strength and power output resulting from long-term resistance training in experienced strength-power athletes. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20 (3): 541–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baker DG, Newton RU. Comparison of lower body strength, power, acceleration, speed, agility, and sprint momentum to describe and compare playing rank among professional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22 (1): 153–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ugrinowitsch C, Tricoli V, Rodacki AL, et al. Influence of training background on jumping height. J Strength Cond Res 2007; 21 (3): 848–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cormie P, McGuigan MR, Newton RU. Influence of strength on magnitude and mechanisms of adaptationto power training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010; 42 (8): 1566–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Behm DG, Sale DG. Intended rather than actual movement velocity determines velocity-specific training response. J Appl Physiol 1993; 74 (1): 359–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Häkkinen K, Komi PV, Alen M. Effect of explosive type strength training on isometric force- and relaxation-time,electromyographic and muscle fibre characteristics ofleg extensor muscles. Acta Physiol Scand 1985; 125 (4): 587–600PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaneko M, Fuchimoto T, Toji H, et al. Training effect of different loads on the force-velocity relationship and mechanical power output in human muscle. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1983; 5 (2): 50–5Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McBride JM, Triplett-McBride T, Davie A, et al. The effect of heavy-vs. light-load jump squats on the development of strength, power, and speed. J Strength Cond Res 2002; 16 (1): 75–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stone ME, Johnson R, Carter D. A short term comparison of two different methods of resistive training on legstrength and power. Athl Train 1979; 14: 158–60Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stowers T, McMillan J, Scala D, et al. The short-term effects of three different strength-power training methods. Natl Strength Cond Assoc J 1983; 5 (3): 24–7Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wilson GJ, Newton RU, Murphy AJ, et al. The optimal training load for the development of dynamic athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25 (11): 1279–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Toji H, Kaneko M. Effect of multiple-load training on the force-velocity relationship. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18 (4): 792–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Toji H, Suei K, Kaneko M. Effects of combined training loads on relations among force, velocity, and power development. Can J Appl Physiol 1997; 22 (4): 328–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cormie P, McGuigan MR, Newton RU. Adaptations in athletic performance after ballistic power versus strength training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010; 42 (8): 1582–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kraemer WJ, Newton RU. Training for muscular power. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2000; 11 (2): 341–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Häkkinen K. Neuromuscular and hormonal adaptations during strength and power training. J Sports Med 1989; 29: 9–26Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Häkkinen K, Komi PV, Alen M, et al. EMG, muscle fibre and force production characteristics during a 1 year training period in elite weight-lifters. Eur J Appl Physiol 1987; 56: 419–27Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Newton RU, Kraemer WJ. Developing explosive muscular power: implications for a mixed method training strategy. Strength Cond J 1994; 16 (5): 20–31Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wilson G, Murphy AJ, Walshe AD. Performance benefits from weight and plyometric training: effects of initial strength level. Coaching Sport Sci J 1997; 2 (1): 3–8Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Newton RU, Kraemer WJ, Hakkinen K. Effects of ballistic training on preseason preparation of elite volleyball players. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31 (2): 323–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Häkkinen K, Pakarinen A, Alen M, et al. Neuromuscular and hormonal adaptations in athletes to strength trainingin two years. J Appl Physiol 1988; 65 (6): 2406–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Campos GE, Luecke TJ, Wendeln HK, et al. Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones. Eur J Appl Physiol 2002; 88: 50–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Costill DL, Coyle EF, Fink WF, et al. Adaptations in skeletal muscle following strength training. J Appl Physiol 1979; 46 (1): 96–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Green H, Goreham C, Ouyang J, et al. Regulation of fiber size, oxidative potential, and capillarization in human muscle by resistance exercise. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 1998; 276 (45): R591–6Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hather BM, Tesch PA, Buchanan P, et al. Influence of eccentric actions on skeletal muscle adaptations to resistance training. Acta Physiol Scand 1991; 143: 177–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jackson CG, Dickinson AL, Ringel SP. Skeletal muscle fiber area alterations in two opposing modes of resistance exercise training in the same individual. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1990; 61 (1-2): 37–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Narici MV, Roi GS, Landoni L, et al. Changes in forcecross- sectional area and neural activation during strengthtraining and detraining of the human quadriceps. Eur JAppl Physiol 1989; 59: 310–9Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Roman WJ, Fleckenstein J, Stray-Gundersen J, et al. Adaptations in the elbow flexors of elderly males after heavy-resistance training. J Appl Physiol 1993; 74 (2): 750–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Staron RS, Karapondo DL, Kraemer WJ, et al. Skeletal muscle adaptations during the early phase of heavy resistance training in men and women. J Appl Physiol 1994; 76: 1247–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Staron RS, Leonardi MJ, Karapondo DL, et al. Strength and skeletal muscle adaptations in heavy-resitance trained women after detraining and retraining. J Appl Physiol 1991; 70: 631–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Staron RS, Malicky ES, Malicky ES, et al. Muscle hypertrophy and fast fiber type conversions in heavy resistance trained women. Eur J Appl Physiol 1989; 60: 71–9Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Thorstensson A, Hulten B, von Dobeln W, et al. Effect of strength training on enzyme activities and fibre characteristics in human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 1976; 96: 392–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Aagaard P, Andersen JL, Dyhre-Poulsen P, et al. A mechanism for increased contractile strength of human pennate muscle in response to strength training: changes in muscle architecture. J Physiol 2001; 534 (Pt2): 613–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Alegre LM, Jimenez F, Gonzalo-Orden JM, et al. Effects of dynamic resistance training on fascicle length and isometric strength. J Sports Sci 2006; 24 (5): 501–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Blazevich AJ, Cannavan D, Coleman DR, et al. Influence of concentric and eccentric resistance training on architectural adaptation in human quadriceps muscles. J Appl Physiol 2007; 103 (5): 1565–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Blazevich AJ, Gill ND, Bronks R, et al. Training-specific muscle architecture adaptation after 5-wk training in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35 (12): 2013–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Folland JP, Williams AG. The adaptations to strength training: morphological and neurological contributions to increased strength. Sports Med 2007; 37 (2): 145–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jones DA, Rutherford OM, Parker DF. Physiological changes in skeletal muscle as a result of strength training. Q J Exp Physiol 1989; 74 (3): 233–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kawakami Y, Abe T, Kuno SY, et al. Training-induced changes in muscle architecture and specific tension. Eur J Appl Physiol 1995; 72 (1-2): 566–73Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Komi PV. Training of muscle strength and power: interaction of neuromotoric, hypertrophic, and mechanical factors. Int J Sports Med 1986; 7Suppl.1: 10–5Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    McDonagh MJN, Davis CTM. Adaptative responses of mammalian skeletal-muscle to exercise with high loads. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1984; 52: 139–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Seynnes OR, de Boer M, Narici MV. Early skeletal muscle hypertrophy and architectural changes in response to high-intensity resistance training. J Appl Physiol 2007; 102: 368–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Widrick JJ, Stelzer JE, Shoepe TC, et al. Functional properties of human muscle fibers after short-term resistance exercise training. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2002; 283 (2): R408–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Thorstensson A. Muscle strength, fibre types and enzyme activities in man. Acta Physiol Scand 1976; 443: S1–44Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    MacDougall JD, Elder GCB, Sale DG, et al. Effects of strength training and immobilization on human muscle fibers. Eur J Appl Physiol 1980; 43: 25–34Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Dons B, Bollerup K, Bonde-Petersen F, et al. The effect of weight-lifting exercise related to muscle fiber composition and muscle cross-sectional area in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 1979; 40: 95–106Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Häkkinen K, Komi PV, Tesch PA. Effect of combined concentric and eccentric strength training and detraining on force-time, muscle fibre and metabolic characteristics of leg extensor muscles. Scand J Sports Sci 1981; 3: 50–8Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Reeves ND, Narici MV, Maganaris CN. In vivo human muscle structure and function: adaptations to resistance training in old age. Exp Physiol 2004; 89 (6): 675–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Häkkinen K, Alen M, Komi PV. Changes in isometric force- and relaxation-time, electromyographic and muscle fibre characteristics of human skeletal muscle during strength training and detraining. Acta Physiol Scand 1985; 125 (4): 573–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Narici MV, Hoppeler H, Kayser B, et al. Human quadriceps cross-sectional area, torque and neural activation during 6 months strength training. Acta Physiol Scand 1996; 157 (2): 175–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Thorstensson A, Karlsson J, Vitasalo JHT, et al. Effect of strength training on EMG of human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 1976; 98: 232–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hä kkinenK, Komi PV. Electromyographic changes during strength training and detraining. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1983; 15: 455–60Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Häkkinen K, Alen M, Kallinen M, et al. Neuromuscular adaptation during prolonged stength training, detraining and re-strength training in middle-aged and elderly people. Eur J Appl Physiol 2000; 83: 51–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Komi PV, Viitasalo JT, Rauramaa R, et al. Effect of isometric strength training on mechanical, electrical and metabolic aspects of muscle function. Eur J Appl Physiol 1978; 40: 45–55Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Häkkinen K, Newton RU, Gordon SE, et al. Changes in muscle morphology, electromyographic activity, and force production characteristics during progressive strength training in young and older men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1998; 53 (6): B415–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Behm DG. Neuromuscular implications and applications of resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 1995; 9 (4): 264–74Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Carolan B, Cafarelli E. Adaptations in coactivation after isometric resistance training. J Appl Physiol 1992; 73: 911–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Rabita G, Perot C, Lensel-Corbeil G. Differential effect of knee extension isometric training on the different muscles of the quadriceps femoris in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 2001; 83: 531–8Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Sale DG. Neural adaptation to resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1988; 20 (5Suppl.): S135–45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Sale DG. Neural adaptations to strength training. In: Komi PV, editor. Strength and power in sport. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2003: 281–313Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Malisoux L, Francaux M, Nielens H, et al. Stretch-shortening cycle exercises: an effective training paradigm to enhance power output of human single muscle fibers. J Appl Physiol 2006; 100 (3): 771–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    MacIntosh BR, Holash RJ. Power output and force-velocity properties of muscle. In: Nigg BM, MacIntosh BR, Mester J, editors. Biomechanics and biology of movement. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2000: 193–210Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Cormie P, McCaulley GO, Triplett NT, et al. Optimal loading for maximal power output during lower-body resistance exercises. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39 (2): 340–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Newton RU, Kraemer WJ, Hakkinen K, et al. Kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activation during explosive upper body movements. J Appl Biomech 1996; 12: 31–43Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Cormie P, McCaulley GO, McBride JM. Power versus strength-power jump squat training: influence on the load-power relationship. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39 (6): 996–1003PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Hawkins SB, Doyle TL, McGuigan MR. The effect of different training programs on eccentric energy utilization in college-aged males. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23 (7): 1996–2002PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Holcomb WR, Lander JE, Rutland RM, et al. The effectiveness of a modified plyometric program on power and the vertical jump. J Strength Cond Res 1996; 10 (2): 89–92Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Kyröläinen H, Avela J, McBride JM, et al. Effects of power training on muscle structure and neuromuscular performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2005; 15 (1): 58–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Lyttle AD, Wilson G, Ostrowski KJ. Enhancing performance: maximal power versus combined weights and plyometrics training. J Strength Cond Res 1996; 10 (3): 173–9Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Winchester JB, McBride JM, Maher MA, et al. Eight weeks of ballistic exercise improves power independently of changes in strength and muscle fiber type expression. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22 (6): 1728–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Elliott BC, Wilson DJ, Kerr GK. A biomechanical analysis of the sticking region in the bench press. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1989; 21: 450–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Lamas L, Aoki MS, Ugrinowitsch C, et al. Expression of genes related to muscle plasticity after strength and power training regimens. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2010; 20 (2): 216–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Berger RA. Effects of dynamic and static training on vertical jumping ability. Res Q 1963; 34 (4): 419–24Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Young WB, Bilby GE. The effect of voluntary effort to influence speed of contraction on strength, muscular power, and hypertrophy development. J Strength Cond Res 1993; 7 (3): 172–8Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Adams K, O’Shea JP, O’Shea KL, et al. The effect of six weeks of squat, plyometric and squat-plyometric training on power production. J Appl Sport Sci Res 1992; 6 (1): 36–41Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Häkkinen K, Kallinen M, Izquierdo M, et al. Changes in agonist-antagonist EMG, muscle CSA, and force during strength training in middle-aged and older people. J Appl Physiol 1998; 84 (4): 1341–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Häkkinen K, Mero A, Kauhanen H. Specificity of endurance, sprint and strength training on physical performance capacity in young athletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1989; 29 (1): 27–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Cronin J, McNair PJ, Marshall RN. Developing explosive power: a comparison of technique and training. J Sci Med Sport 2001; 4 (1): 59–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Baker D. A series of studies on the training of highintensity muscle power in rugby league football players. J Strength Cond Res 2001; 15 (2): 198–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Wathen D. Position statement: explosive/plyometric exercises. NSCA J 1993; 15 (3): 16–9Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    de Villarreal ES, Kellis E, Kraemer WJ, et al. Determining variables of plyometric training for improving vertical jump height performance: a meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23 (2): 495–506PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Schmidtbleicher D. Training for power events. In: Komi PV, editor. Strength and power in sport. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1992: 381–95Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Blattner SE, Noble L. Relative effects of isokinetic and plyometric training on vertical jumping performance. Res Q 1979; 50 (4): 583–88Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Brown ME, Mayhew JL, Boleach LW. Effect of plyometric training on vertical jump performance in high school basketball players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1986; 26 (1)Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Chimera NJ, Swanik KA, Swanik CB, et al. Effects of plyometric training on muscle-activation strategies and performance in female athletes. J Athl Train 2004; 39 (1): 24–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Matavulj D, Kukolj M, Ugarkovic D, et al. Effects of plyometric training on jumping performance in junior basketball players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2001; 41 (2): 159–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Fatouros IG, Jamurtas AZ, Leontsini D, et al. Evaluation of plyometic exercise training, weight training, and their contribution on vertical jumping performance and leg strength. J Strength Cond Res 2000; 14: 470–6Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Gehri DJ, Ricard MD, Kleiner DM, et al. A comparison of plyometric training technique for improving vertical jump ability and energy production. J Strength Cond Res 1998; 12: 85–9Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Tricoli V, Lamas L, Carnevale R, et al. Short-term effects on lower-body functional power development: weightlifting vs. vertical jump training programs. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19 (2): 433–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Schmidtbleicher D, Gollhofer A, Frick U. Effects of a stretch-shortening typed training on the performance capability and innervation characteristics of leg extensor muscles. In: de Groot G, Hollander AP, Huijing PA, et al., editors. Biomechanics XI-A. Amsterdam: Free University Press, 1988: 185–9Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Ebben WP, Hintz MJ, Simenz CJ. Strength and conditioning practices of major league baseball strength and conditioning coaches. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19 (3): 538–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Ebben WP, Carroll RM, Simenz CJ. Strength and conditioning practices of national hockey league strength and conditioning coaches. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18 (4): 889–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Simenz CJ, Dugan CA, Ebben WP. Strength and conditioning practices of national basketball association strength and conditioning coaches. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19 (3): 495–504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Garhammer J, Gregor R. Propulsion forces as a function of intensity for weightlifting and vertical jumping. J Appl Sport Sci Res 1992; 6 (3): 129–34Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Schilling BK, Stone MH, O’Bryant HS, et al. Snatch technique of collegiate national level weightlifters. J Strength Cond Res 2002; 16 (4): 551–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Kawamori N, Crum AJ, Blumert PA, et al. Influence of different relative intensities on power output during the hang power clean: identification of the optimal load. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19 (3): 698–708PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Haff GG, Stone MH, O’Bryant HS, et al. Force-time dependent characteristics of dynamic and isometric muscle actions. J Strength Cond Res 1997; 11 (4): 269–72Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Hori N, Newton RU, Nosaka K, et al. Weightlifting exercises enhance athletic performance that requires highload speed strength. Strength Cond J 2005; 27 (4): 50–5Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Canavan PK, Garrett GE, Armstrong LE. Kinematic and kinetic relationships between an Olympic-style lift and the vertical jump. J Strength Cond Res 1996; 10 (2): 127–30Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Hori N, Newton RU, Andrews WA, et al. Does performance of hang power clean differentiate performance of jumping, sprinting, and changing of direction? J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22 (2): 412–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Kawamori N, Haff GG. The optimal training load for the development of muscular power. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18 (3): 675–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Newton RU, Murphy AJ, Humphries BJ, et al. Influence of load and stretch shortening cycle on the kinematics, kinetics and muscle activation that occurs during explosive upper-body movements. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1997; 75 (4): 333–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Schmidtbleicher D, Buehrle M. Neuronal adaptation and increase of cross-sectional area studying different strength training methods. In: de Groot G, Hollander AP, Huijing PA, et al., editors. BiomechanicsX-B. Amsterdam: FreeUniversity Press, 1987: 615–20Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Schmidtbleicher D, Haralambie G. Changes in contractile properties of muscle after strength training in man. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1981; 46 (3): 221–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Sale DG. Influence of exercise and training on motor unit activation. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1987; 15: 95–151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Hannerz J. Discharge properties of motor units in relation to recruitment order in voluntary contraction. Acta Physiol Scand 1974; 91 (3): 374–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Henneman E, Clamann HP, Gillies JD, et al. Rank order of motoneurons within a pool, law of combination. J Neurophysiol 1974; 37: 1338–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Henneman E, Somjen G, Carpenter DO. Functional significance of cell size in spinal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 1965; 28: 560–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Harris GR, Stone ME, O’Bryant HS, et al. Short-term performance effects of high power, high force, or combined weighttraining methods. J Strength Cond Res 2000; 14 (1): 14–20Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL, et al. Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. J Appl Physiol 2002; 93 (4): 1318–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Desmedt JE, Godaux E. Ballistic contractions in man: characteristic recruitment pattern of single motor units of the tibialis anterior muscle. J Physiol 1977; 264: 673–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Desmedt JE, Godaux E. Ballistic contractions in fast or slow human muscles: discharge patterns of single motor units. J Physiol 1978; 285: 185–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Newton RU, Rogers RA, Volek JS, et al. Four weeks of optimal load ballistic resistance training at the end of season attenuates declining jump performance of women volleyball players. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20 (4): 955–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Dugan EL, Doyle TL, Humphries B, et al. Determining the optimal load for jump squats: a review of methods and calculations. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18 (3): 668–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Bottinelli R, Pellegrino MA, Canepari M, et al. Specific contributions of various muscle fibre types to human muscle performance: an in vitro study. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1999; 9 (2): 87–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    de Haan A, Jones DA, Sargent AJ. Changes in velocity of shortening, power output and relxation rate during fatigue of rat gastrocnemius muscle. Pflugers Arch 1989; 412 (4): 422–8Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Isometric or dynamic training: differential effects on mechanical properties of human muscle. J Appl Physiol 1984; 56: 296–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Faulkner JA, Claflin DR, McCully KK. Power output of fast and slow fibers from human skeletal muscles. In: Jones NL, McCartney N, McComas AJ, editors. Human muscle power. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Inc., 1986: 81–94Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    van Leeuwen JL. Optimum power output and structural design of sarcomeres. J Theor Biol 1991; 149: 229–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Cormie P, McBride JM, McCaulley GO. Power-time, force-time, and velocity-time curve analysis during the jump squat: impact of load. J Appl Biomech 2008; 24 (2): 112–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Sheppard JM, Cormack S, Taylor KL, et al. Assessing the force-velocity characteristics of the leg extensors in well-trained athletes: the incremental load power profile. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22 (4): 1320–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Bevan HR, Bunce PJ, Owen NJ, et al. Optimal loading for the development of peak power output in professional rugby players. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24 (1): 43–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Nuzzo JL, McBride JM, Dayne AM, et al. Testing of the maximal dynamic output hypothesis in trained and untrained subjects. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24 (5): 1269–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Driss T, Vandewalle H, Quievre J, et al. Effects of external loading on power output in a squat jump on a force platform: a comparison between strength and power athletes and sedentary individuals. J Sports Sci 2001 Feb; 19 (2): 99–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Jones K, Bishop P, Hunter G, et al. The effects of varying resistance-training loads on intermediate- and highvelocity- specific adaptations. J Strength Cond Res 2001 Aug; 15 (3): 349–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Newton RU, Hakkinen K, Hakkinen A, et al. Mixedmethods resistance training increases power and strength of young and older men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34 (8): 1367–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Moffroid MT, Whipple RH. Specificity of speed of exercise. Phys Ther 1970; 50: 1692–700PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Lesmes G. Muscle strength and power changes during maximal isokinetic training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1978; 10: 266–9Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    Caiozzo VJ, Perrine JJ, Edgerton VR. Training-induced alterations of the in vivo force-velocity relationship of human muscle. J Appl Physiol 1981; 51 (3): 750–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Coyle EF, Feiring DC, Rotkis TC, et al. Specificity of power improvements through slow and fast isokinetic training. J Appl Physiol 1981; 51 (6): 1437–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Kanehisa H, Miyashita M. Specificity of velocity in strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1983; 52 (1): 104–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Blazevich AJ, Sharp NC. Understanding muscle architectural adaptation: macro- and micro-level research. Cells Tissues Organs 2005; 181 (1): 1–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Fielding RA, LeBrasseur NK, Cuoco A, et al. Highvelocity resistance training increases skeletal muscle peak power in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50 (4): 655–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Bompa TO, Carrera M. Periodization training for sports. 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2005: 3–349Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Stone ME, O’Bryant HS. Weight training a scientific approach. Edina (MN): Burgess International Group Inc., 1987: 121–65Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Zatsiorsky VM, Kraemer WJ. Science and practice of strength training. 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2006: 17–46Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Wathen D, Baechle TR, Earle RW. Training variation: periodization. In: Baechle TR, Earle RW, editors. Essentials of strength training and conditioning. 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2000: 513–27Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    Selye H. The stress of life. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956Google Scholar
  152. 152.
    Garhammer J. Periodization of strength training for athletes. Track Tech 1979; 73: 2398–9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Prue Cormie
    • 1
  • Michael R. McGuigan
    • 2
    • 3
  • Robert U. Newton
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Exercise, Biomedical and Health SciencesEdith Cowan UniversityJoondalupAustralia
  2. 2.New Zealand Academy of Sport North IslandAucklandNew Zealand
  3. 3.Institute of Sport and Recreation Research New ZealandAuckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations