Sports Medicine

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 17–38 | Cite as

Developing Maximal Neuromuscular Power

Part 1 — Biological Basis of Maximal Power Production
  • Prue Cormie
  • Michael R. McGuigan
  • Robert U. Newton
Review Article

Abstract

This series of reviews focuses on the most important neuromuscular function in many sport performances, the ability to generate maximal muscular power. Part 1 focuses on the factors that affect maximal power production, while part 2, which will follow in a forthcoming edition of Sports Medicine, explores the practical application of these findings by reviewing the scientific literature relevant to the development of training programmes that most effectively enhance maximal power production. The ability of the neuromuscular system to generate maximal power is affected by a range of interrelated factors. Maximal muscular power is defined and limited by the force-velocity relationship and affected by the length-tension relationship. The ability to generate maximal power is influenced by the type of muscle action involved and, in particular, the time available to develop force, storage and utilization of elastic energy, interactions of contractile and elastic elements, potentiation of contractile and elastic filaments as well as stretch reflexes. Furthermore, maximal power production is influenced by morphological factors including fibre type contribution to whole muscle area, muscle architectural features and tendon properties as well as neural factors including motor unit recruitment, firing frequency, synchronization and intermuscular coordination. In addition, acute changes in the muscle environment (i.e. alterations resulting from fatigue, changes in hormone milieu and muscle temperature) impact the ability to generate maximal power. Resistance training has been shown to impact each of these neuromuscular factors in quite specific ways. Therefore, an understanding of the biological basis of maximal power production is essential for developing training programmes that effectively enhance maximal power production in the human.

References

  1. 1.
    Gollnick PD, Bayley WM. Biochemical training adaptations and maximal power. In: Jones NL, McCartney N, McComas AJ, editors. Human muscle power. Champaign(IL): Human Kinetics, 1986: 255–67Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kraemer WJ, Newton RU. Training for muscular power. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2000; 11 (2): 341–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Newton RU, Kraemer WJ. Developing explosive muscular power: implications for a mixed method training strategy. Strength Cond J 1994; 16 (5): 20–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baker D. Comparison of upper-body strength and power between professional and college-aged rugby leagueplayers. J Strength Cond Res 2001 Feb; 15 (1): 30–5Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sleivert G, Taingahue M. The relationship between maximal jump-squat power and sprint acceleration in athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 2004 Jan; 91 (1): 46–52Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Young WB, Newton RU, Doyle TL, et al. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of starters and nonstartersand playing positions in elite Australian rulesfootball: a case study. J Sci Med Sport 2005; 8 (3): 333–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Caiozzo VJ, Perrine JJ, Edgerton VR. Training-induced alterations of the in vivo force-velocity relationship ofhuman muscle. J Appl Physiol 1981; 51 (3): 750–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thorstensson A, Grimby G, Karlsson J. Force-velocity relations and fiber composition in human knee extensormuscles. J Appl Physiol 1976 Jan; 40 (1): 12–6Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Widrick JJ, Trappe SW, Costill DL, et al. Force-velocity and force-power properties of single muscle fibers fromelite master runners and sedentary men. Am J Physiol 1996 Aug; 271 (2Pt1): C676–83Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaneko M, Fuchimoto T, Toji H, et al. Training effect of different loads on the force-velocity relationship and mechanicalpower output in human muscle. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1983; 5 (2): 50–5Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Komi PV. Measurement of the force-velocity relationship in human muscle under concentric and eccentric contractions.In: Cerguiglini S, editor. Biomechanics III. Basel: Karger, 1973: 224–9Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tihanyi J, Apor P, Fekete G. Force-velocity-power characteristics and fiber composition in human knee extensormuscles. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1982; 48 (3): 331–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bottinelli R, Pellegrino MA, Canepari M, et al. Specific contributions of various muscle fibre types to humanmuscle performance: an in vitro study. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1999; 9 (2): 87–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hill AV. The heat of shortening and dynamic constants of muscle. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1938; 126: 136–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lieber RL. Skeletal muscle structure, function and plasticity: the physiological basis of rehabilitation. 3rd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Williams, 2010Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    MacIntosh BR, Holash RJ. Power output and forcevelocity properties of muscle. In: Nigg BM, MacIntosh BR, Mester J, editors. Biomechanics and biology of movement. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2000: 193–210Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bosco C, Komi PV. Potentiation of the mechanical behavior of the human skeletal muscle through prestretching. Acta Physiol Scand 1979 Aug; 106 (4): 467–72Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Edgerton VR, Roy RR, Gregor RJ, et al. Morphological basis of skeletal muscle power output. In: Jones NL, McCartney N, McComas AJ, editors. Human muscle power. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, Inc., 1986: 43–64Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Faulkner JA, Claflin DR, McCully KK. Power output of fast and slow fibers from human skeletal muscles. In:Jones NL, McCartney N, McComas AJ, editors. Human muscle power. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Inc., 1986: 81–94Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Herbert RD, Gandevia SC. Changes in pennation with joint angle and muscle torque: in vivo measurementsin human brachialis muscle. J Physiol 1995; 484 (Pt2): 523–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wickiewicz TL, Roy RR, Powell PL, et al. Muscle architecture and force-velocity relationships in humans. J Appl Physiol 1984 Aug; 57 (2): 435–43Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gregor RJ, Edgerton VR, Perine JJ, et al. Torque-velocity relationship and muscle fiber composition in elite femaleathletes. J Appl Physiol 1979; 47: 388–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Perrine JJ, Edgerton VR. Muscle force-velocity and powervelocity relationships under isokinetic loading. Med Sci Sports 1978; 10 (3): 159–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Perrine JL. The biophysics of maximal muscle power outputs: methods and problems of measurement. In: Jones NL, McCartney N, McComas AJ, editors. Human muscle power. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1986: 15–25Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gordon AM, Huxley AV, Julian FJ. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol 1966; 184: 170–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Edman KAP. The relation between sarcomere length and active tension is isolated semitendinosus fibers of the frog. J Physiol 1966; 183 (2): 407–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lieber RL, Loren GJ, Friden J. In vivo measurement of human wrist estensor muscle sarcomere length changes. J Neurophysiol 1994; 71 (3): 874–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Close RI. Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscles. Physiol Rev 1972; 52: 129–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Komi PV. The stretch-shortening cycle and human power output. In: Jones NL, McCartney N, McComas AJ, editors. Human muscle power. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1986: 27–40Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cavanagh PR, Komi PV. Electromechanical delay in human skeletal muscle under concentric and eccentric contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1979 Nov; (3): 159–63Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cavagna GA, Saibene FP, Margaria R. Effect of negative work on the amount of positive work performed by anisolated muscle. J Appl Physiol 1965; 20 (1): 157–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Edman KAP, Elzinga G, Noble MIM. Enhancement of mechanical performance by stretch during tetanic contractionsof vertebrate skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol 1978; 281: 139–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Komi PV, Bosco C. Utilization of stored elastic energy in leg extensor muscles by men and women. Med Sci Sports 1978 Winter; 10 (4): 261–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cavagna GA, Dusman B, Margaria R. Positive work done by a previously stretched muscle. J Appl Physiol 1968 Jan; (1): 21–32Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Anderson FC, Pandy MG. Storage and utilization of elastic strain energy during jumping. J Biomech 1993; 26 (12): 1413–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Asmussen E, Bonde-Petersen F. Storage of elastic energy in skeletal muscles in man. Acta Physiol Scand 1974 Jul; (3): 385–92Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bosco C, Viitasalo JT, Komi PV, et al. Combined effect of elastic energy and myoelectrical potentiation duringstretch-shortening cycle exercise. Acta Physiol Scand 1982; 114: 557–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Asmussen E, Bonde-Petersen F. Apparent efficiency and storage of elastic energy in human muscles during exercise. Acta Physiol Scand 1974; 92 (4): 537–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gollhofer A, Kyrolainen H. Neuromuscular control of the human leg extensor muscles in jump exercises under variousstretch-load conditions. Int J Sports Med 1991; 12 (1): 34–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Takarada Y, Hirano Y, Ishige Y, et al. Stretch-induced enhancement of mechanical power output in humanmultijoint exercise with countermovement. J Appl Physiol 1997; 83 (5): 1749–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    van Zandwijk JP, Bobbert MF, Baan GC, et al. From twitch to tetanus: performance of excitation dynamicsoptimized for a twitch in predicting tetanic muscle forces. Biol Cybern 1996; 75 (5): 409–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bobbert MF, Casius LJR. Is the effect of a countermovement on jump height due to active state development? Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37 (3): 440–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bobbert MF, Gerritsen KG, Litjens MC, et al. Why is countermovement jump height greater than squat jumpheight? Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996 Nov; 28 (11): 1402–12Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mungiole M, Winters JM. Overview: influences of muscle on cyclic and propolsive movements involving the lowerlimb. In:Winters JM, Woo SLY, editors. Multiple musclesystems biomechanics and movement organisation. NewYork: Springer-Verlag, 1990: 550–67Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    van Ingen Schenau GJ. An alternate view to the concept of utilisation of elastic energy. Hum Mov Sci 1984; 3: 301–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bosco C, Montanari G, Tarkka I, et al. The effect of prestretch on mechanical efficiency of human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 1987 Nov; 131 (3): 323–9Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Walshe AD, Wilson GJ, Ettema GJ. Stretch-shorten cycle compared with isometric preload: contributions to enhancedmuscular performance. J Appl Physiol 1998 Jan; (1): 97–106Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    van Ingen Schenau GJ, Bobbert MF, de Haan A. Mechanics and energetics of the stretch-shortening cycle: astimulating discussion. J Appl Biomech 1997; 13: 484–96Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Cavagna GA, Citterio G. Effect of stretching on the elastic characteristics and the contractile component of frogstriated muscle. J Physiol 1974; 239: 1–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ettema GJ, Huijing PA, de Haan A. The potentiating effect of prestretch on the contractile performance of rat gastrocnemiusmedialis muscle during subsequent shorteningand isometric contractions. J Exp Biol 1992 Apr; 165: 121–36Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ettema GJ, van Soest AJ, Huijing PA. The role of series elastic structures in prestretch-induced work enhancementduring isotonic and isokinetic contractions. J Exp Biol 1990 Nov; 154: 121–36Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Huijing PA. Parameter interdependence and success of skeletal muscle modelling. Hum Mov Sci 1995; 14: 443–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Fukunaga T, Kubo K, Kawakami Y, et al. In vivo behavior of human muscle tendon during walking. Proc Biol Sci 2001; 268: 229–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kawakami Y, Muraoka T, Ito S, et al. In vivo muscle fibre behaviour during counter-movement exercise in humansreveals a significant role for tendon elasticity. J Physiol 2002 Apr; 540 (Pt2): 635–46Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Takeshita D, et al. In vivo dynamics of human medial gastrocnemius muscle-tendon complexduring stretch-shortening cycle exercise. Acta Physiol Scand 2000; 170 (2): 127–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kurokawa S, Fukunaga T, Fukashiro S. Behavior of fascicles and tendinous structures of human gastrocnemiusduring vertical jumping. J Appl Physiol 2001 Apr; 90 (4): 1349–58Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kurokawa S, Fukunaga T, Nagano A, et al. Interaction between fascicles and tendinous structures during countermovement jumping investigated in vivo. J Appl Physiol 2003 Dec; 95 (6): 2306–14Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hof AL, Geelen BA, van den Berg J. Calf muscle moment, work and efficiency in level walking; role of series elasticity. J Biomech 1983; 16 (7): 523–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Fukashiro S, Kurokawa S, Hay DC, et al. Comparison of muscle-tendon interaction of human m.gastrocnemius between ankle- and drop-jumping. Int J Sport Health Sci 2005; 3: 253–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Fukashiro S, Hay DC, Nagano A. Biomechanical behavior of muscle-tendon complex during dynamic humanmovements. J Appl Biomech 2006 May; 22 (2): 131–47Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Cook CS, McDonagh MJ. Force responses to controlled stretches of electrically stimulated human muscle-tendoncomplex. Exp Physiol 1995; 80 (3): 477–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Cavagna GA, Mazzanti M, Heglund NC, et al. Storage and release of mechanical energy by active muscle: a nonelasticmechanism? J Exp Biol 1985; 115: 79–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Cavagna GA, Mazzanti M, Heglund NC, et al. Mechanical transients initiated by ramp stretch and release at Po infrog muscle fibres. Am J Physiol 1986 Oct; 251 (4Pt1): C571–9Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sugi H, Tsuchiya T. Enhancement of mechanical performance in frog muscle fibres after quick increases in load. J Physiol 1981; 319: 239–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Woledge RC, Curtin NA. The efficiency of energy conversion by swimming muscles of fish. In: Sugi H, Pollack GH,editors. Mechanisms of my ofilament sliding in muscle contraction. New York: Plenum Press, 1993: 735–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    van Ingen Schenau GJ, Bobbert MF, de Haan A. Does elastic energy enhance work and efficiency in the stretchshorteningcycle? J Appl Biomech 1997; 13: 389–415Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Rassier DE, Herzog W. Force enhancement following an active stretch in skeletal muscle. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2002 Dec; 12 (6): 471–7Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Herzog W, Leonard TR, Joumaa V, et al. Mysteries of muscle contraction. J Appl Biomech 2008 Feb; 24 (1): 1–13Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Joumaa V, Rassier DE, Leonard TR, et al. Passive force enhancement in single myofibrils. Pflugers Arch 2007 Nov; 455 (2): 367–71Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Joumaa V, Rassier DE, Leonard TR, et al. The origin of passive force enhancement in skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2008 Jan; 294 (1): C74–8Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Leonard TR, Herzog W. Regulation of muscle force in the absence of actin-myosin based cross-bridge interaction. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. Epub 2010 Mar 31Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2005Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Dietz V, Schmidtbleicher D, Noth J. Neuronal mechanisms of human locomotion. J Neurophysiol 1979; 42: 1212–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Komi PV, Gollhofer A. Stretch reflexes can have an important role in force enhancement during SSC exercise. J Appl Biomech 1997; 13: 451–60Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Trimble MH, Kukulka CG, Thomas RS. Reflex facilitation during the stretch-shortening cycle. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2000; 10 (3): 179–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Komi PV, Nicol C. Shortening cycle of muscle function. In: Zatsiorsky VM, editor. Biomechanics in sport. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2000: 87–102Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Nicol C, Komi PV. Significance of passively induced stretch reflexes on Achilles tendon force enhancement. Muscle Nerve 1998; 21 (11): 1546–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Voigt M, Dyhre-Poulsen P, Simonsen EB. Modulation of short latency stretch reflexes during human hopping. Acta Physiol Scand 1998; 163 (2): 181–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Cormie P, McCaulley GO, McBride JM. Power versus strength-power jump squat training: influence on theload-power relationship. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39 (6): 996–1003PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Mayhew JL, Ware JS, Johns RA, et al. Changes in upper body power following heavy-resistance strength trainingin college men. Int J Sports Med 1997; 18: 516–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    McBride JM, Triplett-McBride T, Davie A, et al. The effect of heavy- vs.light-load jump squats on the developmentof strength, power, and speed. J Strength Cond Res 2002; 16 (1): 75–82Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Stone ME, Johnson R, Carter D. A short term comparison of two different methods of resistive training on legstrength and power. Athl Train 1979; 14: 158–60Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Stowers T, McMillan J, Scala D, et al. The short-term effects of three different strength-power training methods. NSCA J 1983; 5 (3): 24–7Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Wilson GJ, Newton RU, Murphy AJ, et al. The optimal training load for the development of dynamic athleticperformance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25 (11): 1279–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Fitts RH, Widrick JJ. Muscle mechanics: adaptations with exercise-training. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1996; 24: 427–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Malisoux L, Francaux M, Nielens H, et al. Stretch-shortening cycle exercises: an effective training paradigm to enhancepower output of human single muscle fibers. J Appl Physiol 2006; 100 (3): 771–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Widrick JJ, Stelzer JE, Shoepe TC, et al. Functional properties of human muscle fibers after short-term resistanceexercise training. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2002; 283 (2): R408–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Lionikas A, Li M, Larsson L. Human skeletal muscle myosin function at physiological and non-physiologicaltemperatures. Acta Physiol 2006; 186 (2): 151–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Stienen GJM, Kiers JL, Bottinelli R, et al. Myofibrillar ATPase activity in skinned human skeletal muscle fibres:fibre type and temperature dependence. J Physiol 1996; 493 (2): 299–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Barany M. ATPase activity of myosin correlated with speed of muscle shortening. J Gen Physiol 1967; 50: 197–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Bottinelli R, Betto R, Schiaffino S, et al. Unloaded shortening velocity and myosin heavy chain and alkali lightchain isoform composition in rat skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol 1994; 478: 341–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Bottinelli R, Schiaffino S, Reggiani C. Force-velocity relationship and myosin heavy chain isoform compositionsof skinned fibres from rat skeletal muscle. J Physiol 1991; 437: 655–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Close RI. Dynamic proprties of fast and slow skeletal muscles of the rat during development. J Physiol 1964; 173: 74–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Faulkner JA, Clafin DR, McCully KK, et al. Contractile properties of bundles of fiber segments from skeletalmuscles. Am J Physiol 1982; 242 (12): C66–73Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Trappe SW, Gallagher PM, Harber M, et al. Single muscle fibre contractile properties in young and old men andwomen. J Physiol 2003; 552: 47–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Widrick JJ, Trappe SW, Blaser CA, et al. Isometic force and maximal shortening velocity of single muscle fibers fromelite master runners. Am J Physiol 1996; 271: C666–75Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    McCartney N, Heigenhauser GJF, Jones NL. Power output and fatigue of human muscle in maximal cycling exercise. J Appl Physiol 1983; 55: 218–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Costill DL, Daniels J, Evans WJ, et al. Skeletal muscle enzymes and fiber composition in male and female trackathletes. J Appl Physiol 1976; 40: 149–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Gollnick PD, Armstrong RB, Saubert CW, et al. Enzyme activity and fiber composition in skeletal muscle of untrainedand trained men. J Appl Physiol 1972; 33: 312–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Simoneau JA, Boucard C. Genetic determinism of fiber type proportion in human skeletal muscle. FASEB J 1995; 9: 1091–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Jansson E, Esbjonsson M, Holm H, et al. Increase in the proportion of fast-twitch muscle fibres by sprint trainingin males. Acta Physiol Scand 1990; 140 (3): 359–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Esbjonsson M, Hellsetn-Westing Y, Balsom PD, et al. Muscle fibre type changes with sprint training: effect oftraining pattern. Acta Physiol Scand 1993; 149 (2): 245–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Dawson B, Fitzsimons M, Green S, et al. Changes in performance, muscle metabolites, enzymes and fibre typesafter short sprint training. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1998; 78 (2): 163–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Andersen JL, Klitgaard H, Saltin B. Myosin heavy chain isoforms in single fibres from M. vastus lateralis ofsprinters: influence of training. Acta Physiol Scand 1994; 151 (2): 135–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Friedmann B, Kinscherf R, Vorwald S, et al. Muscular adaptations to computer-guided strength trainingwith eccentric overload. Acta Physiol Scand 2004; 182 (1): 77–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Larsson L, Ansved T. Effects of long-term physical training and detraining on enzyme histochemical and functionalskeletal muscle characteristics in man. Muscle Nerve 1985; 8 (8): 714–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Andersen LL, Andersen JL, Magnusson SP, et al. Changes in the human muscle force-velocity relationship in responseto resistance training and subsequent detraining. J Physiol 2005; 99: 87–94Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Adams GR, Hather BM, Baldwin KM, et al. Skeletal muscle myosin heavy chain composition and resistancetraining. J Appl Physiol 1993; 74: 911–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Staron RS, Karapondo DL, Kraemer WJ, et al. Skeletal muscle adaptations during the early phase of heavyresistancetraining in men and women. J Appl Physiol 1994; 76: 1247–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Andersen JL, Aagaard P. Myosin heavy chain IIX overshoot in human skeletal muscle. Muscle Nerve 2000; 23 (7): 1095–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Brooks GA, Fahey TD, White TP, et al. Exercise physiology: human bioenergetics and its application. 3rd ed. NewYork: McGraw Hill, 1999Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Staron RS, Leonardi MJ, Karapondo DL, et al. Strength and skeletal muscle adaptations in heavy-resitance trainedwomen after detraining and retraining. J Appl Physiol 1991; 70: 631–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Liu Y, Schlumberger A, Wirth K, et al. Different effects on human myosin heavy chain isoform expression: strength vs.combined training. J Appl Physiol 2003; 94 (6): 2282–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Ewing WJ, Wolfe DR, Rogers MA, et al. Effects of velocity of isokinetic training on strength, power and quadricepsmuscle fibre characteristics. Eur J Appl Physiol 1990; 61: 159–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    McGuigan MR, Sharman MJ, Newton RU, et al. Effect of explosive resistance training on titin and myosin heavychain isoforms in trained subjects. J Strength Cond Res 2003 Nov; 17 (4): 645–51Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Malisoux L, Francaux M, Nielens H, et al. Calcium sensitivity of human single muscle fibers following plyometrictraining. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006 Nov; 38 (11): 1901–8Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    McComas AJ. Skeletal muscle: form and function. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1996Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Bodine S, Roy RR, Meadows DA, et al. Architectural, histochemical and contractile characteristics of a uniquebiarticular muscle: the cat semitendinosus. J Neurophysiol 1982; 48: 192–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Partridge LD, Benton LA. Muscle, the motor. In: Mountcastle VB, Brooks VB, Greiger SR, editors. Handbook of physiology. Bethesda (MD): American Physiological Society, 1981Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Shoepe TC, Stelzer JE, Garner DP, et al. Functional adaptability of muscle fibers to long-term resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 944–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Ikai M, Fukunaga T. Calculation of muscle strength per unit cross-sectional area of human muscle by means ofultrasonic measurement. Int Z Angew Physiol 1968; 26: 26–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Maughan RJ, Watson JS, Weir J. Strength and crosssectional area of human skeletal muscle. J Physiol 1983; 338: 37–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Maughan RJ, Watson JS, Weir J. Muscle strength and cross-sectional area in man: a comparison of strengthtrainedand untrained subjects. Br J Sports Med 1984; 18 (3): 149–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Jones DA, Rutherford OM, Parker DF. Physiological changes in skeletal muscle as a result of strength training. Q J Exp Physiol 1989; 74 (3): 233–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Rutherford OM, Jones DA. The role of learning and coordination in strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol 1986; 55: 100–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Chapman SJ, Grindrod SR, Jones DA. Cross-sectional area and force production of the quadriceps muscle. J Physiol 1984; 353: 53PGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Komi PV. Training of muscle strength and power: interaction of neuromotoric, hypertrophic, and mechanicalfactors. Int J Sports Med 1986; 7 Suppl.1: 10–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Sale DG. Neural adaptation to resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1988; 20 (5Suppl.): 135S–45SGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Narici MV, Roi GS, Landoni L, et al. Changes in forcecross- sectional area and neural activation during strengthtraining and detraining of the human quadriceps. Eur JAppl Physiol 1989; 59: 310–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Young A. The relative isometric strength of type 1 and type 2 muscle fibres in the human quadriceps. Clin Physiol 1984; 4: 23–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Aagaard P, Andersen JL, Dyhre-Poulsen P, et al. A mechanism for increased contractile strength of humanpennate muscle in response to strength training: changesin muscle architecture. J Physiol 2001; 534 (Pt2): 613–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    McCullough P, Maughan RJ, Watson JS, et al. Biomechanical analysis of the knee in relation to measuredquadriceps strength and cross sectional area in man[letter]. J Physiol 1984; 346: 60PGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Trappe SW, Williamson DL, Godard M, et al. Effect of resistance training on single muscle fiber contractilefunction in older men. J Appl Physiol 2000; 89: 143–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    MacDougall JD.Morphological changes in human skeletal muscle following strength training and immobilization.In: Jones NL, McCartney N, McComas AJ, editors. Human muscle power. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics,1986: 269–88Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    MacDougall JD. Hypertrophy or hyperplasia. In: Komi PV, editor. Strength and power in sport. Oxford: BlackwellScientific Publications, 1992: 230–8Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Thorstensson A. Muscle strength, fibre types and enzyme activities in man. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl 1976; 443: 1–45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    MacDougall JD, Elder GCB, Sale DG, et al. Effects of strength training and immobilization on human musclefibers. Eur J Appl Physiol 1980; 43: 25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Dons B, Bollerup K, Bonde-Petersen F, et al. The effect of weight-lifting exercise related to muscle fiber compositionand muscle cross-sectional area in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 1979; 40: 95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Häkkinen K, Komi PV, Tesch PA. Effect of combined concentric and eccentric strength training and detrainingon force-time, muscle fibre and metabolic characteristicsof leg extensor muscles. Scand J Sports Sci 1981; 3: 50–8Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Thorstensson A, Hulten B, von Dobeln W, et al. Effect of strength training on enzyme activities and fibre characteristicsin human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 1976; 96: 392–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Staron RS, Malicky ES, Leonardi MJ, et al. Muscle hypertrophy and fast fiber type conversions in heavy resistancetrainedwomen. Eur J Appl Physiol 1989; 60: 71–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Blazevich AJ, Gill ND, Bronks R, et al. Training-specific muscle architecture adaptation after 5-wk training inathletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35 (12): 2013–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Folland JP, Williams AG. The adaptations to strength training: morphological and neurological contributions toincreased strength. Sports Med 2007; 37 (2): 145–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Wernbom M, Augustsson J, Thomee R. The influence of frequency, intensity, Vol. and mode of strength trainingon whole muscle cross-sectional area in humans. Sports Med 2007; 37 (3): 225–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Häkkinen K, Komi PV, Alen M. Effect of explosive type strength training on isometric force- and relaxation-time,electromyographic and muscle fibre characteristics ofleg extensor muscles. Acta Physiol Scand 1985; 125 (4): 587–600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Häkkinen K, Komi PV, Alen M, et al. EMG, muscle fibre and force production characteristics during a 1 yeartraining period in elite weight-liters. Eur J Appl Physiol 1987; 56: 419–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Häkkinen K, Pakarinen A, Kyröläinen H, et al. Neuromuscular adaptations and serum hormones in femalesduring prolonged power training. Int J Sports Med 1990; 11 (2): 91–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Komi PV, Karlsson J, Tesch P, et al. Effects of heavy resistance and explosive type strength training methods onmechanical, functional and metabolic aspects of performance. In: Komi PV, editor. Exercise and sport biology. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1982: 90–102Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Kyrolainen H, Avela J, McBride JM, et al. Effects of power training on muscle structure and neuromuscular performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2005; 15 (1): 58–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Potteiger JA, Lockwood R, Haub M, et al. Muscle power and fiber characteristics following 8 weeks of plyometrictraining. J Strength Cond Res 1999; 13: 275–9Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    Vissing K, Brink M, Lonbro S, et al. Muscle adaptations to plyometric vs. resistance training in untrained young men. J Strength Cond Res 2008 Nov; 22 (6): 1799–810Google Scholar
  152. 152.
    Kubo K, Morimoto M, Komuro T, et al. Effects of plyometric and weight training onmuscle-tendon complex andjump performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39 (10): 1801–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Wickiewicz TL, Roy RR, Powell PL, et al. Muscle architecture of the human lower limb. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; 179: 275–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Sacks RD, Roy RR. Architecture of the hind limb of muscle of cats: functional significance. J Morphol 1982; 173: 185–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Spector SA, Gardiner PF, Zernicke RF, et al. Muscle architecture and the force-velocity characteristics of catsoleus and medial gastrocnemius: impliations for motorcontrol. J Neurophysiol 1980; 44: 951–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Abe T, Fukashiro S, Harada Y, et al. Relationship between sprint performance and muscle fascicle length in femalesprinters. J Physiol Anthropol 2001; 20 (2): 141–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Kumagai K, Abe T, Brechue WF, et al. Sprint performance is related to muscle fascicle length inmale 100-m sprinters. J Appl Physiol 2000 Mar; 88 (3): 811–6Google Scholar
  158. 158.
    Abe T, Kumagai K, Brechue WF. Muscle fascicle length is greater in sprinters than long-distance runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 1125–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Butterfield TA, Leonard TR, Herzog W. Differential serial sarcomere number adaptations in knee extensor musclesof rats is contraction type dependent. J Appl Physiol 2005; 99: 1352–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Lynn R, Morgan DL. Decline running produces more sarcomeres in rat vastus intermedius muscle fibers thandoes incline running. J Appl Physiol 1994; 79: 1439–44Google Scholar
  161. 161.
    Lynn R, Talbot JA, Morgan DL. Differences in rat skeletal muscles after incline and decline running. J Appl Physiol 1998; 85: 98–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Blazevich AJ, Cannavan D, Coleman DR, et al. Influence of concentric and eccentric resistance training on architecturaladaptation in human quadriceps muscles. J Appl Physiol 2007; 103 (5): 1565–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Reeves ND, Narici MV, Maganaris CN. In vivo human muscle structure and function: adaptations to resistancetraining in old age. Exp Physiol 2004; 89 (6): 675–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Seynnes OR, de Boer M, Narici MV. Early skeletal muscle hypertrophy and architectural changes in response tohigh-intensity resistance training. J Appl Physiol 2007; 102: 368–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Alegre LM, Jimenez F, Gonzalo-Orden JM, et al. Effects of dynamic resistance training on fascicle length and isometricstrength. J Sports Sci 2006; 24 (5): 501–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Kawakami Y, Abe T, Kuno SY, et al. Training-induced changes in muscle architecture and specific tension. Eur JAppl Physiol 1995; 72 (1-2): 566–73Google Scholar
  167. 167.
    Rutherford OM, Jones DA. Measurement of fibre pennation using ultrasound in the human quadriceps in vivo. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1992; 65 (5): 433–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    Blazevich AJ, Gill ND, Deans N, et al. Lack of human muscle architectural adaptation after short-term strengthtraining. Muscle Nerve 2007; 35 (1): 78–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. 169.
    Blazevich AJ, Sharp NC. Understanding muscle architectural adaptation: macro- and micro-level research. Cells Tissues Organs 2005; 181 (1): 1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. 170.
    Huijing PA. Architecture of the human gastrocnemius muscle and some functional consequences. Acta Anat(Basel) 1985; 123: 101–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    Powell P, Roy RR, Kanim P, et al. Predictability of skeletal muscle tension from architectural determinations in guineapig hindlimbs. J Appl Physiol 1984; 57: 1715–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Gans C. Fiber architecture and muscle function. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1982; 10: 160–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    Muhl ZF. Active length-tension relation and the effect of muscle pinnation on fiber lengthening. J Morphol 1982; 173: 285–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. 174.
    Kawakami Y, Takashi A, Fukunaga T. Muscle-fiber pennations angles are greater in hypertrophied than in normalmuscles. J Appl Physiol 1993; 74 (6): 2740–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  175. 175.
    Kawakami Y, Abe T, Kanehisa H, et al. Human skeletal muscle size and architecture: variability and interdependence. Am J Hum Biol 2006 Nov-Dec; 18 (6): 845–8Google Scholar
  176. 176.
    Blazevich AJ, Giorgi A. Effect of testosterone administration and weight training on muscle architecture. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33 (10): 1688–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. 177.
    Westh E, Kongsgaard M, Bojsen-Møller J, et al. Effect of habitual exercise on the structural and mechanical propertiesof human tendon, in vivo, in men and women. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2008 Feb; 18 (1): 23–30Google Scholar
  178. 178.
    Kubo K, Ishida Y, Suzuki S, et al. Effects of 6 months of walking training on lower limb muscle and tendon in elderly. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2008 Feb; 18 (1): 31–9Google Scholar
  179. 179.
    Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Kawakami Y, et al. Elasticity of tendon structures of the lower limbs in sprinters. Acta Physiol Scand 2000 Feb; 168 (2): 327–35Google Scholar
  180. 180.
    Bojsen-Møller J, Magnusson SP, Rasmussen LR, et al. Muscle performance during maximal isometric and dynamiccontractions is influenced by the stiffness of the tendinousstructures. J Appl Physiol 2005 Sep; 99 (3): 986–94Google Scholar
  181. 181.
    Henneman E, Clamann HP, Gillies JD, et al. Rank order of motoneurons within a pool, law of combination. J Neurophysiol 1974; 37: 1338–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  182. 182.
    Henneman E, Somjen G, Carpenter DO. Functionl significance of cell size in spinal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 1965; 28: 560–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  183. 183.
    Burke RE. Motor units: anatomy, physiology, and functional organization. In: Brooks VB, editor. Handbook of physiology: section I — the nervous system Vol. II. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society, 1981: 345–422Google Scholar
  184. 184.
    Milner-Brown HS, Stein RB. The relationship between the surface electromyogram and muscular force. J Physiol 1975; 246: 549–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  185. 185.
    Desmedt JE, Godaux E. Ballistic contractions in man: characteristic recruitment pattern of single motor units ofthe tibialis anterior muscle. J Physiol 1977; 264: 673–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  186. 186.
    Desmedt JE, Godaux E. Ballistic contractions in fast or slow human muscles: discharge patterns of single motorunits. J Physiol 1978; 285: 185–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  187. 187.
    van Cutsem M, Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contractionspeed after dynamic training in humans. J Physiol 1998 Nov; 513 (Pt1): 295–305Google Scholar
  188. 188.
    Enoka RM. Morphological features and activation patterns of motor units. J Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 12: 538–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. 189.
    Enoka RM, Fuglevand AJ. Motor unit physiology: some unresolved issues. Muscle Nerve 2001; 24: 4–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. 190.
    Sale DG. Neural adaptations to strength training. In: Komi PV, editor. Strength and power in sport. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2003: 281–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. 191.
    Bigland B, Lippold OCJ. Motor unit activity in the voluntary contractions of human muscle. J Physiol 1954; 125: 322–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  192. 192.
    Belanger AY, McComas AJ. Extent of motr unit activation during effort. J Appl Physiol 1981; 51 (5): 1131–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  193. 193.
    Bellemare F, Woods JJ, Johansson R, et al. Motor-unit discharge rates in maximal voluntary contractions ofthree human muscles. J Neurophysiol 1983; 50: 1380–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  194. 194.
    Grimby L, Hannerz J, Hedman B. The fatigue and voluntary discharge properties of single motor units in man. J Physiol 1981; 316: 545–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  195. 195.
    Shield A, Zhou S. Assessing voluntary muscle activation with the twitch interpolation technique. Sports Med 2004; 34 (4): 253–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. 196.
    Davies J, Parker DF, Rutherford OM, et al. Changes in strength and cross sectional area of the elbow flexors as aresult of isometric strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1988; 57 (6): 667–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. 197.
    Garfinkel S, Cafarelli E. Relative changes in maximal force, EMG, and muscle cross-sectional area after isometric training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992; 24 (11): 1220–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  198. 198.
    Herbert RD, Dean C, Gandevia SC. Effects of real and imagined training on voluntary muscle activation during maximal isometric contractions. Acta Physiol Scand 1998; 163 (4): 361–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. 199.
    Harridge SD, Kryger A, Stensgaard A. Knee extensor strength, activation, and size in very elderly people followingstrength training. Muscle Nerve 1999; 22 (7): 831–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. 200.
    Brown AB, McCartney N, Sale DG. Positive adaptations to weight-lifting training in the elderly. J Appl Physiol 1990; 69 (5): 1725–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  201. 201.
    Jones DA, Rutherford OM. Human muscle strength training: the effects of three different regimes and thenature of the resultant changes. J Physiol 1987; 391: 1–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  202. 202.
    Sale DG, Martin JE, Moroz DE. Hypertrophy without increased isometric strength after weight training. Eur JAppl Physiol Occup Physiol 1992; 64 (1): 51–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  203. 203.
    Carolan B, Cafarelli E. Adaptations in coactivation after isometric resistance training. J Appl Physiol 1992; 73: 911–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  204. 204.
    Babault N, Pousson M, Ballay Y, et al. Activation of human quadriceps femoris during isometric, concentric,and eccentric contractions. J Appl Physiol 2001; 91 (6): 2628–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  205. 205.
    Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Mechanisms of muscle and motor unit adaptation to explosive power training. In: Komi PV, editor. Strength and power in sport. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2003: 315–29Google Scholar
  206. 206.
    Kraemer WJ, Fleck SJ, Evans WJ. Strength and power training: physiological mechanisms of adaptation. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1996; 24: 363–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. 207.
    Smith JL, Betts B, Edgerton VR, et al. Rapid ankle extension during paw shakes: selective recruitment of fast ankleextensors. J Neurophysiol 1980; 43: 612–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  208. 208.
    Enoka RM. Eccentric contractions require unique activation strategies by the nervous system. J Appl Physiol 1996 Dec; 81 (6): 2339–46Google Scholar
  209. 209.
    Nardone A, Romano C, Schieppati M. Selective recruitment of high-threshold human motor units during voluntaryisotonic lengthening of active muscles. J Physiol 1989; 409: 451–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  210. 210.
    Feiereisen P, Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Motor unit recruitment order during voluntary and electrically induced contractions in the tibialis anterior. Exp Brain Res 1997; 114: 117–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. 211.
    Hannerz J. Discharge properties of motor units in relation to recruitment order in voluntary contraction. Acta Physiol Scand 1974; 91 (3): 374–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. 212.
    Zehr EP, Sale DG. Ballistic movement: motor control and muscle activation. Can J Appl Physiol 1994; 19: 363–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. 213.
    Moritani T. Motor unit and motorneurone excitability during explosive movement. In: Komi PV, editor. Strength and power in sport. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2003: 27–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. 214.
    Miller RG, Mirka A, Maxfield M. Rate of tension development in isometric contractions of a human handmuscle. Exp Neurol 1981; 72: 267–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. 215.
    Cracraft JD, Petajan JH. Effect of muscle training on the pattern of firing of single motor units. Am J Phys Med 1977; 56: 183–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  216. 216.
    Leong B, Kamen G, Patten C, et al. Maximal motor unit discharge rates in the quadriceps muscles of older weightlifters. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: 1638–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  217. 217.
    Patten C, Kamen G, Rowland DM. Adaptations in maximal motor unit discharge rate to strength training inyoung and older adult. Muscle Nerve 2001; 24: 542–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. 218.
    Kamen G, Knight CA. Training-related adaptations in motor unit discharge rate in young and older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2004; 59 (12): 1334–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. 219.
    Kamen G, Knight CA, Laroche DP, et al. Resistance training increases vastus lateralis motor unit firing rates inyoung and old adults [letter]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30 Suppl.: S337Google Scholar
  220. 220.
    Saplinskas JS, Chobotas MA, Yashchaninas II. The time of completed motor acts and impulse activity of single motorunits according to the training level and sport specializationof tested persons. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980; 20: 529–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  221. 221.
    Milner-Brown HS, Stein RB, Lee RG. Synchronization of human motor units: possible roles of exercise and supraspinalreflexes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1975; 38 (3): 245–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. 222.
    Semmler JG, Enoka RM. Neural contributions to the changes in muscle strength. In: Zatsiorsky VM, editor. Biomechanics in sport: the scientific basis of performance. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2000: 3–20Google Scholar
  223. 223.
    Semmler JG. Motor unit synchronization and neuromuscular performance. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2002; 30 (1): 8–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. 224.
    Mellor R, Hodges P. Motor unit synchronization between medial and lateral vasti muscles. Clin Neurophysiol 2005; 116 (7): 1585–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  225. 225.
    Lind AR, Petrofsky JS. Isometric tension from rotary stimulation of fast and slow cat muscle. Muscle Nerve 1978; 1: 213–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. 226.
    Rack PM, Westbury DR. The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle. J Physiol 1969; 204: 443–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  227. 227.
    Semmler JG, Nordstrom MA. Motor unit discharge and force tremor in skill- and strength-trained individuals. Exp Brain Res 1998; 119 (1): 27–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. 228.
    Yue G, Fuglevand AJ, Nordstrom MA, et al. Limitations of the surface electromyography technique for estimatingmotor unit synchronization. Biol Cybern 1995; 73 (3): 223–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  229. 229.
    Behm DG. Neuromuscular implications and applications of resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 1995; 9 (4): 264–74Google Scholar
  230. 230.
    Ostering LR, Hamill J, Corcos DM, et al. EMG patterns accompanying isokinetic exercise under varying speed andsequencing conditions. Am J Phys Med 1984; 63: 289–97Google Scholar
  231. 231.
    Gordon J, Ghez C. EMG patterns in antagonist muscles during isometric contractions in man: relation to responsedynamics. Exp Brain Res 1984; 55: 167–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  232. 232.
    Karst G, Hazan Z. Antagonist muscle activity during forearm movements under varying kinematic and loadingconditions. Exp Brain Res 1987; 67: 391–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  233. 233.
    Baratta R, Solomonow M, Zhou BH, et al. Muscular coactivation: the role of the antagonist musculature inmaintaining knee stability. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16 (2): 113–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  234. 234.
    Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL, et al. Antagonist muscle coactivation during isokinetic knee extension. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2000; 10 (2): 58–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  235. 235.
    Kellis E, Baltzopoulos V. The effects of antagonist moment on the resultant knee joint moment during isokinetictesting of the knee extensors. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1997; 76 (3): 253–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  236. 236.
    Milner TE, Cloutier C, Leger AB, et al. Inability to activate muscles maximally during cocontraction and the effect ofjoint stiffness. Exp Brain Res 1995; 107: 293–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  237. 237.
    Carpentier A, Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Velocity-dependent muscle strategy during plantarflexion in humans. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1996; 6: 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  238. 238.
    Fitts RH. The cross-bridge cycle and skeletal muscle fatigue. J Appl Physiol 2008; 104 (2): 551–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  239. 239.
    Allen DG, Lamb GD, Westerblad H. Skeletal muscle fatigue: cellular mecanisms. Physiol Rev 2008; 88 (1): 287–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  240. 240.
    Karatzaferi C, Franks-Skiba K, Cooke R. Inhibition of shortening velocity of skinned skeletal muscle fibers inconditions that mimic fatigue. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2008; 294: R948–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  241. 241.
    Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. Hormonal responses and adaptations to resistance exercise and training. Sports Med 2005; 35 (4): 339–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  242. 242.
    Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. Endocrine responses and adaptations to strength and power training. In: Komi PV, editor. Strength and power in sport. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1992g285Google Scholar
  243. 243.
    Hamdi MM, Mutungi G. Dihydrotestosterone activates the MAPK pathway and modulates maximum isometricforce through the EGF receptor in isolated intact mouseskeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol 2010; 588 (3): 511–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  244. 244.
    De Ruiter CJ, Jones DA, Sargeant AJ, et al. Temperature effect on the rates of isometric force development and relaxationin the fresh and fatigued human adductor pollicismuscle. Exp Physiol 1999; 84: 1137–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  245. 245.
    Ranatunga KW. Temperature-dependence of shortening velocity and rate of isometric tension development in ratskeletal muscle. J Physiol 1985; 329: 465–83Google Scholar
  246. 246.
    De Ruiter CJ, De Haan A. Temperature effect on the force/velocity relationship of the fresh and fatigued humanadductor pollicis muscle. Pflügers Arch 2000; 440: 163–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  247. 247.
    Rall JA, Woledge RC. Influence of temperature on mechanics and energetics of muscle contraction. Am J Physiol 1990; 259: R197–203Google Scholar
  248. 248.
    Bennett AF. Thermal dependence of muscle function. Am J Physiol 1984; 247: R217–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  249. 249.
    Ferretti G. Cold and muscle performance. Int J Sports Med 1992; 13 Suppl.1: 185S–92SCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis Data Information BV 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Prue Cormie
    • 1
  • Michael R. McGuigan
    • 2
    • 3
  • Robert U. Newton
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Exercise, Biomedical and Health SciencesEdith Cowan UniversityJoondalupAustralia
  2. 2.New Zealand Academy of Sport North IslandAucklandNew Zealand
  3. 3.Institute of Sport and Recreation Research New ZealandAuckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations